I am in the process of refitting my 1984 Montauk 17' and would like to install an AM/FM radio. However, I do not want to clutter up the boat with multiple antennas if avoidable. During my research I came across a Y-splitter whereby you can join an AM/FM broadcast band receiver and a VH Marine Band radio to one VHF antenna.
Is a Y-splitter a good idea, something feasible, or better left alone?
I do not want to diminish or harm the strength of the antenna nor harm the functionality of the VHF radio. Obviously the VHF takes precedence over an entertainment radio, and if needed I would install an AM/FM antenna. I appreciate you taking time to consider my question and look forward to your guidance on this matter.
I am posting this public reply because the topic is of general interest, and my remarks may be of interest to other readers.
All VHF Marine Band antenna splitter devices for AM or FM Broadcast band receivers are intended to permit an antenna that is resonant in the VHF Marine Band to be simultaneously connected to three devices:
- a VHF Marine Band transmitter-receiver
- an AM Broadcast Band receiver
- an FM Broadcast Band receiver
The basis for this being possible is due to the difference in frequency of the three bands:
- VHF Marine Band is 156 to 162 MHz
- AM Broadcast Band is 0.5 to 1.6 MHz
- FM Broadcast Band is 88 to 108 MHz
It must be understood at the outset that the antenna is only really resonant and thus proper for its intended band, the VHF Marine Band. The AM and FM devices are just receivers, and will not be transmitting into the antenna. The function of the typical splitter is then to keep the 25-Watt transmitter signal from the VHF Marine Band radio out of the input to the AM and FM receivers, while not disturbing the connection between the antenna and the VHF Marine Band radio. These devices typically are three-port devices: antenna port, marine radio port, broadcast radio port.
There could be several ways to accomplish the division of the antenna port to other two ports, and how a particular splitter performs this function is difficult to know. The splitter devices are often not very expensive, which suggests to me that there must not be much circuitry or componentry involved in their design and manufacture. They also usually do not require any power for their operation, which suggests they use only passive circuitry.
If you look at the three frequency ranges involved, the VHF Marine Band is the highest range of frequencies. This suggests that one might be able to use a LOW-PASS filter to connect the broadcast radio port to the antenna. A low-pass filter does as its name suggests: it has a cut-off frequency and only allows signals lower in frequency to pass through without attenuation; signals higher in frequency will pass through but will be attenuated.
Assuming a splitter does manage to connect the broadcast port to the antenna port, and does so without affecting the marine radio port's path to the antenna, and has some method to attenuate the 25-Watt signal from the marine radio so it does not damage the broadcast receivers, we still have to consider what has been gained. Since the antenna is not resonant at either the AM or FM broadcast band, to know exactly how it will work for receiving those bands is difficult to predict. There is also the problem that not all VHF Marine Band antennas are constructed the same. There are many configurations for connecting the transmission line to the antenna in a VHF Marine Band antenna. Some antennas use capacitors or inductors in parallel or in series with the transmission line as part of an impedance matching network. The impedance of these components depends on frequency, and the impedance they present will be very different at 0.5-MHz (AM band) than at 156-MHz (Marine band). Without knowing exactly how the Marine band antenna has been constructed, how the splitter has been constructed, and the lengths and impedance of all the transmission lines interconnecting all the devices, it is impossible to know what sort of impedance will be presented to either the Marine radio or the entertainment radio. The resulting antenna that becomes connected to the broadcast band receivers is really quite a random antenna with unknown properties.
In reception of broadcast band signals, there is an anticipation that the signal strength available is going to be extremely strong. It won't take an antenna with much performance to pick up a signal. I think that is the real basis on which these splitters work. For local signals, a good receiver will have very good reception if the antenna is just a hunk of wire or even just a human body connected by touching a finger to the antenna terminal. You do not need much antenna in many locations.
My recommendation: before investing in a splitter try using just a short, dedicated broadcast band antenna, such as this $3.50 device:
https://www.defender.com/product.jsp?na ... id=4465443
This antenna may provide enough reception. If it doesn't, then you could investigate other options. Perhaps a small, flexible dedicated broadcast band antenna such as this $25 model:
https://www.defender.com/product3.jsp?n ... id=3745081
I don't like the introduction of any device in the transmission line between the VHF Marine Band radio and its antenna, on the basis that I consider the VHF Marine Band radio to be primary safety gear.
In regard to a splitter device called a "Y-Splitter", I would be very suspicious and very cautious in using such a device if, as the name suggests, the entire device is just a forming of three cables into a wye-connection. If a splitter were to be used, I would expect better performance to occur if the device, at the least, has some sort of enclosure in which there could be a few components. For an example, consider:
http://shakespeare-ce.com/marine/produc ... separator/
This device sell for about $60. I would assume that it can perform as advertised, on the basis that it has been on the market for a while, comes from a reputable manufacturer, and I haven't heard any groundswell of complaints about it. One vendor's website offered many positive comments. See
https://www.hodgesmarine.com/SHAKESPEAR ... 4357-s.htm