When Unsinkable Won't Be Enough

A conversation among Whalers
jimh
Posts: 11719
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 12:25 pm
Location: Michigan, Lower Peninsula
Contact:

When Unsinkable Won't Be Enough

Postby jimh » Tue May 02, 2017 2:35 pm

This article is a corollary to my earlier article on the unsinkable nature of a Boston Whaler boat, "When Unsinkable Comes In Handy."

Sometimes being unsinkable is not enough to avoid tragedy. This was demonstrated quite sadly this weekend when an 29-foot catamaran fishing boat CATATONIC capsized in the open Pacific Ocean off the west coast of Vancouver Island, in the vicinity of Vargas Island and northwest from the town of Tofino.

Susan Pickrell, the Regional Supervisor Maritime Search and Rescue, Canadian Coast Guard, was interviewed by local media. A call was received from the boat [presumably by voice radio, but this is never made completely clear, so perhaps by cellular telephone]; Ms Pickrell:
[A person on the boat] said that they were taking on water, that they were sinking, they were going into the water. And we never managed to get a position from him.


In a second interview with other media, Ms. Pickrell added a bit more information:
The initial report was the caller said they were three miles off of Bartlett Island....We didn't get a direction from them; we just knew three miles. We tasked the resources to respond. And then, as we started getting more and more information from friends and family, it brought {the search] down [to] this area, which is five miles off Bartlett Island...There's a [depth] contour line they like to fish, and that's where we ended up locating them.


The boat is variously described as a charter fishing boat. There were five aboard. The distress call occurred about 1:20 p.m. local time. By about 2:50-p.m. local time, about 90-minutes later, all five were recovered from the water by two good-samaritan private boats in the area, after the capsized boat's position was made clear by a sighting from a private plane flying in search for them. The five people were later transferred to Canadian Coast Guard boats which took them to shore for medical treatment. The water temperature of the ocean was said to be around 5-degrees-C, or 40-degrees-F. After immersion in 40-degree-F water for 90-minutes, only three of the fishermen survived the ordeal.

Curiously, the water temperature in the now famous forced landing of an airliner on the Hudson River occurred when the water temperature there was 41-degrees-F. Scientific American magazine interviewed some expert on the topic of survival in 41-degree water:

Q: How long can a person survive in water that is 41 degrees F like the Hudson was when the plane went down?

A: When you first go into extremely cold water there is this weird response called a cold shock response. People start to hyperventilate immediately. For one to three minutes you breathe very fast and deep, uncontrollably. If you go underwater, you could swallow water and die. …I can't tell you how often this occurs but it's certainly a very real phenomenon. Once that response goes away, you're fine…for awhile.

Generally, a person can survive in 41-degree F (5-degree C) water for 10, 15 or 20 minutes before the muscles get weak, you lose coordination and strength, which happens because the blood moves away from the extremities and toward the center, or core, of the body.

There are many factors that determine how fast a person submerged in water cools. People who are obese, who have a lot of soft tissue that provides a lot of insulation, are likely to last longer than lanky people, because the body fat provides insulation. Another factor is how much of the body is actually underwater. (Water conducts heat away from the body much faster than air does, even if the water temperature is 20 degrees higher than the air temperature. So, the more the body is submerged, the faster its heat will be drained, according to Craig Heller, a Stanford University physiologist). If you have a flotation device that you can pull yourself on top of, you are much better off.


Various news reports describe the CATATONIC as sinking, but another news presentation shows the capsized and inverted hull being towed into the harbor at Tofino. About six feet of the bow remained above water. Many boats made today contain enough reserve buoyancy to meet minimal flotation standards, and the boat will remain afloat, usually inverted and aided by air trapped in the forepeak.

In this story there are several elements that are not clear. The notification of the distress was apparently not made by a digital selective call (DSC) VHF Marine Band radio sending a DISTRESS ALERT. The area in which the boat was operating is well inside the Canadian nation's radio coastal region designated A1, which means there is coverage by the coast guard's VHF Marine Band Radio shore stations with digital selective calling facilities. If the distress alert had been made by DSC with the appropriate inclusion of a current position update from a GNSS receiver of their exact location, it is very likely that both the Coast Guard and other local fishermen or sport boaters would have received the alert and known the position of the boat with very high accuracy.

Image
Map showing A1 coastal zone extending 40-miles offshore.

The person on the boat making the call--again not clear if a cellular telephone call or a VHF Marine Band voice radio call--was apparently either not himself very clear about the boat's position or failed to clearly communicate the position (if known), as he cited their location as being off Bartlett Island by three miles. The boat was found closer to Vargas island and about five miles from the initially described location as Bartlett Island. This discrepancy did not help the search and rescue effort find the capsized boat and its occupants. Since the boat was only adrift for 90-minutes, it seems possible it could have drifted 2-miles in the ocean current. According to the map seen in the background in the Canadian SAR Center, the boat and the people in the water were still in close proximity when the rescue occurred.

If the boat were actually a for-hire charter fishing boat, one would expect that it might require some sort of inspection or minimum safety gear, particularly for a boat that sets out into the open Pacific Ocean. An inflatable life raft, an EPIRB, flair pistols, aerial flares, and so on, would be typically required.

Reports also describe the boat as being at anchor and fishing for halibut. Other reports mention the sea state as 2-meters. I cannot imagine riding at anchor in the open ocean in waves of 6-feet or more height. The desire to catch halibut must have been substantial to overcome the discomfort of being at anchor in six-foot waves on a 29-foot boat.

A further discrepancy in many reports is a reference to the Canadian Coast Guard rescue boats being dispatched from COMOX, a Canadian Coast Guard base. That base is on the wrong side of Vancouver Island to get to the area of this distress. Perhaps the order to launch a Canadian Coast Guard rescue boat came from COMOX, but it seems very unlikely that a boat departing from COMOX could have rendered any aid in the search; the by-water distance is more than 275-miles. I seriously doubt there is any boat in the Canadian Coast Guard that could cover that much water in an hour and a half. It is more likely the aircraft involved in the search may have taken off from COMOX. It is just a short flight over land, about 60-miles, to the search area from COMOX.

jimh
Posts: 11719
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 12:25 pm
Location: Michigan, Lower Peninsula
Contact:

Re: When Unsinkable Won't Be Enough

Postby jimh » Tue May 02, 2017 2:54 pm

In the U.S.A, in the A1 coverage area of the U.S. Coast Guard, the digital selective calling radio system includes a radio direction-finding (RDF) system. The RDF system is able to obtain a line of position from even very brief radio transmissions made on the emergency radio watch channel (156.8-MHz, channel 16). If a boat in distress in the U.S.A. coastal A1 region had made a voice radio distress radio call on their VHF Marine Band radio on 156.800-Mhz, the likelihood is very high that an accurate bearing from the receiving station to the boat in distress would be obtained. Further, if the boat were in range of two RDF stations, then two lines of position would be obtained, and at their intersection a reasonably good position for the location of the transmitter would result, even if the distress caller did not know his position. For more about the U.S.C.G RESCUE 21 system, see

Rescue 21 Radio Installations
http://continuouswave.com/whaler/refere ... tions.html

and

RESCUE 21--The Unrealized Gain
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/002883.html

jimh
Posts: 11719
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 12:25 pm
Location: Michigan, Lower Peninsula
Contact:

Re: When Unsinkable Won't Be Enough

Postby jimh » Wed May 03, 2017 11:02 am

A recent on-line news site article quotes a local person who comments that the Canadian Coast Guard ought to have re-broadcast their report of a MAYDAY situation on 156.425-MHz (Channel 68) instead of 156.800-MHz (Channel 16) because the boaters in that area monitor Channel 68.

Marcie Callewaert, who co-operates [a tour boat] company and lives in Ahousaht wasn't part of the rescue effort, because she didn't hear the Canadian Coast Guard's call-out on international distress channel, 16, because she was tuned to channel 68, the general channel for boaters.


It seems quite odd that this local Vancouver Island boater expects the Coast Guard to use a recreational boat working channel to make a distress alert notification. I am sure if the Canadian Coast Guard routinely made broadcasts on Channel 68 that the local boaters would soon be complaining they ought to stick to Channel 16 for their traffic.

It is still not clear to me that the CATATONIC actually made a VHF Marine Band radio transmission of a distress alert or MAYDAY situation. [UPDATE: the boat in distress DID make a MAYDAY broadcast on Channel 16 and raised the Coast Guard, according to locals familiar with the event.] The concern expressed by the local boater quoted above seems to be directed at the Canadian Coast Guard for not rebroadcasting a notice of the MAYDAY on channel 68, which is apparently the local fishing boat working channel. Also, she was apparently monitoring the radio from shore. Radios on shore are not obligated to monitor Channel 16 for distress alerts, but if a radio operator on shore wants to become aware of a distress alert, maybe they'd want to monitor the international distress alert frequency instead of the local chit-chat channel.

Now as for the notion that there was a fleet of boats in the area that could have assisted if only the Canadian Coast Guard had let them know there was a MAYDAY situation: I am not certain about Canadian regulations, but in the U.S.A., any boat equipped with a VHF Marine Band radio--and this clearly includes recreational boaters who have voluntarily equipped with a VHF Marine Band radio--are REQUIRED to maintain a radio watch on 156.800-MHz (Channel 16) when underway or have a DSC radio maintaining constant monitoring on the DSC channel 156.725-MHz.

§ 80.310 Watch required by voluntary vessels.
Voluntary vessels not equipped with DSC must maintain a watch on 2182 kHz and on 156.800 MHz (Channel 16) whenever the vessel is underway and the radio is not being used to communicate...

Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/80.310

The U.S. Coast Guard further reminds boaters of their obligation to maintain a radio watch on designated channels:

Radio Watchkeeping Regulations

In general, any vessel equipped with a VHF marine radiotelephone (whether voluntarily or required to) must maintain a watch on channel 16 (156.800 MHz) whenever the radiotelephone is not being used to communicate.

Source: https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=mtWatch

The same article reports the sea state as being "three meter swells." I don't know if fishing is normal for those conditions with a 29-foot boat. I suspect that with five people aboard, if the boat became oriented broadside to a swell and there was unequal distribution of crew weight, a boat could take quite a roll, even a twin-hull catamaran boat.

The CATATONIC, erroneously reported as having sunk, has already been towed to port and re-righted from her capsized position, as seen in this image:

Image

Another news website cites the Royal Canadian Mounted Police as saying the five boaters were wearing "survival suits" when recovered from the water. The time required to put on a survival suit would seem to be greater than the time needed to make a distress alert radio call using a VHF Marine Band radio on Channel 16. It also seems odd that the charter fishing boat would be carrying five survival suits but not have an EPIRB or a DSC radio.

jimh
Posts: 11719
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 12:25 pm
Location: Michigan, Lower Peninsula
Contact:

Re: When Unsinkable Won't Be Enough

Postby jimh » Wed May 03, 2017 11:23 am

In discussing this situation with my first-mate, Chris, I was surprised when she said to me, "I don't know how to send a distress alert with the radio." After that announcement, I demonstrated to her how to use the DSC radio's red DISTRESS button to initiate a DSC distress alert, and how to use the "16/9" switch to easily change the channel to 16 and make a voice distress call. That may be a good procedure to go over with your boat crew. You never know when YOU might be a person in the water and your wife or crew, still on the boat, might not know how to send a DSC distress alert or make a voice MAYDAY call on Channel 16 to summon assistance.