13 S/S vs. 13 Sport for handling rough water

A conversation among Whalers
KanakaJack
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:21 pm

13 S/S vs. 13 Sport for handling rough water

Postby KanakaJack » Fri Jul 19, 2019 7:01 pm

Previously I had a 13 Super Sport Whaler and would seldom venture out past jetty because of rougher water. Now I am choosing between a 1986 13 Super Sport or a 2002 13 Sport model and hoping to gain better handling in rougher water with the Sport model. Have spent most time in Intercoastal for that reason. Visually, the Sport model appears to have a much deeper hull. Does anyone have any opinions/suggestions? Thanks.

User avatar
Phil T
Posts: 2607
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 6:08 pm
Location: Was Maine. Temporarily Kentucky

Re: 13 S/S vs. 13 Sport for handling rough water

Postby Phil T » Fri Jul 19, 2019 8:06 pm

While the 130 Sport (model naming changed ~ 2002) is an improvement, it will not be significant.

What really makes a difference is LOA and deadrise. A 13' is still a 13'.

Try finding one of the many 17' models. My Montauk 17 beat my brothers 13' Sport every day.
1992 Outrage 17
2019 E-TEC 90
2018 LoadRite 18280096VT
Member since 2003

KanakaJack
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:21 pm

Re: 13 S/S vs. 13 Sport for handling rough water

Postby KanakaJack » Fri Jul 19, 2019 10:57 pm

Thanks Phil - I had a 17' for years on the west coast when I was younger - now at 85 years old I feel that the 17' is too much to handle at the ramp. Thanks for the suggestion.

biggiefl
Posts: 897
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 1:31 pm
Location: south Tampa Bay area
Contact:

Re: 13 S/S vs. 13 Sport for handling rough water

Postby biggiefl » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:38 am

The newer sport at 600lbs or so is a much better improvement over the classic but Phil is right. Bud had one with a 30hp, needs more power but Ok with light load.
On my 24th Whaler. Currently in the stable: 86 18' Outrage, 81 13' Sport(original owner), 87 11' Sport, 69 Squall(for sale cheap).