Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  Engine Preference: Johnson-Evinrude-Yamaha?

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Engine Preference: Johnson-Evinrude-Yamaha?
bocadrew posted 07-07-2002 01:19 PM ET (US)   Profile for bocadrew   Send Email to bocadrew  
I am looking at a 1987 17-Montauck with a 1993 100-HP Johnson. I notice many used Whalers come with Evinrudes. Are they better than Johnsons? Is Johnson better or worse than Yahama? Is [it] all a matter of preference?

I've already done research on 4-stroke versus 2-stroke and am curious about used 2-stroke engines. Are there any 2-stroke engines that are less smokey then others? [I] was test driving a 13-footer the other day and the smoke was really getting to me; I am definitely going to try [to buy] a Montauk [in order] to be a little more forward of the engine.

Thank You

jimh posted 07-07-2002 05:14 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
[Edited posts and topic--was "another engine question"--jimh]
jimh posted 07-07-2002 05:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Many Whalers were originally sold with Evinrude engines because at that time and in that marketplace (say c.1970-c.1990) the Evinrude outboard was seen as a premium brand.

It made good sense to sell a premium brand boat, a Whaler, with a premium brand engine.

You don't see too many Whalers for FORCE engines on them or other econo-brand outboards.

There is also the sense of color coordination. The Whaler hull was desert tan or white with light blue cockpit in an era when many boats were molded in rather odd colors--shades or red, orange, blue, green, etc.--and thus the usually white or light blue Evinrude engine looked rather nice on the boat.

Johnson engines were more or less identical, although perhaps they lacked some accessories like power trim or electric start in certain models, but they were painted in copper tones and other colors.

Yamaha has grown to be an engine that people will pay a premium for, although that is not to say necessarily that it is a premium engine. Brand marketing is at work in boat engines just like in casual shirts. Some people will pay double for a shirt just because it has a logo on the breast instead of a pocket. Is it a better shirt?

John from Madison CT posted 07-07-2002 06:00 PM ET (US)     Profile for John from Madison CT  Send Email to John from Madison CT     
I hope this doesn't start your typical argument regarding which OB's are better than others, but in my experience of boating, which began in ernest in 1986, I do believe that Yamaha motors are better motors.

I say this with the caveat that I am generally refering to medium to large OB's. (75hp to 250hp)

I find this to be my own experience running many difference HP motors (70-250hp) and through discussions with many many boaters long before the internet existed. Do they deserve a premium because of marketing hype..I do not think so.. I think they deserve a slight premium because they are better build and most importantly engineered.

With the internet, I since learned that my small statistical sampling from years past proved to be representative of what may be actual fact. Yamaha's seem to run more reliably and last a long time.

I think of the people, the thousands of people, who bought Ficht motors in the late 90's, most who got screwed royally. Motors that no one could fix, no parts, no warranty, but again, how a company of this size could engineer such a poor product. (Think if these were cars and the same thing happened!) Same holds true for the early Mercury Optimax technology, and how many of those people had motors that never ever ran right. (i.e. Jurisprudence) If I was one of those Ficht or Optimax owners who learned early on that they were not a rare case but one of so many who had the same problems, i would be livid.

For some reason, you just don't have those #'s of problems with Yamaha's.

Perhaps the Japanese wait a bit longer before releasing new technology to the market, but all in all, what they do put out there seems to give the buyer a much better chance of owning a more reliable product.

The "market" is willing to pay more for Yamaha's for more than marketing hype...I give them more credit than that, especially the boating community, but because they are getting a better product.

Let the games begin !

John

whaleryo posted 07-07-2002 06:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for whaleryo  Send Email to whaleryo     
I've owned Mercury, Johnson, Evinrude, and Yamaha engines, and all were good. I like the way Yamaha handles the oil injection on my 1987 70hp...under the engine cover and problem free. For the most part, if I had a choice, I would go for a Yamaha, but I wouldn't have a problem with any of the other major brands.

One more observation: The baymen who make their living on the water here on Long Island, just about all have Yamahas on their boats.

My $.02

Bill

AllanR posted 07-07-2002 08:27 PM ET (US)     Profile for AllanR  Send Email to AllanR     
Bocadrew.

To your original questions about the 1993 Johnson. I presently have a 1994 90hp Johnson on my Montauk. I bought it new in 1994. It is pretty basic technology. Tried and tested over many years. Does it smoke? Yes, as do all 2 strokes of that era. If it has VRO, then it should use less oil and smoke less. I do basic maintenance on mine. Change the plugs, the lower unit oil, the impeller and a lube job at least once a year and keep the carbs clean. I also just changed the thermostats and cleaned out the coolng jackets. As long as the engine has not been abused and been maintained, it should work fine. Do they burn more fuel than the 4 strokes? Of course. But mine still has good mileage left on it, is paid for and I will keep it until I have to go to the next generation. When I do, I will certainly look at the Yamahas and Hondas. They seem to be excellent products today. But my Johnson has never left me off shore. Always got me back.

Good luck.

Clark Roberts posted 07-07-2002 08:55 PM ET (US)     Profile for Clark Roberts  Send Email to Clark Roberts     
I have noted that where one sees lots of the same brand engines in a particular locale that it's because of a good/great dealer/service nearby! The Long Island/Yamaha I can't comment on except to conject that there is a good yamaha dealer nearby. This subject has been literally beat to death and the same comments keep coming in from the Yamaha guys, Merc guys, OMC/Bomb guys... My brand is best because... blah, blah, blah... on and on and over and over... been there done that! My preference is my preference and if you look at my boats you can tell what I like as I can afford to buy whatever I want. I respect others freedom to choose and hope they get good service and performance! We all love our Whalers and most of us love our engines also and it doesn't matter what brand of engine one chooses... especially if you're going to depend on them for a tow when and if you need one... I'll take a tow from an old smoking Crysler and be thankful for it... Sure would be nice to bury this subject as it anoys me but then I'm old and grouchy! Beam me up! Clark... Spruce Creek Navy
Dick posted 07-07-2002 09:02 PM ET (US)     Profile for Dick  Send Email to Dick     
Clark

The best comment I have heard on this subject.

Dick

whaleryo posted 07-08-2002 12:42 AM ET (US)     Profile for whaleryo  Send Email to whaleryo     
Clark,

I understand your frustration with this topic, but Bocadrew did ask for people's preferences. I have no hidden motive for stating my (slight) preference toward Yamaha. As to the Long Island/Yamaha thing, there are probably more than 100 boat dealers on the island and you can see every imaginable boat/engine combination during a day on the water. There are roughly equal amounts of Mercs, Yamahas, and older Evinrudes and Johnsons on the recreational boats. The vast majority of commercial boats here however, are powered by Yamahas.
I don't know for sure, but I would guess that there are more places to get Mercurys serviced than there are for Yamahas. At least that's the way it seems in my immediate area.

Respectfully,

Bill

FISHNFF posted 07-08-2002 01:11 AM ET (US)     Profile for FISHNFF  Send Email to FISHNFF     
Commercial Whaler guys around here usually between 500-1500+ hours on their motors annually. Most guys running 17's use 70 J/E's because of reliability, simplicity, durability, and economy. Trolls great too. Guys who use their boats for freshwater and salt run 90 J/E's for more speed. Reason is OMC had a strong presence in the Bay area here. Now as boats repower, you see alot of 70 4 stroke Suzi/Evinrudes, but a ton of Mercs. All new Whalers are sold, obviously, with Mercs, and the price of Mercs has a lot to do with repowers. Also you can buy Merc parts just about anywhere now. I have a 90 Merc 4 stroke because it is basically a Yamaha. This replaced a 75 Merc bought because of price. The 90 Johnson original had about 5000 hours, two powerhead rebuilds when the third one blew.
Oh yeah, my preference is Yamaha. Had a 175 on a 20' Grady, then a 200 on a 22' Grady (present), and a 40/50 on a 13' Sport. Everything on it from the cowling to the throttle to the relatively smooth and quiet idle gets it my nod, though the competition has really closed the gap!

FISHNFF

Bigshot posted 07-08-2002 10:10 AM ET (US)     Profile for Bigshot  Send Email to Bigshot     
Qick note: That 100hp was made for 30 years and probably the most popular 4cyl outboard ever sold. It obviously is a great engine. If it was a poor engine....it would have been replaced on that boat in the last 9 years.
Jay A posted 07-08-2002 02:22 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jay A    
I like Suzuki just because! Mine is a 200 hp 2 stroke and to me it is very efficient with oil.with a 9qt internal capacity less can go wrong and I'm still on my 1st 2 gallon jug this season. I launched on 4/13 and still have about 2 quarts left! And yes,I use my boat alot,about 4 or 5 times a week.When Suzuki comes out with a similar hp 4 stroke, I'll probably re-power but am not in a rush to do so. In my 13'sport I started out with a 40hp Evinrude Lark, it burned about 8-9 gallons of fuel a day and then had trouble with the lower unit. In 1975 I repowered with a 40hp Merc and it burned only 3 to 5 gallons a day! It's still going strong today!
masbama posted 07-08-2002 10:54 PM ET (US)     Profile for masbama  Send Email to masbama     
All I can tell you is that I have a Johnson 2stroke 90 on the back of my Montauk and on July 4th, after viewing the tall ships coming up Mobile Bay (awesome site!) I was asked to tow in a Cape Horn with a new looking 115 Yamaha. He said it was NOT a fuel problem. I did it, of course, and told my guests it's all part of owning a whaler! I mumbled "stinkin' Yamahas" and we all had a good laugh!
ufish posted 07-09-2002 04:34 PM ET (US)     Profile for ufish  Send Email to ufish     
I like Honda four-strokes. Honda's been making them for a long time. Since they've been doing it longer they've had more opportunities to work the bugs out. I've seen a lot of new four-strokes being towed. The new 2006 EPA regulations have resulted in some forced technology in two-strokes. While the cleaner engines are needed to protect the fish et al, the resulting bugs in the new two-strokes have yet to be exterminated!
Kelly posted 07-09-2002 04:49 PM ET (US)     Profile for Kelly  Send Email to Kelly     
I think one good thing about an older OMC is that it seems to me that there is a pretty good group of small shops around that work on older OMC motors. The same is probably true of Mercury. Kelly
half shell posted 07-09-2002 09:12 PM ET (US)     Profile for half shell  Send Email to half shell     
Honda or Yamaha they are the best.Every person I know that has another brand wishes they had the Honda or Yamaha. I have never heard a Honda or Yamaha owner say they wish they had a mercury!
tralinj posted 07-09-2002 09:13 PM ET (US)     Profile for tralinj  Send Email to tralinj     
I had a 89 Yamaha 90HP on a Montauk, a 94 150 Johnson Ocean Runner 150 on a 19 Outrage and a 2000 Yamaha 200 HPDI on an 18 Outrage. I never had a problem with any of them. The HPDI was a standout. Fuel efficient and neck snapping acceleration. As has been stated the preferences are subjective. An Evinrude/Johnson of this vintage is a reliable choice...easy to get serviced as well. I am just one of the brainwashed in that when possible I buy Yamaha..I belive it adds to the resale.
Bigshot posted 07-10-2002 09:46 AM ET (US)     Profile for Bigshot  Send Email to Bigshot     
1/2shell I own a suzuki 4 stroke and not once have I wished for either:)
half shell posted 07-10-2002 06:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for half shell  Send Email to half shell     
Bigshot what was your reason for choosing suzuki.Did you know anyone with one?I ask the question with all due respect. I do not know anyone with 2 or 4 stroke suzuki nor have I heard of any complaints. Maybe I should be looking at those also.

Regards
Bob

Bigshot posted 07-11-2002 08:45 AM ET (US)     Profile for Bigshot  Send Email to Bigshot     
I owned one back in 1981...great engine. Bud has 3 4 strokes....never a problem. Bunch here have same engine.

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.