Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  Navigation Rules--pet peeve

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Navigation Rules--pet peeve
elaelap posted 03-20-2009 01:01 PM ET (US)   Profile for elaelap   Send Email to elaelap  
Here are a couple of Navy skippers whose careers are in jeopardy, similar to the grounding last month in Hawai'i:
http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20090320/ML.US.Navy.Ships. Collide/

Now who the hell can understand the challenge and complexity involved in this collision, especially since this early report has the nuclear sub running submerged--certainly not me. But that brings me to the subject I'd like to discuss with this thread:

My pet peeve is the cheerful ignorance with which many boaters--primarily motorboat operators, I'm sad to say--handle their craft at sea. I'd guess that at least half the folks (I almost said idiots) out there don't even have a beginning knowledge of, nor do they seem to care about, the basic navigation rules, including the simple, straightforward "Rules of the Road" in effect when boats cross paths, meet one another heading in opposite directions, or overtake one another.

The classic personal example I've used before at this website involved an otherwise competent, handy member of this forum. I was a guest in his large, beautifully maintained Whaler (I'm purposefully obfuscating some of the details for reasons which will become obvious) four or five years ago. We were blasting right along, heading out to the fishing grounds, and I watched as a large cabin cruiser of some sort approached from starboard, with the boats in a crossing situation. It was a crystal clear day, and I spotted the other boat at least one mile away. Its approximate bearing remained the same as the distance between the boats closed, so I knew that we were on a potentially hazardous course, and I waited for my friend to make a course change in a timely and obvious manner, as required by the Rules since his was the burdened vessel. I mean, this situation was as common and straighforward as glancing to one's right at a four-way stop sign intersection on land, and yielding when proper. But my buddy just kept on his course, glancing at the approaching boat every now and then but making no course change whatsoever. We were probably cruising along at about 28-30 knots, and the other boat--the one with the right-of-way--was making the same speed. We were real close, and I nervously said, "Check that guy out," or something like that. My friend just nodded acknowledgement and proceeded on his merry way, as if nothing at all was wrong. When the boats were perhaps fifty meters apart, and I was tensing myself to either 1) grab the wheel, 2) jump overboard, or 3) meet my Maker, the other boat sheared off and passed right behind ours, with its skipper screaming something very unpleasant to accompany his single-digit salute. I wiped the sweat from my brow, took several deep breaths, and as casually as I was able said, "___________ (his name), doncha think that guy had the right-of-way?" My pal's response--and I swear this is true and that he wasn't joking: "Whaddaya mean, Tony...my boat's bigger."

Soon after, I bought my friend a copy of Chapman's Piloting and Seamanship and showed him the chapter on navigation rules, which he promised to study. I don't think he ever did.

I want to re-emphasize that this guy had owned a series of boats for many years, kept them in beautiful condition, and was very, very capable in their maintenance and repair. An otherwise very intelligent, well educated, decent fellow, he just didn't see any need for studying and obeying some sort of arcane rules about handling his craft in company of other boats. All I can figure is that he thought the "sea is so vast and his boat so small" that he, and the other boats he might come upon, would always be able to somehow blunder their way around one another. I don't know. I just don't get it.

Anyway, there's my long-winded, ultimate pet peeve about boating...unless you want to get me started on the ULTRA-ULTIMATE idiots who blast through our N. Pacific dense fog at thirty knots, often in crowded locations near the harbor entrance or on San Francisco Bay.

Tony

Buckda posted 03-20-2009 01:16 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Congratulations Tony, you've identified the principal reason that I deprive myself of the pleasure of boating in and around Chicago - only once in 10 years of living there did I bring my boat to those shores. Primarily because the waters are filled with landlubbers who have more money than navigation sense and can afford chlorox-bottle inspired behemoths capable of crushing my small Whaler. The prevailing attitude in midsummer seems to be "I can afford this, so get out of my way".

Hence, the Chicago waterfront, despite it's breathtaking views of the skyline and deep blue waters, is one of the most dangerous places on all of the Great Lakes (statistically speaking).

Now....I don't hold my captain's license, and I am far from perfect; but generally I take evasive maneuvers no matter who has right of way. Better to be defensive than dead.

jimh posted 03-20-2009 01:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
There was or perhaps still is a nice video floating around the internet in which the recording videographer is on a Coast Guard Auxiliary boat heading out to sea on some sort of purpose. The Auxiliarist at the helm fails either to see or to yield to another power driven vessel approaching on a crossing course from the starboard. The camera captures the ensuing collision. The Rules, of course, require that the Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel give way to the vessel crossing. So, you might say, it happens to the best of us.

The camera continues to record as the Auxiliarist vessel crew fish out from water the people from the other vessel who were thrown overboard by the collision.

jimh posted 03-20-2009 01:28 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Oh yeah, the video is still on-line:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=590_1206082695

Buckda posted 03-20-2009 01:37 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Well, according to the rules, the CG in that video is clearly at fault, but how in the world do you have such low situational awareness of a much larger vessel approaching you? Especially when traveling at speed.

While "Fault" by rule is clear, "Fault by absence of grey matter" is also at work in the stricken vessel.

Great video though.

Greg Hiller posted 03-20-2009 01:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for Greg Hiller  Send Email to Greg Hiller     
There is the "Prudential Rule" that states, to the effect, both vessels must do what ever necessary to avoid collision even if your vessel has the right of way.

JMARTIN posted 03-20-2009 02:03 PM ET (US)     Profile for JMARTIN  Send Email to JMARTIN     
Tony, it sounds as though your friend believes in the lug nut rule. The vehicle with the most lug nuts wins.

My Dad told me when I started driving not to be "dead" right. Even if you have the right away, yield to avoid a collision.

My experience is that most of the boaters in my area of Puget Sound are pretty good and most of the boaters on the local lakes are pretty bad.

John

No Respect posted 03-20-2009 02:10 PM ET (US)     Profile for No Respect  Send Email to No Respect     
Couldn't help noticing the Force Outboard and fine mullet the guy was sporting. Darwin?
Buckda posted 03-20-2009 02:15 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Darwin?! The CG vessel was at fault on both fronts - by rule and by common sense. It was clear that a collision was imminent and a captain with good SA (for both vessels) would have taken notice and initiated evasive maneuvers to avoid the collision.

I fault captains of both vessels, but I believe that an extra burden weighs on the CG vessel - even if the situation was reversed. I doubt that burden exists on a legal level - but in my mind, it sure does.

Sheila posted 03-20-2009 02:16 PM ET (US)     Profile for Sheila  Send Email to Sheila     
Thanks, Tony, for raising this subject. It's an important one! I must say, though, that I've come across several skippers of sailboats who, while running under power, seem to think that their privilege by virtue of being a vessel under sail still applies.

That video of the USCG Auxiliary accident is actually used in our Team Coordination Training classes.

Buckda posted 03-20-2009 02:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Darwin?! The CG vessel was at fault on both fronts - by rule and by common sense. It was clear that a collision was imminent and a captain with good SA (for both vessels) would have taken notice and initiated evasive maneuvers to avoid the collision.

I fault captains of both vessels, but I believe that an extra burden weighs on the CG vessel - even if the situation was reversed. I doubt that burden exists on a legal level - but in my mind, it sure does.

Buckda posted 03-20-2009 02:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
pardon the hiccup (echo) post......
I agree with Sheila -

The difference is that blow boaters are just making mistakes in slow motion - meaning there is more time to re-think, change course, change your mind or react.

OIA posted 03-20-2009 02:44 PM ET (US)     Profile for OIA  Send Email to OIA     
The captain of the CG vessel seems to have as much common sense as the type of boater to which this thread pertains. "You don't see me, you don't head my warning, so I will just run you down." Unbelievable.

I know it's not a popular position, but I believe it is time for licensing. Today, anyone with enough money in the bank can purchase a 25 foot vessel which holds 10 passengers (or more) and can run as fast as 60mph. That same day, with no prior experience whatsoever, they can be running full speed up some narrow, congested waterway.

Add to this situation: The popularity of sea doos, which people somehow fail to realize the craft does not have breaks; the large 30+-feet offshore go-fast boats that can be found racing atop the narrow waterways; the stupidity factor; and sometimes booze.

It's scary out there.


Brian7son posted 03-20-2009 02:48 PM ET (US)     Profile for Brian7son  Send Email to Brian7son     
"My Dad told me when I started driving not to be "dead" right. Even if you have the right away, yield to avoid a collision."

John, your dad was a wise man.

Basically, that sums it all up. Some people whether behind the wheel of a boat or auto, just get fixated on the fact that they have the "right of way". They actually see the hazard and yet they still collide. I'd much rather give way and continue to enjoy my day on the water every time.

prj posted 03-20-2009 03:03 PM ET (US)     Profile for prj  Send Email to prj     
Michiganders coming across the Big Pond this June should take notice that the accident in the video happened on Milwaukee's generally underpopulated lake front. Perhaps the CG Aux here was enjoying some of Milwaukee's finest.
Buckda posted 03-20-2009 03:15 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Is it customary for CG vessels to have fenders outboard when under way? Sure looks sloppy to me. I associate speeding vessels with fenders flopping with landlubber, more-money-than-sense newbies with a new toy.
HAPPYJIM posted 03-20-2009 03:54 PM ET (US)     Profile for HAPPYJIM  Send Email to HAPPYJIM     
Long ago when I was aboard CG small boats, our job was to board a number of boats and go home. We pulled over a boat about every 5 minutes or so. It was easier to leave the fenders out because of the activity. When we got back to the dock all equipment was stowed. We never thought it looked sloppy.
Buckda posted 03-20-2009 04:05 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Jim -

I agree - if a work boat is moving from vessel to vessel and had fenders deployed as an obvious measure to protect the vessels during these encounters, that makes sense. This boat is moving along at a good clip. Unless they were deployed in an urgent fashion, (i.e. an emergency call on the radio), wouldn't proper preparations for getting up on plane include stowing loose gear such as fenders?

Whenever I see our local CG boats they pull those fenders in when they're moving out to a different location.

When I'm getting ready to move out on plane, I do a sweep of the deck and make sure things are stowed because there is a much greater propensity for things to become airborne, slide, go overboard or otherwise cause distractions/problems when on plane. Likewise, I do a quick check of my companion boats and notify their captains if they are trailing a line or have a fender outboard before getting under way.

I'm not saying that it is "wrong," but it just starts to reflect on the captain about how much he is paying attention to his own vessel operations - which in this video, he is clearly NOT doing.

My experience with coast guardsmen is that they are typically consummate professionals on the water and seem to have their "ship in shape" - right down to personal grooming and bearing.

Perhaps this is just a shout out to USCG Station St. Joseph on Lake Michigan - they seem to have it together.

HAPPYJIM posted 03-20-2009 04:34 PM ET (US)     Profile for HAPPYJIM  Send Email to HAPPYJIM     
First off, todays CG is totally different from when I did boardings back in the mid 70's. We were very "lax" to put it mildly. We had a 21 foot Outrage with twin somethings. It was our rescue boat in case one of the aircraft when down in the river that was next to the Air Station.

Our time would start out with a trip to the civillian boat yard to gas up because we didn't have fueling facilities. After fueling we would go to Lamb's Marina and buy a six pack of beer and then go out and look for boats with bikini's to do our safty checks. That would never, ever happen today. Things were different then. The fenders stayed tied to the railing even when we ran WOT from boat to boat.

elaelap posted 03-20-2009 05:02 PM ET (US)     Profile for elaelap  Send Email to elaelap     
One important point--Yes, there is the 'prudential rule' which basically requires doing whatever one can at the last minute to avoid collision. However--and this is very, very important--the reason that the navigation rules work in this regard (collision avoidance) is that the vessel with the right-of-way (the unburdened or, more properly according to the international and inland Steering and Sailing Rules, the "stand-on vessel") is required to maintain her course and speed, until the "it becomes apparent to her that the [give-way] vessel is not taking appropriate action."

The logic here is clear: if the stand-on vessel is skittish and too early fails to maintain course and speed, because of premature fear that the give-way vessel doesn't know what the hell it's doing, the give-way vessel won't know how or when to make its own required course correction. Very important stuff here, even though we know that half the 'biggest lug' no-sailors out there don't know or give a damn anyway.

Tony

All this information can be found in Chapman's, and for more detail (and the actual law) ref the International and Inland Steering and Sailing Rules, Section II and Subpart II respectively (both entitled "Conduct of Vessels in Sight of One Another").

foghorn posted 03-20-2009 06:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for foghorn  Send Email to foghorn     
I often went out in my boat to watch fireworks while living in a big city. On one occasion, I met up with another boat, and no matter what evasive manoeuvre I tried, I could not get clear of this guy. We finally got close enough in the darkness for me to realize he had his port and starboard running lights reversed.
sapple posted 03-20-2009 08:18 PM ET (US)     Profile for sapple  Send Email to sapple     
I find this video amazing in a number of ways. I am appalled that the CG pilot did not immediately pull back on the throttle and determine an evasive course as soon as he realized a collision was possible. I also find it amazing the pleasure craft pilot DID NOT NOTICE the large and fast moving CG boat approaching and do the same. How do you not notice something like that in broad daylight?! He obviously was not paying attention to what he was doing. Both pilots appeared to be inept, in different ways, at least at that moment.

Chapman's says: "Survivors of collisions between ships and boats are nearly always those persons who are on the ship." That seems pretty obvious.

It also says if you are on a collision course with another boat, even if you have the right of way, you would be foolish to assert that right if it would likely result in a collision. That also seems pretty obvious.

Despite what Chapman's and the CG auxiliary manual say I have my own rule. That is to stay the hell out of everyone's way regardless of who has the right of way. Its my survival instinct because where I boat it looks like this:

http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc264/sapple2/4thofJulycrowd.jpg

If you are not carefull it can look like this:

http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc264/sapple2/Humor-7.jpg

Dave Sutton posted 03-20-2009 09:13 PM ET (US)     Profile for Dave Sutton  Send Email to Dave Sutton     
"I am appalled that the CG pilot did not immediately <snip>

Coast Guard AUXILIARY. Not Coast Guard.


Let's be clear here. Not that the real Coast Guard guys don't make errors, they do. But this was a PRIVATE boat. The quality of the Auxiliaries range from absolutely professional to buffoonish. Less so now than then.


Dave

.

Dave Sutton posted 03-20-2009 09:17 PM ET (US)     Profile for Dave Sutton  Send Email to Dave Sutton     
"Here are a couple of Navy skippers whose careers are in jeopardy"


They are not in jeopardy, they are over. Jeopardy means that there is some possibility of saving the day.

Well, there is one permutation here though: There is absolutely zero possibility of the submarine skipper ever commanding a rowboat in the Navy again. As for the surface vessel skipper: LA Class Attack Boats are so quiet as to be a black hole in the ocean. He 'might' survive if there was no possible way for him to have detected the sub.


Dave

.

elaelap posted 03-21-2009 12:41 AM ET (US)     Profile for elaelap  Send Email to elaelap     
That second shot says it all, sapple. Photoshop or, gulp, for real?

Tony

tombro posted 03-21-2009 06:07 AM ET (US)     Profile for tombro  Send Email to tombro     
We used to say "Is it live, or is it Memorex?"...and now "Is it real, or is it Photoshop?".

Huh.

flippa posted 03-21-2009 10:12 AM ET (US)     Profile for flippa  Send Email to flippa     

"I am appalled that the CG pilot did not immediately pull back on the throttle and determine an evasive course as soon as he realized a collision was possible."

Why would he do that; he is in the bigger boat. Hey smaller boat, I will crush you. Get the hell out of the way.

"I also find it amazing the pleasure craft pilot DID NOT NOTICE the large and fast moving CG boat approaching and do the same."

Why would he do that, he had the right-of-way. Hey bigger boat, I am in the right, so get out of my way or I'll crash into you to prove a point. Don't f--- with me, I have been drinking & have a bad attitude.

"Both pilots appeared to be inept, in different ways"

Not too different; both of them are clueless. Calling them inept is being too kind.


"Despite what Chapman's and the CG auxiliary manual say I have my own rule. That is to stay the hell out of everyone's way regardless of who has the right of way."

AMEN!!!! Sapple hit this one spot on. I am a big-time defensive driver. I know you guys who boat in busy areas probably are as well.

I wish I had a dollar for every time I have been cut off, flipped off or been buzzed while fishing. I boat in & around Boston Harbor, and we have to constantly watch out for the knuckleheads & clowns bombing around in their expensive new boats. I have seen some truely stupid behavior over the years, as I'm sure all of you have.

I took a CG Safe Boating Course whe I bought my first whaler. I probably wouldn't have taken oue, but it was included in the cost of my second-hand boat. The dealer truely believes in educated boaters. The instructors stated that less than five percent of boat owners take any training course at all. Not sure of the accuracy of that statement, but I believe it!

I had a Regulator cut me off last summer,and he gave me the finger when he did it. I was trying to wave him off, because he was heading full speed at a shallow area between two islands. He grounded hard on Great Brewster Spit.

The brain surgeon came to a stop real quick, so I went over to see if anyone got hurt. No one was, probably because the operator & crew were all loaded. Lots of swears when I asked if they were all right "What kind of stupid f---ing question is that? F-U, we are f---ing fine. What the f---, you couldn't of warned me!"

WTF???? OK, I will be right over to help pull you off, drunky. Yeah, right away. Need another beer?

I got on the radio & sent them some help. Probably didn't end too well.


sapple posted 03-21-2009 10:41 AM ET (US)     Profile for sapple  Send Email to sapple     
Both are photoshop. However, the first one is not too far off from reality.
Moose posted 03-21-2009 11:02 AM ET (US)     Profile for Moose  Send Email to Moose     
Sapple,

Are you sure? That first photo appears to be the Black River in South Haven, Michigan on any summer Saturday.

Fishmore posted 03-21-2009 11:34 AM ET (US)     Profile for Fishmore    
Flippa, that Regulator story is great. I love instant Karma.
flippa posted 03-21-2009 07:34 PM ET (US)     Profile for flippa  Send Email to flippa     
I see boats grounded here several times every season. It depends on the tides, but usually you can make it over (if lucky). At low tide, you can't make it over.

I have heard you can walk between Lovells & Great Brewster Islands at extreme low tides.

It always amazes me to see boats grounded here. It is right by Boston Light, so you think people would be extra careful, especially if they weren't familiar with the area. Maybe consult a chart or something? Perhaps stay in the channel? Maybe pay attention to all the darn electronic gizmos in front of them? Perhaps there is a reason that there has been a lighthouse out here since 1716?

It all comes back to clueless people with no experience or formal training operating expensive toys.

flippa posted 03-21-2009 07:37 PM ET (US)     Profile for flippa  Send Email to flippa     
The alcohol probably doesn't help either.
logjam posted 03-22-2009 12:11 AM ET (US)     Profile for logjam  Send Email to logjam     
My pet peeve is with the higharchy of privliged vessels.
A sea-plane on the water is the least privliged vessel even though they are the most easily damaged, the most affected by wind, one of the least maneuverable, and most don't have neutral or reverse. If you see one trying to taxi through a crowded harbor give him a little room I'm sure he'll appreciate it.
gnr posted 03-22-2009 08:11 AM ET (US)     Profile for gnr    
Clearly a new law requiring the wearing of a helmet while underway in a motorboat is necessary.

Dan posted 03-22-2009 08:22 AM ET (US)     Profile for Dan  Send Email to Dan     
My biggest pet peeve are people in large SeaRay type boats who deliberately drive fast and close to me when I'm fishing. They do this because they want to see if I'm catching fish, because their oblivious, or because they want to see me get pitched side to side from their wake. Often, when I'm fishing 50 yards or less from shore these same boats will drive between me and the shore, even though there's a mile or more on the other side of me.

In Basic Seamanship class they tell you to avoid accidents no matter what. That CGA pilot was a nerd, and showing off for the cameras. The vessel that got hit had the sun in their eyes, so that could have contributed to their not seeing the CG vessel.

jimh posted 03-22-2009 12:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
For boats meeting, often the Rule of Gross Tonnage is applied to see who gives way. Here is a good example:

http://yachtpals.com/maltese-falcon-yacht-collision-3074

elaelap posted 03-22-2009 01:43 PM ET (US)     Profile for elaelap  Send Email to elaelap     
Yep, Jim, and I was interested to find out that the Falcon's owner, Tom Perkins, put her up for sale after the incident--I guess the little scratch on her topsides meant it was time for another boat.

Tony

Oh yeah, maybe someone at this forum wants to pick her up. Only $182 MILLION...but that's the asking price. In this economy I'll bet $175M cash would be gobbled right up, so go for it, someone. Damn, one of you guys with a big Conquest could use your boat for the dinghy in the Maltese Falcon's tender ;-)

swist posted 03-24-2009 07:44 AM ET (US)     Profile for swist  Send Email to swist     
In general, I favor boat driving licensing, but only because it's probably better than the nothing we have now. I notice that licensing drivers of automobiles does not keep total idiots off the road, many of whom also don't seem to know fundamental driving rules. But at least there is not complete anarchy, as on some waterways.

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.