Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  Boston Whaler offical Release of 210 Montauk

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Boston Whaler offical Release of 210 Montauk
Jeff posted 10-03-2011 02:20 PM ET (US)   Profile for Jeff   Send Email to Jeff  
Just off [the Boston Whaler] facebook page:

http://www.bostonwhaler.com/Page.aspx/pageId/30613/articleId/252556/ sectionId/23083/view/read/Current-Boston-Whaler-News.aspx

Details and Images. Look at the motor.
http://www.bostonwhaler.com/Page.aspx/pageId/29592/pmid/270171/ 210-Montauk.aspx

What a great boat. It even has a head in the console. Finally a current post -Classic I can really lust after. Still, I would love to see a twins option. With some work I bet you could shoehorn in a pair of skinny profile twins into that transom notch.

Performance Charts:
http://www.bostonwhaler.com/boat_graphics/eprowebsitemedia/2904/ EnginePerformance/270171_EnginePerf.pdf

Sal A posted 10-03-2011 02:37 PM ET (US)     Profile for Sal A  Send Email to Sal A     
I just priced one on the site. $57,000! I would jump all over this if I didn't have to put money away to cover the new debit card feeds. Oh, and food.
K Albus posted 10-03-2011 02:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for K Albus  Send Email to K Albus     
The "Build This Boat" page lists the only two available motors as the VERADO 150 and the VERADO 200. No mention of the new Mercury 150 FourStroke, even though a Performance Report is available for the new motor. See: http://www.bostonwhaler.com/page.aspx/pageid/33910/pmid/270171/ stepNumber/2/Build-This-Boat.aspx

I also noticed that the Performance Reports for the New Mercury 150 FourStroke and the 200 VERADO are from a boat with a T-Top, while the Performance Report for the [VERADO] 150 is from a boat that apparently did not have a T-Top. Without the T-Top, the top speed for the 150 VERADO is marginally higher than that of the 150 FourStroke, but the 150 FourStroke has better MPG across the board. If both boats were equipped the same, I think the 150 VERADO would lose in all categories.

themclos posted 10-03-2011 03:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for themclos  Send Email to themclos     
This is pure speculation on my part, but I am expecting the recently announced Mercury 150 HP FourStroke will be available as an option for this model, as well as for the 190 Montauk. Every promotional picture we have seen for this boat has shown the new motor. Additionally, I think this model would fare far better with a lighter motor than the VERADO.

The "Build This Boat" feature on the website cannot show the new Fourstroke nor its pricing because the motor has not yet been officially released. Time will tell. But I agree with Jeff and others, I really like this model, both its size and the simplicity of the Montauk design.--Dan

Jeff posted 10-03-2011 03:27 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jeff  Send Email to Jeff     
That's better.

https://sites.google.com/site/rohlfingsuploads/_/rsrc/1317669839324/ home/TEMP21.jpg

Photoshop, helping to give vision to dreams but, unfortunately not reality.

themclos posted 10-03-2011 03:49 PM ET (US)     Profile for themclos  Send Email to themclos     
Jeff--No need for twins. That 150-HP FourStroke will take me out to tuna country--maybe the tips of tuna country out here--albeit with a buddy boat or two on a perfect day. With a 273-mile range at 4,000-RPM and 27.5-MPH that leaves me with 90-odd-miles out, 90-odd-miles back, and 90-miles of fuel capacity in reserve. Unless conditions are perfect--when does that happen--my 22 Outrage is typically run between 25- and 30-MPH, so, given the similar dimensions and weight, I expect this model will tolerate similar conditions in terms of comfort.

Look at the pictures showing the boat's transom with the 150-HP FourStroke. The scuppers are nice and clear of the water. Where would they be with a VERADO or twins?

But I like your thinking.

Dan

PeteB88 posted 10-03-2011 03:54 PM ET (US)     Profile for PeteB88  Send Email to PeteB88     
Heard rumors about this. Cool, I think.
Jeff posted 10-03-2011 04:00 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jeff  Send Email to Jeff     
Dan--Needs ≤ Cool Factor.
boatdryver posted 10-03-2011 04:01 PM ET (US)     Profile for boatdryver  Send Email to boatdryver     
themclos--on a boat with 8-foot 6-inch beam I doubt the additional 60-lbs for a 200-HP VERADO would drop those scuppers significantly. [A] 150-HP on this boat with 70-gallons of fuel , several people, and ice, etc., may seem like a 115-HP on a 190 Montauk.--jJimL
tjxtreme posted 10-03-2011 04:31 PM ET (US)     Profile for tjxtreme    
Its nice to know you can take care of business inside the console if need be. Its hard to see how it is big enough in there...
themclos posted 10-03-2011 04:37 PM ET (US)     Profile for themclos  Send Email to themclos     
Jeff--I bow to the Cool Factor argument. At my age, with threekids approaching college, a 25-year-old boat with a 9-year-old motor is about as cool as I get to be these days.--Dan
PeteB88 posted 10-03-2011 05:10 PM ET (US)     Profile for PeteB88  Send Email to PeteB88     
Right on Dan, I'm through being cool.
Mambo Minnow posted 10-03-2011 07:19 PM ET (US)     Profile for Mambo Minnow  Send Email to Mambo Minnow     
The press release mentions an option for a 200-HP motor. Do you think this is the L4 VERADO 200-HP or an uprated version of the new 150 FourStroke?
tedious posted 10-03-2011 07:45 PM ET (US)     Profile for tedious  Send Email to tedious     
The performance results indicate it's the VERADO 200.--Tim
SpongeBob posted 10-03-2011 08:44 PM ET (US)     Profile for SpongeBob  Send Email to SpongeBob     
I'm with you Jeff, this is the only new whaler that interests me. And it does interest me especially with your photo shop twins!--Jeff
jimh posted 10-03-2011 09:56 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
This new 21-foot Boston Whaler reminds me of the classic 22-foot hull. The extra width of the new hull makes up for the missing foot of length.
jimh posted 10-03-2011 10:30 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Is the T-Top a standard feature? Or an option?
Jeff posted 10-03-2011 10:51 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jeff  Send Email to Jeff     
The T-Top is an option.


That livewell is as well. If you get rid of that option you really get a nice open rear cockpit area.

Russ 13 posted 10-04-2011 01:23 AM ET (US)     Profile for Russ 13  Send Email to Russ 13     
I like the design, and the power options......but
$57,000.00 for a 21 foot boat....WHAT!!
That is way off the chart!!
My last new boat an 04 21 foot Seapro with a 200 Yamaha & Aluminum trailer, custom T-top, two live wells, stainless boarding ladder, etc. was LESS THAN 1/2 THAT, for comparison.
...
Don't see B W selling too many at that price in today's
economy.
Peter posted 10-04-2011 07:38 AM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
Based on the performance reports, the new 150 Fourstroke looks like it is every bit as powerful as the Verado 150 and more fuel efficient. Assuming they offer the FourStroke 150 as the base outboard motor, I don't see many opting for the Verado 150 on the 210 Montauk unless they have to have DTS.
tedious posted 10-04-2011 07:43 AM ET (US)     Profile for tedious  Send Email to tedious     
I'm thinking an eTec 200HO would be really nice on that boat - oh wait a minute, it's a modern Whaler, no choices allowed...
prj posted 10-04-2011 09:28 AM ET (US)     Profile for prj  Send Email to prj     
Not to mention that E-TEC would likely match the new powerful Mercury FourStroke 150's performance at a much higher price, Tim!

Nice looking boat, again harkening back to Whaler's halcyon years in both styling and simplicity. The 210's extra foot of beam against the Classic 22's extra foot of length certainly shouldn't improve the ride any, but perhaps additional weight will offset that length to beam ratio disadvantage.

One might say this new 210 Montauk is the 2010s equivalent to the 1980s Outrage-22. You know, a bit cheaper in appearance, lowered standards of expectation and lacking a degree of design sophistication. Sort of a text-message version of the classic.

whaler131 posted 10-04-2011 10:59 AM ET (US)     Profile for whaler131  Send Email to whaler131     
Nice boat, but I would not give up my 1988 outrage with a 200 evinrude and jack plate. That is paid for. :)
tedious posted 10-04-2011 04:00 PM ET (US)     Profile for tedious  Send Email to tedious     
Oh, I think it's just possible that the eTec 200HO would better the performance of the Merc 150. But it's not about one motor vs. another, it's about having a choice. Which I don't with a modern Whaler, which is why I'll never own one.

Tim

andygere posted 10-04-2011 04:39 PM ET (US)     Profile for andygere  Send Email to andygere     
Decent looking boat that will no doubt be popular among new Whaler buyers. That said, I continue to be amazed that the designers don't seem to acknowledge that a lot of folks will want an auxiliary motor, and like other modern era Montauks, this one has no provision for adding one. Doesn't anybody at Brunswick, Inc. want to sell a 9.9 Pro kicker with every new Montauk? It's clear that the market has trended towards single engine power on boats even larger than this one, but the need for reliable auxiliary power seems to be ignored. Sometimes I wonder if there is anything left of the Boston Whaler company that made my '89 Outrage 22...
Sojo81007 posted 10-04-2011 06:18 PM ET (US)     Profile for Sojo81007  Send Email to Sojo81007     
Beautiful boat! I'm glad to see a bigger Montauk. The Montauks are my favorite new Whalers because they seem to retain some of styling/features of the old classics. If I bought a new BW it would be a Montaukk 170.
flawton posted 10-10-2011 11:17 AM ET (US)     Profile for flawton  Send Email to flawton     
Nice to see the straight gunnel lines with a more squared off look. Whaler lost me with the sloping rear in recent years. $57K, I just don't see the value there. I'll wait and find one in a few years that someone has repowered with a yamaha.
diveorfish posted 10-10-2011 06:03 PM ET (US)     Profile for diveorfish  Send Email to diveorfish     
$57k sounds outrageous for that boat, but remember that’s list price. When it’s time to talk turkey the price comes down. I don’t know the markup on boats, but it is very high.

Just for comparison: back in 2002 a fully loaded, with trailer, leftover new 2001 23 Outrage listed for $88k. The dealership was offering it up for $58k. That is a 34% discount and I doubt the dealership would offer it up at a loss.

Take 25% discount and the price for the 21 Montauk comes in around $42k which is much more palatable.

No matter how you slice it though, Whalers aren’t cheap. I’m now curious what the classics cost when they were new relative to today’s dollars.

phatwhaler posted 10-10-2011 06:39 PM ET (US)     Profile for phatwhaler  Send Email to phatwhaler     
My 1996 19/20 Outrage with a 150 EFI, T-top and aluminum trailer was 35g's out the door. I don't know what number you guys want to use for inflation, but this 57K for a new 21 Foot whaler with a outboard that uses half the fuel, seems about right to me. At least for an asking price.

lizard posted 10-10-2011 07:12 PM ET (US)     Profile for lizard  Send Email to lizard     
For $57K, you can get the Everglades 243 Center Console. Last year, at the boat show, there was one fully outfitted for $57 or $58K. It was not a boat show only price. POWER/MOTOR OF CHOICE.

The fit and finish on the boat clearly exceeded that of Whalers at the same boat show. Way more items were standard vs options.

Here is a link to that boat: http://www.evergladesboats.com/boats/243cc.php

I agree that this 21 Montauk is a nice boat, but dollar for dollar, my opinion is that it does not come close to the Everglades.

striper swiper posted 10-10-2011 10:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for striper swiper    
There is usually a discount on new boats but then they add freight and make ready and there goes most of the discount.
plus taxes .
GreatBayNH posted 10-14-2011 08:46 AM ET (US)     Profile for GreatBayNH  Send Email to GreatBayNH     
I'll buy in NH (No Sales Tax) with your money and gift it back to you if that helps.
Jkcam posted 10-15-2011 05:43 AM ET (US)     Profile for Jkcam  Send Email to Jkcam     
Just to clue you guys in. It is cool, to not be cool.
BMR posted 10-20-2011 07:36 AM ET (US)     Profile for BMR    
I am not sure where the price you have quoted is from, but I found this on a florida dealer's website:


http://www.atlanticcoastmarine.com/boat.php?id=329
EVERGLADES BOATS 243 CC 2012

MSRP: $ 104,055.00


Length: 24' 3"
Beam: 8' 2"
Draft: 16"
Dry Weight: 3500lbs

Horsepower: 300HP
Fuel Capacity: 80gals
In Stock: yes
Colors currently available:
Ice Blue Hull

lizard posted 10-20-2011 11:30 AM ET (US)     Profile for lizard  Send Email to lizard     
The dealer from Long Beach, CA gave us the quote.
bwhaler01 posted 10-23-2011 02:23 PM ET (US)     Profile for bwhaler01  Send Email to bwhaler01     
Have any of you heard of when the new 150 hp 3.0 liter engine option will be available? I read January, but my dealer is saying March.... Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Jeff posted 10-23-2011 09:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jeff  Send Email to Jeff     
Plenty of discussion around the new Mercury 150 FourStroke here:
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020983.html[/url}
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020833.html[/url]
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020959.html
Jeff posted 10-23-2011 10:00 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jeff  Send Email to Jeff     
Lets try that again
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020833.html
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020959.html
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020983.html

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.