|
ContinuousWave Whaler Moderated Discussion Areas ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area Boston Whaler offical Release of 210 Montauk
|
Author | Topic: Boston Whaler offical Release of 210 Montauk |
Jeff |
posted 10-03-2011 02:20 PM ET (US)
Just off [the Boston Whaler] facebook page: Details and Images. Look at the motor. What a great boat. It even has a head in the console. Finally a current post -Classic I can really lust after. Still, I would love to see a twins option. With some work I bet you could shoehorn in a pair of skinny profile twins into that transom notch. Performance Charts: |
Sal A |
posted 10-03-2011 02:37 PM ET (US)
I just priced one on the site. $57,000! I would jump all over this if I didn't have to put money away to cover the new debit card feeds. Oh, and food. |
K Albus |
posted 10-03-2011 02:38 PM ET (US)
The "Build This Boat" page lists the only two available motors as the VERADO 150 and the VERADO 200. No mention of the new Mercury 150 FourStroke, even though a Performance Report is available for the new motor. See: http://www.bostonwhaler.com/page.aspx/pageid/33910/pmid/270171/ stepNumber/2/Build-This-Boat.aspx I also noticed that the Performance Reports for the New Mercury 150 FourStroke and the 200 VERADO are from a boat with a T-Top, while the Performance Report for the [VERADO] 150 is from a boat that apparently did not have a T-Top. Without the T-Top, the top speed for the 150 VERADO is marginally higher than that of the 150 FourStroke, but the 150 FourStroke has better MPG across the board. If both boats were equipped the same, I think the 150 VERADO would lose in all categories. |
themclos |
posted 10-03-2011 03:26 PM ET (US)
This is pure speculation on my part, but I am expecting the recently announced Mercury 150 HP FourStroke will be available as an option for this model, as well as for the 190 Montauk. Every promotional picture we have seen for this boat has shown the new motor. Additionally, I think this model would fare far better with a lighter motor than the VERADO. The "Build This Boat" feature on the website cannot show the new Fourstroke nor its pricing because the motor has not yet been officially released. Time will tell. But I agree with Jeff and others, I really like this model, both its size and the simplicity of the Montauk design.--Dan |
Jeff |
posted 10-03-2011 03:27 PM ET (US)
That's better. https://sites.google.com/site/rohlfingsuploads/_/rsrc/1317669839324/ home/TEMP21.jpg Photoshop, helping to give vision to dreams but, unfortunately not reality. |
themclos |
posted 10-03-2011 03:49 PM ET (US)
Jeff--No need for twins. That 150-HP FourStroke will take me out to tuna country--maybe the tips of tuna country out here--albeit with a buddy boat or two on a perfect day. With a 273-mile range at 4,000-RPM and 27.5-MPH that leaves me with 90-odd-miles out, 90-odd-miles back, and 90-miles of fuel capacity in reserve. Unless conditions are perfect--when does that happen--my 22 Outrage is typically run between 25- and 30-MPH, so, given the similar dimensions and weight, I expect this model will tolerate similar conditions in terms of comfort. Look at the pictures showing the boat's transom with the 150-HP FourStroke. The scuppers are nice and clear of the water. Where would they be with a VERADO or twins? But I like your thinking. Dan |
PeteB88 |
posted 10-03-2011 03:54 PM ET (US)
Heard rumors about this. Cool, I think. |
Jeff |
posted 10-03-2011 04:00 PM ET (US)
Dan--Needs ≤ Cool Factor. |
boatdryver |
posted 10-03-2011 04:01 PM ET (US)
themclos--on a boat with 8-foot 6-inch beam I doubt the additional 60-lbs for a 200-HP VERADO would drop those scuppers significantly. [A] 150-HP on this boat with 70-gallons of fuel , several people, and ice, etc., may seem like a 115-HP on a 190 Montauk.--jJimL |
tjxtreme |
posted 10-03-2011 04:31 PM ET (US)
Its nice to know you can take care of business inside the console if need be. Its hard to see how it is big enough in there... |
themclos |
posted 10-03-2011 04:37 PM ET (US)
Jeff--I bow to the Cool Factor argument. At my age, with threekids approaching college, a 25-year-old boat with a 9-year-old motor is about as cool as I get to be these days.--Dan |
PeteB88 |
posted 10-03-2011 05:10 PM ET (US)
Right on Dan, I'm through being cool. |
Mambo Minnow |
posted 10-03-2011 07:19 PM ET (US)
The press release mentions an option for a 200-HP motor. Do you think this is the L4 VERADO 200-HP or an uprated version of the new 150 FourStroke? |
tedious |
posted 10-03-2011 07:45 PM ET (US)
The performance results indicate it's the VERADO 200.--Tim |
SpongeBob |
posted 10-03-2011 08:44 PM ET (US)
I'm with you Jeff, this is the only new whaler that interests me. And it does interest me especially with your photo shop twins!--Jeff |
jimh |
posted 10-03-2011 09:56 PM ET (US)
This new 21-foot Boston Whaler reminds me of the classic 22-foot hull. The extra width of the new hull makes up for the missing foot of length. |
jimh |
posted 10-03-2011 10:30 PM ET (US)
Is the T-Top a standard feature? Or an option? |
Jeff |
posted 10-03-2011 10:51 PM ET (US)
The T-Top is an option.
|
Russ 13 |
posted 10-04-2011 01:23 AM ET (US)
I like the design, and the power options......but $57,000.00 for a 21 foot boat....WHAT!! That is way off the chart!! My last new boat an 04 21 foot Seapro with a 200 Yamaha & Aluminum trailer, custom T-top, two live wells, stainless boarding ladder, etc. was LESS THAN 1/2 THAT, for comparison. ... Don't see B W selling too many at that price in today's economy. |
Peter |
posted 10-04-2011 07:38 AM ET (US)
Based on the performance reports, the new 150 Fourstroke looks like it is every bit as powerful as the Verado 150 and more fuel efficient. Assuming they offer the FourStroke 150 as the base outboard motor, I don't see many opting for the Verado 150 on the 210 Montauk unless they have to have DTS. |
tedious |
posted 10-04-2011 07:43 AM ET (US)
I'm thinking an eTec 200HO would be really nice on that boat - oh wait a minute, it's a modern Whaler, no choices allowed... |
prj |
posted 10-04-2011 09:28 AM ET (US)
Not to mention that E-TEC would likely match the new powerful Mercury FourStroke 150's performance at a much higher price, Tim! Nice looking boat, again harkening back to Whaler's halcyon years in both styling and simplicity. The 210's extra foot of beam against the Classic 22's extra foot of length certainly shouldn't improve the ride any, but perhaps additional weight will offset that length to beam ratio disadvantage. One might say this new 210 Montauk is the 2010s equivalent to the 1980s Outrage-22. You know, a bit cheaper in appearance, lowered standards of expectation and lacking a degree of design sophistication. Sort of a text-message version of the classic. |
whaler131 |
posted 10-04-2011 10:59 AM ET (US)
Nice boat, but I would not give up my 1988 outrage with a 200 evinrude and jack plate. That is paid for. :) |
tedious |
posted 10-04-2011 04:00 PM ET (US)
Oh, I think it's just possible that the eTec 200HO would better the performance of the Merc 150. But it's not about one motor vs. another, it's about having a choice. Which I don't with a modern Whaler, which is why I'll never own one. Tim |
andygere |
posted 10-04-2011 04:39 PM ET (US)
Decent looking boat that will no doubt be popular among new Whaler buyers. That said, I continue to be amazed that the designers don't seem to acknowledge that a lot of folks will want an auxiliary motor, and like other modern era Montauks, this one has no provision for adding one. Doesn't anybody at Brunswick, Inc. want to sell a 9.9 Pro kicker with every new Montauk? It's clear that the market has trended towards single engine power on boats even larger than this one, but the need for reliable auxiliary power seems to be ignored. Sometimes I wonder if there is anything left of the Boston Whaler company that made my '89 Outrage 22... |
Sojo81007 |
posted 10-04-2011 06:18 PM ET (US)
Beautiful boat! I'm glad to see a bigger Montauk. The Montauks are my favorite new Whalers because they seem to retain some of styling/features of the old classics. If I bought a new BW it would be a Montaukk 170. |
flawton |
posted 10-10-2011 11:17 AM ET (US)
Nice to see the straight gunnel lines with a more squared off look. Whaler lost me with the sloping rear in recent years. $57K, I just don't see the value there. I'll wait and find one in a few years that someone has repowered with a yamaha. |
diveorfish |
posted 10-10-2011 06:03 PM ET (US)
$57k sounds outrageous for that boat, but remember that’s list price. When it’s time to talk turkey the price comes down. I don’t know the markup on boats, but it is very high. Just for comparison: back in 2002 a fully loaded, with trailer, leftover new 2001 23 Outrage listed for $88k. The dealership was offering it up for $58k. That is a 34% discount and I doubt the dealership would offer it up at a loss. Take 25% discount and the price for the 21 Montauk comes in around $42k which is much more palatable. No matter how you slice it though, Whalers aren’t cheap. I’m now curious what the classics cost when they were new relative to today’s dollars. |
phatwhaler |
posted 10-10-2011 06:39 PM ET (US)
My 1996 19/20 Outrage with a 150 EFI, T-top and aluminum trailer was 35g's out the door. I don't know what number you guys want to use for inflation, but this 57K for a new 21 Foot whaler with a outboard that uses half the fuel, seems about right to me. At least for an asking price. |
lizard |
posted 10-10-2011 07:12 PM ET (US)
For $57K, you can get the Everglades 243 Center Console. Last year, at the boat show, there was one fully outfitted for $57 or $58K. It was not a boat show only price. POWER/MOTOR OF CHOICE. The fit and finish on the boat clearly exceeded that of Whalers at the same boat show. Way more items were standard vs options. Here is a link to that boat: http://www.evergladesboats.com/boats/243cc.php I agree that this 21 Montauk is a nice boat, but dollar for dollar, my opinion is that it does not come close to the Everglades. |
striper swiper |
posted 10-10-2011 10:33 PM ET (US)
There is usually a discount on new boats but then they add freight and make ready and there goes most of the discount. plus taxes . |
GreatBayNH |
posted 10-14-2011 08:46 AM ET (US)
I'll buy in NH (No Sales Tax) with your money and gift it back to you if that helps. |
Jkcam |
posted 10-15-2011 05:43 AM ET (US)
Just to clue you guys in. It is cool, to not be cool. |
BMR |
posted 10-20-2011 07:36 AM ET (US)
I am not sure where the price you have quoted is from, but I found this on a florida dealer's website:
MSRP: $ 104,055.00 Horsepower: 300HP |
lizard |
posted 10-20-2011 11:30 AM ET (US)
The dealer from Long Beach, CA gave us the quote. |
bwhaler01 |
posted 10-23-2011 02:23 PM ET (US)
Have any of you heard of when the new 150 hp 3.0 liter engine option will be available? I read January, but my dealer is saying March.... Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. |
Jeff |
posted 10-23-2011 09:58 PM ET (US)
Plenty of discussion around the new Mercury 150 FourStroke here: http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020983.html[/url} http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020833.html[/url] http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020959.html |
Jeff |
posted 10-23-2011 10:00 PM ET (US)
Lets try that again http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020833.html http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020959.html http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020983.html |
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.