Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  Fed boat bought with fines used for fun (there's a BW tie-in)

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Fed boat bought with fines used for fun (there's a BW tie-in)
crabby posted 02-18-2012 08:33 AM ET (US)   Profile for crabby   Send Email to crabby  
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017537782_noaaboat18m. html

===============================================================

Federal fish cops in Seattle bought a $300,000 luxury boat to spy on whale-watching tours, but it was used as "a fishermen-funded party boat for bureaucrats," said U.S. Sen. Scott Brown.

By Craig Welch

Seattle Times environment reporter


Federal fish cops in Seattle bought a $300,000 luxury boat to spy on whale-watching tours — but didn't go through an appropriate bidding process, held barbecues onboard, ferried friends and family across Puget Sound to restaurants and resorts, and used the boat for what one visitor called "a pleasure cruise."

When confronted, one federal employee in Seattle misled inspectors about how the vessel was used, and one interfered with federal investigators, according to an internal investigation by the Commerce Department. Those documents were released Friday by U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass.

At issue is a 35-foot, 14-passenger boat purchased by federal agents with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) using money seized from fishermen who violated the law.

The 2008 purchase wasn't illegal, according to the Commerce Department, but federal agents manipulated the acquisition process and misrepresented the urgency and need for the vessel.

The fisheries service, a division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has a law-enforcement branch employing special agents with the same powers as the FBI. They police the Endangered Species Act and other crimes against marine creatures, from poaching to fishing commercially in closed waters or out of season.

The boat ultimately was used for just 119 hours, according to the documents, and remains moored in Western Washington.

"The sad truth is that it was a fishermen-funded party boat for bureaucrats," Brown said on the Senate floor Friday.

Blistering reviews

Brown, a harsh critic of NOAA chief Jane Lubchenco's environmental policies, has repeatedly called for her resignation after a series of scathing inspector general (IG) reports in 2010 that criticized heavy-handed fisheries enforcement and mismanagement of an asset-seizure fund.

The blistering reviews focused almost exclusively on fisheries agents in New England and managers in D.C., one of whom was reassigned after shredding documents.

But this week Brown received a heavily redacted follow-up report about misuse of a Boston Whaler bought by the Seattle law-enforcement branch.

In a statement, NOAA officials said the agency has since "conducted a top-to-bottom overhaul of its enforcement program. We hired new leadership, implemented new policies to ensure consistent enforcement practices nationwide, and put in place better accounting and oversight" of its asset-forfeiture program.

The Seattle office in 2006 sought to buy a $146,000 boat to police halibut fishermen and to clandestinely keep tabs on San Juan Island whale-watching tours. Agents wanted to make sure the tours weren't harassing endangered orcas, but feared tour operators were well-behaved when agents approached in marked boats.

But after shopping online and at boat shows and talking to other cops, one agent instead submitted a request for the Whaler. The 345 Conquest comes standard with a 20-inch flat-screen TV, hardwood cabin floors and vanity countertops, which cost more than twice as much as the original request: $300,787.

Questions were quickly raised.

"I don't understand from the document exactly what NOAA is purchasing the boat for," one agency-procurement official wrote in 2008. "Why is this exact model the only one that meets the minimum requirements?"

That official didn't even know it had been purchased until approached by investigators two years later. He said the whole process was "wired from the start to get that one boat."

Cruising Puget Sound

The first time a fisheries-service agent boarded the boat in June 2008, he brought his wife and a friend. They ran out of gas, called Seattle Harbor Patrol and had to be towed back to the Ship Canal.

They refueled and motored the boat through the Ballard Locks to the dockside Boat Shed Restaurant in Bremerton, had dinner and then returned to Seattle.

A month later the same agent took the boat to Poulsbo for lunch and went back to Seattle. He picked up some friends who brought aboard a six-pack of beer and sped down to Gig Harbor for dinner at Tides Tavern. One passenger told investigators the trip was "every bit a pleasure cruise."

A few days later, the same employee briefly got stranded in the boat in a shipping lane while taking his wife to a restaurant in Everett.

Twice that summer, while the boat was moored at Elliott Bay Marina, a fisheries-service employee grilled burgers and hot dogs with a small group that included at least two other special agents. A supervisor told an employee his wife could come aboard any time and "kick back and watch TV." One agent later told investigators the gatherings kept up the vessel's appearance as a recreational boat and not an unmarked-police vessel.

Once in August 2008, the boat ferried around a special agent's visiting parents, eventually dropping them off at the Semiahmoo Resort in Blaine, Whatcom County. The boat that day blew out a $10,000 engine as a result of what investigators called "operator error." The boat's first use in an actual undercover capacity didn't take place until the next summer.

When internal investigators learned about the boat in 2010, one employee gave such contradictory answers, investigators called the statement "disingenuous and not credible."

NOAA officials, in a statement, said, "NOAA cannot discuss the nature or results of specific personnel actions. Appropriate action has been or will be taken."

The agency has since banned use of the boat and is in the process of surplusing it, agency spokesman Connie Barclay said in an email.

jimh posted 02-18-2012 09:17 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
A 345 CONQUEST is a very luxurious boat. When you've got trillions of dollars to spend in a government, it is not surprising that you can waste $400,00 on a boat here and there.

I did get a laugh about the "[blown] out $10,000 engine"--Mercury must be giving away those VERADO engines to the government.

DBOutrage17 posted 02-18-2012 09:28 AM ET (US)     Profile for DBOutrage17    
"One agent later told investigators the gatherings kept up the vessel's appearance as a recreational boat and not an unmarked-police vessel."


I want to work there.

frontier posted 02-18-2012 02:17 PM ET (US)     Profile for frontier  Send Email to frontier     
It's no wonder that went unnoticed here in Washington State for over 3 years.
This state is quite good at wasting taxpayer money and hiding it.

Our state, like many, is broke.
They say they may have to cut funding for our kids education.

The Washington State Dept. of Ecology has 1745 employees (2010 figures), 332 of which make between $75,000 and $139,000 a year.

And the Washington State governor and legislature are working on gay marriage, legalizing drugs, and making plastic shopping bags illegal.

One of my favorite automotive writers, Jamie Kitman, wrote a column about when his car was rear ended.
The other driver was honest said he'd dropped a quarter and bent down to pick it up.
The author told him "whether you're an inexperienced driver or an education-slashing governor, idiocy in service of thrift doesn't make it any less idiotic"

contender posted 02-18-2012 03:01 PM ET (US)     Profile for contender  Send Email to contender     
And this surprises you how?
WT posted 02-18-2012 04:07 PM ET (US)     Profile for WT  Send Email to WT     
Governments use other people's money so waste isn't a surprise.

Governments all over the world don't seem to understand that you can't borrow your way out of debt.

Warren

jimh posted 02-18-2012 05:50 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
A few months ago I was reading a newspaper article about a new municipal fire and rescue boat just purchased and put into service for a small community in Northern Michigan. The article described the boat in detail, and extolled the many nice features. And the boat had plenty of nice features.

As I read the article I was getting madder and madder, because this boat was rather extravagant and costly for the small community's actual needs. I was expecting to eventually read in the article that a new federal grant had paid for the boat under some congressional authorization for Homeland Security. However, as I got to the end of the article, I was completely surprised by the revelation that the cost of the boat had been entirely paid for by the local community itself, and the money was collected in a volunteer fund raising effort specifically to buy the boat. That is how America used to work.

It seems wrong that I should be surprised when a small community buys itself a fire boat with its own money, and not surprised when I find out some nebulous state agency has bought itself a party boat under the guise of needing an undercover boat to spy on boaters and fishermen.

David Pendleton posted 02-18-2012 06:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for David Pendleton  Send Email to David Pendleton     
I would imagine it went a little something like this:

Public employee #1: If we're going to spy on folks, we're going to have to blend-in. Here's our government credit card, go out and buy the biggest Boston Whaler they make. Make sure you get a flat screen too.

Public employee #2: You know, if we want to blend-in, maybe we should buy something older and a little more common, like a trawler or a Sea Ray. You know, something like that...

Public employee #1: Are you still here?

dfmcintyre posted 02-18-2012 07:07 PM ET (US)     Profile for dfmcintyre  Send Email to dfmcintyre     
Hmmm. Would have been cheaper to reimburse undercover officers for taking rides on a watching tour.
an86carrera posted 02-19-2012 07:15 PM ET (US)     Profile for an86carrera  Send Email to an86carrera     
quote:
They say they may have to cut funding for our kids education.

Government does not want Smart voters.

Len

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.