Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  Upgrade to an Outrage 18 from Montauk 17

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Upgrade to an Outrage 18 from Montauk 17
930chas posted 07-27-2013 05:24 PM ET (US)   Profile for 930chas   Send Email to 930chas  
Earlier in 2013 we bought an 1986 Montauk with a 2006 Yamaha F90. The intent of the purchase was a lightweight boat that we could trailer behind my wife's van. Instead we ended up sharing a slip with some friends and are keeping it permanently in the water. Never even got a tow hitch on the van. We enjoy the boat a lot, but I feel that it just isn't meant to be kept in the water: no bilge pump, although I installed one, no cleats, and the weight of the four-stroke-cycle outboard engine really has it sitting pretty low. Also, it might be a tad small for our family of five. I was thinking of looking at an Outrage 18. It seems like it would be a better option for full time dock storage and also a roomier deck for our family. But my main concern is we love running the Montauk. It really is like no other boat I have ran. Would we lose that sense of gliding across the water with the Outrage? Again, I am not worried about the Outrage being more seaworthy. We only use this boat for fun, wake boarding, dinner cruises, beaching, etc. I am just thinking it might be more handy since it has more room, more storage and would be better adept at staying in the water. Any thoughts?
jcdawg83 posted 07-27-2013 06:39 PM ET (US)     Profile for jcdawg83    
I have a classic Montauk, and love it, it really is a great boat that does so many things well. That said, a Montauk is really a one or two person boat. More than that and it gets really tight. For a day at the beach with 4 or 5 people, with bags, chairs, umbrellas, etc; the Montauk will be very small. In my opinion, if you want to take 5 people in a boat at the same time and have everyone enjoy the day, you really need to look at something in the 20 foot range.
jimh posted 07-27-2013 08:23 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I was thinking the same thing. If you want an upgrade, go to a 20-footer.
boatdryver posted 07-27-2013 08:36 PM ET (US)     Profile for boatdryver  Send Email to boatdryver     
if seating on seats with a seatback for a group is important you might take a look at a used Dauntless 18

JimL

Peter posted 07-27-2013 08:47 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
There is a big difference in size between the Outrage 18 and the Montauk such that the Outrage is a true upgrade. If you like the Montauk, you will love the Outrage. The Outrage is much better riding.
wannabe posted 07-27-2013 08:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for wannabe  Send Email to wannabe     
I looked for a Montauk initially but when I pictured the family of four in it, I found it too tight. I happened upon an Outrage 18 and am glad I did. The Outrage 18 is two feet longer and one foot wider. The storage issue won't improve any with the eighteen.
Mambo Minnow posted 07-28-2013 08:17 AM ET (US)     Profile for Mambo Minnow  Send Email to Mambo Minnow     
I have a 1984 Montauk 17 but it is too small for my family of six. I upgraded to a 21 foot Whaler. You will get more use out of a boat this size moored in a slip. I like having the Montauk when I want just two of us to get out on the water.
930chas posted 07-28-2013 08:47 AM ET (US)     Profile for 930chas  Send Email to 930chas     
Thanks much for all the comments. I love how the Montauk is so easy and simple to run. It honestly is just a joy to run. I think going over 20' might sacrifice some of that joy and ease, but honestly don't know. Figured the 18' would give us a little bit more room to move around and also be a boat more suited for slip storage yet still have that same peaceful easy feeling...as written by Jack Tempchin and made famous by the eagles.
Marko888 posted 07-29-2013 08:43 PM ET (US)     Profile for Marko888    
I own an Outrage 18. Mine has the RPS and a 94q cooler seat in front of the console.

For cruising about, I find 4 adults to be comfortable in this boat. For salmon fishing on the west coast, 3 is the max comfortable number.

I think that if your kids are young, a family of 5 in an 18 would be fine. If the kids are in their teens, it might be a bit tight.

Our family owned a Montauk 17 in the 80's, which inspired me to get the 18 a couple of years ago. Same Whaler feel of sledding a long with the wind in your face, standing at the helm, but the 18 is more comfortable in every way...except maybe at the the fuel dock!

Ridge Runner posted 07-29-2013 10:16 PM ET (US)     Profile for Ridge Runner  Send Email to Ridge Runner     
I am not sure what the budget range you would be looking at, but a used 190 Montauk would be a nice option.
930chas posted 07-30-2013 04:29 PM ET (US)     Profile for 930chas  Send Email to 930chas     
Thanks again for all the comments. A good friend of mine, who's opinion I trust, has suggested that I really should concentrate on finding a 22' outrage, but, man, that is quite a step up from a 17' Montauk, amd I am concerned that it will just be too much boat. I love the manueverability of the smaller boat and don't know if I will lose that with this 22'. Again, just looking for thoughts from people who have first hand knowledge of both boats. Thanks much.
themclos posted 07-30-2013 05:06 PM ET (US)     Profile for themclos  Send Email to themclos     
I moved up from a 17 Montauk to a 22 Outrage Cuddy. My wife and I were out on the boat last week and fondly remembering how the kids and dog would sit up front and go airborne when we would hit some waves. The kids loved it.

There is no comparison, but there is more upkeep. Depending on the motor, the gas hit may not be too bad as the Outrage is pretty economical as 22 footers go.

If you have teak, there is maintenance there.

I would consider a 190 Montauk if finances allow. It would keep things pretty simple as well.

Good luck. It is a good dilemma to have.

Dan

whalerdude posted 07-30-2013 11:56 PM ET (US)     Profile for whalerdude  Send Email to whalerdude     
I have owned a Montauk 17, Outrage 19 (current boat) and Outrage 22.

The Outrage 19 is perfect! The 22 was just too big. The 22 is a lot heavier too so when operating you feel a lot of mass wanting to porpoise. I felt I needed a full size v8 SUV or pickup.

The OR 19 is easy to tow with my 6 cylinder BMW SUV.

One thing that was more fun in the Montauk was that you felt like you were skipping over the waves. The OR 19 rides much better but you feel like you always have part of the bow chines touching the water.

martyn1075 posted 07-31-2013 03:00 AM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
For many the Outrage 22 is one of the best all around boat ever made by Whaler It sounds to me by the description you are fighting a bit of what the 22 offers. What's holding you back is it may be too large so instead the 18 outrage may do the job. If I were to just keep the boat at the dock I would go for the 22. However things to consider the power is much larger and more importantly to re-power will be more expensive. If you ever need to pull the boat a larger trailer and fairly good size vehicle is required. If you need to store it its doable but becomes not as easy as the 17-19 which can be tucked away in most homes driveways or secondary parking without looking like you have a house somewhere in behind the boat.

Martyn

930chas posted 07-31-2013 06:42 AM ET (US)     Profile for 930chas  Send Email to 930chas     
I definitely appreciate all the advice and shared experiences. I think we are going to go with the 22'. I had found the 18' I wanted, and then oops stumbled upon a really nice 22'. It looks like the 22' has won. It is an '83 hull that has been completely redone (including new fuel tank ) running an Evinrude Etec 200. I will admit I am not excited about the size, but honestly feel the 18' would be too smallish. Also, agree with the above sentiments that the Montauk 19' would be about perfect, but right now it is out of the budget and I also really love the classic whalers. Thanks again.
TC posted 07-31-2013 06:51 AM ET (US)     Profile for TC  Send Email to TC     
I went from a classic Montauk to a Gaurdian 18 (same hull as a classic outrage 18) for many of the same reasons you described. It was a big difference. I posed the same question here and the best description I got was that a Montauk is a big little boat, while an Outrage 18 is a little big boat. The difference in a big chop was significant, and having a large built in gas tank was a big plus. On the other hand, I recently went to a Grady White walkaround, and find I miss the feeling of surfing on top of water after a week's vacation boating in sound/ocean waters. I also realize that fond memories of past boats and vehicles always conveniently leave out the day to day negatives and focus on the nostalgic good times.
Peter posted 07-31-2013 07:29 AM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
I sold my first Outrage 18 to a family that owned a Montauk 17. The father and the two kids came to the sea trial which happened to be on a day with a wind driven chop. The two kids sat on the cooler seat in front of the console while the dad stood behind the console next to me while I drove. Just before hitting the first wave at an angle I could see the kids brace themselves and duck. After we passed through the wave I watched them look at each other and laugh. I asked the dad what that was all about and he explained that in their Montauk if they hit a wave like that under the same conditions, they usually got soaked by the spray so they were preparing themselves for getting wet but it didn't happen.

It wasn't until a few years later when I had some time behind the Montauk console that I discovered exactly what they expecting when hitting waves at that angle. In the right wind and wave conditions, the Montauk can have a tendency to get you wet. In those same conditions, that won't happen in the Outrage 18. While only 2 feet longer, the Outrage 18 is a MUCH better big sea boat -- softer and drier ride.

Having owned two Outrage 18s and having spent considerable time in a Montauk 17, for the kind of boating I do I would never own a Montauk if I could have an Outrage 18.

Jay Fitz posted 07-31-2013 09:51 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jay Fitz  Send Email to Jay Fitz     
Please let us know how you feel about the 22 compared to the Montauk after you have some time with it. I'm in the same situation, I am looking into moving up from a Montauk 17 to a Revenge 22 as my wife wants a porta potty and some shelter/cabin as well. That is my biggest concern, the difference in handling with the 22 vs. the Montauk. The Revenge and Outrage 22 are the same hull if I'm not mistaken.
martyn1075 posted 07-31-2013 11:37 PM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
I did that same jump for pretty much the same reasons. Towing was largest drawback for me. Moving a 17 around was like not even knowing it was there (weight) Plenty of room on either side no blind spots. I remember times where we took it though the drive thru McDonalds. Also on very low tides it was a breeze even with one person. The 22 makes you think twice. The same vehicle with the 17 was right on the too small side for the 22 Revenge. It worked but not really all that well and boy you could feel the weight. Even with a large truck the boat sits high on the trailer its definitely a different best in that regard. Otherwise the boat was fantastic great in many nasty sea conditions. Surfing style with a following sea or head on the water breaks over the molded top and races off the sides back into the water.

Martyn

930chas posted 08-01-2013 06:42 AM ET (US)     Profile for 930chas  Send Email to 930chas     
After much thought, I actually went back to the 18'. I have a great repoire with the seller, he is so passionate about his boat, the boat itself is just an amazing specimen, and most importantly I think for the near future it will just fit our needs better then the 22'. We aren't really bad weather or offshore boaters, it is more tubing, wakeboarding, and beach tie ups so no need to have more boat then is needed for those simple tasks. Now it is just the wait for it to arrive!
PeteB88 posted 08-02-2013 07:27 PM ET (US)     Profile for PeteB88  Send Email to PeteB88     
I have a 95 Outrage 17 which I got instead of a Montauk. Purchase criteria then was it had to be easy to tow and ground handle. We got the bonus plan for sure - had her out all day yesterday on inland lake with channel to Lake Michigan (it was snotty out there and no fun conditions for Montauk from what I know about them point is if I wanted to go in 3s, 4s I could do it no problem but no illusions about comparing to 22 or bigger, heavier boat)

I think Montauks are incredible. I don't think you drive a Montauk, I think you wear it like great skis, or a cutting horse or KTM motorcycle - an incredible MTB bike that is nimble on the trickiest trails. There is a feel and a vibe about that boat like no other I've experienced and at times I wish I had that with my boat. More specifically, I get in situations where water is shallow and I want to fish top waters - My 13 is perfect and 40 yamaha is bombproof sucking muck and weeds or filtering not sure which - Montauk would probably be great too.

In n any case I see a bigger boat in our future but after days like yesterday we feel super lucky and happy with Outrage 17 + that huge console

mkelly posted 08-07-2013 10:55 PM ET (US)     Profile for mkelly  Send Email to mkelly     
What I find with my 19' Outrage is a definite upgrade in handling of water & seaworthiness....but I'm 40 now & many of the smaller center consoles are not great for more than two people, and you have to stand all day. My two cents, particularly if you have a family day on the boat, a dual console 18-20 would be your best bet. Kids can ride up front when cruising without getting bounced around, mom & dad can sit in the back dual seats, add'l seats on the back next to the motor. Makes for a great day of fishing, crabbing, water sports, etc. I'm looking for a good dual Whaler or (sorry Whaler-ites), Grady makes a great dual console. I'll let you know if I'm struck by lighting.....
pcrussell50 posted 08-07-2013 11:37 PM ET (US)     Profile for pcrussell50  Send Email to pcrussell50     
quote:
& many of the smaller center consoles are not great for more than two people, and you have to stand all day.

AFAICT, for HARDCORE fishing, which the previous owner of my classic 17 was, it's almost a one-man boat. Mine has no seats at all, all in the name of deck space. But I am nowhere near the hardcore fisherman that Brian/Fishnff is. I think he used his alone a lot. OTOH, I take my clutzy landlubber brother and senior citizen mother out in it all the time. If it's smooth out, a passenger can sit on a large cooler in front of the console like a stock Montauk. If it's rough, the ride is surprisingly good in the back of the boat. We have discovered that it's pretty darned comfy to sit on a duffel bag of beach towels just in front of the transom. A long duffel becomes like a lounger. You sit low, but the low freeboard makes the height of the gunwale feel about right anyway.

Not trying to talk anyone out of a bigger boat like an Outrage. The Whaler collector in me wants an Outrage 17/18, (I already have a Montauk and a 13), and I'm jealous of the folks that have one when I don't. But I can't honestly say that I _need_ one for my uses.

In my nearly 5 years as a boater, only a few blocks from the launch ramp at either residence, the boat that gets used the most is the small one that is quickest to get wet when I decide on a whim to go boating... which I often do after a hot day of yard work, because I live close to ramp.

-Peter

russellbailey posted 08-08-2013 07:16 AM ET (US)     Profile for russellbailey  Send Email to russellbailey     
I went from a Striper 15 to an Outrage 25. Don't let the size intimidate you. With the right setup it is not a big deal, but you can't really cheat and force things with the larger boat. I solely trailer boat, often on lakes, often for water sports. Last week my siblings families and mine all rode around in the boat and managed and had fun. Unless you run a lot of hours I doubt the fuel economics are that different, and the purchase and maintenance costs once you get into the 18+ Outrage sizes are not all that different. The bigger ones do take a truck-based vehicle to tow. I'm enjoying the 25 for our uses.
EJO posted 08-08-2013 10:10 AM ET (US)     Profile for EJO  Send Email to EJO     
So what is wrong with a Montauk 170 or 190 with the two transom seats. We test drove a 170 with my two adult sons, wife and salesman (5 adults for sure 1,000 (due to our sizes)) and had now problem with two at the helm two or on on the cooler up front and two or one in one of the transom seats.
The 90HP bigfoot shot out of the hole fine and speed was good and with a 1 ft wind chop we all stayed dry in 50 degree weather.
I wish the Admiral would have said OK as I think for value it is a better buy than the Dauntless of equal size at 30% more expensive with the same power.
The Montauk is quicker on plane and out of the hole to 30 mph, runs more efficient, plus the Montauk looks more like a Whaler. If the Dauntless didn't have a logo on it, it could be any other 17 to 20 ft family dual C bowrider, except it is of much better quality than the 4-Winns, Bayliners, Regals, Monterreys, Rinkers, etc.
Go with a 19ft Montauk, simple, easy to maintain, easy to trailer, less expensive all conclude into more fun for the family.
whalerdude posted 08-08-2013 11:25 AM ET (US)     Profile for whalerdude  Send Email to whalerdude     
You will not regret getting the OR 18'
Peter posted 08-08-2013 11:26 AM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
"So what is wrong with a Montauk 170 or 190 with the two transom seats.?"

In my view, it just doesn't have the eye catching personality that a classic Outrage 18 has. No "integrated" Mills' canvas system quickly turning a center console boat into a wet weather "cabin cruiser".

930chas posted 08-08-2013 07:29 PM ET (US)     Profile for 930chas  Send Email to 930chas     
Completely agree with whalerdude and peter. The montauk 190 is nice, but doesn't speak to me the way the classic outrage does. I think it will be the perfect family setup for the next couple of years and again so appreciate all the comments and thoughts on the topic!
Peter posted 08-08-2013 07:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
In all my years of owning boats, the Outrage 18 is the only boat I bought for my use and enjoyment twice. In my opinion, it is still the best boat Whaler ever made.
martyn1075 posted 08-08-2013 09:41 PM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
I agree with Peter its probably the best al around boat for the majority. It can do everything almost, but cost a fraction of the cost a big one would and it's easily trailerble as well kept covered for pennies.

Martyn

mkelly posted 08-08-2013 10:19 PM ET (US)     Profile for mkelly  Send Email to mkelly     
Have to agree on the 18' Outrage (if CC is what you want), I have the 19' & a buddy of mine has the 18'. They are fantastic, fast, fun & easy to run & maintain. 20' Outrage I'm guessing is great as well...try to find a mid '90's 21' Outrage. Again, if you want to sit & relax a bit, dual console.
pcrussell50 posted 08-08-2013 11:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for pcrussell50  Send Email to pcrussell50     
Do even the small Outrages have below-deck fuel tanks? I don't think I like those, based on what I've read about them and problems thereof. I would think an 18 footer might still be in the on-deck plastic tank category.

-Peter

Marko888 posted 08-09-2013 01:30 AM ET (US)     Profile for Marko888    
The 18/19 Outrage has a built-in 63 gallon fuel tank beneath the floor.
Don SSDD posted 08-10-2013 08:33 AM ET (US)     Profile for Don SSDD    
I'm looking at upgrading from a 17 Montauk 1987 with 2 stroke 1998 Merc 90. Considering a 170 or 2 OR's, a 1997 20 with 97 200 Merc Offshore 2 stroke and a 1998 ORII 18 with a 1998 Evinrude Oceanpro 115 2 stroke. The 2 OR's have the same asking price and similar condition and it looks like they would be a similar weight, give or take 200 lbs? Will both fit on a single axle trailer?
I use my boat off a mooring in Mahone Bay so I never trailer it far. I am looking to upgrade to get a drier boat in 2 or 3 foot seas and a better ride.
I read this thread, it has been quite helpful. I would also consider a OR 18 up to a 1992, they look like a great option if I could find one worth buying here locally.
Thanks.

Don

RandyV posted 08-24-2013 11:00 AM ET (US)     Profile for RandyV  Send Email to RandyV     
I just got what I thought was an extremely good deal on a 2000 Outrage 18. This model year (and maybe 2001?) seems to be an anomaly with the hull being very deep, a 90gal tank(I think) and full 8' beam. I'm having the main motor (Optimax 225) checked out right now and the kicker (evinrude 15) fixed.

Getting into this Outrage 18 as compared to the 1979 Montauk 17 (I'm now selling), is like stepping onto a basketball court. There is so much room it is amazing! I can't wait to get it on the water and see how it performs. I am expecting nothing less than a major change in every aspect of our Walleye fishing experiences in Lake Erie. This should make a day on the typical Lake Eric Chop much more tolerable. I believe that a day trip/cruise with up to 5 adult sized people would not be too crowded given the 2 stern seats, helm seat and front Cooler seat.

Anyone with experience with this hull, what kind of performance should I expect out of it with the 225 Optimax? Is the 15 Evinrude (4 stroke) going to be too much for a use as a trolling motor? I have to believe that there might be excessive weight on the transom with so much HP hanging off the back.

RandyV posted 09-01-2013 08:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for RandyV  Send Email to RandyV     
Well, we had a chance to take the 2000 Outrage 18 on a 60 mile run up & down the Detroit River today from the Trenton area and into Lake Erie a bit. WOW! What a difference from the 1979 Montauk 17 we own. 2' wider beam and 1.5' longer doesn't seem like that much until you are in it and on the water. The Outrage 18 really feels like a big water boat and seems to handle the chop like a hot knife through butter compared to the Montauk. The Optimax 225 jumps it on plane very quickly - almost feels overpowered but it is nice. As a quick guess, we burned about 12-14 gallons of fuel (no flow sensor yet).

My wife said we might want to keep the Montauk because it is so easy to use on smaller inland lakes - Not sure if I want to maintain 2 boats though . . . what a dilemma to have. Two wonderful boats with totally different characteristics. One Classic, one not classic each great in their own right. Now I can't wait to get some walleye fishing time out on Lake Erie in the Outrage.

Moose posted 09-01-2013 11:59 PM ET (US)     Profile for Moose  Send Email to Moose     
RandyV,

I have the same model, yeah, they they an amazing amount of boat jammed in to 18 feet, eh? The link is a 1999 model, somehow over the years I've lost the link for the 2000 year, but they were identical from my understanding. To the best of my knowledge this model was only available as a 1999 and a 2000, not as a 2001.

http://web.archive.org/web/20000301233722/http://www.whaler.com/Boats/ outrage18.html

As far as performance, I'm still with the orginal outboard that came with it, a 2000 Optimax 150. Sadly mine does not have any clever modern gauges to provide precise fuel use numbers. My best calculations have consistantly provided evidence that I'm somewhere in the area of 4 miles per gallon. It took me quite a few years to get comfortable with that and stop using 2.5 - 3 MPG to base my gas purchases on. I was constantly over buying gas on trips and towing it home with more in the tank than I started the trip with.

Speed has never been big with me, but in flat water with two people on board I've seen 38-40 MPH at about 4,500 - 4,600 RPM. I've only seen 4 or 5 other boats of this model over the 13 seasons I've owned mine, but never with anything larger than a 175 HP, I'd be interested in hearing how much higher your top end may be with the 225 and how the gas consumption compares, 60 miles on 14 gallons sounds pretty good.

Have fun out there,

Steve

RandyV posted 09-02-2013 07:30 AM ET (US)     Profile for RandyV  Send Email to RandyV     
Top speed for the day on the gps was 43mph with a wide open RPM of 5000rpm. It seems to me that the 225hp should push it faster so maybe it isn't propped right. It has a 3 blade Mirage Plus 3 blade 48-18278-17P prop on it and the motor height seems correct. The anti cavitation plate is above the bottom line of the boat a couple of inches. In any case, 40+ is plenty fast enough for me. I don't need a 50 MPH boat. By the way, I was able to stay on plane down to about 20 mph in fairly flat water going straight. Any lower and it started to drop off plane. 25 - 35 mph felt very comfortable depending on how the chop was. I didn't play with motor trim much. First time out with it and I was more concerned with everything else and trying to enjoy the day. Tweaking will come later.

Hey! there was a nice tall boat festival on the Canadian side. I am amazed how nice the Canadians have made their river front look from the water side. It is disgraceful how ugly Detroit looks from the Canadian side. We are not doing them any favors in what they have to look at when looking West across the river.

I have another prop that was given to me with the boat which was on the original Merc 135. It is a 4 blade Trophy, 48-825942A45-25p. I am not a prop guy so I don't know what it would do on the 225. If I had to guess, it would spin up too high on the RPM range. Maybe someone here can tell me (I know this is a subject for "performance" but we sometimes get sidetracked).

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.