Author
|
Topic: Evinrude 60 vs Evinrude 70
|
Wayneman |
posted 04-14-2003 03:34 PM ET (US)
Hello there: Other than the 70 having 3 cylinders and the 60 2, do you think there is a large difference in performance on my old 1964 Nauset? The engine year is 1981 and in good condition. Thank you for any feedback.
|
JBCornwell
|
posted 04-14-2003 04:04 PM ET (US)
Hi, Wayneman.Evinrude also made 3 and 4 cylinder 60HP engines. The 3 cylinder, 70HP looper should show a lot more torque than the 2 cylinder, 60HP looper, and about 5mph more top end. I considered the 70 the perfect engine for a 16-17 Whaler until the JohnnyZukiRude 70 4 stroke came along. Red sky at night. . . JB |
Bigshot
|
posted 04-14-2003 04:23 PM ET (US)
It will be fine but probably about 3-4mph slower than the 70. |
whalernut
|
posted 04-15-2003 09:22 PM ET (US)
I would think the 2 cyl 60 would weigh less? Better fuel mileage? Also, a 2cyl should troll slower than a 3 cyl, a big plus in my book :) Jack. |
captbone
|
posted 04-15-2003 09:24 PM ET (US)
The 60 2 cylinder is very close to a new 50 hp. The 40,50,60 2 cylinder omcs were the same and the 60 have not been made for a while. |
sargerator
|
posted 04-16-2003 06:53 PM ET (US)
Saw a '98 Rude 60hp 2 weeks ago, next to a '93 70hp rude. Looked like they used same block . It was a 3 cylinder. Sarge |
Bigshot
|
posted 04-17-2003 10:26 AM ET (US)
Yes they are.....after 1985 or 1986 when they changed the 60hp to a 3cyl. |