Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: Whaler Repairs/Mods
  RPS "Z" Legs

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   RPS "Z" Legs
prj posted 02-27-2004 09:51 AM ET (US)   Profile for prj   Send Email to prj  
In light of the conversation in the Marketplace Forum,
I have a few questions regarding the plastic RPS legs.

I've recently purchased an 18' Outrage
w/ the RPS, unfortunately, the vessel is in VA,
half the country and a full mindset away.

Q: What type of degradation is occuring
to these legs such that many here feel the need
to replace them?

Q: Is there a specific weak point, such as a thinner
anchorage location, that tends to fail?

Q: Are there only brown legs, or have black legs
also been produced/installed?

Q: If there are brown and black legs, does anyone know
which color may have been installed on a '90 18' Outrage?

Thanks for the assistance.

kamie posted 02-27-2004 10:36 AM ET (US)     Profile for kamie  Send Email to kamie     
prj,

I'll try to answer some of your questions. I'm sure someone will jump in if I get it wrong.


Type of Degradition? I don't know of anything specific except what the effects of wind, water, sun and plain time will do to resin.

Specific part of the unit that fails. I have not heard of anyone that sat on their RPS one day only to find themselves on the deck

According to Tom, "brown plastic resin (1975-1994), white plastic resin (1991-199?) and black plastic resin (1995-2002)" So the 1990 Outrage would have had brown legs. http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/004236.html


As for me, I want to purchase the legs to make an RPS since my 18' Outrage didn't come with one(other half considers the captins chairs comfy only for skiny folks). Unless of course I can sneak away with the one on your boat they are very hard to find. Also for anyone that has an RPS and wants to keep their boat forever if the legs go there will be no way to replace them. The OEM supplier isn't making them since BW isn't using them. There are black ones available at $118.50 each or $237.00 for a pair. While those last I might add, because if you need a pair in 10 years you will probably be SOL. At least one member needs/wants to replace the current legs on his RPS, others of us are looking for parts to build our first one because we are tired of waiting for one to popup on ebay or just want spare parts while we can get them.

Tom W Clark posted 02-27-2004 10:41 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Patrick,

A: The typical degradation that is suffered by these plastic legs is discoloration or fading. The plastic deteriorates and becomes "bleached out" and the surface can even become a bit fuzzy. The plastic legs almost never actually break.

A: No, there is no weak point that I am aware of for the plastic legs. I am sure that if subjected to extreme stress under laboratory conditions a particular point might fail, but I do not know where that might be. The aluminum Z-legs WERE prone to breaking as well as becoming unsightly from salt water corrosion. That is why the plastic versions were developed.

A: No, there are not just brown legs. There are also white plastic legs used on the Outrage 17 and the black plastic legs that were used late in the 1990s. The original RPS Z-legs were made of unpainted aluminum, however. These were in production from 1970 when they were first designed to c. 1974.

A: A 1990 Outrage 19 (not Outrage 18) would have had the brown Z-legs if the optional RPS was installed.

It should also be pointed out that there were two versions of the brown Z-legs. The first made from 1975 to c. 1980 were modeled on the aluminum ones in that they did not have the pivot frame locating notches in the top of them. The pivot frames on an RPS thus supported had blocks of plywood screwed to the underside of the seat cushion to hold the pivot frames in place.

At some point they figured it would be better to alter the Z-leg mold and cast semi-circular notched into the top of the legs thus simplifying the assembly of the RPS.

prj posted 02-27-2004 11:32 AM ET (US)     Profile for prj  Send Email to prj     
Many thanks for the excellent responses, Gents.

I've asked my father to look at the boat
in his driveway to determine whether I should
jump on board the RPS leg order in Marketplace.

Curious on two points:

1. How did Tom accurately get my first name...

2. While I don't have my HIN information handy,
I recall the bill of sale indicating it was a 1990 hull
and photographs (that I keep in my wallet)
clearly show the port side decal reading " Outrage-18 "
I'll have to check on the HIN, though no real concern.

Thanks again.

Tom W Clark posted 02-27-2004 11:55 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Patrick,

1. I can put two and two together. Your firm's web site is referred to in your profile, as well as the fact you pointed to it in another thread.

2. Maybe it's a 1989 model? Maybe some of the 18' 6" long Outrages they made in 1990 received the last of the Outrage 18 decals? Who knows. It doesn't really matter; It's the exact same boat either way.

I honestly doubt you need a replacement set of Z-legs. the ones that look bad are the ones that have been sitting outside exposed to sunlight for 20 years.

The Z-legs I had made last year as well as the black ones of recent Whaler production, have a UV stabilizer in them that the originals did not have. So theoretically, these will last longer.

whalersman posted 02-27-2004 12:20 PM ET (US)     Profile for whalersman  Send Email to whalersman     
Tom,

Just for the record on the "Notches" for the Z Legs where you state they were "not" molded in on the 1975 to c. 1980 models...

I had a 1978 Montauk with the Notches molded in.
A friend of mine has a 1977 Montauk with the Notches molded in..

I am not sure about the 1976 model..

Joe Kriz

Tom W Clark posted 02-27-2004 12:34 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Joe,

Thank you. I was not sure of when they were added. Good data points.

BillB posted 02-27-2004 01:11 PM ET (US)     Profile for BillB  Send Email to BillB     
I have the original legs from my '76 Montauk (Shipped Nov. '75) They are not notched and lack any kind of pigment.

They are coated with a whiteish paint/gelcoat? I cut a 1/4" into one with a pen knife and there is no indication that they ever had any color....just a neutral colored fiber filled resin.

Another variation?

If anyone is interested I'll measure them and take some photos this weekend.

Bill

David Jenkins posted 02-27-2004 02:40 PM ET (US)     Profile for David Jenkins  Send Email to David Jenkins     
I would love a photo. I have no idea what everybody is talking about when they mention a "notch." My 1974 boat has the older style aluminum legs.

I have ordered two sets of legs with the idea that I could lay a 1-inch thick, 1-foot wide, 4-foot-long mahogany board on top of the legs. I will not be using the legs with an RPS. Will I be able to use the new legs for this application?

whalersman posted 02-27-2004 03:28 PM ET (US)     Profile for whalersman  Send Email to whalersman     
Tom and everyone,

I must retract my last statement on the "Notches" for the RPS legs is the 1977 and 1978 Montauk model..
They "DO NOT" have the two single notches....
They have one long notch and then have the wood pieces under the seat that holds the pivot frames in place...
I drove 10 miles to my friends house to double check this as I no longer have a Montauk.

My 1985 Outrage has the 2 separate notches for the pivot frame and no wood blocks...

So, Tom was right as it appears sometime in the early 80's they changed the design of the Z legs to incorporate the 2 separate notches...

My apologies.....

Joe Kriz

David Jenkins posted 02-27-2004 03:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for David Jenkins  Send Email to David Jenkins     
I'm getting worried about these notches as I have just committed to buying two sets of legs.

Can you attach the bottom of the new legs to the deck and lay a flat board on the top of them (rather than an RPS)? Where are the notches?

BillB posted 02-27-2004 04:06 PM ET (US)     Profile for BillB  Send Email to BillB     
David,

I have a pair of the "new" brown legs from the last order. The notches will not prevent you from fastening a plank to the top. They are only large enough to accept the stainless tubing in the RPS, leaving a large "flat" for attachment of a seat.

Bill

lhg posted 02-27-2004 04:40 PM ET (US)     Profile for lhg    
I saved the original RPS legs from my 1989 Outrage when I installed the new ones from Tom. I did this only for appearance sake, to look better next to my newly varnished teak riser blocks. First of all, the old ones were still perfect structurally, just looked a little color UV faded. But the brown color of the new ones, although looking good, is nowhere near a brown color match to the originals, either on the 89 boat or my 86 boat.
David Jenkins posted 02-27-2004 07:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for David Jenkins  Send Email to David Jenkins     
Thanks, Bill. Now I understand what is meant by "notched."
Tom W Clark posted 02-27-2004 10:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
David Jenkins,

As Bill points out, the notches will do nothing to interfere with your plans.

Here is a photo a Z-leg:

http://empslc.com/c_se5.html

Note that the leg is displayed upside down and that the colors have been changed digitally. This is actually a photo of a brown leg.

It's amazing how faded those old brown legs can get, isn't it?

David Jenkins posted 02-28-2004 09:34 AM ET (US)     Profile for David Jenkins  Send Email to David Jenkins     
I will probably use them upside down, just like in the photo, unless someone can tell me a reason not to do so.
mtbadfish posted 02-28-2004 12:15 PM ET (US)     Profile for mtbadfish  Send Email to mtbadfish     
Do the new style legs have the same "footprint" top and bottom as the older early to mid '70's legs?
Tom W Clark posted 02-28-2004 12:42 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
David Jenkins,

It would probably be OK, but the tops are designed with the gussets that resist lateral bending forces, so if they are inverted, you give up a little lateral stiffness.

Also, the foot print on the deck will be bigger and you will have a slightly harder time scrubbing the deck around the legs.

Michael,

Yes. As far as I know, the foot print is the same, top and bottom.

mtbadfish posted 02-28-2004 12:55 PM ET (US)     Profile for mtbadfish  Send Email to mtbadfish     
Thanks Tom
kamie posted 02-29-2004 03:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for kamie  Send Email to kamie     
Anyone know the distance from the console to the start of the RPS legs.
Thanks
sailorson posted 03-01-2004 01:45 AM ET (US)     Profile for sailorson  Send Email to sailorson     
The RPS legs on my '95 17 Outrage were badly deteriorated and after trying pressure washing and several chemicals to restore the finish, I used a heat gun and "fused" the plastic back to a smooth surface. I don't yet know if it will endure but it looks good for now.
Tom W Clark posted 03-01-2004 11:35 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
sailorson,

Are the Z-legs on your 1995 Outrage 17 white, brown or black?

sailorson posted 03-01-2004 03:02 PM ET (US)     Profile for sailorson  Send Email to sailorson     
White
sailorson posted 03-02-2004 04:32 PM ET (US)     Profile for sailorson  Send Email to sailorson     
Another question regarding the RPS legs... Is there a front/back to the legs? I have seen pictures in Cetacea that show them oriented both ways. Did Whaler use the same legs on the Montauk and the 17 Outrage ('95)?
Tom W Clark posted 03-02-2004 05:22 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
sailorson,

The Z-legs are exaclty the same, apart from the color. Why Whaler chose to use white Z-legs only on the Outrage 17, I do not know. As far as I know, it's the only model that ever received them.

Yes, there is a front and rear, though the screws will line up either way. The legs are designed to "lean" backwards, but some people have them reversed either through personal choice or ignorance. The photos of Hooter's boat show them reversed.

sailorson posted 03-02-2004 05:55 PM ET (US)     Profile for sailorson  Send Email to sailorson     
Tom
In my case - ignorance. That's how they were installed when I purchased the boat. Oh well, one more item on an already extensive list... Thanks for all the great information. I have been mining this website for several months during my restoration project and the sharing of wisdom and experience is invaluable.

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.