|
ContinuousWave Whaler Moderated Discussion Areas ContinuousWave: Whaler Repairs/Mods Fuel Plumbing Question
|
Author | Topic: Fuel Plumbing Question |
Buckda |
posted 08-18-2010 03:48 PM ET (US)
My boat has two in-deck tanks and twin 130 HP carburated V-4 OMC's. I'd like to add a portable on-deck tank plumbed into the fuel system. Right now, the plumbing goes like this: I'd like to add a "T" fitting to one of the lines that goes into the fuel filter manifold AFTER the distribution manifold on the switch. This T fitting would lead to my on-deck tank and have a shutoff valve on it to effectively seal the line when not in use. In this setup, I could shut the main under deck tanks to "off" and just draw from the on-deck tank. When it empties, I'd be able shut off the on-deck tank and select one of the belly tanks to resume operation as normal. Any thoughts as to doing it differently? All lines would be 3/8" ID - the same as is currently on the boat. |
contender |
posted 08-18-2010 04:45 PM ET (US)
Separate fuel line and connect it right to the engine, or put your tee at the engine connection(with a shut off then you can remove the tank when not in use), use/have a shut off for the main tank and would just suck fuel out of the on deck tank....good luck |
Buckda |
posted 08-18-2010 04:56 PM ET (US)
Here's an illustration for what I'm thinking. http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31625863&l=3d5b18c4af& id=1383963684 The fuel lines are plumbed directly into the engines, so I can't just disconnect the main tanks at the engines...plus, there are two engines, so how would you do that with an auxiliary tank? I realize now that I didn't label the tanks - in my illustration, but the top two represent the twin 70 gallon belly tanks and the third one down represents the auxiliary tank. Dave |
Buckda |
posted 08-18-2010 04:58 PM ET (US)
From the brass T fitting back to the third tank would be "new" plumbing the rest is original. Realize that in the long term, this system will be re-plumbed to accomodate a second fuel filter...for now, I'm "stuck" with that portion of the setup and it won't be changed for this project. Dave |
contender |
posted 08-18-2010 09:45 PM ET (US)
Bucka: You can just put the tee where the brass manifold is and elimate some connections and the manifold. Just have another shut off for the third tank... |
Jerry Townsend |
posted 08-20-2010 12:38 PM ET (US)
Dave - Your plan - and the suggested modification by Contender will work. My only comments - 1) use the largest diameter lines and components possible to reduce the friction and improve the fuel flow, and 2) consider using ball valves - better sealing, you do not need "throttling" capability and faster operating - but a bit more expensive. ---- Jerry/Idaho |
Jerry Townsend |
posted 08-20-2010 12:42 PM ET (US)
Dave - damn - I meant to mention one more item - when possible, plumb your lines so that the normal fuel flow is via the straight thru tee run - rather than the branch tee run - -- just guves less flow restriction and resistance. --- Jerry/Idaho |
Buckda |
posted 08-20-2010 12:54 PM ET (US)
Thanks guys. The T fitting came in the mail today. I will be rigging this over the weekend. Dave |
Buckda |
posted 08-23-2010 10:15 AM ET (US)
Rigged and no leaks. Thanks for your thoughts! |
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.