ContinuousWave   Whaler   Moderated Discussion Areas   ContinuousWave: Whaler Performance   Fuel consumption: Outrage 25 with twin 150-HP Optimax Engines
 Author Topic:   Fuel consumption: Outrage 25 with twin 150-HP Optimax Engines Ector posted 06-27-2004 06:41 PM ET (US)         I took my OUTRAGE 25 with its new 150-HP Mercury Optimax engines out today for a first ride. First performance observations below. I couldn't do more than this because of the bad sea conditions:Props: Mercury LASER II 19-inch pitch with medium vent holesSea: quite high waves (3 to 5 feet ... sigh!)GPS: Garmin 126 on boardCrew: 2 people on boardFuel: about 80 gallons of gasThe boat was quick to get on plane. It was easily on plane also with an engine totally tilted up and only one engine running. The minimum plane speed about 20-knots at about 3000 RPM. In about 60 minutes at 24-knots average speeds (3300 RPM) we used about 30 litres of gas (less than 8 gallons)A second trip with 7 people on board and about 70 gallons of gas: the boat was quick on plane; not tested with one motor tilted; minimum plane speed about 20-22-knots at 3300-3400 RPM; in about 80 minutes at 24 knot average speed (3600 RPM) we used about 70 litres of gas (18 gallons)Hope to take more data next weekend. Tell me what do you think about this?Ector jimh posted 06-28-2004 07:35 AM ET (US)             With twin Optimax 150-HP engines we saw fuel economy in the range of 3 miles-per-gallon at cruising speed on a 2003 OUTRAGE 240, which is probably a heavier boat with a deeper vee hull.If you have the Smartcraft gauge option you can get instantaneous readings of fuel consumption.To convert your numbers to more familiar units:60 minutes= 1 hour24 nautical miles = 27.6 statute miles30 liters = 7.75 gallonsMPG = 27.6/7.75 = 3.56So you are reporting fuel economy of 3.5 MPG, which is in good agreement with the observation noted above. Ector posted 06-28-2004 04:42 PM ET (US)             jimh .. thank you for editing the subject and the text...i hope my observations could be useful also if my english is quite poor....!maybe the fuel consumption data (and the quality of the cruise: too much punching on the waves) could be better raising the engines one or two hole ... i think they are mounted too low on the stern (anticav plate is 1 inch under the water surface while cruising on plane and the spray is quite high)So i'll take more data after raising them up...hoping it could be interesting for the forum.Ector

 Hop to: ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General AreaContinuousWave: Whaler MarketplaceContinuousWave: Whaler Repairs/ModsContinuousWave: Whaler PerformanceContinuousWave: Cetacea CommentsContinuousWave: Small Boat ElectricalContinuousWave: Trips and RendezvousContinuousWave: Post-Classic WhalersMETA-Discussion