Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: Whaler Performance
  Time to Re-Power my Montauk

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Time to Re-Power my Montauk
Musky_Don posted 10-18-2005 12:36 PM ET (US)   Profile for Musky_Don   Send Email to Musky_Don  
Hi All. I just joined the forum - found it during a Google search. Great site.

Anyway, it is time for me to re-power my 85 Montauk. I'd like to spring for a new 90 E-Tec, but with the new rigging/controls, plate, etc. it is out of my budget range. I found a 2002 90 Johnson 2-cycle from a dealer that I trust for $5700. The motor is new, comes with the Johnson warranty which was 1 year at the time. I am hesitant as this motor is pretty close to the quality issues time at Johnson. I am also thinking that if I buy a new motor I may be better off buying in the fuel efficient/emission friendly spectrum of offerings. I'm thinking that as the manufacturers discontinue 2-cycle designs, the price for the newer technology 'should' drop.

My current problem - my '83 Johnson 90 has a lower unit seal problem and the power trim died (2nd time). I figure I have approx. $1500 in repairs. Also the 83 currently operates a bit under original specs for compression, not sure why (my top end with two adults, light load has dropped to about 36 mph).

One other option is a used 1989 Johnson 110. For $3000 I should be able to keep my controls and move into a motor that still meets specs. Since the dealer is going through the motor for me top to bottom, I s/b able to get 2-3 years w/o major repair bills, and hopefully move into a more fuel efficient motor down the road. I can’t find much on the internet re: the Johnson/Evinrude 110. Seems like a relatively trouble free motor.

Any thoughts or suggestions are welcome. Thanks. (I need to move fast - I'd still like to do a little more fishing before the lakes freeze over in Musky country.)

The Judge posted 10-18-2005 01:11 PM ET (US)     Profile for The Judge  Send Email to The Judge     
$3k for a 16 year old engine.....PASS!

Ed's marine has NEW 2005 90hp Jophnson 2 strokes for $4995...use that as a bargaining tool. That 90 should ne like $42-4500. Neighbor just bought a 2004 115 Johnson froma dealer for $5200 out the door.

fourdfish posted 10-18-2005 01:40 PM ET (US)     Profile for fourdfish  Send Email to fourdfish     
Welcome Musky-Don, I don't live that far from you-Orland Park.
I would also pass on that 89. I sold my 1993 175hp last year for $2650 and it still ran ok. I'm sure you can get a better deal than that! It's too bad you are in a hurry because the winter is the best time to shop around. My dealer is great but he is a bit out of the way for you. I have a 200hp E-TEC and it's great.
ratherwhalering posted 10-18-2005 02:28 PM ET (US)     Profile for ratherwhalering  Send Email to ratherwhalering     
Don, I believe you are going to have the same rigging costs for a 1996 or later model Johnson/Evinrude. The 2002 Johnson 2-stroke, 1996 or later Johnson/Evinrude 4-stroke, and a new E-TEC, all call for you to upgrade to the Systems Check rigging. You may get away with using your current binnacle (and control cables) by splicing the trim/tilt wires on a new, Systems Check compatable wiring harness.

The E-TEC does not have "blind hole" mounts. Regardless, the set-back brackets/jackplate is optional for an E-TEC:

If your current engine is mounted using the second set of top holes (one hole down from the top hole) AND using the lower "sliding" holes, then the E-TEC should mount directly to the transom in the identical position.

If your current engine is mounted using any of the top holes AND using the "blind holes" (ie. the lower mounting bolts go through the transom and screw directly into the engine bracket) you will need to fill in the blind holes and drill new lower mounting holes that fit into the 'sliding' holes of the engine bracket lower mounting holes. The other option is to buy a jackplate/set-back brackets, drill the blind hole mounts in the jackplate/set-back brackets, then mount the engine to the jackplate/set-back brackets. This allows you to bridge the incompatable blind mounting holes.

Musky_Don posted 10-18-2005 05:52 PM ET (US)     Profile for Musky_Don  Send Email to Musky_Don     
Thanks to all for the quick replies. I do think 3k for the 89 seems a bit steep. I don’t have all the info on the motor yet, but the dealer is telling me they have gone through and pretty much replaced major preventive maint. items (i.e., motor for trim, water pump, etc.). The compression was good as well. I am going to check it out in person tomorrow afternoon. Does anyone have experience with this motor? I may take it as a short term option if I am satisfied as to condition, I get a warranty that will run through May of next year, and the price becomes a little more enticing.

I did check out the prices at Ed’s Marine. Heck of a trip for me…..but I do have a cousin in the area. Will call them to see what deals they may have lying around.

Fourdfish – Orland Park is quite a bit closer than Richmond, VA. Please share which dealer you work with. Thanks. I have been calling dealers from lower WI to Fox Lake to Chicago looking for good used motors and off year new. Not much luck except for used and new Mercs. No offense to Merc owners, I am not a big fan (though my kicker is an old Merc). BTW Bass Pro has quite a few 2004 2-cycle 90s for 5600 plus install if anyone is interested.

Thanks also for the info on the E-Tec mounting. If I do decide to call it a season and shop this winter, it will be helpful to know if I can avoid the bracket, though I’m not sure I should even if I can. Lots of good threads on this site re: the E-Tec and other motors, thanks and I wish it was a bit closer to my budget limit – who knows – maybe by March I can swing it.

I have been shopping for a few weeks now. I'm usually a believer that with time and money you can get what you want at the right price. With boats it never seems to work out that way at least for me. I walk outside and I see that the leaves are changing, whick means that the big Muskies are fattening up and I’m w/o a boat. Time for a drink.

Teak Oil posted 10-18-2005 07:52 PM ET (US)     Profile for Teak Oil  Send Email to Teak Oil     
The 110 is the same engine as you 90, just different carbs, porting, and exhaust. I would not pay more than 2k for this motor, and that's if it looks great.

I agree with Nick, the 2002 motor should go for about $4500, and that's if you can get a warranty with it.

Look around, you have more options than you think. Get the dealer to come within a couple hundred of Ed's pricing and give them the business

The Judge posted 10-20-2005 01:44 PM ET (US)     Profile for The Judge  Send Email to The Judge     
Ed's delivers....no sales tax either so it is a wash.
NedsPoint posted 10-22-2005 05:38 AM ET (US)     Profile for NedsPoint  Send Email to NedsPoint     
I have a 1999 90 hp Johnson Ocean Runner that is for sale. IT runs great, super compression, controls, etc. $2500. But would need shipping. Its coming off a Newport that I have inked a Super deal on a 4strk for. Otherwise, am happy with the 90 2 strk. Fast and strong.

email at cleoboat@yahoo.com if interested
located on Ma.

Musky_Don posted 10-28-2005 12:50 PM ET (US)     Profile for Musky_Don  Send Email to Musky_Don     
NedsPoint - Thanks for the note. Seems like a very fair offer but I have already made a purchase.

I took a close look at the ‘89 110 and took a pass. I ended up buying the 2002 Johnson 90. The dealer gave me what I consider a very fair deal. The new motor cost me $4.9k plus oil tank, and some electronics. It also has a new factory warranty. I may have done better with a little more time but I think it is a fair deal. Plus the dealer has been servicing my boat for years and I am happy to keep the relationship. They went out of their way to do the set-up according to my wishes - they have asked me for some fairly specific information during and after break in and want to see the boat as many times as it takes to help make sure everything is tuned for maximum performance. Having a local dealer that cares - priceless?

A quick side note. Several years ago I was heading up into Canada for a fishing trip. About 50 miles into the trip I blew a bearing (yes it was packed with grease - have no idea why it failed). This was on a Saturday at about 11:45. I called the dealer, they said no problem, they had everything I needed, come on in. They normally close at 12 on Saturday. The owner waited for me, gave me two complete bearing kits (some uncertainty over which one I needed - charged me for one - just bring the other back after my trip), gave me some sandpaper to smooth out a knick in the axle, and his cell phone number in case I ran into problems. He did not end up leaving till about 1:30. His plans that afternoon - taking his Daughter out for her birthday. Long story short, I thanked him and tossed in a little extra for a nice dinner with his Daughter. Anyway, this small dealership saved me a day or two on my trip. I really wanted to give him the business on the new motor and am happy that it worked out.

Picked up the boat yesterday. I'll be out tomorrow enjoying the fall foliage and getting my fix for a little late season Musky fishing! Thanks to all for comments on this thread and others. Great site filled with just about everything a whaler owner might want to know/discuss.

Don

Buckda posted 10-28-2005 01:15 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Don -

I'd also recommend waiting...get as close as you can to those muskies and use your kicker motor for the fall. The new, low-emission motors are the way to go, and I'm betting there will be some nice extended warranties offered at the Chicago boat and RV show, and again at the fishing/outdoor expo at Allstate Arena in Rosemont (still getting used to calling it that instead of the Rosemont Horizon!)

It's unlikely that a local dealer will come very close to Ed's pricing. If you find one locally (or even regionally) who will, let me know, because they'll sell me two E-Tec 90's and guages.

Since you hunt muskie, you want a quiet motor that you can troll with all evening. If you get a 4-stroke, you won't even need your kicker, since it will get about the same economy as a 2-stroke kicker at trolling speed.

The other place to consider for Evinrude E-Tec's is Custom Marine in GA - they seem to beat Ed's pricing, and it's "on the way" to Florida - perfect opportunity to have the engine installed, test it on the warm, florida waters, and bring it back on the way home for a 10-hour inspection.

(you think that thought has crossed my mind before?!)

Anyway - good luck in whatever you decide, and welcome to the site.

Dave

Musky_Don posted 10-30-2005 12:25 AM ET (US)     Profile for Musky_Don  Send Email to Musky_Don     
Hey Dave - the deed is done. The 'new' 2002 is on da Whaler. I was torn between waiting, looking for a great deal at the boat shows vs. getting a bit more time on the water this year. For me, when I looked at the newer carbed motors vs, the 4 strokes, weight became an issue. I do al ot of fishing in Canada and an inch of draft can make the difference between being able to pass through a shallow channel into a new lake or not being able to. The E-Tec looks like a great motor, but it is expensive. If I played the waiting game, I am certain a 90 E-Tec would have been on the stern. Instead, I opted for the 2002 carbed 90. I took the difference in price and dropped half into Google Nov 300 call options and the other half into December call options (same strike). Easy decision IMO . The dealer I have raved about on this thread is Denna Marine in Bensenville. Talk to the owner, Jim Denna. Class act. May not be the best price compared to some of the volume folks, but they have my business for life. If you or Fourdfish want to fish/drink/fish sometime down the road drop me a line.

Ok. Enough with the formalities. Got about 4 1/2 hours worth of break in time today. My wife and I cruised the Fox Chain in IL and killed a couple+ bottles of wine in the process. Beautiful day - 60 degree high but a bit windy. The boat ran great. I opened it up a few times. As part of the motor purchase, I bought some new electronics including a new speedometer. If it is correct, top end was 47 - 48 1/2 depending on wind, rpms touched 5600. Not bad for first pass. I will check it tomorrow with a handheld GPS. I put a no thrills 17 pitch aluminum prop that I had lying around for break in (have a better one on order - do I need it?). Besides the two of us I had approx. 20 gallons of fuel on board, but I did not have the kicker on the boat. The motor ran beautifully. With the kicker, I may be dead on with 5500 at WOT. I did notice mild porpoising at about 4000 rpms with trim up. Pulling the trim back down fixed it quickly. Still, need to work that bit out. Saw a mid 80s Newport out on the water today. It looked like a Whaler commercial - must have been 10 people on board. Had a great day - all my fishing gear on board - hardly fished at all. Enjoyed the time with my wife. Thinking of taking a week off and heading north towards Eagle River. Why not? GOOG hits 375 next week - I am gone.

I have owned this boat for 12+ years. Fell in love with her again today.


MJS posted 10-30-2005 07:57 AM ET (US)     Profile for MJS  Send Email to MJS     
Hey Musky.

Are you off of Grove street on Princeton?

Mike

Teak Oil posted 10-30-2005 10:50 AM ET (US)     Profile for Teak Oil  Send Email to Teak Oil     
Your speedo is probably a little off, I dont see a 17" prop pushing that boat to 48mph ever with a 2:1 gearcase. You would need 6000 rpms

It should have a little more top end than before though, the 90 loopers here all have been doing better than the crossflows they replaced. I think you will find that 45 or so is where she will run, excluding tides and currents helping the GPS numbers. Thats flying on a Montauk

fourdfish posted 10-30-2005 11:10 AM ET (US)     Profile for fourdfish  Send Email to fourdfish     
Sounds Great Don, Denna Marine sounds like a good dealer and they are sometimes hard to find. I would have stuck with him too! Good luck up in the Northwoods, It's great up there.
Musky_Don posted 10-30-2005 11:44 AM ET (US)     Profile for Musky_Don  Send Email to Musky_Don     
Hey Mike,

Too funny neighbor - yep, that's me. Where are you at? Oh heck, just stop by and say hello. Will be home this morning (still shaking some of the cobwebs out), then heading back to the chain.

Don

Musky_Don posted 10-30-2005 10:43 PM ET (US)     Profile for Musky_Don  Send Email to Musky_Don     
Well I met Mike this morning. Nice guy - hey Mike we should plan on getting together w/spouses - I bet ours have a few things in common. I knew I liked the neighborhood - no fair hiding your Whaler up north.

Took the boat out this afternoon. It was just myself. My wife had a commitment and my buddy bagged with a work issue. Clear skies early, strong wind. Fishing was not looking good, so I decided to explore. I put quite a few miles on the boat, met some nice folks in a couple of establishments. The speedometer is way off. I did a couple of quick runs early - with and against the wind in a bit less than a foot chop. The GPS hit 42 mph one way 44 the other. I did get a chance to open it up later. I think it was a 'windless' run, flat water, 45.4 on the GPS.

Current set-up will allow me to exceed the 5500 rpm red-line. I held it at 5500 for the above readings. Porpoising was a bigger problem with less weight in the boat. Need to fix this quick, I was close to full tilt down to tame the beast. On my way back it was cloudy, windy, then started to rain. Perfect. Made another 12 mile run just for fun.

Musky_Don posted 10-30-2005 10:47 PM ET (US)     Profile for Musky_Don  Send Email to Musky_Don     
Just for clarity, the 45.4 reading was with close to full tilt up. The porpoising issues are non-existant at 4400+. Later.
Teak Oil posted 10-31-2005 08:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for Teak Oil  Send Email to Teak Oil     
My Montauk had a hydrofoil on my 90 Evinrude when I bought it and I pulled it off for several weeks. All in all the boat handles MUCH better with the fin on there.

It planes easier, is more stable, and incredibly has a higher top end with the foil on. I do have a jack plate which may make the foil more effective. I would reccommed you get one and your porpoising will dissappear. Its also possible you had the engine mounted a little too low at the dealer. It should be mounted at least two holes up from "all the way down"

I also run an OMC Raker prop which has fantastic "grip" in rough water as well as when I trim the motor up. You can get these pretty cheap on eBay and they are one of the best OMC props for holding and for top end

Musky_Don posted 10-31-2005 10:18 PM ET (US)     Profile for Musky_Don  Send Email to Musky_Don     
Teak Oil,

Thank for the note. I read through some of the posts here on porpoising. I talked with the dealer. They suggested raising the motor, but then talked with the technician that mounted the motor. Apparently, the way the original motor was mounted limits the options on raising the motor. It appears to be something to do with where the lower bolts were put in. I was not at home during the discussion so I had to check the transom this evening. The motor is on the lowest setting. The lower bolts appear to be hidden - from the motor side of the transom - not sure what kind of mount this is. It may be more apparent in daylight. Is this a common problem with re-powering Montauks?

The good folks at Denna also suggested moving weight forward - not easy unless you want to throw a couple of weights in the bow locker. They also suggested trying different props. My problem is not bad, with 1 and 2 people in the boat sitting behind the console, I can eliminate the problem using trim. It just seems that running the trim down is not the most efficient way to cruise. They told me they had worked on a few smaller whalers through the years - as far as they can recall - all with the same original mounting. I am a bit confused at this point. It seems to me that raising the motor is the most correct course of action - not sure how to accomplish this. Any and all comments appreciated. I can post pics if it would be helpful (though I am new to the site will have to figure out how to do it). Do you think the Raker prop has enough bite to resolve this problem? I have not tested any weight distribution tactics, but I am guessing I have a 50 lb problem - if that.

Don

Musky_Don posted 10-31-2005 10:31 PM ET (US)     Profile for Musky_Don  Send Email to Musky_Don     
One more thing... they also suggested a adding a fin, as a last resort. I don't think they are a big fan - not sure why, but I think they would rather resolve the problem in other ways. I have no experience with tails/fins (I hope I have the terms correct), but realized I forgot to include this in the prior post).

Thanks again,

Don

kingfish posted 10-31-2005 10:42 PM ET (US)     Profile for kingfish  Send Email to kingfish     
Fins (at least those of a similar style to DoelFins) typically serve to help achieve planing speeds more easily and to hold plane at lower speeds. If the motor is set to optimum height (AV plate 3/4" to 1-1/2" above the "keel"), they are unable to do much if anything to affect performance at moderate to high planing speeds because they are above the water at those speeds. If you have porpoising problems you didn't use to have, I'd check the motor mounting height (what you describe sounds like the motor could be raised at least one hole if not two).

John

goinboatn posted 11-01-2005 10:05 AM ET (US)     Profile for goinboatn  Send Email to goinboatn     
I added a bob's jackplate and bob's hydrafoil to my montauk. It's rigged with a 83 v-4 90 rude. The hydrafoil keeps more water to the motor or prop. The jackplate and reeds got me about 300 rpm's up top and the montauk flies! HOLD ON
Buckda posted 11-01-2005 10:18 AM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Denna's in Bensenville -

Thanks Don, and congrats on the beginning of the next 20 years with your Montauk, eh!?

Dave

Musky_Don posted 11-07-2005 03:52 PM ET (US)     Profile for Musky_Don  Send Email to Musky_Don     
Thanks all for your suggestions and comments. I have put about 18 hours on the motor and she runs fine. The mild porpoising around 4k rpms can be controlled easy enough with tilt. However, I think I will put a jack plate on the boat as there are several areas where a few inches draft will be important for me (and I am somewhat of a perfectionist). Not sure whether I will go manual or hydraulic. Lots of good information on this site with respect to that topic. I hope to get out a couple of more times before the snow flies. Thanks, again.
Teak Oil posted 11-07-2005 04:54 PM ET (US)     Profile for Teak Oil  Send Email to Teak Oil     
Don your motor is mounted in the blind holes, which is how almost all Montauks were setup with OMC engines. The mechanic is right, the motor can't easily be raised the way it is mounted right now. This is why a lot of us have jackplates.

Here is my setup. Unless you feel the need to make constant adjustments on the fly a hydraulic plate is not necessary

http://photobucket.com/albums/v735/MontaukBob/Jack%20Plate%20Install/

Musky_Don posted 11-07-2005 05:41 PM ET (US)     Profile for Musky_Don  Send Email to Musky_Don     
Teak Oil,

Thanks fo the pics - and yes, the 'blind' holes are the problem. Do you have any reservations regarding the Rite-Hite jack plate?

Don

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.