|
ContinuousWave Whaler Moderated Discussion Areas ContinuousWave: Whaler Performance E-TEC 25 and 30-HP models
|
Author | Topic: E-TEC 25 and 30-HP models |
jimh |
posted 05-26-2008 02:13 PM ET (US)
Bombardier showed their Evinrude dealers new E-TEC 25-HP and E-TEC 30-HP models at a recent dealer meeting. Dealers have been asking Bombardier for E-TEC motors in this horsepower range, and it looks like they'll have them for model year 2009. Bombardier currently has prototype motors in the field for testing. The new 25-HP and 30-HP motors are, as you might expect, compact and low profile. They are two-cylinder motor. The E-TEC injectors look similar to the ones used on the rest of the E-TEC line, however the fuel distribution system has been changed. To keep things even cleaner and simpler, the vapor separator and electric fuel pump are now incorporated into a molded assembly that connects directly to the fuel inlets and outlets on the E-TEC injectors. This eliminates all rubber fuel hoses downstream of the vapor separator. Bombardier has also developed a steering tiller assembly with shift and throttle controls built into the handle. The tiller also has a trolling speed bump button which electronically shifts the engine speed up or down in 50-RPM increments to permit precise control of boat speed. These long tiller accessories are popular with fishermen who don't opt for remote steering, throttle, and shift controls. The engines will be available in a wide variety of models. The preliminary information indicates that there will be four basic variations in the engine. Weights in parenthesis are for the [short (15-inch) and long (20-inch) shaft] models: --Rope starting, tiller control (142-lbs, 148-lbs) Early testers reported that the 30-HP motor ran at 35-MPH with a 14-foot aluminum boat with three adult men aboard. This "spy camera" photo shows the new E-TEC with tiller arm. We have E-TEC's "Lake-E" under surveillance and will try to get some more pictures of the new motor in action. |
jimh |
posted 05-26-2008 02:29 PM ET (US)
At only 142-lbs, the rope starting E-TEC 30-HP would make a great motor for a classic Boston Whaler 13-footer being re-powered. These modern direct-injection motors start on the first pull, so giving up electric start should not be a burden for most operators. And getting rid of the cranking battery will save another 60 to 85-lbs of weight in the boat. |
andygere |
posted 05-26-2008 07:51 PM ET (US)
It looks like there is a steering cable installed on the tiller model in the photo. Any speculation on the unusual rigging? The 30 h.p. should be a nice outboard for the classic 13, and no doubt the first one will be seen on this website. |
jimh |
posted 05-27-2008 08:36 AM ET (US)
I think the mechanical steering cable was something that just happened to be on the boat being used for testing. It probably was hooked to the engine to keep it from flopping around the boat during testing. |
Tohsgib |
posted 05-27-2008 11:32 AM ET (US)
Most tiller models do NOT allow for remote steering these days and no inexpensive way to convert them. It will be interesting to see what BRP does with all this. I would love a pullstart engine if she would always start on 1 pull or 2. |
Tohsgib |
posted 05-27-2008 11:33 AM ET (US)
Ps..Jim I did you mean 15 & 20" shaft engines? |
jimh |
posted 05-27-2008 12:45 PM ET (US)
A 15-inch shaft model would be nice--I'll double check with the guy who took the spy photograph. |
jimh |
posted 05-27-2008 05:41 PM ET (US)
UPDATE--OK, I just de-crypted the triple-DES encoded message delivered by the anonymous email server in Sweden from the guy sending the spy photographs: he says the shaft lengths are going to be 15-inch and 20-inch! Apparently Bombardier has the re-power market for older boats that need a 15-inch shaft motor right in the center of their target circle. That means that these Evinrude E-TEC 25 and 30-HP models will be the perfect motor for re-powering all those 40-years old Boston Whaler 13-footers that still need a 15-inch shaft motor due to their low transom height. |
Perry |
posted 05-27-2008 10:50 PM ET (US)
quote: What makes them a perfect match? Evinrude is not the only manufacturer that makes a 15 inch shaft motor in the 25 and 30 HP class. Mercury and Honda also make them and are similar in weight. The Mercury can be rope started as well. |
jimh |
posted 05-28-2008 09:33 AM ET (US)
The term "perfect" does not mean "unique" or "the only one." However, of the other brands mentioned, the E-TEC is the only one made in the United States, so that does make it a bit unique. |
Peter |
posted 05-28-2008 09:52 AM ET (US)
quote: A Mercury 30 in its lightest configuration is 172 lbs. According to the "spy report' an E-TEC 30 in its lightest configuration will weigh in at 142 lbs. That's a 20 percent difference. Generally I would not call that similar and particularly not so if that 30 lbs of additional weight is residing on a classic 13 transom. As far as clean 30 HP outboards go, it looks like it will be the lightest. The Honda BF30 is the next lightest at 152 lbs but that's before you throw the necessary 40 to 50 lb starting battery into the boat. Realisticly, an operational Honda BF30 puts close to 200 lbs in the boat, and with a classic 13 Whaler, the battery is typically located in the stern near the transom so some of that 40 to 50 lbs is putting additional weight load on the transom. The Suzuki DF30 seems to be the heaviest at 212 lbs. In my opinion, the most "perfect" motor match made for the classic 13 transom was the pull start, 32 cubic inch, 2 cylinder, 2-stroke Johnson/Evinrude made between 1976 and 2005. That motor was simple, darn near bulletproof, spunky and light at 120 lbs or less depending on configuration. Presuming the new E-TEC 30 has 30+ cubic inches of displacement, it should have quite a bit more low end torque than the 4-stroke 30s of similar displacement, which is important when you are trying to plane off a loaded down classic 13. One in pull start form keeps it simple. So when Jim said
quote: I think he was right on the money. |
Tohsgib |
posted 05-28-2008 11:11 AM ET (US)
Suzuki nolonger makes the DF30 and the DF25 is between 152-161lbs..I assume more for PTnT but it does not say in the brochure how much. |
Perry |
posted 05-28-2008 01:16 PM ET (US)
Peter, 172 pounds on the transom of a classic 13 is just fine. I spent hundreds of hours on a classic 13 as a kid with a 120 lb. Evinrude elec start 25 HP motor that weighed 120 lbs and a 50 lb battery at the transom. So if 170 lbs of Evinrude on the transom was fine, 172 lbs of Mercury on the transom would also be fine. I guess "perfect" is in the eye of the beholder and your eyes aways see Evinrude and Johnson as "perfect". |
fourdfish |
posted 05-28-2008 01:53 PM ET (US)
I am just glad another option is available for my kicker. Would like to see these engines running. Perry, You are correct about the "eye of the beholder"! Everyone should buy what they like. Peter was just expressing his opinion about the statistics. |
Tom W Clark |
posted 05-28-2008 02:09 PM ET (US)
You can't fairly compare one outboard WITH a battery to another outboard WITHOUT a battery. |
jimh |
posted 05-28-2008 04:10 PM ET (US)
I think inclusion of the battery weight is legitimate if one engine can't run without a battery. I like the word "perfect" as a verb, meaning to bring to final form, to improve. Bombardier certainly has been perfecting the direct-injection two-cycle outboard. This latest result of their research and development is another example of that process of perfection. |
Peter |
posted 05-28-2008 04:24 PM ET (US)
Perry -- The numbers speak for themselves. Extra weight on the transom is never a bonus feature when talking about a classic 13 Whaler with a 15 inch transom. Seems to me that was what JimH was referring to when he said "the perfect motor for re-powering all those 40-years old Boston Whaler 13-footers that still need a 15-inch shaft motor due to their low transom height". I don't know whether you remember the days when the pre-smirk 13 Sports with their 15 inch transoms were powered with mid 1960s Evinrude Lark and Johnson Super Sea-Horse 40s with the electric pushbutton shift (shift-by-wire) but those motors at 160 lb coupled with a 40 to 50 lb starting battery in the stern and a full gas tank or two put a lot of weight on the transom. Those motors were really too heavy for the 15 inch transom version of the 13 Whaler. You could see it whenever one of these Whalers came off plane too quickly because they just about buried the motor under water if you didn't also get a wash of water in the full length motor well. Also, those Whalers powered with those motors always sat with their stern pretty low in the water when on a mooring. Those were Evinrudes and Johnsons and they weren't perfect for the classic 13 with 15 inch transom. |
TomK |
posted 05-30-2008 02:52 PM ET (US)
[Changed the topic to a completely different focus. This article will re-appear as its own topic.--jimh.] |
jimh |
posted 05-31-2008 09:30 AM ET (US)
More details are now available about the new Bombardier Recreational Products Evinrude E-TEC 25-HP and 30-HP motors, as BRP has put out a press release on them. These two-cylinder engines have 576-cc (35.5-cubic-inch) displacement. The electrical system will have 15-Amperes of net output available to power the boat electrical system and re-charge the cranking battery. Although not mentioned in the press release, it appears that production of these new 25-HP and 30-HP E-TEC motors will be in mainland China. Frankly, I was somewhat surprised by this, but it should not be a shock. The only other American outboard manufacturer, Mercury, moved all manufacturing of their outboard motors of [less than] 75-HP to the Far East several years ago. It would have been difficult for Bombardier to manufacture this motor and offer it for sale at a competitive price if it were built in Wisconsin. |
L H G |
posted 06-02-2008 03:06 AM ET (US)
Jim - that should be 60 HP and less. All Merc 75's are made here. Has BRP built a new plant in China to manufacture these engines, like Mercury did? Or is the manufacture of the engine sub-contracted to a Chinese firm? |
fourdfish |
posted 06-02-2008 06:59 AM ET (US)
Larry- The engines are going to be manufactured right here in the good old USA ! |
fourdfish |
posted 06-02-2008 07:02 AM ET (US)
However, From what I was told some parts will be made in China, However, assembly will be stateside. |
seahorse |
posted 06-02-2008 08:12 AM ET (US)
Sorry to say but the 25-30 E-TECs are being built in a brand new state-of-the-art plant in mainland China, and not the old OMC/BRP Hong Kong plant. |
jimh |
posted 06-02-2008 08:54 AM ET (US)
More performance reports in from some on-water tests, and they all say the power of this E-TEC is very impressive. It runs like an E-TEC--good low end torque and throttle response. The four-cycle engines the 25-HP and 30-HP E-TEC will compete against are generally not recognized for their power. In those small four-cycle engines there are no power enhancing additions like variable valve timing or supercharging, so the small four-cycle motors don't have as much torque and acceleration as the E-TEC. |
fourdfish |
posted 06-02-2008 11:25 AM ET (US)
So much for my dealers info! He has poor info reliability. |
Peter |
posted 06-02-2008 11:32 AM ET (US)
Given that these motors have generous displacement, as much as the largest 30 hp 4 stroke, I would expect about the same performance differences, relatively speaking, as we have seen in the article comparing 2 vs 4 stroke 90 hp motors of similar displacement. Based on that article, it seems that naturally aspirated 4 strokes need about 20 to 25 percent more displacement to match the power curve of the 2 strokes. These new E-TECs out to pack a pretty good punch. |
fourdfish |
posted 06-02-2008 11:34 AM ET (US)
Seahorse--Are the fuel injectors for these engines made in China also? What about the computers? Are the engines test run in China and then shipped straight to dealers? Sorry, I was led to believe that the injectors etc were still made here. |
Tohsgib |
posted 06-02-2008 11:41 AM ET (US)
Question is when we we be ABLE to get them...2009? 2012? NEVER? |
Tohsgib |
posted 06-02-2008 11:43 AM ET (US)
PS. The old two-cylinder OMC's from 20-35hp from 1976-200x were 521cc so these are about the same size. |
Peter |
posted 06-02-2008 12:24 PM ET (US)
About 4 more cubic inches plus DFI shpould translate into much quicker throttle response and more low end torque than the retired 521 cc motor. |
kamie |
posted 06-02-2008 01:49 PM ET (US)
[W]ill the remote control versions with Tilt and Trim also come in short shaft? Or only long shaft as listed in the first post? |
jimh |
posted 06-04-2008 08:17 AM ET (US)
On the new 25-HP and 30-HP E-TEC engines, the engine speed bump button on the tiller adjusts the engine speed at idle up or down in small increments to allow the boat speed to be set for trolling. But these adjustments are cleared as soon as you turn the throttle handle, and thus they don't affect the normal engine idle. It sounds like a good implementation of sophisticated electronic controls. These modern E-TEC engines all have sophisticated engine management modules which control the engine's operation. |
Utik |
posted 06-12-2008 07:49 AM ET (US)
Here are some pictures [of an Evinrude E-TEC 25-HP motor]. |
Tohsgib |
posted 06-12-2008 10:13 AM ET (US)
Any word on price and availability? I don't mean retail MSRP but actual "Hey this 25 is $2995 show special" I can get both the Suzuki and Mercury 25hp remotes for about $2850 and am interested to see what these go for. |
blkmtrfan |
posted 06-12-2008 11:50 AM ET (US)
Cut and paste of specs:
quote: |
blkmtrfan |
posted 06-12-2008 11:50 AM ET (US)
Unfortunately there isn't a 15" w/ PT&T listed |
Tohsgib |
posted 06-12-2008 12:34 PM ET (US)
Unfortunately they want almost a grand for 5 more hp....why? I think Mercury gets like $300 which is still a lot. I am considering a repower from my 40hp but man I wish they would make the 30 more reasonable in price...makes you have to go with a 25 which is no biggie but... |
jimh |
posted 06-17-2008 10:57 PM ET (US)
Note that this E-TEC 25 and E-TEC 30-HP are the first models from E-TEC with DIGITAL THROTTLE (but not SHIFT). The digital throttle is the BUMP switch which can bump the engine speed up or down in 50-RPM increments while trolling. This feature is implemented in the digital engine control module, hence, "digital throttle." When the twist-grip throttle control is changed, the engine speed reverts back to the normal idle speed, and this is an indication that the throttle control was implemented in the digital domain by the engine controller, not by some mechanical means. This is the beauty of putting some digital processing into the engine control mechanism: you can add a feature like this in software. The hardware of this system is just an electrical switch and a few wires into the engine management module. It was speculated that it would take years for other outboard makers to catch up to Mercury with their digital throttle and shift (DTS), but E-TEC has added digital throttle to these new E-TEC motors. The speculation has ended: Bombardier has digital throttle on their newest motor! OK, now we can speculate about digital shift. |
Tohsgib |
posted 06-17-2008 11:43 PM ET (US)
Who cares about digital smigital on a 25hp...I want a great motor at a great price. Next time I need to bump it up 50rpms...I will twist my wrist some more ;) |
soggy bottom boy |
posted 08-10-2008 05:36 PM ET (US)
I see the BRP site is updated to include reference to [the new] 25-HP and 30-HP two-cyclinder E-TEC motors due out Fall 2008. Anybody seen one at a boat show or dealer? I think they will be made outside Canada/United States. Maybe Mexico, which would be better than China in my book. [See above--there is a new plant in China to make these motors--jimh] My local dealer said they have had small prototypes of 6-HP and 8-HP for several years, but the cost of production has kept them out of the market. I noticed the E-TEC webpage states only remote on the longshaft. Soggy. |
jimh |
posted 08-10-2008 09:44 PM ET (US)
Information on the 25-HP and 30-HP E-TEC motors is now on the www.evinrude.com website. They're listed with the other in-line motors. |
Baja Bound |
posted 02-22-2009 10:21 AM ET (US)
While I'm not a Whaler owner I searched this topic because I'm about to buy a 30 hp for a tin boat meant for the Columbia River and the Sea of Cortez. Everything I read about the E-Tec 30hp seems appealing but I'm being advised that it won't troll as well as a four stroke. At this point I'm strongly considering a Tohatsu 30 hp efi as much because it's available now but hope I'm not passing up the next great advancement in small outboards simply because I'm not willing to wait another season. Any opinions? |
Tohsgib |
posted 02-22-2009 12:33 PM ET (US)
Like with most mechanical stuff, many do not wish to "experiment" with the first production run. I personally would wait a few years to see how the smaller E-Tecs hold up which should be just fine but I am a skeptic sometimes. Price and dealer network would be a main concern for me as well. Although the smaller the HP the cheaper it gets, I would not pay a 10-20% premium to be the first one on the block when I could get a tried and proven model for $500 less which would pay for gas for say 5 years. |
jimh |
posted 02-22-2009 03:48 PM ET (US)
I can't offer you any specifics about the E-TEC 30-HP motor at trolling speeds, other than two general observations: --these are two cylinder engines; at low speeds a two-cylinder engine may not run as smoothly as an engine with more cylinders; --the E-TEC engine in general gives fantastic fuel economy at low engine speeds because it uses a stratified charge combustion mode. I don't know if it is common for other 30-HP engines to have more than two cylinders, but, if you happen to find a three or four cylinder 30-HP engine, then I would expect it might run more smoothly at idle and trolling speeds than this two-cylinder E-TEC will run. The E-TEC ought to run more smoothly than a four-cycle motor with only two cylinders. I say this because the E-TEC is going to provide a power stroke on every piston cycle, so it will provide two power strokes per revolution of the crankshaft. A four-cycle engine with two cylinders is only going to have one power stroke per revolution of the crankshaft, as the cylinders will alternate their power strokes. How this might affect the comparative performance of the E-TEC I will leave to you to draw your own inference. The use of stratified charge combustion mode permits an engine to run at low speeds by using a smaller volume of fuel in the cylinder than would otherwise be needed. The result is generally an improvement in fuel economy. Considering that this is a small displacement engine to begin with and the cylinders may not be that big, the use of stratified charge combustion might not be as significant as it is on larger engines. When I tested an E-TEC V6 250-HP engine, I was very impressed with the fuel economy it produced at idle speeds; it was absolutely phenomenal. I don't know if you will see the same with the 30-HP motor. The 30-HP motor seems to be in short supply at the moment, as production of them is just beginning. My local dealer, Lockeman's Boat and Hardware, has one in stock--at least he did a few weeks ago if he hasn't already sold it. |
Peter |
posted 02-22-2009 05:31 PM ET (US)
While it doesn't have pairs of cylinders moving together top and bottom and another pair moving together in the middle like a 4-cylinder 4-stroke, I would expect a DFI 2-cylinder 2-stroke to run almost as smoothly as a 4-cylinder 4-stroke. You are getting the same number of combustion events per flywheel revolution. However, at the 25/30 HP level, there are no 4-cylinder 4-strokes. Yamaha's F25 is a 2-cylinder, Suzuki's DF 25 is a 2-cylinder V, neither offer a 30 HP outboard and you don't get 4-cylinders until you hit 50 or 60 HP. Honda's 25 and 30 HP models are 3-cylinders which is not inherently balanced. DFI makes a 2-stroke idle far more smoothly than any carbureted or EFI 2-stroke. This is quite noticible when listening to the exhaust signature of a DFI 2-stroke idling out of the water. For example, on ear muffs, the exhaust sound on my 225 Ficht DFI V6 2-stroke outboards is much quieter and much more uniform than it is on my Johnson 150 V6 2-stroke of similar vintage. There is none of that idle pop-pop-pop that you get with the carbureted 2-stroke at idle. I suspect that the tiny amount of fuel used at idle speed coupled with the stratified charging mode in this particular implementation of DFI 2-stroke is one reason. Regarding fuel consumption at a 750 RPM idle, Evinrude reports a measly 0.07 GPH for the 30 HP model. In one performance report, that was good for almost 33 MPG at 2.3 MPH! I seriously doubt any 25 HP 4-stroke could top that. The thing I dislike the most about portable 4-stroke outboards is that you have to handle them carefully when carrying them around. They can't be laid over any which way otherwise you risk hydrolocking them. |
Tohsgib |
posted 02-23-2009 11:00 AM ET (US)
No you do not risk hydrolocking anymore than with a 2 smoke(read your manual). What you risk is putting the crankcase oil where it does not belong, either in the engine somewhere or in your trunk. All 4 stroke engines show exactly which side to lay them down on. Same would go with an engine that has an internal oil resevoir which I imagine the 25/30 E-Tec does. Lastly not too many people transport their 25/30hp on a regular basis. Most are bolted to the transom permanently. PS Merc Tohatsu/Nissan & Honda are all 3cyl in that range. Suzuki and Mercury both start their 40's with 4 cyls, I think Honda as well. |
Peter |
posted 02-23-2009 11:22 AM ET (US)
25 to 30 HP outboards are usually put in the portables category. The Suzuki DF25, Yamaha F25, the Honda BF25 and BF30, the Tohatsu MFS 25 and 30 and the Mercury 25 and 30 HP FourStrokes all have clamp on engine bracket models suggesting portability. The term "hydrolocking" means oil where it doesn't belong causing the motor to become inoperative. I have a friend who purchased a Yamaha F4 for his inflatable against advice from other long time experienced boaters warning him about hydrolocking. Despite the labeling about how to lay the outboard down, he has managed to hydrolock the outboard (motor can't be turned) several times while transporting it in his boat. I've never had any problems like that in the 30 odd years I had an Evinrude 4 or in the 4 years I've had a Johnson 3.5. I believe that hydrolocking is one of the reasons why portable 4-strokes never did very well before emissions regulations came into play. |
95Outrage17 |
posted 02-23-2009 11:47 AM ET (US)
Dad has a Yamaha F4 for his dingy. We try our best not to lay it down as it seems to get hydrolocked (with engine oil) even if it's positioned "correctly". It's a real pain and he's been considering looking for a 2-cycle to replace it. For portable motors, I certainly prefer 2-cycle carborated versions for their ease of transport, light weight and throttle response. I just wish they had cleaner emissions. - Chris |
Tohsgib |
posted 02-23-2009 11:57 AM ET (US)
Maybe it is the F4? I had a merc 6 and my 40 Suzuki both transported a few times in trunk with no such occurance. |
macfam |
posted 02-23-2009 08:27 PM ET (US)
Never a problem with my Honda 2hp 4-stroke when left on the correct side. |
fourdfish |
posted 02-24-2009 06:26 AM ET (US)
Nick-- Up in the North woods(stateside and Canada), we transport our 25hp 2 strokes to and from boats a lot and have been doing so for many years. Of course some old guys can't lift and carry them anymore. I am seriously looking at replacing my kicker with one of these. |
Mad Hunt |
posted 03-30-2009 11:18 PM ET (US)
Has anyone here put a 30 E-TEC on a 13 yet? Thanks, |
jimh |
posted 04-04-2009 02:57 PM ET (US)
I had a chance to see an E-TEC 25-HP motor without power trim and tilt. I believe the absence of power tilt reduces both the weight and cost of these E-TEC motors. The cost is reduced about $500. The weight is probably reduced about 25-lbs. Based on my attempts to tilt up the motor while it was on a display stand, I would say that the $500 invested in the power tilt mechanism will probably be about the best $500 ever invested in an outboard motor. |
fourdfish |
posted 04-04-2009 04:45 PM ET (US)
I'm sure it will be easier to tilt when you can use your weight and are over the top of it in the boat. |
Peter |
posted 04-04-2009 05:31 PM ET (US)
Jim -- You don't have the right leverage for tilting with the motor on the stand. If the motor was mounted to a boat transom, you'd be standing with the pivot point about shin to knee high pulling up on the back of the motor cowling rather than having the pivot waist to shoulder high pulling on the cowling across the top of the motor. |
Hoosier |
posted 04-11-2009 08:58 AM ET (US)
On a small engine like these wouldn't a motorcycle or lawn tractor battery work fine as a starting battery? It would sure save a lot of weight. |
mulfam |
posted 04-20-2009 07:07 AM ET (US)
We have an 1983 13-footer. We re-powered with an E-TEC 40 a few years ago. Now we have a dangerous rocket. Possibly interested in the 25 or 30-HP. The lighter models sound perfect. Right now the transom rides pretty low. Would [a 25-HP E-TEC with tiller steering] be good on [a 1983 Boston Whaler 13-foot boat]? Getting rid of the battery is appealing,- ASIDE: What do you run the lights with if you don't have a battery? |
jimh |
posted 04-20-2009 09:41 AM ET (US)
ASIDE: Navigation lighting can be powered by a small battery, one that is sufficient for the load of the lamps but much too small for engine starting. The amount of time when a small boat like a 13-foot Boston Whaler will be operated while navigation lights must be shown is typically brief. To discuss this new topic further, please move the discussion to SMALL BOAT ELECTRICAL. Thank you. |
gillilands |
posted 07-21-2009 06:00 AM ET (US)
I am looking to re-power my boat and was interested if anyone has hands on experience operating the 30 hp manual start Etec model. We have some experience with the 2006 40 hp manual Etec and have found the motor hard to start and operate the manual tilt. That is you need a lot of upper body strength to use the pull start or lift the motor. This pretty much preclude my girl friend from operating the boat by herself which is my main motivation for re-powering the boat. Thanks |
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.