Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: Post-Classic Whalers
  2005 180 Dauntless, pure joy

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   2005 180 Dauntless, pure joy
MontanaWhaler posted 03-19-2008 12:36 AM ET (US)   Profile for MontanaWhaler   Send Email to MontanaWhaler  
We all love our whalers, I know, but I haven't seen a lot of owner reviews of some models like the Dauntless. When I was boat hunting I wish this perspective had been available, so here's my contribution.
I've now owned my 180 Dauntless for a month and have had it out 3 times. (Note the nearest non-solid water is currently 90 miles away.) It has a 150 Optimax.
So far, I have to say this is by far the best boat I've ever used. It jumps on a plane immediately, no porpoising or other trim issues, it's very stable (There's no trim tabs either). It cuts through waves and wakes like butter. Very solid,no rattles. The optimax is really efficient and smoke free. In three days I've burned about 7 gallons of gas. (My old 115 mariner powered boat would do that in a morning easily and with lots of smoke too!)I like the quick throttle response. The smartcraft gages provide a lot of information and the trolling "cruise control" feature is really handy on a windy day.
The boat fishes really well. I like the rear casting deck and the fact that it folds up into extra seating is a plus. The standard livewell is bigger than I was expecting and I had no trouble keeping several nice sized rainbow trout in there for safekeeping so I could put off the keep or release decision (they were released).
A great safety and convenience feature is the fold down ladder on the stern. Its nice to know you could climb back in the boat if you were by yourself and fell out.
The boat feels much larger than it is when underway, I guess because it's so beamy and stable. However, it's very easy to launch and retrieve single handed and it doesn't trailer big.
boatdryver posted 03-19-2008 12:06 PM ET (US)     Profile for boatdryver  Send Email to boatdryver     
I 'm glad you love your Dauntless. In my recent boat search, the 190 Outrage I had put a deposit on turned out not to have the livewell plumbed and it would have been a bad idea to retro fit it, so I became open to Dauntlesses.I was sorely tempted by an unsold '06 180 Dauntless. I liked the standard livewell and the built in seating for passengers.

I wound up with an unsold '07 200 Dauntless which was introduced that year. It also has a lot of the standard multipurpose Dauntless features like seating and storage. And they seem to have gone to more of a V hull and back to a flat transom. I've only put about 2 hours on it so far but it seems great.

I hope to post some performance figures and photos soon.

JimL

David1877 posted 03-19-2008 09:59 PM ET (US)     Profile for David1877  Send Email to David1877     
The Dauntless 18 is a nice rig. I owned one for a few years. Very stable and seaworthy. I liked the boat but it could be a rough ride at times.
cban posted 03-19-2008 10:39 PM ET (US)     Profile for cban  Send Email to cban     
I have noticed as well that there are not a lot of postings about the Dauntless models. I have the 180, a 1999 with a 2003 Suzuki 140, and I could not be happier. The boat fits my needs very well. I have been impressed with the quality of construction and the ride and handling. For a first time boat owner, I think I was fortunate to have found this website and the opinions of the Boston Whaler owners who post here before I purchased a boat. The enthusiasm and knowldege I gathered helped me make a decision that I think will ensure that I enjoy boating for many years. It is unfortunate thought that the Dauntless models are not discussed very often.
erik selis posted 03-20-2008 01:56 AM ET (US)     Profile for erik selis  Send Email to erik selis     
I almost bought a new Dauntless 180 back in 2002. I took this boat out several times to test drive it. It had a 150-hp Optimax engine and I must say I really liked the overall performance and handling of this boat. The console is one of the nicest Whaler has ever made. The fit and finish is great. Also plenty of room to move around and sit if you want. As much as I wanted this boat I didn't buy it because I bought the 170 Montauk instead. The price difference was the only factor that made me choose the 170 Montauk.

The 180 Dauntless is indeed pure joy, especially with the 150 Optimax engine.

Erik

JoeyP posted 03-20-2008 06:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for JoeyP  Send Email to JoeyP     
I'm in the market for a 190 Outrage and had seen an 18 Dauntless at the same dealer. It seems like a nicely laid out boat but it is 4K more than the 190 Outrage. The hulls appear slightly different. After looking over each, I preferred the 190 Outrage. I have not test riden either boat yet though. Which would handle the chop better?
boatdryver posted 03-20-2008 07:46 PM ET (US)     Profile for boatdryver  Send Email to boatdryver     
JoeyP, as I mentioned above I just went through an overly compulsive 19-21 foot boat search and tried to buy a 190 Outrage. For me its two strong points were the deeper V hull compared to the 2006 18 ft. Dauntless and the larger amount of foot room inside the hull. One would expect the 190 Outrage to have a somewhat better ride than the previous version of the 18 ft Dauntless in a chop.

I really liked the 190 Montauk because of the huge amount of interior deck space.

The Dauntless 18 is a little shorter overall than the 190 Outrage and that wonderful full width fold down seating in the stern takes up a lot of floor space. It's worth the trade off if carrying people is more important to you than fishing.

Now, the previous 18 Dauntless has been discontinued and for 2008 Whaler has introduced a new version, called the 180 Dauntless. I don't know about the bottom shape on this new one, but I just bought a 200 Dauntless, newly introduced in 2007, and it has much more of a modified deep V hull than the previous Dauntless series.

So now, with the newly introduced Dauntless hulls, the gap in ride quality between the 190 Outrage and Dauntless series is probably less than with the 18 ft Dauntlesses up to and including 2007..

Just to show you how subjective the issue of ride quality is, I'll quote my local Boston Whaler Dealer on San Francisco Bay, a dealer for over 20 years, and now a Master Dealer. He says that the customer favorite of recent model Whalers in this size range for a good ride in bay chop is................guess what? No, not any of the Outrage series. It is the "old" just discontinued 22 ft Dauntless, which did not have much of a V bottom. I told him I was surprised. He said "So am I." And, no, he was not trying to sell me one of those.

JimL

David1877 posted 03-20-2008 08:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for David1877  Send Email to David1877     
I moved from a 2001 Dauntless 18 to the 2005 Eastport.

The Dauntless was a great boat but the Eastport is a FAR btter ride in choppy conditions. The Eastport deadrise is more similar to the Outrage.

The Dauntless 18 is very seaworthy and for an 18 footer, it handles rough water well.

I have not owned an Outrage, but I suspect for rougher conditions, it may be a more comfortable ride. If you want more of an offshore hull, I think the Outrage series design may give you a softer ride. The Dauntless may be a more stable fishing platform.

Trim tabs on the Daunt 18 may help that matter.

JoeyP posted 03-20-2008 08:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for JoeyP  Send Email to JoeyP     
JimL, interesting info thanks. What was the story with the 190 Outrage you originally had the deposit on? Livewell not plumbed?
boatdryver posted 03-21-2008 09:24 AM ET (US)     Profile for boatdryver  Send Email to boatdryver     
JoeyP, on the 190 Outrage I was going to buy, the fiberglass seating "module" with two pedestal seats externally looked the same whether a livewell was ordered or not. If no livewell was ordered, the cavity was intended to be used for storage. I had seen the boat at a boatshow but not looked inside the cavity, wrongly assuming that on a 190 Outrage there would be a livewell.

When Whaler authorized a $3,000 rebate on unsold 2007 models the dealer called me and I put down a deposit over the phone. I quickly learned that this one had not been ordered with a livewell option. The dealer thought he could retro fit, but was told by the factory that would involve removing the seating assembly and it might crack. With the livewell option, the intake pump is aft under the motorwell area (no problem), but getting the seawater to and from the well under the seat with no hoses showing above deck would have required all this extra work.

So I had to choose another boat. I really, really liked the 190 Montauk (I still wonder if I should have bought it) for its traditional style and cavernous interior but in the end I chose a 200 Dauntless because of its porta potti in the console and extra seating and low freeboard and no bowrail (it does have foreword side rails ) for beachcombing which we do almost every outing. It has less floor space that the 190 Montauk because of all the space allocated to seating in the bow and stern, but way, way more than my classic Montauk..

This dealer orderss 190 Outrages equipped like this one to sell to commercial users, for example oil spill removal companies and refineries which operate tanker ports on San Francisco Bay.

JimL

MontanaWhaler posted 03-21-2008 12:20 PM ET (US)     Profile for MontanaWhaler  Send Email to MontanaWhaler     
One thing that should be clarified, the 2002 and up Dauntless hulls are different than the prior ones. It sounds like the 01 and older hulls had planing and porpoising issues that required trim tabs.
For those who primarily just fish offshore the rear fishing platform that converts to extra seating may not be as attractive. However if you like to fish shallow water too, you will like having the extra height to aid in seeing and casting to fish. The fact that it also allows you to carry 4 extra passengers when not fishing is a plus too in my opinion. There's also quite a bit of storage under the platform as well.
boatdryver posted 03-21-2008 02:04 PM ET (US)     Profile for boatdryver  Send Email to boatdryver     
Yes, Montana, I agree with your statement about the rear platform being either a plus or a minus, depending on what kind of fishing one does, and what the water conditions are like. I'm going to miss walking all the way back to the transom in my 200 Dauntless but its OK since I get all that seating and storage. It's rare for me to bring so large a fish to the boat that I can't maneuver it foreword to where I am standing. I wouldn't even think about standing up on the platform while drift fishing in big water.

Now that I own a Dauntless I can better understand the premium price Whaler ask for them. All these interior features do cost more to manufacture than the models with more simple interiors.

Regarding trim tabs, my dealer said that for several years they have not ordered trim tabs on Dauntlesses and it is unusual for a Dauntless buyer to return for installation of trim tabs.

JimL

mypilikai posted 03-23-2008 05:40 PM ET (US)     Profile for mypilikai  Send Email to mypilikai     
I have been reading posts here for a while and was glad to see a post concerning the Dauntless. We purchased a 2006 180 Dauntless with a 150 Verado last year and the boat has been "pure joy" for my family as well. This is our first boat and I really appreciate the rock solid feel and performance of this boat. The combination fishing platform and bench seat both see a lot of use, why do small kids go to sleep on the water? We have used the boat for tubing, exploring the rivers around Savannah & Hilton Head, and just fishing the bays. Probably will not venture too far from home without a buddy who runs a Montauk. Best regards to all, SK
podosky posted 03-24-2008 06:19 PM ET (US)     Profile for podosky  Send Email to podosky     
JimL:

Our dealer is also a Master Dealer and told me about the same favorable traits of the Dauntless line from 2002-2007. He also sang their praises regarding a bay chop.

Last year I was at the shop for service with our 2006 180 Dauntless. The service manager was asking me how I liked the boat, and what other Whaler models I had considered. I explained that I loved the boat and had considered the 190 Outrage also. Actually, I had agonized over the decision. He walked me over to a 190 Outrage to show me that the keel of the Outrage was much more round, in comparison to the sharp keel of the Dauntless. This was especially noticeable near the transom when viewed from behind. In his opinion this was the reason for the favorable ride of the Dauntless. I knew the Dauntless had only one degree less deadrise, but honestly, in all my consideration of these two boats I had never noticed this difference in keel shape.

He told me a story of an in water boat show where they had the 190 Outrage right next to the 180 Dauntless. He stated that the stability of the Dauntless was noticeably far superior. The side by side position allowed easy comparison while boarding and walking around on both boats. He was telling me that most people found much more roll in the 190 Outrage. I suspect the large reverse chines of the Dauntless may be in some manner responsible for this, as one degree of greater deadrise should not make that much of a difference. The manager again mentioned that, in his opinion, the keel shape may also be contributing to this difference in stability.

The owners and certain employees of the dealership have the ability to take the smaller easily trailerable demo models out on the water on weekends. They tell me that they suction cup mount their handheld GPS to the console and go. They also tell me that their favorite model to take out is the 180 Dauntless.(The new 2008 180 Dauntless had not been released)

Last week I was had my 2006 Dauntless in for service and it was parked near the new 2008 180 Dauntless. The 2008 gave the impression of a much smaller boat with a much more shallow hull. I was chatting with two of the dealership owners who had the same impression. After seeing the two boats near each other it would seem that the 2008 180 Dauntless is really not very comparable to either the 2002-2007 180 Dauntless or the 190 Outrage. The 2008 seems to be much more bay specific.

Before any 190 Outrage owners become offended, I did not mean for this to be an unfavorable comparison between the Outrage and the Dauntless. I only thought the comments from my dealership were interesting. After all, I was considering both the Outrage and the Dauntless. The Dauntless just works better for me. My primary concern is fishing, but the Dauntless better affords other non fishing activities with my family without giving much up in the way of seakeeping.

JoeyP posted 03-25-2008 05:15 PM ET (US)     Profile for JoeyP  Send Email to JoeyP     
podosky

That's a very interesting analysis on the two boats. I was looking at both the 08 18 Dauntless and the 08 19 Outrage at the dealer a couple of weeks ago. The dealer actually steered me away from the Dauntless which I found suprising at the time. He felt that the Outrage was better laid out and was more roomy then the Dauntless.

lurkynot posted 04-02-2008 08:37 PM ET (US)     Profile for lurkynot  Send Email to lurkynot     
I have the 2001 18 Dauntless and have been very pleased with all that it offers me and the family from hard core fishing to cruising and just hanging out on the beach.

Very solid and capable when it gets snotty. I do admit the ride is a bit harsh in the snot however with the added tabs and more than 7+ years of use I can usually drop the tabs and reduce the speed and the ride improves.

That being said the wife has been after me for the larger 22 foot model that includes the head.

Just an observation on the pre 2002 models 18 or 22. I do prefer the console layouts and removable dock boxes on the pre 2002's in that they offer more storage and versatility.

podosky posted 04-02-2008 08:43 PM ET (US)     Profile for podosky  Send Email to podosky     
JoeyP: Which of the two, if any, did you purchase? If I were to consider the 08 models I also would choose the 190 Outrage.
fifi4 posted 04-11-2008 07:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for fifi4  Send Email to fifi4     
I am new to this site so I just read the comments about the Dauntless 180. I researched buying a new boat for several years. My family was in the boat manufacturing business and I have enjoyed being on some sort of boat practically since I was born. I quickly figured out that Whaler was the only way to go. I had the good fortune to test drive a 22 foot 2001 Dauntless for almost 100 miles of open water in the Bahamas. It was very stable, even in rough seas. I seriously thought about the 18 foot Dauntless because I did not want a 22 foot boat. I settled on the Dauntless 200. I have put about 25 hours on it, mostly in the bays around Corpus Christi. It is incredibly comfortable and safe. I have taken it out in choppy seas and it handled it very well. This boat is the best fishing/family/all around capable boat I could find. I wanted something that could handle flats and open water and this was it.

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.