Define Classic Whaler
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 2:54 pm
What constitutes a classic whaler? I read through Jim’s excellent account of the Boston Whaler company’s history. Would the term “classic” pertain to a particular time period?
To the quality or type of boat design?
To the location where a boat was made? To whom the chief designer was?
Or would the term classic be a combination of some or all of the above?
For example, would the distinction be made as boats designed by Bob Dougherty and earlier? Were all of the boats that he designed great and classic, or just classic?
It looks like after Bob Dougherty left the company, Peter Van Lancker was doing the designs. If I read the history correctly, Peter Van Lancker designed the AccuTrack hull. Would the change from Boston Whaler smirk to AccuTrack be the distinguishing factor between classic versus non-classic?
Interestingly, the Bob Dougherty boats at Edgewater and Everglades seem to have more AccuTrack characteristics then they have old-style Whaler smirk characteristics. Was AccuTrack something he was conceiving at Whaler and got developed further by others after he left?
What would you call the 1993 through 1997 AccuTrack hulls? Classic, semi classic, not classic, modern era?
In the company history, it was noted that there could’ve been some employee stress related to the move from Boston to Edgewater, Florida. Would the timing of that move be part of the determination of classic versus non-classic? Or would the determination be later when the hull went from two-piece (outer shell and turtle) to the three-piece concept? For example, if you look at the swamped capacity ratings, you will see a much higher rating (ability to withstand the heavier load) with the two-piece hull design. Would that be the determining factor?
Or would the factor be based on really good designs that appeared from time to time regardless of year? For example, to me, the 1993 through 1997 Outrage 24 and Offshore 27 are classic. I consider them classic in the sense that if they were offered today, they would be the best or nearly the best boats of those sizes as compared to what competitors are offering today.
Or would classic be defined by age without respect to what the boat really was? For example, the Rage didn’t do very well. Would the Rage be considered a classic whether it was any good or not? In that same light, would an American Motors Gremlin, or a late 1970’s Ford Pinto be considered a classic today? I was curious about people’s takes on this and their opinions.
To the quality or type of boat design?
To the location where a boat was made? To whom the chief designer was?
Or would the term classic be a combination of some or all of the above?
For example, would the distinction be made as boats designed by Bob Dougherty and earlier? Were all of the boats that he designed great and classic, or just classic?
It looks like after Bob Dougherty left the company, Peter Van Lancker was doing the designs. If I read the history correctly, Peter Van Lancker designed the AccuTrack hull. Would the change from Boston Whaler smirk to AccuTrack be the distinguishing factor between classic versus non-classic?
Interestingly, the Bob Dougherty boats at Edgewater and Everglades seem to have more AccuTrack characteristics then they have old-style Whaler smirk characteristics. Was AccuTrack something he was conceiving at Whaler and got developed further by others after he left?
What would you call the 1993 through 1997 AccuTrack hulls? Classic, semi classic, not classic, modern era?
In the company history, it was noted that there could’ve been some employee stress related to the move from Boston to Edgewater, Florida. Would the timing of that move be part of the determination of classic versus non-classic? Or would the determination be later when the hull went from two-piece (outer shell and turtle) to the three-piece concept? For example, if you look at the swamped capacity ratings, you will see a much higher rating (ability to withstand the heavier load) with the two-piece hull design. Would that be the determining factor?
Or would the factor be based on really good designs that appeared from time to time regardless of year? For example, to me, the 1993 through 1997 Outrage 24 and Offshore 27 are classic. I consider them classic in the sense that if they were offered today, they would be the best or nearly the best boats of those sizes as compared to what competitors are offering today.
Or would classic be defined by age without respect to what the boat really was? For example, the Rage didn’t do very well. Would the Rage be considered a classic whether it was any good or not? In that same light, would an American Motors Gremlin, or a late 1970’s Ford Pinto be considered a classic today? I was curious about people’s takes on this and their opinions.