Page 1 of 1

Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:05 pm
by fly by night
I have a classic Montauk 17. I am considering buying a kicker. I know that a long shaft model is required, but the owner's manual doesn't recommend any horsepower. [Give me a horsepower] recommendation.

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:58 am
by Jefecinco
Is the purpose of a kicker on your Montauk to save fuel or wear on your main engine while trolling or is it for "get home" power in case your main fails?

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:38 pm
by frontier
Stern weight is a problem, especially with your Yamaha F75 a 366-lbs. Consider the Honda 2.3-HP long-shaft mounted right on the transom. It only weighs 31-lbs.

[NOTA BENE: the preferred abbreviation for weight in avoirdupois pounds in the forum is "lbs"; do not use the octothorpe or number sign.--jimh]

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:35 pm
by jimh
Exactly where in this thread is the mention that the boat under discussion has a Yamaha F75?

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:10 pm
by Jefecinco
It is in the OP's signature.

[Display of the signature is a user-preference; many users choose not to see the signature of other users. I would not count on all readers having set their preferences to show signatures as a way to convey important information about a discussion--jimh]

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 3:03 pm
by fly by night
Yes, I'm running a Yamaha F75 and stern weight is a problem. The [engine splash well] scupper holes are already slightly below water. The reason for the kicker would strictly be for peace of mind, not fuel savings or trolling.
Thanks,

FBN

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 7:09 pm
by Jefecinco
Given the reliability of your Yamaha four stroke engine I would pass on the kicker, especially in view of the existing problem with stern weight.

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 6:31 am
by Whal
At 366-lbs for your F75 Yamaha, a kicker is out of the question IMO; there is already too much weight on the back of the Montauk 17. If your battery is in the rear of your boat I would move it under the console to transfer some of the weight. Also a Honda 2.3 hp is not enough horsepower as a backup, though it might be enough to troll with. I have a Tohatsu 6-HP four-stroke-power-cycle engine on my 1999 Alert 17, and it will push the boat to 6.1-MPH. I don't think the Honda 2.3-HP would come close to that, and with currents and tides you might not even keep from losing ground with a engine that small. My previous kicker was a Mercury 9.9 and I got 6.4-MPH max. Unless an engine will get your boat on plane you will only get hull speed out of it, which on my Alert 17 [is about] 6-MPH.

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 10:26 am
by fly by night
Thanks for the advice, guys. I was already thinking about moving the battery to the console to try to get some of the weight off of the stern. I guess I will give up on the idea of a kicker, although I do have an old 5-HP Mariner (made by Yamaha) that I have been thinking about repairing when I get a chance.

Also thanks to Jim for introducing me (through his editorial comment) to a few new words/terms including avoirdupois, NOTA BENE, and octothorpe. An internet search of the last term led me to the interesting history of the word. http://massis.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archi ... real.story Who knew?

Chuck

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2017 1:18 pm
by Dutchman
chuck that was educational regarding the # sign
Thanks.

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:39 am
by jimh
FLY-BY-NIGHT--it is my pleasure to share a few new words with my lotic friends.

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:56 am
by TransFueler
My classic Whaler; "Smirk" is the superb and coveted Super Sport Limited 17 model. It is outfitted with a rather portly Johnson-Suzuki 90 EFI four-cycle engine, weighing in at a hefty 416 lbs. I just finished relocating the dual batteries to under the port console, which balanced her out nicely. I also moved the two nine-gallon tanks forward a bit, under the rear seat. At rest, she sits slightly stern low, and laterally level. The "well" drains are under water when at rest by a couple inches.

I also added a Doel-Fin, which helps her pop up on plane far more quickly than before. On plane, trim the bow up a bit, and she cruises effortlessly.

The Johnson-Suzuki 90 EFI four-cycle engine idles almost silently, and has excellent acceleration.

My pal loaned me his Mercury 7.5 two-stroke to try it out. It didn't seem to lower the stern much, if at all. It power was ok, but often hard to start.

I'm also interested in adding a kicker and have pretty much decided that an 8 to 9.9-HP two-stroke is the ticket. After having a number of small pull-start outboards over the years, I vastly prefer an electric start model, though they are much less common.

Comments, suggestions or complaints about adding a nice two-cycle kicker to Smirk?

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:56 pm
by fly by night
jimh wrote:FLY-BY-NIGHT--it is my pleasure to share a few new words with my lotic friends.


    Dictionary result for lotic
    /ˈlōdik/

    adjective: (of organisms or habitats) inhabiting or situated in rapidly moving fresh water.
I hope inhabitants of rapidly moving salt water also provide some pleasure. :)

Re: Kicker for classic Montauk 17

Posted: Fri May 31, 2019 8:30 pm
by fly by night
TransFueler wrote:I'm also interested in adding a kicker and have pretty much decided that an 8 to 9.9-HP two-stroke is the ticket.


What did you end up doing regarding a kicker on your boat?

Recently I saw (a photo of) 15-footer with a 9.9 HP kicker; it didn't appear horribly stern heavy.