OUTRAGE 18 E-TEC 150

Optimizing the performance of Boston Whaler boats
bubbleRefuge
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:17 am

OUTRAGE 18 E-TEC 150

Postby bubbleRefuge » Fri Aug 07, 2020 8:49 am

In December 2019 I bought a legacy E-TEC 150 V6 2.6-litre engine, and I am loving it. The engine torque is amazing. With my OUTRAGE18, top speed with five people is about 4-MPH less than top speed with one person.

I also purchased seven-year warranty. I hope parts for the engine will be continued to bemanufactured. I suspect they will.

My previous engine was a 1996 Johnson 130. That was a great engine but terrible on gasoline. I bought a new OEM fuel [pump] for the 130 at a cost of $450. I sold the engine for $600. OEM part sales is a profitable business.

biggiefl
Posts: 897
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 1:31 pm
Location: south Tampa Bay area
Contact:

Re: OUTRAGE 18 E-TEC 150

Postby biggiefl » Fri Aug 07, 2020 10:29 am

Since this is the performance section....what is your performance numbers, GPH, etc?
On my 24th Whaler. Currently in the stable: 86 18' Outrage, 81 13' Sport(original owner), 87 11' Sport, 69 Squall(for sale cheap).

pcrussell50
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 1:08 am
Location: SoCal/SoNev

Re: OUTRAGE 18 E-TEC 150

Postby pcrussell50 » Fri Aug 07, 2020 11:44 am

bubbleRefuge wrote:My previous engine was a 1996 Johnson 130. That was a great engine but terrible on gasoline. I bought a new OEM fuel [pump] for the 130 at a cost of $450. I sold the engine for $600. OEM part sales is a profitable business.


You sold a 1996 Johnson 130 with a new fuel pump and nothing else wrong with it except old age--for $600? I need to learn how to shop where people like you are selling.

I paid $1,200 for a used (but complete) 1987 Mercury 150-HP powerhead only. It's been reliable as the day is long for the last eight years, and of course it's horrible with fuel. But I'm OK with that. I don't think I could ever make up the difference in price vs. something new, no matter how much more I spend on gasoline.

Performance: I'm told that by 1987, the horsepower was "prop rated", so it should compare with 150 hp on modern engines. Except it's only 2.0-litre not 2.6-liter. So it can't hope to compare on torque with your 2.6l 150-HP. With the light weight speed-form (non-Boston Whlaler] hull it's mounted on, it goes about 55-MPH in smooth water with a 24-inch propeller and me, my wife, and two little girls.

-Peter

jimh
Posts: 11673
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 12:25 pm
Location: Michigan, Lower Peninsula
Contact:

Re: OUTRAGE 18 E-TEC 150

Postby jimh » Sat Aug 08, 2020 3:02 am

Re outboard engine power ratings being made at the propeller shaft: the ICOMIA organization published a standard in 1983 which came into general use by engine manufacturers soon afterwards. See the REFERENCE article I wrote that reproduced the ICOMIA standard in clear text:

ICOMIA 28-83
http://continuouswave.com/whaler/reference/ICOMIA28-83.html

The ICOMIA 28-83 standard specified that outboard engine power ratings be based on power measured at the propeller shaft.

The above linked article was for many years the only presentation of ICOMIA 28-83 in clear text available on-line at no cost.