SUPER SPORT 15 Engine Mounting Height
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2024 5:23 pm
My 1985 Johnson 70-HP engine is presently mounted on the transom of my 1985 SUPER SPORT 15 in the lowest possible position. The upper engine mounting holes are drilled in the transom about 1.75-inches below the top of the notched transom.
Q1: will raising the engine mounting height [from lowest possible to one-hole-up or two-holes up] improve [the top speed] performance of the boat?
Q2: when an engine is raised above the lowest possible engine mounting position, it is proper that some part of the engine mount [that appears to have been designed to rest on the top surface of transom] to be then above the transom top surface?
BACKSTORY
In the last two days I have spent hours reading many very helpful threads as I start a restoration of my 1985 SUPER SPORT 15 boat. I grew up with a classic 13-footer classic. The 15-footer is now a project boat for me to both have both fun boat and to keep me busy in my retirement; it is also a easily-controllable boat for my spouse.
I read in several threads about adjusting the height of the engine on the transom, targeting the distance between the bottom of the hull to the Anti-ventilation plate. The general advice was to move the engine up, which would--to a point--improve top end boat speed and reduce chine walking. I think I understand this based on the technical descriptions from the various people posting.
Currently recently acquired 1985 SUPER SPORT 15 boat has a 1985 Johnson 70-HP two-stroke-power-cycle engine. The top boat speed is not much over 30-MPH as measured by an OMC pitot tube speedometer. From what I have read I think the boat should be faster.
Many of the threads indicated the my boat's current engine mounting height [the lowest possible mounting height] might be too low. But, if the engine were raised, the over-transom-part of the engine mount would sit up substantially above the transom edge, depending how far I raised the engine.
Q1: will raising the engine mounting height [from lowest possible to one-hole-up or two-holes up] improve [the top speed] performance of the boat?
Q2: when an engine is raised above the lowest possible engine mounting position, it is proper that some part of the engine mount [that appears to have been designed to rest on the top surface of transom] to be then above the transom top surface?
BACKSTORY
In the last two days I have spent hours reading many very helpful threads as I start a restoration of my 1985 SUPER SPORT 15 boat. I grew up with a classic 13-footer classic. The 15-footer is now a project boat for me to both have both fun boat and to keep me busy in my retirement; it is also a easily-controllable boat for my spouse.
I read in several threads about adjusting the height of the engine on the transom, targeting the distance between the bottom of the hull to the Anti-ventilation plate. The general advice was to move the engine up, which would--to a point--improve top end boat speed and reduce chine walking. I think I understand this based on the technical descriptions from the various people posting.
Currently recently acquired 1985 SUPER SPORT 15 boat has a 1985 Johnson 70-HP two-stroke-power-cycle engine. The top boat speed is not much over 30-MPH as measured by an OMC pitot tube speedometer. From what I have read I think the boat should be faster.
Many of the threads indicated the my boat's current engine mounting height [the lowest possible mounting height] might be too low. But, if the engine were raised, the over-transom-part of the engine mount would sit up substantially above the transom edge, depending how far I raised the engine.