SUZUKI DF60 Owners Sought For Comments
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 6:33 am
TO ANYONE WHO HAS REPOWERED A MONTAUK 17 WITH A SUZUKI DF60: please reply to this thread and give information about your experience.
BACK STORY: My 1987 MONTAUK [17] boat originally had a Johnson 110-HP engine that always felt too powerful to me, and it weighed 300-lbs. I use my 1987 MONTAUK [17] mostly for fishing and pleasure riding. It is not used for water skiing or tubing.
MODERN ENGINES: All modern four-stroke-power-cycle engines of 70 to 100-HP seem to weigh at least 50-lbs more [than some other unspecified engine, which perhaps was meant to be the original engine on the boat, thus they must weight about 350-lbs], except the Yamaha F70 [that has an unspecified weight apparently less than 350-lbs]. I have read recommendations on the Yamaha F70
SUZUKI DF60: A Suzuki DF60 has lower weight and cost [compared to some other engines]. The DF60 has three-cylinders.
BACK STORY: My 1987 MONTAUK [17] boat originally had a Johnson 110-HP engine that always felt too powerful to me, and it weighed 300-lbs. I use my 1987 MONTAUK [17] mostly for fishing and pleasure riding. It is not used for water skiing or tubing.
MODERN ENGINES: All modern four-stroke-power-cycle engines of 70 to 100-HP seem to weigh at least 50-lbs more [than some other unspecified engine, which perhaps was meant to be the original engine on the boat, thus they must weight about 350-lbs], except the Yamaha F70 [that has an unspecified weight apparently less than 350-lbs]. I have read recommendations on the Yamaha F70
SUZUKI DF60: A Suzuki DF60 has lower weight and cost [compared to some other engines]. The DF60 has three-cylinders.