DIMENSIONS (from 2002 Specification Sheet) Length......................17 feet Beam........................6 feet 10 inches Draft.......................9 inches (with engine tilted clear of water) Dead rise at transom........16 degrees Cockpit Depth...............19 inches Weight......................1440 pounds dry, no engine Maximum Weight .............1650 pounds Swamped Capacity............3400 pounds Persons Capacity............7 people Maximum horsepower..........90 HP Minimum Horsepower..........60 HP Fuel Capacity...............13.2 gallon (two 6.6 gallon external tanks) Transom Height..............20 inches Bridge Clearance............4 feet 7 inches HISTORY Designer....................Boston Whaler First year offered..........2002 Last year offered...........TBA Color.......................2002 Whaler White M.S.R.P.....................$ 17,655 Introductory Price which includes Mercury two-cycle 90-HP ELPTO engine, E-Z Loader galvanized trailer Engineering Changes.........Hulls made after 07/12/2002 incorporate embedded plywood in the transom for the purpose of reinforcing a mount for an auxillary outboard engine bracket. EQUIPMENT Standard .....DECK/COCKPIT: Bow locker with fiberglass cover and overboard drain; Bow and stern lifting eyes; Welded 316L stainless steel bow rail and side rails; Heavy-duty rub rail; 8-in stainless steel bow cleat; molded-in port and starboard boarding steps. Stern cleats (c.2004) CONSOLE: Stainless steel steering wheel; electric horn; electrical switch panel; welded 316L stainless steel grab rail; acrylic windshield; access door; binnacle control; drink holders (2). SEATING: Reversible pilot seat with locking backrest. MECHANICAL: Teleflex no-feedback steering; classic style navigation lights; battery box with hold-down strap in console; Mercury-TM pre-rig; 90 ELPTO Mercury engine; bilge pump with float switch; 6.6 gallon fuel tanks (2) with hold- down straps. GALVANIZED TRAILER E-Z LOADER: Trailer jack; tie-downs; winch with nylon strap. Notable options... Swim platform with hand rail and stainless steel telescoping ladder ($ 256); Striping and graphics (red or blue); 60 ELPTO Bigfoot four-cycle Mercury engine ($ 1,122); 90 ELPTO four-cycle Mercury engine ($ 2,308); Drum brakes and flush kit for trailer ($ 577). FISHING PACKAGE: ($ 660) Tackle drawers; compass; 72-quart cooler seat with cushions and backrest; console mounted rod holders (4). COMFORT PACKAGE: ($ 641) 72-quart cooler seat with cushion and backrest; bow cushion. CANVAS: Sun-top with boot (red or blue) and stainless steel fittings ($ 822); Gray console cover ( $201); Gray reversible pilot seat cover ($ 192).
The 170 Montauk was introduced at the Miami Boat show on February 14, 2002, replacing the classic 17-foot Montauk model which had been in continuous production since 1976. Accordingly, much of the description that follows will make reference to the differences between the old and new models.
The new Montauk hull is generally the same size as its predecessor, but has grown slightly. The length has increased five inches and the beam has increased eight inches. The draft has remained the same. The cockpit depth remains the same. The rated capacity is the same, seven persons. The dry hull weight has increased about 450 pounds. The engine ratings are somewhat unusual. Because of the growth in hull weight, the minimum horsepower recommendation has increased to 60-HP from 35-HP. On the other hand, the maximum horsepower limitation for the new, larger, heavier boat, has decreased to 90-HP from 100-HP.
The hull departs from the old twin sponson design and now resembles the 13-Sport in its general lines more than it does its classic predecessors. The bow has a chine line suggestive of the old "smirk" trademark of a Whaler hull, but the depth of the reverse chine is much less. The hull is more slab sided (actually almost concave at some points), with the bow chine line sloping down and becoming a very prominent reverse chine in the aft portion of the hull. The bow entry is fairly sharp and the traditionally squarish Whaler bow flares considerably over the central hull. The hull bottom tapers to a very gentle rounded vee at the transom. At the rear corners of the hull the gunwales curve into the transom in a rounded radius as opposed to the more traditional 90-degree bend. A running strake on either side runs from the bow to the transom.
The sheer line of the boat is similar to its ancestors and is generally straight, but it does appear to curve ever so gently upward at the bow. The general slope of the sheer line is downward to the stern from the bow.
The lines of the hull are generally pleasing, but they seem to run into some aesthetic difficulties in the forward one-third of the boat, where the chines rising from the waterline make an awkward bend in and under the bow. The grace of the traditional lines has been lost here. Let's hope that this artistic cost is paid back in improved ride characteristics or other improved performance.
The cockpit of the 170 has the same interior freeboard as the previous model, 19-inches. A bow railing is standard, as are twin side railings. The attachment point for the railing has been changed. The rail bases are now mounted to the top of the gunwales instead of being fastened to a lip below the gunwales and in the cockpit. The bow has a short foredeck which steps down to a raised forward platform that occupies approximately the forward one-quarter of the cockpit. A locker with molded cover provides storage in the bow.
A molded console with windshield and grab rail provides a center helm station. A 5-spoke destroyer-style wheel is mounted at about a 45-degree upward angle on of the console, offset to port. A granite-colored sub-panel behind the wheel provides space for mounting gauges. The specifications do not explicitly mention it, but the boat shown in the brochure appears to have three gauges. These are presumed to be a tachometer, a temperature gauge and a battery gauge. The gauges appear to be the new doomed-face style. The console also has several electrical switches for lights and accessories. A compass is optional. Two molded drink holders are inset in the console, in front of the area where the engine shift and throttle controls are mounted binnacle style. The boat's battery is mounted in the interior of the console. Access to this space is via a opening door or hatch on the port side of the console. A fire extinguisher pocket is molded into the starboard side of the console. Above this pocket is another opening into the interior of the console, perhaps an optional tackle drawer.
In c.2008 the molded center console height was increased by four inches.
In front of the console additional seating may be provided by an optional cooler. Aft of the console a reversible pilot seat with backrest provides seating for the helmsman. The base of this seat is molded and encloses twin fuel tanks, with an opening toward the stern. The seat is a controversial element. The classic "reversible pilot seat" which was first introduced on the 16-Sakonnet in 1961 with teak construction (and still available in 2002 on the Classic Montauk some 41 years later) has always been an icon of a Boston Whaler center console boat. The new seat, while functional, is very non-distinguished and fails completely to project any "Whaler" image.
The rear of the cockpit has been significantly changed. The central engine well is now flanked by two raised areas which provide steps into the boat. These molded steps appear to be large enough to also provide seats for smaller adults. The raised steps continue the line of the engine well across the cockpit, creating a raised platform across the rear 15 inches (approximately) of the boat. In front of this raised wall there is a central bilge sump which is normally covered by a molded hatch with slotted openings to permit cockpit water to drain into the sump. An electrical bilge pump is mounted in the sump and evacuates water that collects there via its own overboard thru-hull fitting on the transom. The bilge sump also has a direct drain overboard by a thru-hull fitting that exits down thru the hull and out the bottom of the boat. The engine well is drained overboard at its lowest point by drains which exit through the transom.
In the earliest production of the boat, hulls molded prior to July 12, 2002, did not have encapsulated reinforcement material embedded in the transom for attaching an auxillary outboard engine mounting bracket. Strong complaints from die-hard fishermen who demanded a "kicker" motor for trolling got the factory's attention.
A very nicely engineered feature of the new 170 Montauk is a central rigging tube which is molded into the interior of the hull. It runs aft from the console to the stern, angling slightly to starboard and entering the bilge sump. The bilge sump cavity extends upward into the starboard side of the engine well, where a gasketed exit at the very top of the wall permits the cables to leave and enter the motor well. There is also a removable sealed hatch cover in the engine well to facilitate access and rigging of the cables. The high exit point in the motor well reduces the tendency for water to enter the sump area. All engine controls run via this tunnel, and this makes for a very clean and neat installation. The cables running via this hidden tunnel include: fuel lines, battery cables, engine control cables, steering control cables, navigation lighting cables, gauges wiring, and so forth.
Just as was done previously, the 170 Montauk uses external plastic fuel tanks to contain the boat fuel supply. Two 6.6 gallon tanks mount under the helm seat. The use of this style fuel tankage is typical in smaller boats. In this case, there is not sufficient room in the hull to encapsulate the fuel tank beneath the cockpit floor. To have provided the room needed would have meant raising the floor, which in turn would have required raising the gunwales, and drastically altering the profile of the boat.
Only one fuel line runs aft to the engine, so changing tanks is presumed to be accomplished by disconnecting that fuel hose and moving it from tank to tank.
The low capacity of the tanks have raised some questions about the boat's endurance. Perhaps the designers were anticipating outstanding fuel economy from the four-cycle engine option to make up for what is otherwise a rather anemic fuel load. Concerns with safety certification may have been included in the design process.
The package shown includes a galvanized E-Z Loader trailer that appears to be well fitted to the boat. The boat is carried very low on the trailer, its maximum beam just fitting between the wheels and fenders. The trailer is presumed to be of the all-bunk style seen so commonly these days. An option provides for adding brakes and freshwater washdowns to the trailer.
The navigation sidelights are provided by the traditional Whaler combined sidelights lamp and bow chock fitting. "Classic" fans will appreciate this detail. The bow cleat is mounted on the short foredeck, directly behind the chock and lamp fitting. A standard horn cleat is used instead of a mooring bit or norman pin. There do not appear to be any stern cleats. The transom ski eyes could be used for securing lines.
The attachment of the bow railing and side railings has been changed. The new arrangement is similar to that used by other boat in production. Previously the rail bases were located below the gunwale level and were secured into a flange or lip molded into the cockpit. A second atttachment point secured the railing to the cockpit bulwarks about 8-inches above the base and provided additional support. This two-point attachment technique produced an exceptionally sturdy railing, but resulted in some loss of interior room. This technique must have also been more costly. There were twice as many attachment points to fabricate and install, and twice as many locations in the hull interior had to be provided with embedded backing material. The new railing attachment mechanically fastens the rail bases to the gunwales. The bases are fastened to internal "Whaler-board" backing plates. By using tapped holes and stronger backing material, the strength of the rail system is maintain. Also, the railings are now welded into one-piece assemblies, further increasing their integrity. The change in mounting has probably saved considerable time in labor in the post-molding finishing of the boat. It also increases interior cockpit room.
The new model seems on par with the old with the exception of the factory canvas. The only canvas available is a sun-top or seat and console covers. In fairness, it has been some time since the Mills & Co. complete canvas package (Forward Shelter, Flying Top, Side Curtains, Aft Curtain) was offered by the factory.
Reports from Whaler engineers who tested the pre-production models of the 170 Montauk are summarized in the table below. Speeds were measured with RADAR and are averages. The load was "typical", that is, two people aboard plus fuel and safety gear.
|Factory Performance Tests 170 MONTAUK|
|ENGINE||PROP DIA X PITCH||PROP TYPE||WOT MPH||TIME TO PLANE (sec)|
|Mercury 60 HP four-cycle EFI Bigfoot||10.25 x 14||BlackMax Alum.||33.5||7.3|
|Mercury 90 HP two-cycle||12.75 x 21||BlackMax Alum.||43.7||4.4|
|Mercury 90 HP four-cycle||13.12 x 16||Vengeance SS||43.0||4.3|
The results reported raised a few eyebrows. Additional computations of boat speed potential and prediction were conducted to allow comparison of those computed results to the factory reported results.
When prop pitch and prop shaft speed are known, the speed of advance of the propeller can be calculated. Prop shaft speed can be calculated from crankcase speed and gear reduction. Here is an analysis of the three engines and propellers cited above. Compare the calculated top speed with the reported observations.
|Calculated Top Speeds 170 MONTAUK|
|ENGINE||WOT RPM||GEAR REDUCTION||PITCH INCHES||CALCULATED MPH||REPORTED MPH|
|Mercury 60 HP four-cycle EFI Bigfoot||6,000||1:2.31||14||34.4||33.5|
|Mercury 90 HP two-cycle||5,500||1:2.30||21||47.5||43.7|
|Mercury 90 HP four-cycle||6,000||1:2.07||16||43.9||43.0|
The results shown in the table above are in close agreement with the reported results from the factory test boat
It is also possible to predict speed potential for a particular boat based on horsepower, weight, and "hull factor." Some experience with the classic Boston Whaler style hull suggests a hull factor of "200" is appropriate; that was used for the new 170 MONTAUK hull. The hull weight without engine was calculated using the following weights.
Hull Weight, Dry.....1,440 pounds Two people, 175-lbs.. 350 6 firstname.lastname@example.org/gal.... 40 Battery and gear..... 70 --------------------------------- TOTAL WEIGHT........ 1,900 pounds (no engine)
The weight of each engine was then added to obtain the total weight. The speed was predicted based on weight, horsepower, and hull factor.
|Predicted Top Speeds 170 MONTAUK--HULL FACTOR=200|
|ENGINE||ENGINE WT.||TOTAL WT.||PREDICTED SPEED||REPORTED SPEED|
|Mercury 60 HP four-cycle EFI Bigfoot||252||2152||33.4||33.5|
|Mercury 90 HP two-cycle||303||2203||40.4||43.7|
|Mercury 90 HP four-cycle||386||2286||39.7||43.0|
In these results the reported speeds exceed the predicted, but this is not unusual as the algorithm for speed prediction is somewhat simplistic and the hull factor was chosen arbitrarily.
Perhaps the most controversial specification of the new 170 MONTAUK is the horsepower and engine weight limitations. To understand the thinking behind these numbers (90-HP and 410-lbs) it must be realized that the 170 MONTAUK boat is intended to be sold only as part of a package, pre-rigged with an engine and a trailer. The developers of the new boat thus selected the most appropriate engines from the Mercury line of outboards and included the three choices noted above in the possible configurations. Their selection was based not only on performance, but also on price. It should be noted that 115-HP versions of these same 90-HP engines are available at the same weight. The drawback for these engines is their increased price, which would tend to drive the package priced boat above the targeted price point at which it was intended to be sold.
The three options appear to offer decent performance. The lower horsepower option of the 60-HP Mercury four-cycle will appeal to fishermen. It may also be attractive to parents who wish to restrain their teenagers from excessive speeds when operating the family boat. The two 90-HP choices provide good mid-40 MPH speed. The low-emission and fuel economy of the four-cycle option will likely be chosen by California buyers and those interested in long-term fuel savings. Performance does not appear to suffer with the four-cycle, although a premium propeller was used to get the results shown. The four-cycle 90-HP engine is approximately a $2,300 up-charge.
This is the first year of 170 Montauk production. The first factory production hull was finished on February 21, 2002.
It is not known at this writing if this hull will have applicability in the Commercial Products Division.
The pricing of this new 17-foot boat represents a considerable reduction from the concurrent pricing for the 17-Montauk that it supercedes. The older boat was selling for about $23,000 - $24,000 when similarly rigged (by the dealer) with an engine and trailer. The new boat (at $17,655) thus represents a very significant reduction in the price, a savings of about 25-percent. Even more amazing is the fact that the reduced price accompanies a boat that actually weighs more than its predecessor by about 450 pounds. The general rule of thumb in boat pricing is to equate weight with costs (unless going for exotic light-weight racing boats), so that for two boats of similar materials, the heavier one typically will usually cost more.
The price reduction was made possible by very careful attention to the labor required to build the boat. The earlier model was, in comparison, much more labor intensive. By designing and engineering the boat to be capable of being built with less labor, the selling price could be reduced. The assembly process for the new boat has been "streamlined." The result is an attractively priced 17-foot boat that sells for three-quarters of the price of its predecessor.
The following photographs were taken at the Miami Boat show in February of 2002 by Jeff Angeleri.
2002 Boston Whaler 170 Montauk
The new Montauk model shows many similarities in its lines to the 13-Sport seen in the background. The introductory price is an attractive $17,655, as shown rigged with trailer and 90-HP Mercury 2-stoke Saltwater Series engine.
PhotoCredit: Jeff Angeleri - Scan: JWH
The bow of the new hull includes just enough of a suggestion of a smirk to pay homage to its lineage as a Boston Whaler. The hull sides appear to be slightly concave, with the chine line from the bow forming a strong reverse chine as it slopes aftward. Note also how well fitted to the trailer the boat's hull is. The hull width just clears inside the fenders. The bow navigation lamp fitting is a nice return to "classic" style.
PhotoCredit: Jeff Angeleri - Scan: JWH
The center console has a small windshield protected with a wrap-around grab rail. The classic Reversible Pilot Seat has been replaced with one with a molded base which encloses the twin fuel tanks underneath. The seat back can be locked in position.
PhotoCredit: Jeff Angeleri - Scan: JWH
The center console appears nicely laid out in this view, although it is hard to judge the proportions. Not a great deal of space is available for mounting electronic accessories.
PhotoCredit: Jeff Angeleri - Scan: JWH
Several new designs are seen here. The rounded corners of the hull/transom now provide raised step pads. The bilge sump is covered with a slotted lid. The engine well provides an access tunnel to the console, concealing all the wiring and control cables.
PhotoCredit: Jeff Angeleri - Scan: JWH
At the stern the hull rounds to a soft vee, although the specifications call for a deadrise of 16-degrees. It does not look like that here. The "granite" color of the gauge instrument sub panel shows better here. The drawer on the side of the console may be an optional tackle drawer. Note the thru-hull drain on the transom for the exhaust of the bilge sump pump. The tight fit between the trailer fenders is evident. Use care when loading!
PhotoCredit: Jeff Angeleri - Scan: JWH
Cetacea Page 58 shows more views of a recently delivered Montauk 170.
To Jeff Angeleri who has provided me with the photographs of this new model I must extend my most sincere thanks.
DISCLAIMER: This information is believed to be accurate but there is no guarantee. We do our best!
This article first appeared February 21, 2002.
Copyright © 2002 by James W. Hebert. All rights reserved.
Unauthorized reproduction prohibited.
This is a verified HTML 4.0 document served to you from continuousWave
Author: James W. Hebert