Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  REVENGE-22: Water Over Transom

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   REVENGE-22: Water Over Transom
frankb posted 09-08-2003 02:14 PM ET (US)   Profile for frankb   Send Email to frankb  
I have an 1985 Revenge-22, and I am not familiar with the boat. I purchased it a month ago and repowered with a 200-HP Yamaha. Set sail with wife and kids and all was well until I decided to fish a rip line. The water had a nice 1-2' tight chop as I drifted through the rip and water was splashing over the transom fairly quick. Now you could imagine; first time out, tackle box, well cover all floating about the deck in 2 inches of water. My wife is freaking out thinking we are sinking. I don't recall but suspect my bilge pump (500 GPH) may have been off. Plug from well to transom and thru hull plug were in. I powered up and headed for flatter water and got rid of the water. Then proceeded to calm down wife and family.

What should I have done? After that experience I am reluctant to take vessel in ocean. Currently only fishing in Long Island Sound. I suspect I should have the bilge on auto all the time. Should I have the thru hull plug out so the water can just drain out? I pulled the plug to experiment and the water was about 1" from the deck. Is that an indication that my vessel is to low in the water? I have a 77 gallon fuel tank and it was full.

Any feedback for this Newbie Whaler owner appreciated.


Peter posted 09-08-2003 02:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
If you were drifting in all likelihood you were transom to the waves as that is how most Whalers drift. There is probably not more than foot of "freeboard" between the top of the transom and the water line on the notched transom Revenge so you will take some waves over the transom if they exceed 1 foot and they are tightly packed. There is not much you can do about this except to put as much weight as far forward as you can to increase the transom freeboard.

Also, your 500-GPH pump, if in the cockpit drain, is too small. I have an 1100-GPH pump there and a 500-GPH in the motor well, although an 1100-GPH in the well couldn't hurt. Leave both pumps on Automatic.

For maximum buoyency, leave all thru-hull plugs in. If you have water in your fish well, pull the plug out when underway on a plane so that it will drain and make sure someone is steering. Obviously, replace the plug once the water has drained out while still on plane.

jimp posted 09-08-2003 03:17 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimp  Send Email to jimp     
frankb -

I agree with Peter. My 1990 Revenge-22 W/T has a different bilge configuration than yours, but is still essentially the same boat.

Three years ago, while fighting a king salmon, I was getting blown onto some rocks and had to back off the rocks to deeper water - still fighting the fish (I was alone). The wind was on shore at about 15 knots and there was a 1-2' chop (some bigger) left over from the night before. I was backing hard, and the first three waves washed right over the transom and down below to the cabin flooding it to about 6" below the cushions. My coolers, bait, and other gear were all floating around me, I was standing in 6" of water, and both bilge pumps were blasting water over the side. And I was still fighting the fish. Well, to shorten the story, I lost the fish (straightened the hook), turned into the wind, restowed the gear, the pumps finished pumping and 5 minutes later I had fresh bait in the water.

For the future, avoid situations where you expose your transom to incoming seas while you are dead in the water or backing down. The boat can take it, but it is an uncomfortable position for your family. Some other folks have crafted splash boards that go across/above the outboard well. I imagine that these likely work fairly well.

JimP

frankb posted 09-08-2003 04:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for frankb  Send Email to frankb     

Thanks for replies. I had a nice fluke in the well and imagine that had it been a bass or other type species they may have been smart enough to escape to freedom.

I will get another bilge installed in deck well as it appears there was one there at one time as bracket is still there.

I'm contemplating attaching some form of safety line to prevent losing the well cover which started floating away.

One thing for sure is is unnerving.

Just for clarification, I have a 500-GPH in the engine well and no other bilge [pumps].

Frank

Knockerjoe posted 09-08-2003 04:51 PM ET (US)     Profile for Knockerjoe  Send Email to Knockerjoe     
I disagree with the previous posts. All plugs should be left out(except forward locker). This makes the boat self bailing and you will not need a bilge pump. I believe this is the best setup on a classic 22-foot. Anyone else?
WSTEFFENS posted 09-08-2003 05:44 PM ET (US)     Profile for WSTEFFENS  Send Email to WSTEFFENS     
I tend to agree with Joe. Having owned both a 22 & 25 Revenge W/T. Both boats were and equiped with twins. The 22 w/ 110 OMC V4's had an estimated weight of engines 550 pounds combined. The 25 is powered by OMC V6's, weighing about 800 pounds. How heavy is your new Yamaha in comparison?

Both boats were used in the Great Lakes, and I intentionally tried to flood the cockpits just to see how fast the boat would self-bail. In both cases the boyancy would tend to lift the engine exhaust out of the water during the experiment. Other than being a little unnerving to someone not familiar with the boat's performance, I found it rather reassuring to see 6-8 in of green water wash out over the transom cut-out as fast as it came in. My experience is when the going is really rough, I pull the plugs and let it self drain.

As for the wet equipment, I solved that by using large Igloo coolers that are tied down to the deck by shock cord. This keeps things dry and in place in all sorts of seas.

Best WLS

Peter posted 09-08-2003 05:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
With the plugs out, the boat will sit lower in the water, increasing the tendency to take a wave over the transom. However, if you have no bilge pump in the cockpit sump, leave the plug out if you think you'll be in those conditions.

One thing is for certain. Be glad you were in a Whaler. In some cases, other boats that have taken the amount of water you have described over the transom have gone to the bottom or capsized. Once water starts to rush in over the transom or a gunnel of a boat the hydrodynamics are such that its hard to stop the flow unless you have good positive flotation.

lhg posted 09-08-2003 06:04 PM ET (US)     Profile for lhg    
Joe - Yes I disagree about leaving sump plugs out, letting water run in and out of the rigging tunnels, during normal running & boating conditions. First of all, when at rest, Whalers with open sump plugs tend to take in additional water as people stand around in the stern of boat. The floor can flood a little, even in my Outrage 25. On acceleration to plane, the weight of all this water adds to the boat load as the boat planes off, before it drains. Thirdly, the accumulation of water, particularly salt water, in the rigging tunnels inevitably spills over into the gas tank cavity and foam, keeping that continually wet and grungy, possibly corroding the gas tank if salt is involved.
I try to keep my gas tank cavities as dry as possible, even to the extent of opening up the covers when the boat is stored, so moisture in there can evaporate.

So on both my 18 and 25 Outrages, I keep the sump plugs in place, and rely on pumps to get rid of minor water. I should also note that on both of these boats, water over the transom, flooding the boat floor deck, never happens. Now, if the going really got bad in torrential rain, rough seas and water splashing into the boat, the plugs would be opened up for additional safety.

kneucker posted 09-08-2003 09:00 PM ET (US)     Profile for kneucker  Send Email to kneucker     
I have an 1986 Revenge-22 with twin 140's (820 lbs). Drifting will wet your feet on all but the calmest of days. I am currently fabricating an extension to the transom notch out of 1/2" starboard. Because of the way the OB's are mounted (they don't sit flush with the top of the transom) I can add two inches of freeboard at the engine locations and I've extended the transom upwards by six inches at the corners where most of the water seems to enter.

Another help I've found is to have only as much fuel as needed. I have the 129-gallon tank and I try to keep it no more than half full. Another tip, if you have a portly friend (or if you are portly yourself) fish from the front of the boat. The extra weight helps balance the see-saw. I've even thought of placing sand bags (100-200 lbs) in the bow locker but havn't tried this yet.

Has anyone ever considered closing the transom completely and adding an Aluminum bracket, in effect, creating a home made Whaler Drive? Just wondering.

jimh posted 09-08-2003 11:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Regarding the splash well configuration on the 22-foot Boston Whaler boat, in either OUTRAGE or REVENGE models, I think you will find that the earlier boats have a splash well that is rather small and confined to the center of the boat. There is a change in later models where the splash well was increased in size (in all three dimensions): in width athwartship, in fore and aft length, and in depth (due to raising the height of the splash well dam). The dam for the splash well runs fully across the beam of the boat, clearly separting the rear of the cockpit from the splash well. This wall also adda a structural cross piece that adds rigidity to the stern of the hull.

The earlier version with the small center-only well often had a metal tubing brace running from gunwale to gunwale at the stern, which helped to strengthen the stern and also provided a little sense of security for passengers who otherwise might have thought they could go right out of the back of the boat and over the wide notched transom. This seems particularly easy to do if the boat has only a single engine; there is plenty of open space on the wide notched transom that was designed for twin engines

In the older design, which I have seen in a few boats that I have had the chance to observe close-up, it looks to me like the height of the splash well dam is actually lower than the transom height. This means that once the well has filled with water, the well begins to drain into the cockpit and not into the sea, unless you have the splash well drain plugs removed. If the plugs are removed, you may be able to drain the well faster than water is coming aboard, but if not, the splash well overflows into the cockpit.

On the newer style splash well, the volume of the splash well is increased by its wider width, its longer fore and aft length, and by its greater depth (due to the higher dam). It can hold much more water before overflowing into the cockpit. And on these boats the splash well dam on the cockpit side is several inches higher than the transom. It keeps water out of the cockpit unless you really get a big wave rolling aboard and the splash well dam has filled.

By the way on the 20-foot Boston Whaler boat hull, it seems that the wider splash well and gunwale to gunwale dam are the norm, at least they are in my 1987. I don't know what year the 22-foot hull was changed, but later ones apparently have the full width splash well and higher dam. I think this was c.1989

That change was probably as a result of feedback from people who were shipping water into the cockpit from backing or big following seas, etc.

--jimh

hooter posted 09-09-2003 09:02 AM ET (US)     Profile for hooter    
Only thing Ah'll add here is that a Whaler's splash-well plugs are designed to remain open. It's that simple. You can decide to defeat that design, try to improve on it or go with it as is, which has been mah choice for about thirty years. Water's GOT to be able to exit through those ports whether or not you put a bilge pump in the splash well (which is unneeded in mah opinion). Ocean fishin' typically involves waves and some occasional water over the transom. Leaving those splash-well plugs open will let the water escape far quicker than even a reasonably-sized pump. If you've just got to have that extra li'l bit of space back there dry, install some scuppers.
Louie Kokinis posted 09-09-2003 09:44 AM ET (US)     Profile for Louie Kokinis    
The owners manual recommends leaving the plugs out.

Louie

PS I don’t know were my plugs are, and never had a problem.

Plotman posted 09-09-2003 09:52 AM ET (US)     Profile for Plotman  Send Email to Plotman     
I have an 87 22 with the old sytle splash well. I am powered with a single, light engine (200 carbed merc ~ 425 lbs) and I tend to get a little water in on the corners if I am drifting in a chop, and can take a fair amount if I back down hard.

It drains out. When I stop backing down.

My splash well is also pretty small - it is tapered both fore-and-aft and side-to-side. I really question whether there is enough room to even put a bilge pump down there.

The new style splash well is probably more forgiving of the 800 lbs you are going to have if you put on twins. But I don't think I would do it on this boat.

David

diveorfish posted 09-09-2003 11:28 AM ET (US)     Profile for diveorfish  Send Email to diveorfish     
You could look on the bright side. A little water on the deck keeps the fish goo from getting ground in and drying on your non-skid. Maybe you could tell your passengers that it’s designed that way?
FLUKEDUKE posted 09-09-2003 12:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for FLUKEDUKE  Send Email to FLUKEDUKE     
Dropped my daughter off on an open ocean beach to swim with some friends, normally would have preferred to keep the bow facing out but with swimmers in the water decided to go in bow first and take the swells on the transom. Wifes in the bow waving good bye the daughter and I look back to see about a 4 footer coming. With about 6" of water now in the cockpit she's screaming at me and asking what I'm going to do and "what do you mean, nothing?. Got turned around and headed out, her next question was, where did the water go?
Story probably wouldn't have been the same if any of the aft plugs were in or it was other than a Boston Whaler.
Only plug installed on my 18 is the bow locker plug.
andygere posted 09-09-2003 02:54 PM ET (US)     Profile for andygere  Send Email to andygere     
I have never put the plugs in on my '89 Outrage 22 Cuddy. It has the newer style splashwell, and I've never had any water on the deck coming in over the splashwell dam, or up from the aft corner sumps. I've been drift fishing in lumpy seas with a full fuel tank, and have also backed down with no water entering the cockpit. I've got a carb'd 200 Mercury, a 15 hp kicker, 2 batteries and 2 oil tanks all mounted in the splashwell. On my boat, I suspect the cuddy helps balance the boat a bit, perhaps keeping the transom a little higher than a standard Outrage 22.

Regarding bouyancy with the sump drains open, I don't think it's a big issue. The corner sumps are so small that you don't gain very much additional bouyancy by having them closed. I doubt if you could measure if the boat is floating any higher on her lines with them closed and pumped out. Larry makes a good point about water around the fuel tank, and I think that may be a better reason to keep them closed than any other.

Drisney posted 09-09-2003 04:07 PM ET (US)     Profile for Drisney  Send Email to Drisney     
When drift fishing, a way to keep your feet dry and be more comfortable is to deploy a sea anchor. If it is a Revenge model; keep a line tied to the bow eye, tie on the sea anchor with 15 feet or so of scope. then run a retrieve line that is long enough to reach the cockpit. This will slow your drift, keep the bow into the wind, and make things calmer.... Dave
Peter posted 09-09-2003 06:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
I believe that the Revenge with its cabin shell has a higher center of gravity than the Outrage and therefore a greater tendency to roll back and forth with the waves allowing the edges of the transom to momentarily go below the water line. The Outrage cuddy may also have a greater tendency to roll.

I can't speak for my 22 Revenge as I've never run it without the cockpit drain plugn, but with the fishwell drain plug out, it definitely floats differently with less bouyency as the volume once occupied by air is now occupied by water. Also, water in the fishwell has a "free surface" which I believe exagerates the rolling that you sometimes encounter when drifting thereby letting the ends of the transom dip below the water line more easily.

My 18 Outrage with the cockpit drain plug out with people in the boat definitely sat lower. Get enough people at the rear of the cockpit (3 or 4?) and you might be standing in some water. Although not a big deal, I usually ran with the plug in because I didn't like the salt water rushing in and out all the time.

whaler131 posted 09-09-2003 08:17 PM ET (US)     Profile for whaler131  Send Email to whaler131     
I have a 1988 OUTRAGE-22. I leave the plugs in both sides in the back, I also have a pump on each side. I do not want to open because of water around the gas tank. Water has never been a problem either on Lake Erie or the Gulf. My bigest problem is the live well, does not have a drain in the bottom; it pumps out over the side. (It never wants to dry out.) I also keep the fuel tank full even when I put it to bed in the winter, and leave the covers off to get air to the tank.,
doobee posted 09-09-2003 08:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for doobee  Send Email to doobee     
Backing into a wave will swamp just about any boat. The advantages of a Whaler in this situation become obvious.

With a 22-foot hull you should plan to get your feet wet, even in a beam sea. This is particularly true of the boats that don't have the full width splashwell. The boat was designed to be run with the sump plugs out. They allow water to flow out faster, and the fuel tank cavity is designed to allow water to flow out. The baitwell is optional as you may want to keep water in, or out. With the baitwell full of water, the excess weight will certainly lead to wet feet. With the extended fuel tank your, situation improves slightly because fuel is more buoyant than water.

As far as self bailing cockpits go, this was not Dougherty's best effort. When asked, he would tell you the transom had to be low to match the engine's shaft length. That doesn't explain why he didn't have a better splashwell design.

Knowing the nature of the beast, there are two options to minimize flooding. One is to rig the boat with a single outboard, to reduce weight aft. The other is to build a custom splash guard to keep water from entering the sumps and filling the baitwell. This is harder to do on the older models, due to the location of the sumps.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go wring out my topsiders.

Capt_Tidy posted 09-09-2003 10:48 PM ET (US)     Profile for Capt_Tidy  Send Email to Capt_Tidy     
Maybe adding a little weight in the bow will help trim the rear drain wells/plus holes... but I would suspect that an inch below the deck at the rear is a hair low but within the norm. Nobody seems to answer your original question?

Having been up to above my knees in water from a big wave over the side of my 25, it takes a while for water to drain through the drain holes... I had enough that the balance of the boat when forward and not to the rear... a little scary. I hate all the growth that comes with any water so I seal them up and rely on pumps. But the drain won't help with with serious water... it took several minutes for the deck to dry even with the power on to get the bow up in my case.

But it is amazing how much water you get in aboat without rerally noticing... I don't think you can get enough water inside a notched transom whaler to worry about stability.

Cheers
Ian
(missing the 25 big time)

jimh posted 09-10-2003 09:38 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
There is a little confusion here about which drain plugs are being recommend to be in place or not.

The splash well drain plugs are in the lower part of the transom and drain the transom splash well to the sea.

The cockpit sump drain plugs are in the hull bottom and drain the sump to the sea.

If you leave the splash well drain plugs out, the splash well fills with some water. The amount depends on the engine weight and trim on the oat, but generally it is not too much and is contained in the splash well area.

If you leave the cockpit sump drain plugs out, water will flow in from the sea until the sumps, the rigging tunnel, and (likely) the main center cavity of the hull (with the aluminum fuel tank foamed in place) are flooded, resulting (in some cases) with accumulation of water on the deck in the rear of the cockpit. This is the condition to which LHG refers when he said "I disagree about leaving sump plugs out."

Leaving the cockpit sump drain plugs in and depending on the automatic bilge pump to clear any accumulated water seems to be the best advice, particularly in salt water operation. This avoids having the cables in the rigging tunnel and the rear part of the fuel cavity (with its hoses, etc.) sitting in a bath of salt water.

When the boat is on the hard, on its trailer or rack stored, it is a good idea to remove the cockpit sump drain plugs. This way any water that collects from rain will not pool in the sumps and flood the cockpit.

If the boat is left on a mooring you have the dilemma of what to do about the cockpit sump drain plugs, the automatic bilge pumping, your battery charge, how much rain you anticipate, how waterproof your mooring cover is, etc.. Everyone has a different strategy for that situation.

--jimh

Knockerjoe posted 09-10-2003 11:02 AM ET (US)     Profile for Knockerjoe  Send Email to Knockerjoe     
I believe the cockpit sump drains should also be left out. The reason being is that when you do take one over the transom (which I have a few times) this allows the water to dissipate fairly quickly. A bilge pump will take much longer maybe allowing for a second wave to come along and add to the problem. Also this takes out the possibility the bilge pump is not on or working--similar to what happened in the first post--leaving your wife and friends to believe they are sinking!
I can understand people getting freaked out about having some water standing in the sumps. Whether the water is salt or fresh the hoses and cables are plastic and rubber and not subjected to corrosion. My concern is the fuel cavity but I think that through the years everyone with a classic Whaler is going to have some accumulation there. I guess it something you have to live with? One poster on this thread say it automatically drains? I can not see that but it would be nice.
Bottom line is that when you are offshore in some rough conditions I think you are safer pulling all your plugs. When a big one comes over the transom you will be glad you did and remember to thank God it's a Whaler!
Peter posted 09-10-2003 01:48 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
I'm not entirely certain that the water flows out of the cockpit sump (at rest) any faster than my 1100 gph bilge pump pumps it out. It would be an interesting test to see which one gets rid of a certain volume of water faster.

If one really wants to quickly get rid of water taken aboard while drift fishing then the combination of a bilge pump (obviously not on Auto) and the sump drain open would be the best setup.

elaelap posted 09-10-2003 02:15 PM ET (US)     Profile for elaelap  Send Email to elaelap     
I keep a large plastic bucket at hand under my console for the big one that's sure to come aboard some day. Can't beat a bucket and a skipper motivated by stark terror when it comes to quickly bailing out a small craft...certainly faster than my small bilge pump, which may or may not work when everything's flooded...ditto running at speed with the plug out, since the motor might have packed up. Course I'm talking about a 16/17 hull here; easy as bailing out a big bathtub, I would think.

Tony

lhg posted 09-10-2003 02:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for lhg    
On all 18-25 Outrage/Revenge models, the 1500 GPH Rule bilge pump, with separate float switch, was a HIGHLY recommended option for the starboard sump. This thing really cranks out the water, much faster than the boat's bouyancy can force water thought a 1" sump drain. With one of these in place, and functioning on "Auto", it is highly unlikely that a sump drain needs to be left open in all but the worst of conditions. Same goes for a splashewll converted to be dry, with 1 1/4" plugs in place and an 800 gph pump/float switch.

On the 25, with a sump also in the port corner, a 500 GPH pump will keep that rigging tunnel dry. On this boat, water can overflow from the rigging tunnels on either side into the gas tank cavity, where it becomes trapped. It's only means of removal is evaporation through opened deck plates.

I think we all know now why the later 22 Guardians are being made with 30" transoms. With the 22, especially the lighter Outrage, it seems that the worst floor flooding conditions occur with large twin engines (around 350#'s each) installed on a boat with the 129 gallon tank option. No matter how much fuel is in that tank, it is always at the stern end of the boat.

Knockerjoe posted 09-10-2003 04:41 PM ET (US)     Profile for Knockerjoe  Send Email to Knockerjoe     
I am not a marine engineer but I am willing to wager that 4 1" drains with the boats bouyancy will pump out water far quicker than a 1500 gph bilge pump. I have also read that bilge pumps are far over rated for the water they will actually pump. Add in factors such as length of hose, kinks, debris and length of hose over the water line and that 1500 pump might be doing 750 gph. Try figuring that out when when your 30 miles off and the water is half way up your ankles and the pump quits.
csj posted 09-10-2003 10:18 PM ET (US)     Profile for csj  Send Email to csj     
Frankb, I have a 1989 22' revenge with the fishwell at the stern, and a 77 gallon tank. I was faced with the same dilemma with water over the transom and filling the fish well, and having to go under the stern seat and remove the plug. What I did to solve the problem was to install a bilge pump in the fishwell and run the hose into the well in front of the motor. It may not be as quick as leaving plugs out, but I'm not comfortable with the amount of weight (my family), having water resting in the boat unneccessarily. Any time after a rain storm, or water over the transom I turn on the bilge pump to remove the water. Also as earlier stated I usually don't fill up more then 3/4 fuel ref having unnessessary weight. Just my 2 cents !!
glassman posted 09-18-2003 09:59 PM ET (US)     Profile for glassman  Send Email to glassman     
I fabricated a solution to this problem for a buddy of mine. He has a mid-1980's OUTRAGE-25. He is a spear fishermen and diver who always boats in rough Hawaiian waters carrying a lot of tanks aboard. Here the sea's average height is 3 to 4 feet. With a boat packed with 12 to 15 scuba tanks, ice, gear, and 4 guys over 200-pounds, he always had water over the transom--sometimes water ankle deep at the console. I raised the splash well dam to the height of the gunwales. That solved everything. The cockpit now stays absolutely dry when drifting in rough seas. The modified splash well dam also serves as a bench seat. In addition, I have mounted a dive tank holder to hold six tanks in the center of the splashwell, as well as two pole holders on each end (for use when trolling). Without a doubt the modification has been a big improvement and an increase in comfort.
jimh posted 09-19-2003 04:33 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
It would be interesting to see pictures of this modification and any others like it. If you have some available, please post them or send them to me via e-mail. Perhaps we can do a CETACEA article on modified transoms on 22-foot and 25-foot hulls.

--jimh

Charleston Revenge posted 09-21-2003 11:35 PM ET (US)     Profile for Charleston Revenge  Send Email to Charleston Revenge     
Would it be a good idea to place a pump or suction tube into the fuel well to get the (salt)water out and prevent corrosion of the fuel tank?
Deanster posted 09-22-2003 12:12 AM ET (US)     Profile for Deanster  Send Email to Deanster     
I'd be very interested to see any modified 22' transoms - I loved my 1983 OUTRAGE-22 in every way, but the tendency to leave me ankle-deep at the transom when drifting in even moderate chop made it a poor choice for having my kids on board.

I've since moved to a 1989 Center Console Cuddy-27, and it's amazing how nice it is to have dry feet.

The OUTRAGE-22 is the finest boat on earth when underway. It's also the only boat you ever want to be on with water around your ankles - My only wish is that I didn't have to experience this on a weekly basis.

If someone set up a mold for, say, a plexiglass insert that you could then bolt/caulk into place on these boats, they could make literally tens of dollars off selling them, especially with a pair of free dry socks in the package!

jimh posted 09-22-2003 08:16 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
In regard to the question about the rate of water flow though the drain openings versus the rate at which a pump can flow water from the sumps, I offer this:

The openings of the sump drains are about 0.875 inches. The rate at which water will flow through an orifice (that is the proper technical term in this situation) depends on the height of the water above it. If the orifice has a 200-foot head of water above it, the flow rate will be spectacular. If the orifice has only a few inches of water above it, the flow rate will be much less.

The flow rate from a pump will be fairly constant, although it too might benefit from an increased head of water at its intake.

It would also be interesting to calculate the weight of water contained in a splash well which has been allowed to fill partially due to the transom being loaded to the point where the drain outlets are below the waterline. At 7-pounds/gallon, you might have a fair amount of weight in the form of water in the splash well, adding to the problem.

I just finished installation of an automatic pump in the splash well of my boat (REVENGE-20) and now intend to keep the splash well drains plugged in normal operation. I did this more to keep the well dry so as to permit me to use it as a storage bin. (My engines are mounted on set back brackets, freeing up all of the well from cables, etc.)

[Changed TOPIC; was "Water Cver (sic) Transom on REVENGE-22"]]

Footnote: There is an interesting controversy surrounding calculating the rate of flow of water through an orifice. Marilyn vos Savant. author of a column giving answers to difficult questions, and who is listed in some references as having the "Highest IQ" in the Guinness Book of Records, seems to have gotten it wrong. At least according to this rebuttle:

http://www.wiskit.com/marilyn/water.html

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.