Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  22' Lo Pro

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   22' Lo Pro
lizard posted 01-02-2009 02:14 PM ET (US)   Profile for lizard   Send Email to lizard  
Can someone explain the difference in ride between a 22 Lo Pro and a conventional 22 Outrage? Is the Lo Pro ride more like the ride of a smirked hull like the Montauk or a conventional Outrage?

Thanks.

Tom W Clark posted 01-02-2009 02:36 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
There is no such thing as a 22 Lo Pro.
Ritzyrags posted 01-02-2009 05:12 PM ET (US)     Profile for Ritzyrags  Send Email to Ritzyrags     
Liz,

A 22' Low Pro would had to be a conversion.
Same as a 19'4" LP conversion the 22' has also been converted.
The hull will remain the same as in early to mid seventies Banana type hull.
The noticeable difference would be in a lighter unit due to the removal of the cap and fittings.

lizard posted 01-02-2009 06:55 PM ET (US)     Profile for lizard  Send Email to lizard     
It is described as a 22. I may have been mistaken in my wording, I thought Banana hull and Lo Pro were the same thing. There are no ribbed sides that I can see from the photos, there is a center console that appears to be Whaler (but no teak on it), , there is a bit of open storage below the bow gunwhales, there is an original RPS seat.

It is described as having a built in 30 gal. stainless steel fuel tank, which sounds low in capacity. Don't know if it is original.

The question is really the ride. I understand the following question is an apples and oranges sort of question, but is the hull more likely to ride like a Montauk (if it was made in a 22) or more like an Outrage.

jeffs22outrage posted 01-02-2009 07:31 PM ET (US)     Profile for jeffs22outrage  Send Email to jeffs22outrage     
There was never any 22' Boston Whaler that was built in a lo profile model nor in an Outrage model that you could remove the gunwale cap. There was the 21' Outrage however, I believe Whaler only had a test sled 21 Outrage without a cap. They never sold a 21 lo profile model. You could never run the 21 in this configuration in open water as the top of the gunwale is nearly at or at the water line.

There are a number of Whaler knock off manufactures that build hulls that where splashed and modified for actual Whalers hulls (or claim to be).

Transport boats [url]http://transportboats.com/[/url} offers a 22' lo profile model.

Gulf coast boats http://www.gulfcoastboats.net/models.htm offers an 18 and 20 foot model that look like a whaler as well as a 22 that looks like a modified whaler.

Be sure what is being offered is really a Whaler.

Tom W Clark posted 01-02-2009 07:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
"Lo Pro" (low profile) and "Banana" are not synonymous in the context of Whaler hulls.

The Lo Pro 19 was a derivative of the original Outrage 19 which was one of two "banana" models that Whaler made, the other being the original Outrage 21.

Only the Outrage 19 was offered as a lo-pro variant because the hull itself formed one half of its topsides. The 21 foot model's hull ended virtually at the waterline with the "cap" making up the topsides and foredeck.

The 22 foot Whaler was introduced in 1978 and had a single piece foam filled deep-V hull. It is an entirely different type of hull than either of the two "Banana" hulls.

jamesmylesmcp posted 01-02-2009 08:32 PM ET (US)     Profile for jamesmylesmcp  Send Email to jamesmylesmcp     
Jeff's correct, here is the test sled. http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc91/71outrage/surfboard.jpg
filthypit posted 01-03-2009 11:32 AM ET (US)     Profile for filthypit  Send Email to filthypit     
re: gulf coast boats

what a rip!
how'd they get away with that?

Ritzyrags posted 01-03-2009 11:42 AM ET (US)     Profile for Ritzyrags  Send Email to Ritzyrags     
Now that Tom mention it I must agree that a 21' low Pro conversion would be something of a challenge.
The thing is good old Joe Muniz did sell me a set of Bow and Stern railings that had apparently been from the cap section of a banana 21 footer.
The story goes on to say that the owner of this Outrage did convert it to a Low Pro and thus removed all railings.
Now that I am examining the cap and hull sections and the way that they will join;
I would find it a challenge to bring said hull to a comparable success as seen with the nineteen..
I wonder if anyone will have recognized this unit?
http://img254.imageshack.us/my.php?image=whaler3nu5.png
Tohsgib posted 01-05-2009 11:10 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tohsgib  Send Email to Tohsgib     
That looks like a very clean 21 that I would not molest. Many Lo=pros are done these days because the cap is basically shot but the hull is sound so you can buy it for a song.
dfmcintyre posted 01-05-2009 10:03 PM ET (US)     Profile for dfmcintyre  Send Email to dfmcintyre     
Agree with Tosgib, it's evidently (cannot see the interior) a clean 1973 - 1979 Outrage. I don't think you can drill down the age further without an interior shot. All models for the series had one 40 gallon internal fuel tank, with optional 18 gallon saddle tanks.

In the fall of 1977, I took a tour of the plant and recalled seeing out back, a 21' sled with a tower, like a tuna tower. It was explained to me that it was used for photo missions. It may or may not be the same sled in the photos. I don't recall the engine make. And took very few photos of the tour. Bummer.

I've always thought that a 21 conversion to a low-pro would be a great knock around beach boat. The factory listed the raw weight at 1600lbs. The portion of the top cap I'd remove might be around 400lbs. Power with an overhauled 150 Merc straight six and you would still have a light enough boat for a beach trailer or hoist.

Place two custom hatches on the forward currently open storage bins. Replace the RPS with a small fiberglass dock box with removable cushion. The stern would take some creative thought as I think I'd want to retain the three hatched storage compartments.

It would be a wet ride though, might have to wear wetsuit booties.

Attention Tom Clark: In my notes on the model, I noted the following:

1 - there was a console production change between '77 - '79 from the flanged bottom to the teak over aluminum brace (due to cracking?). The newer console design had teak trim strips
surrounding a black applique on the dash. Also the inset lip for the windshield was eliminated.

2 - The solid teak plywood doors were replaced with slatted ones. Between '73 - '79.

3 - Teak storage hatches were replaced with fiberglass ones.

Any idea on when these changes occured?

Don

Tom W Clark posted 01-06-2009 10:42 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
This probably deserves its own thread but in a nutshell:

There have been four versions of the classic standard fiberglass center console over the years, the first was made from 1973 to 1977. This is the "winged" console you have on your Outrage 21. It attached to the floor via the integral flanges that are part of the consoles shell. Doors on the console are solid.

In 1977 (for the 1978 model year) a new, simplified, console design came out with a single flat face to it. It mounted to the floor by having screws driven through its lower sides into mahogany blocks under the console. There was a teak strip on the outside the mounting screws passed through first. The doors were changed to louvered and a flat black Mac-Tac applique was applied to the console face as a non-glare effort.

In 1982 yet another console design came out that featured a raised binnacle area for the motor control. The angle of the face was increased to near vertical. This console was the first to mount via aluminum angle which allowed numerous robust screw to be driven into the floor of the hull on the outside of the console. This was a HUGE improvement in the security of the console connection to the hull.

In 1986 the console mold was modified to allow the face of the console to be more angled so the instruments were more easily viewed. This console shape remained in production, unchanged through 2002.

I presume the hatches you refer to are the three in the stern of the 21s. I have never seen these hatches made of anything but teak.

One important note: The original 21 was in production until 1982, not 1979, though the 1979 Boston Whaler catalog is the last in which it appears.

dfmcintyre posted 01-06-2009 02:08 PM ET (US)     Profile for dfmcintyre  Send Email to dfmcintyre     
Tom -

Thanks for the information. Regarding the hatches: I cannot remember where I saw them or on what year model. Will have to search my photo bin. I don't think I was hallucinating.

Drunk, possibly, but not hallucinating.

Honest....


D

lizard posted 01-08-2009 10:43 AM ET (US)     Profile for lizard  Send Email to lizard     
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/boa/979700454.html

I found a photo on Craigslist that is like the boat in question. What model is this 22 footer?


Tom W Clark posted 01-08-2009 11:07 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
That is a 1973-1977 Outrage 21, not a 22. It is not a lo-pro.

The fuel tank is made of aluminum, not stainless steel and has a 40 gallon capacity, not 30 gallons.

Ritzyrags posted 01-08-2009 12:04 PM ET (US)     Profile for Ritzyrags  Send Email to Ritzyrags     
posted 01-08-2009 10:43 AM ET (US) Profile for lizard Send Email to lizard http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/boa/979700454.html
Tohsgib posted 01-08-2009 12:16 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tohsgib  Send Email to Tohsgib     
Splattered interior and a steel trailer for $9k...don't think so.
lizard posted 01-08-2009 12:40 PM ET (US)     Profile for lizard  Send Email to lizard     
Now that the boat in question is identified (thanks!), can someone talk about the ride of this hull?
Tom W Clark posted 01-08-2009 12:45 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
The Outrage 22 will be MUCH smoother riding with its deep-V hull.

One former owner of an Outrage 21 I know called it "The Pounder". He went on to own an Outrage 22 and nows owns a Revenge 25 Walk Through.

MDI posted 01-08-2009 01:46 PM ET (US)     Profile for MDI  Send Email to MDI     
Tom
I think I know that guy.
flippa posted 01-08-2009 04:31 PM ET (US)     Profile for flippa  Send Email to flippa     
I have one of these hulls.

It rides alot like a Montauk if that answers the question. I never rode in a 19 Outrage hull of this vintage, but imagine that the ride is similar. They do pound the snot out of ya in rough water, so the name "The Pounder" pretty much sums up the experience.

I moved up from a Montauk, and don't mind the ride (too much). It can get old real fast on really rough days when you have to travel a good distance. I strongly recommend a leaning post & a good rubber anti-fatigue mat on the floor behind the console to help absorb the pounding on the knees.

It can also be a real wet ride on the rough days, so it is real nice to have a good canvas set on the boat. The factory forward shelter & windshield are a requirement IMHO.

It is an extremely stable boat. I do alot of diving off mine. I am a proud member of the 200+ pound club, and the boat barely tilts when I am standing on the outside lip. The stability is real nice when you have a bunch of big guys moving around in various stages of putting on/wearing dive gear or when fishing.

The boat can be kind of a pain in the arse getting in & out of the water, and has limited options for mounting a ladder due to the odd shape of the transom.

All that being said, I absolutely love the boat & wouldn't trade it for the world. Well, not entirely true, I would trade it for a much cleaner one.

The boat reminds me of a reproduction canal barge from the old Middlesex Canal that was on display near my office. I affectionately call my boat "The Scow" (see Wikipedia for definition) as it looks like a barge & is a little cosmetically challenged.

My nephew always tells me that "the boat is so fugly that it is cool". Again, that statement pretty much sums it up. This wierd looking boat always gets attention.

My hull is a 78. I have the later style console as outlined by Don & Tom. I have a fiberglass storage cover up front & teak for the three rear covers.

The later model Outrages with the deep vee are a completely different ride; much smoother as Tom & others stated.

flippa posted 01-08-2009 05:07 PM ET (US)     Profile for flippa  Send Email to flippa     
Check out the picture on the Wikipedia site under the Scow definition.

There is a picture of a schooner scow named the Jane Gifford. The boat must be a later model, it has a smirked hull.

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.