Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  Mercury May Leave Fond du Lac

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Mercury May Leave Fond du Lac
jimh posted 06-28-2009 11:12 AM ET (US)   Profile for jimh   Send Email to jimh  
Newspapers and other media in Wisconsin are filled with stories about the possibility that Mercury Marine may shut down its operation in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and consolidate its production elsewhere, presumably to Stillwater, Oklahoma.

Mercury Marine employes about 1,900 workers in their Fond du Lac operations, which amounts to about ten percent of the workforce in the local region. It has been reported that local government bodies have been conducting closed-door meetings with Mercury Marine, presumably to discuss options or incentives which might encourage Mercury Marine to maintain its presence in Fond du Lac.

Mike Mentzer reports that officials of Stillwater and the State of Oklahoma "are negotiating to lure Mercury Marine away from Fond du Lac and Wisconsin."

Cf.: http://www.fdlreporter.com/article/20090628/FON06/906280592

Lindsay Veremis of broadcast station WLUK-TV says the Fond du Lac county board "held a closed meeting June 2 to discuss possible funding for an economic opportunity," apparently to entice Mercury to stay.

http://www.fox11online.com/dpp/news/ local_wluk_could_FDL_lose_mercury_marine_20096252230_rev1

Bill Glauber of the Milwaukee JOURNAL SENTINEL writes:

"With its major plants running under capacity and the boat industry sinking during the recession, Fond du Lac-based Mercury Marine has become the subject of intense speculation that it may seek to consolidate operations either in Wisconsin or Stillwater, Okla."

http://www.jsonline.com/business/49048011.html

Laurie Ritger of THE REPORTER, notes that "the Stillwater plant is a nonunion operation, paying lower wages than the Fond du Lac plant, which has a union."

http://www.postcrescent.com/article/20090624/APC03/906240514/1028/ Mercury-Marine-keeps-quiet

fourdfish posted 06-28-2009 08:59 PM ET (US)     Profile for fourdfish  Send Email to fourdfish     
What a sad state of affairs.
Mercury was started here. I know people from Fond du Lac
and they are down right mad! What a bunch of crap.

I bet they will soon be moving all their production overseas. Now I know why they did not participate in the Wisconsin commercial being broadcast in other states.
BRP jumped in and shared it.

So Larry the Merc salesman, How proud are you now?

SC Joe posted 06-29-2009 09:59 AM ET (US)     Profile for SC Joe  Send Email to SC Joe     
Fourdfish, I'm a bit puzzled by your challenge to LHG of "how proud is he now."

In all of the articles Jimh references, cost reasons are associated with Merc's closing--from high union wages to the recession to emissions. With that in mind, I don't think it takes a rocket scientist to figure out why they would want to consolidate businesses to areas that have lower wages when none of them are running at capacity.

Are GM fans "proud" that their organization had to shut down plants and sell of businesses? Are Chryslers fans and employees "proud" that Chrysler had to shut down almost 900 dealers because they couldn not support them? Certainly it's not a good thing that Merc has to consolidate and cut jobs.

What you have Mercury do..go out of business completely? What would be your solution? Find simple, unfounded digs at people who like their products? That should fix the problem, huh?

gnr posted 06-29-2009 10:31 AM ET (US)     Profile for gnr    
SC Joe,

Don't do it man. Don't take the bait.

Some guys just like to troll for trouble and your swimming in for a look.

Tohsgib posted 06-29-2009 12:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tohsgib  Send Email to Tohsgib     
Check out the pot calling the kettle black!

My question would be why not move everything to FL by Lake X?

Hilinercc posted 06-29-2009 12:35 PM ET (US)     Profile for Hilinercc  Send Email to Hilinercc     
First it was OMC, the Johnson and Evinrude die-cast plant and corporate offices in Waukegan. Nobody ever thought this hollowed ground would come to such an end.
When it did, we still had Carl Kiekhieffer's Fond du Lac Merc plant. Its alarming to find out that this sacred ground for outboards is also going the way of OMC and Merc's own Lake "X".

Current Economics being what they are, these decisions get made as a matter of survival. But it will be a sad day indeed if they close Fond du Lac. So much rich outboard history, as was with Waukegan.

hauptjm posted 06-29-2009 12:41 PM ET (US)     Profile for hauptjm    
Why Stillwater? Do they already have a plant there? Lake X makes the most sense, if they have to consolodate.
frontier posted 06-29-2009 02:12 PM ET (US)     Profile for frontier  Send Email to frontier     
I wonder why they waited this long.
Have we forgotten why Boston Whaler moved from Taxachusetts to Florida?
fishgutz posted 06-29-2009 02:22 PM ET (US)     Profile for fishgutz  Send Email to fishgutz     
Is there really a "Lake X"? I thought that was just an imaginary place or code word for the collective places where they said they tested motors. I have personally seen Mercury tests take place in Oshkosh Wisconsin and Ft. Myers Florida. Both places on a daily basis. And the old stories of some lake in Florida where they first ran motors for weeks on end. Is that the real Lake X?
fishgutz posted 06-29-2009 02:28 PM ET (US)     Profile for fishgutz  Send Email to fishgutz     
Just found this about Lake X. http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/006178.html
outragesteve posted 06-29-2009 02:43 PM ET (US)     Profile for outragesteve  Send Email to outragesteve     
Lake X was Mercury/MerCruiser's testing facility. It also was an incredible facility for the rigging, engineering, and testing on high perofrmance boats from tunnel boats to 50'+ offshore race boats. Fun place to visit! Merc High Performance did some rebuilding and rigging on my offshore race boat. Lake X was gated and unless you had the gate code, you had to be escorted in by an employee. The airstrip was just adjacent to the entrance gate. No signs, very low key and unassuming from the outside, but inside, very impressive!
TransAm posted 06-29-2009 03:14 PM ET (US)     Profile for TransAm  Send Email to TransAm     
Kinda looks like Fountain Powerboats facility in NC

http://www.fountainpowerboats.com/ec/company/factory.html

fourdfish posted 06-29-2009 03:59 PM ET (US)     Profile for fourdfish  Send Email to fourdfish     
SC- Just excuses, and your comparisons of apples to oranges!
Good Luck with that!
Poor business practices not location is responsible
for their mess.

Hilinercc- BRP (formerly OMC) is still in Sturdevent, Wisconsin!
offshore27miami posted 06-29-2009 04:13 PM ET (US)     Profile for offshore27miami  Send Email to offshore27miami     
Sounds like good business sense to me, not speaking for all unions but I know a few that have sent corporations into bankrupcy. Merc is just responding to the times.
R T M posted 06-29-2009 04:13 PM ET (US)     Profile for R T M    
Florida is an ideal place for Mercury to relocate. Low corp taxes, no state income taxes for employees, Fl. is a Right To Work state. so those pesky unions are of no concern. Ready work force of available employees if those greedy union types don`t want to relocate. Lake X is north of Orlando, easy transportation.
COME ON DOWN!

rich/Binkie

jimh posted 06-29-2009 07:55 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Mercury has a plant in Stillwater, Oklahoma. I believe it manufactures gas and diesel sterndrive and inboard marine engines.
SC Joe posted 06-29-2009 09:55 PM ET (US)     Profile for SC Joe  Send Email to SC Joe     
quote:
SC Joe,

Don't do it man. Don't take the bait.

Some guys just like to troll for trouble and your swimming in for a look.


You are correct.

WhalerAce posted 06-29-2009 11:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for WhalerAce  Send Email to WhalerAce     
And don't forget about the Cummins Diesel / MerCruiser operations in Charleston, SC.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FZX/is_5_70/ai_n6050169/


I am never in town long enough to know what is going on there, though.


--- WhalerAce

SC Joe posted 06-30-2009 09:36 AM ET (US)     Profile for SC Joe  Send Email to SC Joe     
I work very close to the Cummnins Diesel/Merc plant. We used to see large "cigarette" type boats coming and going out of there from time to time, but I haven't seen one enter or leave their in years.
Whalerdog posted 06-30-2009 07:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for Whalerdog  Send Email to Whalerdog     
Even sadder news for the economy [appended long cut and paste of copyrighted news story taken from another website about the General Motors bankruptcy proceedings].
Whalerdog posted 06-30-2009 07:51 PM ET (US)     Profile for Whalerdog  Send Email to Whalerdog     
surpised they are not looking to relocate in China
WT posted 06-30-2009 08:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for WT  Send Email to WT     
Everyone wants to save money even if it means relocating.

It cost California approximately $50,000/year to house an inmate/prisoner here. The other states can house their inmates for about $25,000/year. I say have the other states bid for our prisoners. We provide jobs to other states in the US and California saves money. :-)

California starts issuing IOU's on Thursday.....we're broke.

Warren

17 bodega posted 07-01-2009 11:26 AM ET (US)     Profile for 17 bodega  Send Email to 17 bodega     
It's tough to see U.S. Manufacturing in such a sad state of affairs. I have family in Ohio with a service related business and they are struggling to hang on. It seems everyone knows someone or has a relative that is impacted by manufacturing layoffs and downsizing.

In the news media there is lots of blame being thrown around from complaining about forklift operator pay to union corruption, but there seems to be a lack of focus on a "way forward" to revitalize the manufacturing sector. Creating a product with true demand would be an excellent start.

I happen to believe that an extreme 180 degree shift into sustainable and energy efficient products is a giant step toward that goal.

I also understand at the same time that boating will be the first sport to take an extreme hit in tough times regardless of company strategies.

I have always noticed on this website and others that there is a desire for maximum horsepower and performance, which is fine and good, however Boston Whaler boats occupy a unique niche in boating as boats that reqire MINIMUM horsepower to operate. In my opinion, this is the way forward for boating manufacturers.

Where is the Boston Whaler "Prius"?

L H G posted 07-01-2009 12:01 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
It was here, 38 years ago, back in 1971, the year when the American standard of living peaked.

http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v429/lgoltz/ Harbor%20Springs%20MI%202008/?action=view& current=BostonWhalerRendezvousAug2008007.jpg .

Only now are these supposedly old fashioned, out of date Boston Whalers of the 70's being re-recognized for the genius they were, with low HP requirements and high fuel economy.

Somewhere, like so much of America, Whalers got lost in the excesses, extravagance and over indulgence of the last 25 years.

R T M posted 07-01-2009 12:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for R T M    
What you say is true Larry, with the exception of those outboards from back in the day. When I finished up my '61 13 footer last year I clamped a '58 35 Lark on her, and I couldn't`t afford to run her on a daily basis. 24:1 oil mix, most of the gas winds up in the river, but it had a lot of torque though. I pulled that motor off and bought a new 25 Merc 4 stroke. Runs good, low fuel consumption, but still something is missing.

rich/Binkie

Tohsgib posted 07-01-2009 12:43 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tohsgib  Send Email to Tohsgib     
WOW...that is the smartest and most logical thing I have heard Larry say in a long time. Not only that I totally agree with him but I made that plunge years ago with a VERY efficient and reliable Japanese engine. What a combination and it shows how I love my foreign brotheren even though they did bomb the crap out of us in Pearl Harbor 68 years ago.
gnr posted 07-01-2009 01:03 PM ET (US)     Profile for gnr    
quote:
but I made that plunge years ago with a VERY efficient and reliable Japanese engine.

Not sure if you intended this qoute to be just bubbling over with irony but it's spectacular in it's awesomeness just the same.

:-)

dscew posted 07-01-2009 01:16 PM ET (US)     Profile for dscew    
My water Prius is my 16 Katama with the 60 HP Merc 4 stroke. Quick to plane, fast enough even with 4 adults aboard, with only the occasional sip of gasoline; a pair of 6 gallon tanks lasts a very long time. I'm amazed at the fuel economy of this package. LHG is right about those old hulls.
Nauti Tauk posted 07-01-2009 05:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for Nauti Tauk  Send Email to Nauti Tauk     
I still want a 115HO e-Tech for my 170!
MarthaB posted 07-01-2009 07:28 PM ET (US)     Profile for MarthaB  Send Email to MarthaB     
Warren--Michigan's Gov wants to rent out a couple of our prisons that are closing. She said she will offer them to Arnold.
WT posted 07-01-2009 09:10 PM ET (US)     Profile for WT  Send Email to WT     
MarthaB:

Ahnold should jump on that deal! It's a win-win solution for both states. (It might be a bad deal for our $100,000 per year-benefits included prison guards.)

Ahnold wants to sell San Quentin Prison and it might fetch $1 billion on the open market due to its fabulous location on San Francisco Bay.

Warren

hauptjm posted 07-17-2009 02:20 PM ET (US)     Profile for hauptjm    
I looks like whatever State offers the best deal is where Mercury may land.

From Soundings Trade Only:

Mercury to decide on consolidation by summer’s end
July, 17 2009, 11:00 AM

Mercury Marine officials are weighing their options for potential consolidation of the engine manufacturer's plants in Fond du Lac, Wis., and Stillwater, Okla., with a decision expected by the end of the summer.
See Related Articles

* Mercury Marine downplays talk of move
* Mercury to be recertified for ISO 9001 standard

"All of our facilities are underutilized," Kevin Grodzki, Mercury president of marketing, sales and commercial operations, told Soundings Trade Only.

Mercury's production level has dropped about 55 percent in the last two years. In that time, the company reduced the work force at its two major plants - from 3,600 to 1,900 in Fond du Lac and from 1,300 to less than 400 in Stillwater.

The Brunswick Corp. engine subsidiary has manufacturing facilities in Mexico, Japan and China, in addition to the two main plants in the United States. Grodzki said company officials are looking at all of these facilities for ways to cut expenses.

However, he said more emphasis is being placed on the U.S. plants because they share similar functions. Although the Fond du Lac plant manufactures outboards and the Stillwater facility makes MerCruiser engines, both facilities perform casting, machining and assembly operations.

"Our options are going to include all of our manufacturing facilities, but we are focusing a lot on the complementary capabilities we have at Fond du Lac and Stillwater," Grodzki said, adding that "consolidation of operations is a potential outcome."

During the last several months, Mercury executives have been meeting with local and state officials from Wisconsin and Oklahoma to discuss incentives designed to keep the plants in their respective locales.

"We have had progressive dialogue with both the State of Wisconsin and the State of Oklahoma," said Grodzki. "Both states recognize the importance of Mercury Marine to the local economies."

Mercury did not provide details of the incentives offered, but Grodzki indicated incentives are not the only factor to weigh before making a decision.

Starting next week, Mercury executives plan to meet with union officials in Fond du Lac to renegotiate existing contracts with an eye toward trimming costs through wages and other savings.

"We still have more work to do and more facts to put together, and then we'll put that into a detailed evaluation model," said Grodzki. "There are a lot of different things to consider - the customers; the communities, which have decades-long dependence on Mercury as a core part of their economies; employees; and the fact that we want to emerge from this downturn a stronger, healthier company."

— Melanie Winters

hauptjm posted 07-17-2009 02:23 PM ET (US)     Profile for hauptjm    
Also, you have to wonder if the union aspect of Wisconsin vs. the non-union aspect of Oklahoma will weigh in the decision??
L H G posted 07-17-2009 02:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
It did for the Japanese and German auto maker plant locations, so why not Mercury? It did for Boston
Whaler, too.

Quoting, they say "The Brunswick Corp. engine subsidiary has manufacturing facilities in Mexico, *JAPAN* and China, in addition to the two main plants in the United States. Grodzki said company officials are looking at all of these facilities for ways to cut expenses."

I'm intrigued by the comment that Mercury has a manufacturing location in Japan. JimH has told us this is not so, that it is a Tohatsu manufacturing plant, run and owned 100% by Tohatsu, and that Tohatsu makes the black painted engines for Mercury, like Suzuki did for BRP. Jim and Mercury need to get this conflicting information on CW straightened out.

jimh posted 07-17-2009 08:06 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I have written to Mercury Marine several times about the Komagane plant. They never reply. If Mercury has anything to say about Komagane they are welcome to say it here, but they have chosen to ignore my inquiries.

It is clear to me that Komagane is run by Tohatsu. I believe there is only one person who thinks otherwise.

jimh posted 07-17-2009 11:44 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I have no idea who owns the Komagane plant. There are often complex arrangements with ownership of land and facilities, and no doubt more so in Japan perhaps than in the United States. Actual ownership of the property may be distinctly different from who built, manages, and runs the plant, and who designs and produces the motors. All Mercury ever really says is that some of the motors they sell are built there. I've shown you pictures of the plant with the name TOHATSU prominently displayed, and given you names of all the plant management personnel, all gentlemen of Japanese background, but you seem to hang on to this notion that Mercury is calling the shots over there. We've even had people close to Tohatsu come on here and explain that Tohatsu runs the plant. No one really knows what sort of stake, if any, Mercury has over there. They are very cagy about talking about it, probably so they won't have to reveal to their employees how much work they've sent to Tohatsu already.

It would quite a blow to the heritage of Mercury if they abandoned Fond du Lac, Wisconsin and moved all their manufacturing to Oklahoma. It would also be quite a blow to the local economy of Fond du Lac Wisconsin, considering how large the Mercury Marine operation there used to be. Dustin McCoy, or as Fox News called him, dusty book boy, already said their manufacturing was cut in half. If you have two plants to make engines, and your volume is cut in half, it certainly sounds like you only need one plant.

highanddry posted 07-18-2009 12:03 AM ET (US)     Profile for highanddry  Send Email to highanddry     
Oklahoma is in the Free USA. Low taxes, work oriented non union citizens, great place to live and raise kids, good place for Mercury to live too, already have a plant there, great move.

Elections matter, vote in all of those liberal congressman up there and raise all the taxes to the sky and unionize everything. Come on down South, we love business.

duckear posted 07-18-2009 11:39 AM ET (US)     Profile for duckear  Send Email to duckear     
Unions are bad enough for manufacturing in the 21st century with China as your competition.

Add the Kenyan's economic policies and this is what you get.


prj posted 07-19-2009 08:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for prj  Send Email to prj     
Hell, if Mercury intends to move to third world Oklahoma, they should just go all the way to Mexico or another country with appreciably greater labor savings.
jimh posted 07-19-2009 08:41 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
An article in Friday's STILLWATER NEWS PRESS says Mercury executives have been in Oklahoma meeting with MerCruiser employees and representatives of the Chamber of Commerce. On Monday, Mercury executives will return to Wisconsin and meet with the Union representing employees in Fond du Lac, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers.

It seems clear that some consolidation of the two facilities, Stillwater, Oklahoma and Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, is going to happen. The question seems to be which city will remain a Mercury manufacturing center.

See:

http://www.stillwater-newspress.com/local/local_story_198235325.html

R T M posted 07-19-2009 10:10 PM ET (US)     Profile for R T M    
In my opiniom it doesn`t matter if Mercurys are built in Wi. or OK. Getting out of the clutches of labor unions is a good thing, and the factory is still in the good ol` USA.

rich/Binkie

Chesapeake posted 07-20-2009 06:19 PM ET (US)     Profile for Chesapeake    
RTM - I think you are really getting to the point of all this now. What a tough position Mercury is in... as much of industrial America is. The economy is tough, fewer people can afford Merc's product and industrial overhead is expensive. You cannot blame these folks for trying to stay in business. At the end of the day, they are accountable to shareholders more than they are to employees at one of two underutilized plants. The alternative is to allow our president to usher them into Chapter 11 and have them do the restructuring for Merc.

Unions are a blessing and a curse. They were ushered in during a period when the US worked needed rights. Now, they often have the leverage to hold companies hostage. While US automakers have suffered from leadership or lack of, their degrees of freedom to restructure were very limited by Union contracts... which became an entitlement, rather than the countermeasure they were originally put in place to be. Merc needs the freedom to adjust to a changing economy and if a union cannot contribute, then there is always the dreaded alternative of unemployment or relocation to OK.

BTW don't get me started on entitlements, because we are about to see the biggest entitlement enacted since Johnson was president... called government healthcare. This will be his second trillion dollar mistake in a year.

Sorry, I am ranting. Good luck, Mercury Marine

fno posted 07-21-2009 09:15 AM ET (US)     Profile for fno  Send Email to fno     
You will find that unions exist and thrive in Oklahoma also. The companies and employees that they deal with are not necessarily thriving though. Case in point, GM's Oklahoma City plant shut down a couple of years before the latest collpase of the economy.
an86carrera posted 07-21-2009 12:41 PM ET (US)     Profile for an86carrera  Send Email to an86carrera     
It is too bad the unions can't control the salaries and benefit packages for this nation's VP and up level management. These are the people that are really raping the country's businesses.

The accountants just finagle (sp?) the financial data which allows executive salaries that are not long term justified. Sure enough, in a year or two the company is not making any money because they have dropped customer service, engineering, etc.

Or, they move production offshore and the real costs; vacations, benefits (breakfast, lunch and housing), attendance, maintenance, travel expenses, shipping overnight due to production deficits start to pile up. Then management start cutting salaries and jobs at home to show more profits. It can't be done at the overseas locations due to contracts they made with the local governments.

Another great one I have seen recently is to buy another company worth as much as the one you are the CEO types of, the money comes from an adjustable rate loan. Two years later after the brainiacs consolidate the operations which puts all of the companies in a non-growth state, the balloon payment is due. Then, the banks come in and demand more consolidation before they will extend the credit line which is necessary since you have lost so much business and can't make the payment. Where did the money go? Oh yes, it went to the idiots at the top in bonuses for doubling the size of the corporation.

And these director/CEO types are sucking funds from multiples of companies at the same time. Have you ever checked the financial data from companies and read the biographies for the leaders? A lot of them are directors at many corporations at the same time.

The old saying still stands, it's not what you know...it's who you blow. And, the rich get richer etc...

I am all for government regulation as soon as our government is truly run BY THE PEOPLE. Take a look at our socialist friends across the Atlantic, we have a lot to learn.

Len

hauptjm posted 07-22-2009 09:54 AM ET (US)     Profile for hauptjm    
The government running businesses: now that's an oxymoron. With all due respect, admittedly, there are some horribly run entities, however to lump tens of thousands of well run and fairly compensated executives together with these few, is quite amazing.

It seems popular in today's climate to reduce everything down to the lowest common denomintor, but that is a slippery slope to mediocrity. What Brunswick has to do as a profit generating concern, is to do whatever necessary to stay afloat. If it means moving to OK, then so be it. That sure beats sinking!

Remember, Whaler moved to Florida and thrived for many years.

highanddry posted 07-22-2009 12:51 PM ET (US)     Profile for highanddry  Send Email to highanddry     
I cannot get over how many socialist there are here.

Mercury should leave for Oklahoma, I would already have done it. When all the folks up there in the rust belt figure out what is going on, union unemployeed, maybe they will finally return to capitolism.

Change, you wanted change, you gonna get it. When they start taxing health benifits from corporations then they will stop offereing them, we will all be beholding to the gubernment fromcradle to grave. Maybe they will decide who get's born and when you gwet to die and wher you will be buried, how much you make, if you ar smart enougnt to go to school, a sad new world of dumbed down, burger fed, human cattle.

Come on down Merc, when the feds finally push us to far we might ask to be on our own.

Feejer posted 07-22-2009 03:08 PM ET (US)     Profile for Feejer  Send Email to Feejer     
Just as long they fix the fuel floats.............I don't care where they move to.
R T M posted 07-22-2009 04:19 PM ET (US)     Profile for R T M    
high and dry,
If you believe all that nonsense you spew, and are as dumb as you appear, you are going to need every benefit you can get from the "New Socialist Society." How are you existing in a capitalist society anyway. Not very well, I would say.

rich/Binkie

an86carrera posted 07-22-2009 04:46 PM ET (US)     Profile for an86carrera  Send Email to an86carrera     
They might even make up a spelling test for an internet licence.

Len

elaelap posted 07-22-2009 11:34 PM ET (US)     Profile for elaelap  Send Email to elaelap     
Hey, leave highandry alone, guys. His was the most spirited defense of "capitolism" I've heard in a dog's age. Is he suggesting that Mercury move its plant to our nation's capitol? Man oh man...

Tony

jimh posted 07-22-2009 11:48 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
God bless Mercury for actually manufacturing something in the USA, and particularly in a plant with a strong Union.
L H G posted 07-23-2009 12:24 AM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
[Changed topic to introduce speculation about other companies moving production out of the United States. This discussion is about Mercury's highly publicized process of consolidation in the U.S.A. Please start a new thread if you wish to change the topic to another company.--jimh]
jimh posted 08-05-2009 10:54 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Mercury Marine has posted an FAQ to answer many questions about the current status of their plans to reduce their manufacturing footprint:

http://www.mercurymarine.com/_media/pdfs/decision09/ 1249409825Questions_and_Answers_7.30.09.pdf

number9 posted 08-06-2009 02:24 AM ET (US)     Profile for number9  Send Email to number9     
From Mercury Marine Q&A post,
"We, like you, are certain that the market will recover, however it has become clear that the market will never return to the peaks of even a couple of years ago. Our current facilities will never be fully utilized in the new market and if Mercury is truly to become profitable again we must permanently reduce our severely underutilized manufacturing capacity."

Obviously this has been said before but their current facility utilization would have be higher now if the 60hp and under motors were domestically produced. It would be interesting to see the real cost/benefit to the corporate bottom line when the costs of opening foreign and closing domestic facilities, agreements with other manufactures and loss of brand loyalty are taken into consideration.

L H G posted 08-06-2009 05:08 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
I am convinced that Americans are currently learning nothing from this severe recession, 10% of people out of work, and losses of years of savings and investments, including Real Estate.

Why? I see no changes, and nobody is REALLY getting the message. 55% of the US taxpayer's "Clunker" stimulus money is going out of the country to "stimulate" foreign companies and jobs in Germany, Japan and Korea. Just crazy. What fools we are. Look at the big three jobs being lost to these foreign workers on just this situation, right now. Those lost jobs will cost all of us money.

At corporate levels it's no better. Mercury says they have too much manufacturing space, but have plants in China and Japan, where people work for less, and work better. Why aren't the 40, 50, and 60 4-strokes still made here? The truth. Our workers are too expensive, because those engines have to compete with Honda, Suzuki and Yamaha which are also made over there. Price is everything these days, or nobody will buy your engine. So why not make Mercs over there? BRP has done the same thing. Laid off workers in WI, and opened a plant in China to build 25 & 30 HP engines. Same situation. And it's repeated 1000's of times in other industries.

So how are we really going to get all these people back to work. We're not, unless consumers and corporations get smart, and so far it's not happening. In outboards, autos and thousands of other items, many Americans think we are not competing with foreign companies, and therefore buy foreign. They think they are getting the BEST for their money. Maybe, but it's a recipe for disaster, now starting to show.

Who, here, driving a foriegn car, feels sorry for the people in Michigan?

Who, here, owning a foreign outboard, feels sorry for the people in Wisconsin?

In both cases, NONE. If you did, you'd buy American and help these folks out. Most of these Americans think Michigan and Wisconsin DESERVED it, becuae of overall poor performance, quality and design.

dscew posted 08-06-2009 05:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for dscew    
I bought a Saturn Vue in 2006. American car, right? Until I looked under the hood and found a Honda drive train (a good one, too, I might add). I bought a 2006 60 HP 4 stroke Mercury and hung it on my Katama. American outboard, right? Until I looked at the crate when it was delivered to my driveway and saw "manufactured in China to Mercury specifications." I bought a Lawnboy mower in 2008. American mower, right? Until I opened the operator's manual--Honda engine.

LHG is right, nobody has learned yet, nor will they. I do feel for the people in Michigan, my wife grew up in Detroit, went to school in Ann Arbor, and has strong roots there; no one knows the devastation Detroit and its neighboring communities have faced until they see it first hand. The Southfield, MI condo my father-in-law paid $300,000 for in 1986 is on the market for $59,000 with no lookers. This is being repeated more or less across our country.

No one in MI or WI deserved it, but those who shipped the jobs overseas in response to their own greed deserve a lot less than they have--the problem is, they're insulated from the economy because of the millions or billions they've already plundered--they're fine.

We're thinking of a new Malibu or Impala, we're even thinking of flying to Detroit to make the purchase, but who knows where the components in those cars came from? And will I have my job tomorrow when the bill comes?

About the only difference I see now is that everyone is scared to death and has pulled back from some of the discretionary spending like restaurants (which hurts the restaurants.

Everyone needs to own this recession, but no one wants to pony up to help fix it.

jimh posted 08-06-2009 07:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Mercury is looking down the road and it sees a much reduced demand for its expensive recreational products. That is probably a good vision. America needs to re-size its economy to fit the real economic conditions of today. In the past decade we bought too much on debt with cheap credit. That credit buying is gone. People won't be buying outlandish products on credit like they once did. Mercury Marine won't be selling $20,000 VERADO motors in triplicate in nearly the volume they once anticipated. Boston Whaler won't be selling $96,000 trailerable outboard boats like they once did.
Buckda posted 08-07-2009 09:00 AM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Larry, I agree with you, but it's tough to take when you've recommended on these pages to buy batteries from WalMart.

cf: http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/002378.html

jimh posted 08-10-2009 01:18 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Brunswick announced today it was seeking new credit, including pledging its corporate headquarters and its corporate owned bowling center real estate assets as security. See

http://sev.prnewswire.com/retail/20090810/CG5909310082009-1.html

for details of the offering.

WT posted 08-10-2009 08:05 PM ET (US)     Profile for WT  Send Email to WT     
Many business owners have mortgaged their homes in an attempt to keep their businesses going. Looks like Brunswick is trying to make the same kind of bet.

Good luck to Brunswick on their refinance.

Warren

fourdfish posted 08-10-2009 08:45 PM ET (US)     Profile for fourdfish  Send Email to fourdfish     
Now who in their right mind would lend Brunswick money today.
Sounds like a fire sale to avoid bankruptcy.
It is a shame they didn't think of that earlier like Ford.
The recreational business will always do poorly in this
kind of economy.
The president of Mercury was on TV yesterday to spin damage
control for the move out of Wisconsin. Looked like he was
on a some cartoon show.
Some had the foresight to prepare for these times.
It is a good thing I don't have to listen to Larrys suggestions for economic survival.
WT posted 08-10-2009 09:23 PM ET (US)     Profile for WT  Send Email to WT     
"Some had the foresight to prepare for these times."

Not Genmar, Sun-Times, Star Tribune, General Motors, Chrysler, Circuit City, Lehman Brothers, Bear Sterns, Wachovia, Trump Entertainment, Ritz Cameras, Washington Mutual, etc.

Let's hope Brunswick survives because they have 19,720 employees as of their last report.

Good luck to all,

Warren

L H G posted 08-11-2009 02:44 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
A Wells Fargo Analyist had this comment:

"We believe investors should view this announcement positively as it removes 2010 refinancing risk and further enhances [Brunswick's] near/intermediate-term liquidity position," said Tim Conder, senior analyst with Wells Fargo Securities.

Sal A posted 08-11-2009 02:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for Sal A  Send Email to Sal A     
I have done my part. Since September 11th 2001, which was a defining moment for me and my ways...

New :

Boston Whaler 110 Tender
Boston Whaler 130 Sport
Boston Whaler 205 Conquest
Boston Whaler 190 Nantucket

Parker 2005 2520 SL

2001 Ford F150
2003 Ford F150
2007 Chevrolet Silverado
2008 Saturn Outlook
2009 Chevrolet Silverado


The last three GM vehicles I have are the best I have ever owned.

I did repower with a Yammie though...

Ablewis posted 08-24-2009 05:07 PM ET (US)     Profile for Ablewis  Send Email to Ablewis     
The Mercury Marine Union in Wisconsin rejected the most recent package and the company announced that they are relocating jobs to a right to work state (Oklahoma).
See:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ ALeqM5iEhyqlL2_5Y82aeoWPgc7sryZX6QD9A8SR400

http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/54321942.html

Very sad indeed, but it's following a trend of locating large plants in states where unions are weak.

Average hourly wages of $20 doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Asking these workers to go without a raise for 7 years and asking laid off workers to accept a 30% cut seems like a pretty desperate plea to me. Maybe these jobs do belong in Oklahoma. It's a huge blow to Fond du Lac and the workers who have worked for this company for decades. "Buy American" doesn't ring true to me when I see these kinds of moves.

HAPPYJIM posted 08-24-2009 08:42 PM ET (US)     Profile for HAPPYJIM  Send Email to HAPPYJIM     
Better Oklahoma than Mexico...........
jimh posted 08-24-2009 10:22 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I wonder how the quality control is going to be for the next two years of production of the VERADO in Fond du Lac?
R T M posted 08-24-2009 10:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for R T M    
Better Oklahoma than Mexico

Your right about that. I would hate to read about Americans illegaly crossing into Mexico to work in the mercury plant.

rich/Binkie

HAPPYJIM posted 08-24-2009 10:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for HAPPYJIM  Send Email to HAPPYJIM     
Will they allow workers to relocate to Oklahoma to work there?
If I was facing the jobless market I would have to consider relocating to keep my job and move to another state.
Whalerdog posted 08-25-2009 05:55 AM ET (US)     Profile for Whalerdog  Send Email to Whalerdog     
They just need to unionize in OK then Mercury can move to China with a smile. We are in the race to the bottom with each state slashing each other throat for plants. Then from China they can move to Vietnam where wages are cheaper than China.
R T M posted 08-25-2009 07:10 AM ET (US)     Profile for R T M    
Mercury is not moving to Oklahoma becuase they for some reason don`t like the residents of Wisconsin. It`s all about unions. Apparently OK. is a Right To Work state, as is Florida and the South. The unions have driven manufacturing out of this country. There was a time for unions, but that time is long past, and they are not needed in present society. Not only that they are pure Socialism. (Join the union and they will take care of all your working problems) Union workers are for the most part layabouts. I`m speaking from experience as a former union Carpenter, and permit holder in the Ceramic Tile Layers union, which would not take me in as a member as I did not have a direct relative in that union. Work quotas are set so low that a worker can cruise through the day working at a sloooow snails pace, for a high wage. Great when your the worker but for the contractor its another story as his bids must reflect the high cost of union sub contractors. Thankfully in Right To Work States General contractors can hire non union subs.

rich/Binkie

TransAm posted 08-25-2009 08:24 AM ET (US)     Profile for TransAm  Send Email to TransAm     
Seminole Jack-ass Writes:

quote:
Mercury is not moving to Oklahoma becuase they for some reason don`t like the residents of Wisconsin. It`s all about unions. Apparently OK. is a Right To Work state, as is Florida and the South. The unions have driven manufacturing out of this country. There was a time for unions, but that time is long past, and they are not needed in present society. Not only that they are pure Socialism. (Join the union and they will take care of all your working problems) Union workers are for the most part layabouts. I`m speaking from experience as a former union Carpenter, and permit holder in the Ceramic Tile Layers union, which would not take me in as a member as I did not have a direct relative in that union. Work quotas are set so low that a worker can cruise through the day working at a sloooow snails pace, for a high wage. Great when your the worker but for the contractor its another story as his bids must reflect the high cost of union sub contractors. Thankfully in Right To Work States General contractors can hire non union subs.


Now insert the word "government" in place of "union(s)". Sound familiar???

fishgutz posted 08-25-2009 09:25 AM ET (US)     Profile for fishgutz  Send Email to fishgutz     
Yay, I hope they move so they will be cheap enough to buy at Walmart. That would be great. Then if something goes wrong we can just buy a new one or have some minimum wage Walmart mechanic, the same kid that assembles the bicycles, do all the repairs. Sweet.
R T M posted 10-17-2009 10:47 PM ET (US)     Profile for R T M    
The latest facts now are the plant in Stillwater will close and all operations from that plant will move to Fond Du Lac.

rich/Binkie

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.