Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  Honda 7.5 v. Mercury 7.5

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Honda 7.5 v. Mercury 7.5
JW_Spencer posted 05-10-2010 02:13 PM ET (US)   Profile for JW_Spencer   Send Email to JW_Spencer  
With apologies to the purists, I am looking for a kicker/auxiliary motor for my 1991 Wahoo 1850 (Whaler wanabe, the hull is like the bastard love child of an Outrage 18 or 19 and Montauk without the smirk, deep vee, cathedral -- and I am very grateful, because I am loving it).

BACKGROUND: Low budget operation, 1st boat, it will be used for trolling for salmon in the Puget Sound (there can be some 7-8 mph tidal currents in places). I searched this forum and while I could not find uniformity of opinion, there seemed a quorum of those who thought a 6 hp would be the smallest recommended kicker for an 18 Outrage (similar hull and weight).

I am looking at a 70's Merc 7.5 hp -- asking price $250 and an 80's Honda 7.5 hp -- asking $425. If it gets be through a summer or two, I'll be happy enough.

What are your thoughts/recommends? ( for discussion purposes, assume same decent running condition -- I know -- big assumption).

Thanks,
JW

acseatsri posted 05-10-2010 06:11 PM ET (US)     Profile for acseatsri  Send Email to acseatsri     
If you already have a 2-stroke that you mix the oil and gas, go with the Mercury. If you have an outboard that mixes the oil in the fuel automatically( or a 4-stroke), go with the Honda.
JW_Spencer posted 05-10-2010 07:06 PM ET (US)     Profile for JW_Spencer  Send Email to JW_Spencer     
Thank you. Oh yeah, an important piece of information. The current motor is a Yamaha 150 oil injected 2 stroke.
adlert posted 05-11-2010 10:15 AM ET (US)     Profile for adlert  Send Email to adlert     
Though acseartri's comments certainly make good sense, if you have room, many would say there is also value in having a totally separate fuel supply for your kicker for maximum redundancy. If your main engine goes down and the main fuel supply is to blame you'll be happy you've got the totally separate kicker set-up.

If you choose to use the same (currently straight gas) fuel supply as acseartri suggests then I guess your easiest choice would be the Honda. Additionally, the Honda is newer which is often a good thing. I think I'd try to assess the actual mechanic condition and use history of the two engines and let that be my guide. Either should provide excellent service if in good shape.

burning_hXc_soul posted 05-11-2010 10:46 AM ET (US)     Profile for burning_hXc_soul  Send Email to burning_hXc_soul     
I keep a separate 3 gallon gas tank on board for my kicker even though it uses the same pre-mixed gas as my main engine. That way, you always have at least 3 extra gallons of good gas on hand. I personally like mercury's but that's just me.

A recommendation from me would be to always make it a habit to start your kicker motor each time you take your boat out. I don't use mine for trolling hardly ever, just a back up means of propulsion. That being said, my main motor has never left me stranded since I've owned it, but I keep my kicker motor current by running it at least 15 minutes each trip to keep it from just sitting and rotting.

Tohsgib posted 05-11-2010 12:08 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tohsgib  Send Email to Tohsgib     
Condition would be the main point. You also need a long shaft or it might be a moot point in rougher seas.
Kingsteven18 posted 05-13-2010 06:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for Kingsteven18  Send Email to Kingsteven18     
Here's mine:
http://s189.photobucket.com/albums/z84/kingsteven18/18%20Wahoo/

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.