Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  What It Means To Cross the Strait or Straight of Juan De or de Fuca or Juan De Fuca Strait

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   What It Means To Cross the Strait or Straight of Juan De or de Fuca or Juan De Fuca Strait
OldToby posted 04-30-2011 11:36 AM ET (US)   Profile for OldToby   Send Email to OldToby  
Greetings. My wife and I are planning a summer trip in late July to the San Juan Islands, trailering our 1964 Eastport. One part of our plan (besides cruising Lake Washington, Lake Union, and going through the Ballard Locks) is to put in at Anacortes and cross to Victoria for a few days. I've searched the forum here and really haven't found anything that addresses this specific subject--the Victoria crossing, that is. This may be due to my feeble searching skills.

I've talked to a few people who raise their eyebrows when I tell them that I'm going to take a 16-foot boat across to Victoria, given that the water thereabouts can get pretty choppy. However, we've Whalered further north along Vancouver Island (out of Telegraph Cove) in some pretty rough weather, and I don't really see too much difficulty in a crossing like that, barring gales or fog or something.

Can anyone offer advice for me about the crossing? And once into Victoria Harbour I'm guessing I'll be able to find moorage, but maybe I'm overly optimistic??

Any input would be welcome. Thanks!!

Tom W Clark posted 04-30-2011 12:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
That can be a very easy crossing but it depends on the weather, the wind mostly. It can have huge wind driven, tide opposed, breaking waves or it can be smooth as a baby's butt.

In the summer the latter is far more common than the former. Choose your days and you'll be fine.

OldToby posted 04-30-2011 02:52 PM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
I don't know; huge wind-driven, tide-opposed waves sound fun.
20dauntless posted 04-30-2011 04:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for 20dauntless  Send Email to 20dauntless     
If the weather is good you'll have no problem, and it's good most summer days in my experience. If it's foggy or windy, you can always spend some time in the San Juans at any number of beautiful spots.

Your biggest problem would probably be wind against current. This condition can produce big tide rips, especially in the passes that connect the islands with the straits. You could also take a variety of routes to get to Victoria from Anacortes depending on wind and tide conditions.

contender posted 04-30-2011 05:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for contender  Send Email to contender     
Tom is correct, pick your days, leave a float plan with someone that is knowledgeable/dependable. How far is it?
martyn1075 posted 04-30-2011 07:39 PM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
I have done that crossing in a Revenge 22. It is very nice when it is calm but nasty depending on the wind and which way it is blowing. It is one of the worst if you get caught, so be careful. The Northwest wind can be a real battle if in the range of 15- to 20-knots, and up. I guess what's unique in that crossing is you can cut through broken islands and dodge what would be an open sea right to Victoria.

Sometimes the forecasts are just wrong! It is best just to check the day of and make a smart decision. I know it can be a pain when you are on a tight schedule but it is just the right thing to do I feel. The early morning and late evening have normally been a good time for that crossing and that goes for anywhere up the coast in that direction from the north side Vancouver to Vancouver Island.

Martyn

OldToby posted 04-30-2011 08:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
Thanks for all the input. I am pretty conservative in my boating decisions, so we will only attempt the crossing in good conditions. Our home water is Pend Oreille in north Idaho, so we're well used to choppy water; what's different is the tide and currents. Anyway, we'll have a standby plan if we need one, but I sure hope we don't. I've been wanting to do this trip for several years!
jimh posted 04-30-2011 10:17 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
It looks like the distance to Victoria, British Columbia from Anacortes, Washington is about 45-miles by shortest route. If you make 20-MPH you only need two hours of calm seas and fair weather to make it. With today's weather reporting and forecasting it should not be too hard to predict two hours in advance and know if you're likely to see a significant change in wind and wave c conditions.
Tom W Clark posted 04-30-2011 10:27 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Jim,

Traveling to Victoria, B.C. from Anacortes, WA through the San Juan Islands will take you across the Straight of Georgia, not the Straight of Juan de Fuca.

If you must meddle with the Subject Line, please do not muddle it.

deepwater posted 05-01-2011 09:07 AM ET (US)     Profile for deepwater  Send Email to deepwater     
"I don't know Huge wind driven,Tide opposed waves sound fun" Maybe if your a seal chasing fish or a youngsta on a skidoo ^@^,,It sounds like you have some time on the water and enjoy some spray in your grin so enjoy the trip and learn some new waters
wezie posted 05-01-2011 10:46 AM ET (US)     Profile for wezie  Send Email to wezie     
"Go offshore with fear" was the title of an article written by a gentleman that routinely took a 16 ft boat way offshore. His rule, along with fear, was that if "things" begin to go wrong, quit!
He applied his rule from the time of getting up.
Do not know what his percentage of success was, but he was alive to write the article.
All good things begin with proper planing.
Good Luck!

kmev posted 05-01-2011 11:24 AM ET (US)     Profile for kmev  Send Email to kmev     
If you're not familiar with the area, take a paper chart and have a few "bailout" plans for alternate ports or routes in case you do get caught in some seas.
jimh posted 05-01-2011 11:29 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Tom--I planned the route using NOAA charts and got the geographical names from there. You should contact NOAA to let them know they've made a mistake on their charts. Also contact the rest of the world's geographers, too, as they are all similarly misinformed, according to you.
Tom W Clark posted 05-01-2011 11:44 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Jim -- It is not NOAA that is in error.

Actually, I chuckled when reading your response. It is almost verbatim the response I was going to give you last night before I decided meddle and muddle were just too good together in one sentence to pass up.

My suspicion is that you and I have chosen different routes for traveling by small boat from Anacortes, through the San Juans, to Victoria.

You can describe your suggested route, and why you would choose it and then I'll describe my suggested route, and why I would choose it.

jimh posted 05-01-2011 12:14 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
My route to Victoria, BC from Anacortes, WA:

--depart Anacortes heading North
--transit Guemes Channel Westward to Rosario Strait
--transit Rosario Strait Southwesterly to Juan De Fuca Strait
--proceed across Juan De Fuca Strait generally westerly to Victoria

The last leg is the really open water leg, a stretch of about 25 miles. If the weather cooperated, you could make that in an hour in a 16-footer, but, of course, you'd need cooperative wind and wave conditions.

Island hopping across the San Juan Islands will offer more sheltered conditions, but that sort of boating is done all the time in 16-foot Whalers.

jimh posted 05-01-2011 12:25 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
And, Tom, the Georgia Strait is North. If you run from Nanaimo to Sechelt you will cross the Georgia Strait.

I made such a crossing in 2003 and we were most fortunate to have absolutely dead calm winds and flat seas. On that afternoon you could have crossed in a SPORT 15 towing a water skiier--if you had the right propeller.

jimh posted 05-01-2011 12:47 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
As for my route planning, the choice was for shortest distance.

I also add this warning: even if wind waves are small, watch out in this area for commercial shipping. Large commercial ships appear to transit this area at speeds which produce significant wakes. In the two weeks I spent boating in this area--well actually most of the time was much farther North and not in the San Juan Islands--the worst wave we encountered was the wake of a large commercial ship.

I still recall that situation. We were on a crossing course with a commercial ship. My initial estimate of our relative positions indicated I could cross in front of the approaching ship, which I much preferred to do so as to avoid his wake. I increased my speed to give me greater clearance for the crossing, however I soon saw that my initial judgement was wrong. The relative bearing to the commercial ship was staying constant or slightly decreasing, indicating I was not making any headway toward crossing his bow. I increased speed to full-throttle, but still the relative bearing did not increase. I had to alter course and pass astern of the ship, which caused me to cross his wake. The wake was very substantial, and on the third wave of the wake the bow of the REVENGE could not rise in time. We took green water over the foredeck, even though we slowed to idle speeds.

I attribute the mistake to my previous experience with commercial ships in the Great Lakes, which we mostly encounter when operating in channels. In restricted areas the ships operate "under check," a quaint reference to the days of steam power, meaning their speed is reduced. In open water a modern commercial ship, particularly one intent on a fast passage to the Far East from the Seattle area, can go darn near as fast as some Boston Whaler boats. Keep an eye out for them and their wake.

20dauntless posted 05-01-2011 12:50 PM ET (US)     Profile for 20dauntless  Send Email to 20dauntless     
Jim, that may be the most direct route but it is not the only route. For example, a less exposed (and less direct) option could be to cross Rosario Strait to Thatcher Pass, run north betwen Blakely and Lopez Islands, head through Harney Channel and Pole Pass, then through San Juan and Spieden channels to Roche Harbor. If the weather is still good, head through Mosquito Pass to Haro Strait. If it's bad, stop and enjoy Roche Harbor or Garrison Bay and English Camp until the weather improves.

Once you're in Haro Strait you can cross immediately to the Canadian side and hug their coast, follow the coast of San Juan Island, or go whereever you want depending on the weather conditions. Keep an eye out for lots of ~25 foot, brightly colored inflatables leading whale watching tours in the area. It's quite common to see Orcas in Haro Strait in the summer, and it's wonderful to see them from your own boat. Just make sure you stay 200 yards away and follow all the other rules if you do find the whales.

There are several more possible routes as well, but I think this one is generally the most protected and certainly gives you a good taste for the beauty of the area. Going this way you never have to cross the Strait of Juan de Fuca, but no matter which way you go you have to run the last few miles into Victoria in it.

jimh posted 05-01-2011 12:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
ASIDE: Let me also offer some advice on crossing the Georgia Strait. Keep your VHF Marine Band Radio tuned to Channel 16 for advisory notices of submarine warfare simulations. It was my experience that navigation in the Georgia Strait was restricted on certain days due to Canadian Navy ships and submarines engaging in warfare simulations. We had to contact the Canadian Navy station via radio to get permission to cross the area on such a day in late Summer of 2003.
20dauntless posted 05-01-2011 12:56 PM ET (US)     Profile for 20dauntless  Send Email to 20dauntless     
Jim, I believe the area you're describing is known as Whiskey Gulf, just outside of Nanaimo, which won't effect anyone on a trip from Anacortes to Victoria. But if you're crossing the Strait of Georgia from Nanaimo to the mainland side, watch out!
Tom W Clark posted 05-01-2011 01:16 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
My route to Victoria, BC from Anacortes, WA:

- Depart Skyline Marina on the South side of Fidalgo Island.

- Cross Rosario Straight to either Thatcher Pass or Lopez Pass.

- Travel north up Lopez Sound thence westward through Harney Channel through the Wasp Group to Speiden Channel and on to Roche Harbor.

- From Roche Harbor, cross Haro Straight (the Southern extension of the Straight of Georgia) to Victoria via Baynes Channel and either Mayor Channel or Plumper Passage.

Because this trip is a part of a visit to the San Juan Islands, skirting the islands altogether by traveling south of them does not make sense.

The Southern route also exposes you to the big water of the Straight of Juan de Fuca. When the swell is right, it can roll all the way from the Pacific Ocean down the Straight of Juan de Fuca to its east end south of the San Juan Islands. That is a lot of fetch and can produce some very big waves when a Westerly blows.

If you do take this route, you are traveling along the edge of the Straight of Juan de Fuca, you are not crossing it. You cross the Straight of Juan de Fuca if you travel to Victoria from a port on the Olympic Peninsula like Port Angeles.

Once in the heart of the San Juan Islands, the most logical path to Victoria is across and down Haro Straight. When the weather is good, the wind, if any, will usually be from the North. By leaving Roche Harbor early and traveling downwind to Baynes Channel you will have a much easier ride.

[ Aside: We call it the Straight of Juan de Fuca not Juan de Fuca Straight. It is so named on the numerous NOAA charts I have here in my office. ]

I cannot understate the importance of boating across water that is moving the same direction as the wind. The change of tide, even when weak, will have a profound effect on how the waves build. As little as 30 minutes can be the difference between light tight chop and big breaking waves.

I strongly suggest OldToby use the Current Atlas for the Straight of Juan de Fuca and Straight of Georgia published by the Fisheries and Oceans, Canada.

jimh posted 05-01-2011 01:18 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Sechelt is on the mainland. The body of water I described as the Georgia Strait is what most chart makers call the Georgia Strait. I am not familiar with Whiskey Gulf, but from the name it sounds like a good place to visit. It reminds me of the Whiskey River in Canda, which, according to legend, was so named because a railroad bridge washed out, causing a train to wreck. The train was carrying several carloads of Canadian whiskey, which were washed into the river, allowing the locals to recover a substantial portion of the cargo.

Tom, I have to confess I am still chuckling, too. I fully expected you to take offense to my use of the geographic name "Juan De Fuca Straight" and instead to offer the variation "Strait of Juan De Fuca" or perhaps even "Strait of Jaun de Fuca." This sort of close shaving seems to have become an everyday occurrence around here. The notion that you'd think I was so geographically impaired I could get the name wrong for two very major bodies of water in the Pacific Northwest never occurred to me. You must think I am becoming senile.

jimh posted 05-01-2011 01:22 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Tom and I were writing at the same time. It gives me a good feeling to know that one cannot slip "Juan De Fuca Strait" past the close readers here. Actually, I would normally write "Strait of Juan De Fuca" but I noticed that GOOGLE EARTH was calling it otherwise.

I just checked the NOAA ENC charts, and they show "Strait of Juan De Fuca." That's my preference, too. I confess to having mischievously used the alternative spelling.

jimh posted 05-01-2011 01:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Whether one does cross or does not cross the Strait of Juan De Fuca on my proposed route is not a particularly interesting point to argue. I am satisfied that my critics are now agreeing that the Strait of Juan De Fuca is one of the bodies of water involved.
Tom W Clark posted 05-01-2011 01:32 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
I just checked my Canadian Charts, published by The Canadian Hydrological Service. They use the name Juan de Fuca Straight.

But they're Canadian.

;-)

Tom W Clark posted 05-01-2011 01:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Correction: Canadian Hydrographic Service.
jimh posted 05-01-2011 01:50 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
One aspect of the general area through which we are planning to help OldToby safely across (or acrost) is the delightful place names which reflect a Spanish heritage. Normally one would not expect the Pacific Northwest to have a Spanish heritage, at least not until the wealthy agriculturalists of the region began to exploit migrant laborers to harvest their crops, but the actual exploration of the region was done by both English and Spanish expeditions. As a result there are many place names with a very Spanish nature, such as Texada Island, Strait of Juan de Fuca, Hernando Island, Cortes Island, and so one, as well as many very English place names, such as Princess Louisa Inlet, Victoria, Vancouver, Johnstone Strait, Port McNeil and so on.

The Spanish were the first Europeans to visit his area, arriving in 1774. Royal Navy Captain George Vancouver arrived a bit later, in 1792.

jimh posted 05-01-2011 02:02 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I presume one might then say we will help OldToby, when in Canadian water, acrost the Juan De Fuca Straight, but when he is in USA water we will have to help him across the Strait of Juan de Fuca.
20dauntless posted 05-01-2011 02:18 PM ET (US)     Profile for 20dauntless  Send Email to 20dauntless     
Just to clarify...Whiskey Golf (not 'gulf' as I wrote earlier) is the name that I've often heard for the military exercise area in the Strait of Georgia (or Georgia Strait as Jimh says). Info from the Canadian Coast Guard here: http://www.ccg-gcc.gc.ca/e0003902
OldToby posted 05-01-2011 03:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
Well, I'm gratified that my initial post has touched off such a free-for-all of wit, repartee and general geo-nautical foofaraw. I'm going to get a copy of the appropriate chart/s and spend many happy, warm and dry hours plotting this course, and I appreciate all of your responses, suggestions, tips and warnings. We're heading out on this trip with a fairly flexible schedule and, I think thanks to you all, a pretty realistic idea of what the trip will involve. I love Whalering in the salt, and I'm looking forward to the crossing almost as much as I'm looking forward to the International Buskers Festival in Victoria.

Thanks again, very much!!

jimh posted 05-01-2011 04:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I find that the aerial photography on GOOGLE EARTH is particularly clear and marvelous for this general region, and you can get a good sense for the lay of the land (and water) from browsing around on GOOGLE EARTH.

I make use of GOOGLE EARTH in planning all sorts of trips and adventures, and it conveys the geography of distance places so well that when one arrives at them it feels like you have already been there.

jimh posted 05-01-2011 04:34 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
ROGER on Area WG in the Strait of Georgia. Yes, we called up on the VHF Marine Band radio to Winchelseas Island Control on Channel 10 to get permission to cross during a period of military activity. The next morning we noticed that the perimeter of the prohibited area was being patrolled by a rather impressive military craft, one might call it a gunboat, which we saw as we continued our passage.
jimh posted 05-01-2011 05:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
ASIDE to DAVE--Thanks for the advice on how to run my boat. We already operate the boat in the manner you specified.
jimh posted 05-01-2011 06:00 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Re Tom's complaint about my choice of TOPIC for the discussion. If following Tom's advice I should change the topic to be

Crossing from Island to Island in Protected Water in an EASTPORT 16

but then there would not be much to discuss.

contender posted 05-01-2011 08:51 PM ET (US)     Profile for contender  Send Email to contender     
OldToby: Per Jims threads I gather the distance is 45 miles, open water of 25 (about 45 minutes of not seeing land), This is an easy trip, like I said leave a float plan with someone dependable and just pick a good weather day. Make sure you have plenty of fuel, and just be careful....Have a safe trip
Buckda posted 05-01-2011 10:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Toby -

If you happen to encounter the wake of a large vessel, don't slow to idle speed unless you like wet feet. Use the ability of the motor to keep the bow up as you cross the wake...you may have to speed up or slow down, depending on the speed at which you were traveling when you encountered the wake. You and your passengers and gear will get jostled a little, but you will not take green/blue/brown water over the bow.

BTDT. I prefer the brief discomfort of a jostle than wet feet or belongings in the boat.

(*Brown water reference applies in New Jersey and Wisconsin)

Sounds like a fun trip. Good luck.

jcrwshw posted 05-02-2011 03:39 AM ET (US)     Profile for jcrwshw  Send Email to jcrwshw     
I've used my 15' whaler to zip from Victoria Harbour to Friday Harbor many times... pick your weather and have a great time. I suggest following the ferry route to Friday Harbor on San Juan Island and do some sight seeing - great place for a walk and lunch.

The trip from Friday Harbor to Victoria is great, just shoot for Oak Bay and then follow the shoreline. You'll see Orca and if you're lucky it will be the whole herd - 10 -20 whales.

Good luck.

revengewanted posted 05-02-2011 12:08 PM ET (US)     Profile for revengewanted  Send Email to revengewanted     
Welcome to Victoria!
Moorage is available within the Inner Harbour and full details of the reservation process and customs clearance requirements are very well covered on the GVHA (Greater Victoria Harbour Authority) website. Your visit will coincide with our peak tourist season and the Inner Harbour is a great focal point for the International Buskers event, plus numerour tourist trappings within easy walking distance. Assuming you will be seeking some land based accomodations, you might also wish to visit the Tourism Victoria website where full details of the numerous facilites are outlined.
Cheers,
george
JMARTIN posted 05-02-2011 12:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for JMARTIN  Send Email to JMARTIN     
OldToby,

Stay in the shelter of the islands and cross Haro Strait from the north end of San Juan like Tom and 20Dauntless suggest. Crossing Rosario will be your biggest water and you will never be out of sight of land.

Check out the custom rules, they seem to change each year. Get good charts, better yet, a GPS with a good chart card. Lots of rocks and reefs in weird places. Watch out for stuff in the water and be aware of the tide.

Have all your required safety stuff up to date. The Guard really checks out the traffic in this area.

John

towboater posted 05-02-2011 01:14 PM ET (US)     Profile for towboater  Send Email to towboater     
I probably shouldnt jump in here since I dont know squat about the Puget Sound...except...in the NW, summertime, the wind usually doesnt come up until early afternoon and will die down early evening. (Sun heats up the cold water is part of the issue)

In a 47 year old 16 ft glass boat, 45 miles in open water, plan a early morning run and work your itenerary backwards from your arrival.

Example; Figure noon to be the drop dead time to arrive prior to prevailing wind.
Give yourself an hour of contingency time.
Plan to arrive at 1100.
20 mph cruising speed x 45 miles = 2.5 hrs.
Doesnt matter how fast the engine will make the boat go, what is the safe speed for the hull in some chop?
Plan to leave 0830.
+ 30 mins contingency time = 0800 departure.
You will arrive safe, dry and rested.

come to think of it, I have a pair of Mustang survival suits laying around here somewhere. I think L, too small for my crew. Originally owned by a Husband and wife who sailed around Puget sound in a 24 ft Seasport we bought. Perfect shape.

pglein posted 05-02-2011 06:37 PM ET (US)     Profile for pglein  Send Email to pglein     
Nomenclature aside, this is a trip that, in a 16' boat, can be either very enjoyable, or very frightening or even deadly.

It's all about weather and current. The trip across Rosario to the San Juans is usually pretty safe. I would recommend going via Thatcher pass and through the islands, stopping along the way for lunch or whatever. When you get to the west end of the islands, you can make a decision as to whether or not you want to attempt to cross Haro Straight to Victoria. There is certainly plenty to keep you occupied in the San Juans. Many people spend their entire summer vacations bumping around the islands on their boats. One alternative is to go into Sydney or even Brentwood Bay and then catching a bus/cab service to Victoria proper. This avoids the most hazardous part of the trip on the southern end of Vancouver island.

Tom W Clark posted 05-02-2011 08:01 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
A few points:

- OldToby said in his first sentence he is planning a trip to the San Juan Islands. I take this to mean he plans to cruise the San Juans with a trip from there to Victoria as well, not a go-for-broke run from Anacortes to Victoria.

- There is no 45 miles of "open water".

- At no point, regardless of what route you take, including Jim's, will OldToby cross the Straight of Juan de Fuca.

- At no point anywhere in the PNW will you be out of sight of land unless you are 100 miles or more offshore in the Pacific Ocean. Unlike Florida, we have very tall mountain ranges here.

- The maximum single distance of "open water" one might encounter between Roche Harbor and Victoria is about 8 nautical miles in Haro Straight between Mosquito Pass and Bayne's Channel.

- Victoria is a Port of Entry into Canada and likewise, Roche harbor is the logical place to clear Customs when returning to the US. It makes sense to leave the US from Roche so the same route can be followed. The only other practical route is through Cattle Pass and I do not recommend it unless the water is exceptionally calm.

OldToby posted 05-02-2011 08:42 PM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
I picked up a chart today at West Marine, and I've already spent a few hours perusing it and getting more and more excited about the trip. Towboater got my attention by pointing out that my boat is 47 years old, only six years younger than I am, and that's a LOT of water out there. We will take it slow and easy and will probably get our feet wet, which is part of the fun of boating in a wet hull.

Roche Harbor seems like a good place to stop over prior to the crossing. We thought we'd overnight there, but does anyone know if there's any lodging there other than the resort? I hate spending big bucks on a place to sleep, preferring to spend my precious few disposable dollars on my boat (the 'Mary Elyse', if you see us bobbing around this summer).

Thanks, everyone!!

jimh posted 05-03-2011 01:01 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Tom keeps saying:

"- At no point, regardless of what route you take, including Jim's, will OldToby cross the Straight of Juan de Fuca."

I am not buying this. Tom is wrong.

My route takes one directly across the strait, from its Eastern shore to its Northern shore as labeled ("Strait of Juan De Fuca") on the NOAA chart. For me to believe otherwise would mean I can't read a chart, however, I am actually quite good at chart reading.

jimh posted 05-03-2011 01:09 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
"Open water" means you are exposed to a long fetch. When approaching Victoria you will be exposed to some rather long fetches. To the East there is about 30-miles of water, to the Southeast about 40-miles, and to the South about 15-miles. If the conditions are unfavorable, that is enough fetch for seas to build to impressive wave height, enough to make operating a 16-foot Boston Whaler a challenge.
OldToby posted 05-03-2011 01:47 AM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
If conditions are unfavorable, no 16-foot Whaler of mine will be out there. I plan a hospice death.
WT posted 05-03-2011 02:03 AM ET (US)     Profile for WT  Send Email to WT     
Here is the NOAA Buoy Data for the area near Victoria.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=46088

Average wave height in July is less than .5 meters.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/view_climplot.php?station=46088&meas=wh

Have a great run.

Warren

kwik_wurk posted 05-03-2011 02:07 AM ET (US)     Profile for kwik_wurk  Send Email to kwik_wurk     
As mentioned by others, the San Juans are a "choose your own adventure" sort of place. It will be easy to get around in a Eastport. Crossing Haro Strait will be weather dependent, and below are two suggested options to deal with this.

I would target being in the islands mid-week, avoid weekends. Moorage should be feasible, a 17' boat will help, as you'll find those small openings that just fit. (Some marinas take reservations.)


It is not clear how many days you want to spend in the San Juans/Victoria, the more the merrier.

Once you leave Anacortes I would suggest Orcas Island and find a B&B in Deer Harbour. Deer Harbour is centrally located within the San Juans, and you can head almost regardless of weather because it is protected. You can equally stay in Roche, plenty of places to stay too. I can't say that either are low cost.

When you feel like heading to Canada, as mentioned by others: pick your AM weather window and head through Mosquito Pass (next to Roche Harbour); once in Haro, target Baynes Channel (south west) to get to Victoria. Plan B, is Sydney, which is a north-west track from Mosquito Pass. In Haro you'll end up with a north-westerly or southerly breeze and wave pattern (depending on weather and tide), and sometimes you end up in a convergence zone. The trade wind (a loose moniker for the typical wind/weather pattern) picks up in the afternoon and blows west in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and this generates the dominate air mass and nastiness when trying to get to Victoria. If you get halfway across Haro and you can tell you'll be pounding into the wind and waves, turn north and head for Sydney. This will put you on a downwind course (heading north), and you'll likely get into Sydney at the same time as you would have in Victoria. Both Victoria and Sydney have decent customs, and are end destinations for the boating community. Victoria has a lot more to offer, but less boating in the immediate vicinity.

I have made this Haro run a several times (power boats and sailboats), and this is how we setup our crossing, target Victoria, option to Sydney. -- I called into customs the early AM, to set up a check-in time and asked for any concerns.

A couple tips:
-Killer whales are most likely to be found on the west side of San Juan island between Cattle Pass and Mosquito Pass. (Know your boating rules, as getting in their ways is a no-no.) You can listen to the VHF to get the radio chatter to get their exact location, they do move around and could be anywhere.
-The Frasier river (Vancouver, CA) is expecting some 16 million Pink salmon this season, almost all of which travel along the San Juan's. July is a little early for the run, but if you get into calm water and into the run, you see schools of them. If you like to fish, bring a pole, and get a license (anything hot pink will work).
-Container/Ferries/Ro-Ro's ships travel at 12-24 knots in open waters, as jimh stated, don't underestimate their speed.

Good luck.

jimh posted 05-03-2011 09:33 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
quote:
" The trade wind (a loose moniker for the typical wind/weather pattern) picks up in the afternoon and blows west in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and this generates the dominate air mass and nastiness when trying to get to Victoria."

I must ask for clarification on the wind direction. Do you mean the prevailing wind is an East wind in the afternoon?

ASIDE: The wind direction is normally cited as being the direction the wind blows from, which can create some confusion. I recall reading a fellow's account of sailing in Alaska. At one point in his trip he was at the mouth of a long inlet that ran North for perhaps 50-miles. He was considering sailing up the inlet, but inquired with a local about the prevailing winds. The local replied the wind was almost always a North wind. At that moment the wind was South at 20-knots.

Well, the cruiser thought, what a chance. I'll run up this inlet, enjoy the spectacular view, and wait a day or two for the wind to return to normal. The fellow made an easy run up the inlet with the wind behind him, found a good anchorage, and settled in. For the next week the wind remained from the South, and kept increasing. Finally reluctant to remain stuck deep in the inlet no longer, the cruiser began the tedious trek of sailing out into the strong head wind, tacking back and forth across the narrow inlet. After a long day of beating into head seas and head winds, the guy makes it back to the mouth of the inlet, where he stops for the night.

The next morning at the dock, the wind now raging from the South at 30-knots, he happens to run into the same local. "Hey," he says to the local, "I though you said the prevailing wind here was North?"

"Yup," says the local, "just like she's blowing North right now!"

jtms posted 05-03-2011 10:06 AM ET (US)     Profile for jtms  Send Email to jtms     
Epirb would be a good idea considering you are crossing open water in a small boat. I think you can even rent them now. Having piece of mind makes the trip even more enjoyable.
Tom W Clark posted 05-03-2011 11:16 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Jim -- Unroll a smaller scale chart. I do not think you appreciate how big the Straight of Juan de Fuca is.

Perhaps you and I disagree about the meaning of the word "cross". To me and my dictionary, it means to travel from one side to the other.

If you travel by boat from Chicago to Milwaukee, are you crossing Lake Michigan? Or are you traveling in open water along its periphery?

At any rate, this side bar discussion is peripheral to the topic at hand: offering OldToby practical advice and information for planning his trip to the San Juan Islands and thence to Victoria, BC, which is how his original topic line did, and should, read.

Tom W Clark posted 05-03-2011 11:21 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
I have to disagree with Mike's concern about the age of OldToby's Eastport.

There is nothing about the Boston Whaler hull and its construction that would concern me at all after 47 years, assuming it has been maintained and does not still have its original 47 year old outboard motor on it.

The 16'-7" Eatport is an entirely suitable vessel for this trip, much more so than most 16 foot boats from 47 years ago.

kwik_wurk posted 05-03-2011 11:57 AM ET (US)     Profile for kwik_wurk  Send Email to kwik_wurk     
Late night rambling on the wind direction, the wind blows EAST. (Not west as I stated.) For clarification, the typical air mass in the Strait of Juan de Fuca goes from west to the east. Or if you were in your boat, heading upwind you would be pointed west.

I suggest using SailFlow website for wind forecasts and real time values. (There are several other websites, all using the same publicly available data. SailFlow tends to have an easier user interface in my opinion. If you like to play around with raw data, you can go to the UW atmos website.) And like any forecast in the PNW, it is only good for ~24-48hrs hours.

http://www.sailflow.com/windandwhere.iws?regionID=133& regionProductID=30&timeoffset=0

martyn1075 posted 05-03-2011 12:08 PM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
For argument sake if you cross from West Vancouver to Departure Bay.. which is further North...

Schedule Crossing time: 1 hour 40 minutes (ferry) 24-28 knots??
Distance: 30 nautical miles

On a calm sea it has taken me about 1:20 mins in a 17 Montauk/Standard/Revenge no problem at all providing you don't encounter any disturbance, for example engine, wind, avoiding wood etc.

This route in comparison is wide open to the route further south where you have the San Juan Islands in between. If you take in the sites of course add more time but realistically I would think you are in that ball park area of an 1:30-2 hours maximum to cross providing you pick a good time which I will say early morning and late evening to be the best time almost always. Middle of the day is not normally preferred for a small crafts as the winds can build and be a real problem. I have fished over there dozens of times and have never had a problem making the crossing with exception of one time where we never should have crossed a bad error on my part and learned my lesson. The problem is that if they predict 10-15 knot wind, that is really just an average but in honesty it tends to build in the middle portion of your trip and can be more like 25-35 with massive swells with white caps on top. It doesn't become much fun anymore and mentally and physically can really test your wits.

I seriously think it will be a great trip for you in your Eastport my only advice is not to push it, enjoy the ride and leave plenty of time early morning is perfect on most summer days.

JMARTIN posted 05-03-2011 12:16 PM ET (US)     Profile for JMARTIN  Send Email to JMARTIN     
OldToby

The problem you are going to have is finding reasonably priced accommodations for you and your boat. I do not know about Deer Harbor B&B's, but if you can find one with dock space, that could be fun. Roche is expensive and dock space is really expensive. Friday Harbor is another spot to look. B&B owners might be able to get you free dock space if you stay with them.

A reasonably priced place to launch and store your rig, might be the Skagit County Swinomish boat launch. It's only about 1 1/2 hours from there to a jumping off spot for Victoria.

You should plan on stopping at one of the islands that are run by the State. You can raft up for free next to someone, walk around and commune with nature.


John

Tollyfamily posted 05-03-2011 02:03 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tollyfamily  Send Email to Tollyfamily     
Friday Harbor for cheap motels.

Dan

Tollyfamily posted 05-03-2011 02:19 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tollyfamily  Send Email to Tollyfamily     
We make this trip several times each year in my 40’ Tollycraft and its nasty, the boat is usually drenched in salt water by the time we get to Victoria. Listen to the Canadian marine weather and if it’s blowing 5-10 you’re good to go but at 10-15 you will see 2-3 foot waves and you can forget it. Mid morning is usually the smoothest.

Stage yourself in Roche and if you think it’s time to try it you proceed thru Mosquito pass (watch the chart, lots of rocks) and peek your bow out, you will know in a hurry if it’s smooth enough to get over inside of Discovery Island.

Personally I wouldn’t waste my time taking a small boat over there, the only reason we do it is because we can stay on board. Get a room in Victoria and walk on the ferry from Friday Harbor. You could easily be stuck for days waiting for a weather window.

If you just want to visit Canada in your boat try going from Roche to Sidney BC, it’s like a small Victoria with a beautiful marina and lots closer.

Dan

kglinz posted 05-03-2011 02:27 PM ET (US)     Profile for kglinz  Send Email to kglinz     
I swore I wouldn't post to this, but. I get a Waggoners cruising guide every year and find it has the info you need.... http://www.waggonerguide.com/
Tollyfamily posted 05-03-2011 02:39 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tollyfamily  Send Email to Tollyfamily     
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=46088
mgeiger posted 05-03-2011 02:56 PM ET (US)     Profile for mgeiger    
Thankfully, it sounds like Toby got the advice he needed.

I was hoping for an enlightening read. My hope has drained and I have let myself become utterly frustrated with two of my most valued and respected purveyors of just about everything related to the boats I love.

It's a damn shame.

OldToby posted 05-03-2011 03:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
Yes, I believe that I DID get the advice I needed, and I appreciate the time and trouble of all you fine folks.

Part of the reason for this trip, and part of the reason I own and operate a 47 year-old boat, is for the experience of being out on big water and experiencing the risk and adventure (for lack of a better and less-cheesy word) of navigating my old boat to its destination. I'm not looking for unnecessary risk, but I'm not going to avoid an activity because it has some degree of danger or difficulty or risk associated with it. Hence, no ferries for me; why would I bother? If I only wanted to see Victoria, I'd fly there.

PeteB88 posted 05-03-2011 03:32 PM ET (US)     Profile for PeteB88  Send Email to PeteB88     
"To be Forewarned is to be Forearmed"
"Beyond This Point Your Life May Depend On Your Good Judgement"

Locals who live there or cruise there don't screw around with guessing games and have back up plans in place. This is the Pacific Ocean with big tides people and things with big teeth, cold water. I've been in San Juans plenty of times when I lived out there, more when I lived in Seattle and did some cruising with friends on sailboats.

The fun and options are limitless and there are more things alive and good to eat in those waters than any Great Lakes, flatlander boater could ever imagine.

GO OUT THERE - and cruise with the locals or rent something, if you're qualified, and figure it out.

In my experience Oregonians and Washingtonians and some Californians and probably all BC people know that that ocean, mountains, back country and moving (fast) water (rivers) can kill yo' ass lickity split and bang, you are dust in the wind. They do not play, guess or mess around. That's where I learned to be careful and pay attention to the locals - TOTAL focus.

There wasn't a week that went by when I lived there where some fool from the flatlands could read their name in the paper, if they hadn't been killed screwing around on rocks, alpine terrain, fast water, ocean (including tide pools), back country. Not a week- goof balls trying to run white water in Coleman canoes (should have gone to the bowling alley) or rock climb in tennis shoes, or ski drunk.

It is so fantastic out there and plane tickets are cheap - go for it - I'd love to and hope to get to OR this summer.

Thanks for the info Tom, Tow and PG and the others.

Taylor posted 05-03-2011 03:41 PM ET (US)     Profile for Taylor  Send Email to Taylor     
"I must ask for clarification on the wind direction. Do you mean the prevailing wind is an East wind in the afternoon?"

No, it blows from the west in the afternoon in the strait.

Nice weather summer days in Washington finds the mainland to the east of the Strait of Juan de Fuca warming which causes the air to rise and this in turn draws cooler marine air down the strait, which can give you quite a strong afternoon seabreaze, blowing from the West down the Strait, and then channeling down Puget Sound (a north/south trench) which ends up bringing a northerly at Seattle in the late afternoon.

At Victoria, the mornings may start calm, but by early afternoon it can be blowing 25-30 from the west. And if this crosses an outgoing tide (flowing towards the west)there can be some chop.

Oh.. and generally here we talk about going out the strait (west), down the straight (east), or across the strait (more or less north/south). Don't ask me why, that's just the way I've heard it.

prj posted 05-03-2011 04:16 PM ET (US)     Profile for prj  Send Email to prj     
I'd like to thank OldToby for this particular gem of a statement, and it bears repeating:

quote:
Part of the reason for this trip, and part of the reason I own and operate a 47 year-old boat, is for the experience of being out on big water and experiencing the risk and adventure (for lack of a better and less-cheesy word) of navigating my old boat to its destination. I'm not looking for unnecessary risk, but I'm not going to avoid an activity because it has some degree of danger or difficulty or risk associated with it. Hence, no ferries for me; why would I bother? If I only wanted to see Victoria, I'd fly there.

Anytime I suggest towing my boat across country, someone invariably recommends renting one when I get there. They don't understand OldToby's position like I do.

Tom W Clark posted 05-03-2011 06:42 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Toby -- I'm sure you'll have a fun trip. Don't let anybody scare you off.

I would not stay overnight in Roche Harbor under any circumstances. It is just a zoo in the high season. Great place to stop and look at very expensive yachts, clear customs, buy groceries or have lunch but it not my idea of getting away in my boat.

I have stayed just around the corner from there in Westcott Bay in a rental vacation house for one night that was arranged at the last minute. It came with its own mooring buoy out front. It can be done.

If on San Juan Island, I would be MUCH more inclined to visit Friday Harbor if you want on-land overnight accomodations. They have an excellent marina.

But if you want to do any camping, even lazy comfort camping, the San Juan Island abound in State and County Parks. James Island, Jones Island, Turn Island, Stuart Island, Clark Island, Sucia Island, Patos Island, Martia Island all have wonderful beaches, docks, mooring buoys. There are many others too.

There are parks on the big islands too. Orcas, Lopez, San Juan and Shaw all have public parks accessible by boat.

Marinas with transient moorage are also abundant. I like Deer Harbor Marina too, though West Sound has nice amenities as well. Fisherman's bay on Lopez is very popular and good place to grab a meal even if you are not overnighting there.

The list goes on and on. As Pete pointed out earlier, you could spend weeks exploring the San Juans, and may do.

I also recommend you pick up a copy of the Marine Atlas, Volume 1 Olympia to Malcolm Island, published by Bayless Enterprises, Inc.

OldToby posted 05-03-2011 07:22 PM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
I don’t know why I care enough about this to post further, but I don’t want to leave the impression that I am some half-witted, testosterone-fueled flatlander who’s going to go barreling off into Puget Sound thinking it’s the same sort of thing as floating down a lazy river on an inner tube with a straw hat on my head and a PBR in my hand. I know the Puget Sound area pretty well, having gone to college in Seattle and worked there for the first ten years of my professional life. I grew up on some fairly big water, albeit the fresh stuff, bombing around Lake Pend Oreille as a child in a 12-foot aluminum boat with a six-horse Evinrude on the back. A lake, sure, but a HUGE lake; try four-foot waves in a 12-foot boat sometime and see if it doesn’t get your attention. I’ve had my Whaler up in the Johnstone Strait in 20-30 knot north winds on a couple of occasions, and I have a basic understanding of and respect for the interplay between wind and wave and current and tide. I am not reckless at all when it comes to natural forces, but I don’t try to avoid the challenges that Nature presents either. For me it’s part of the joy of being OUT THERE in the middle of it, to have a challenge to face, to plan for and anticipate and deal with and overcome. This string of comments has been invaluable to me in planning this trip and in giving me the information I need to make smart decisions when I’m out there. So thanks, everyone.
Tom W Clark posted 05-03-2011 07:32 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
But Toby, you weren't thinking of something like this:

http://bp1.blogger.com/_ZU34lcpICsY/SIN2QqOO1DI/AAAAAAAAANA/aRe1xiltV0U/ s1600-h/image001.jpg

Tom W Clark posted 05-03-2011 08:05 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
[ Note: That is my mother on the left. She is not tipping back a PBR. It is an Olympia, or Oly as they were known back then. And that can is steel, not aluminum.

My father can be seen in the rear, just visible in a Top Hat.

The photo comes from a 1953 article published in LIFE magazine, photographs by Burt Glinn.

http://books.google.com/books?id=FEgEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA103&dq=life+magazine+ seattle+tubing+society#v=onepage&q&f=false ]

OldToby posted 05-03-2011 08:16 PM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
Tom, that is AWESOME!!! I am surprised, though, that your dad didn't have your mom drinking her Oly from the bottle, so he could sign the back of the label later (if you know what I mean and I think you do).

THIS is the kind of boating excursion that would do me in. NO amount of planning would save me.

Tom W Clark posted 05-03-2011 08:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Of course, your Victoria excursion could take the other tack:

http://home.comcast.net/~tomwclark/18outrage200dpi.jpeg

Tom W Clark posted 05-03-2011 08:23 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
[ Note: That *is* the Straight of Juan de Fuca, extreme West end. ]
OldToby posted 05-03-2011 08:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
Now THAT looks a little like Pend Oreille with a good southwest wind. I hope you had your mouthguard in...
jimh posted 05-03-2011 09:00 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
That picture of Tom and his boat should be in LIFE magazine today, if only they were still publishing.

'Toby: have fun. Take some pictures, make some notes, and drink a few beers when your boating is done each day.

PeteB88 posted 05-03-2011 10:50 PM ET (US)     Profile for PeteB88  Send Email to PeteB88     
That's right - go have a blast - don't make it complicated. Tom and the Seattle crew know what's up
JMARTIN posted 05-04-2011 02:36 PM ET (US)     Profile for JMARTIN  Send Email to JMARTIN     
I don't know, it looks pretty nasty out there. Haro Strait from Speiden Channel, and I think the camera angle would be your heading.

http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d137/jmartin-/light017.jpg

I am willing to bet that fog, not water conditions, will determine when you do the crossing.

John

Tom W Clark posted 05-04-2011 03:23 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Anacortes, Washington to Victoria, British Columbia in a [sic] EASTPORT 16: Sidebars, Sandbars, plain ol' Bars.

We are on the third or fourth version of the Topic Line now. OldToby's original Topic Line was both adequately descriptive and grammatically correct.

pglein posted 05-06-2011 03:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for pglein  Send Email to pglein     
jimh,

Tom is correct. You do not "cross" the straight going from Anacortes to Victoria. You do cross Rosario and Haro Straights, but not Juan deFuca. Understand that us locals who are very familiar with the area know the difference, regardless of what the chart may say.

If you went from, say Chicago to Milwauke, would you say that you had "crossed" Lake Michigan?

"Crossing the straight" is something that many of us up here do every year, as we take our boats north and south to and from the islands. It is very different than skirting the shore, and requires a certain amount of skill and planning to do safely.

pglein posted 05-06-2011 03:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for pglein  Send Email to pglein     
haha, guess I should have read Tom's reply before posting basically the exact same thing.
jimh posted 05-06-2011 08:02 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
When you cross from one shore to the other, you have crossed. When you go from mainland to island you have crossed. When you go from one country to another you have crossed. End of discussion. You might want to read Tom's first reply: "It can be a very easy crossing."
jimh posted 05-06-2011 08:17 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I go by the NOAA Chart for my basis of saying that my course crosses the Strait of Juan de Fuca. On my NOAA chart I start at the Eastern shore, on the main land, in the United States. I proceed West by South, into a body of water called the Strait of Juan De Fuca. After about 25 mile of water I approach a different shore, not the shore I left from but the shore of an island, in another country. All along my course line the chart refers to the body of water as the Strait of Juan De Fuca.

Exactly on what basis am I supposed to agree that I have not crossed the Strait of Juan De Fuca?

I fully realize that the Strait of Juan de Fuca continues Westward for a very long distance, and that the gap between the shorelines increases, and that the major axis of the Strait of Juan de Fuca is West to East, making a crossing course generally in a South to North direction, but these are simply other places where one can cross. They are not the only place.

The Strait of Juan De Fuca curves Northward at its Eastern extreme, and that is where my course line crosses it.

Would you like me to send you the ROUTE in GPX format to study?

jimh posted 05-06-2011 08:32 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
The suggestions of comparing the trip from Anacortes, Washington to Victoria, British Columbia as being the same as going from the Illinois shore of Lake Michigan to the Wisconsin shore of Lake Michigan are laughable. Let me laugh, like pglein did:

hahaha

I will explain carefully in three bullet points the differences:

--Lake Michigan is a lake, which is a closed body of water. The Strait of Juan de Fuca is an arm of the sea, and it only has two shores.

--Wisconsin and Illinois are on the same shore of Lake Michigan, the Western shore. Victoria, British Columbia is on a different shore of the Strait of Juan de Fuca than Anacortes, Washington. Victoria is on the Northern shore, and Anacortes is on the Eastern Shore, an extension of the Southern Shore

--Wisconsin and Illinois are both part of the mainland. Victoria British Columbia is an island.

An equivalent body of water to the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Lake Michigan would be the Manitou Passage. If I leave from the Eastern shore of the Manitou Passage and travel to South Manitou Island, I have crossed the Manitou Passage. There are various places where one could do this, and the distances involved vary. Depending on where you depart your course could be either mostly Westerly or mostly Northerly. But, no matter, you have crossed the Manitou Passage.

jimh posted 05-06-2011 08:54 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I have changed the topic to reflect the full bore silliness of these arguments about where one can cross the Strait of Juan de Fuca.

Everyone who wants to argue about where NOAA put the name Strait of Juan de Fuca on their charts should jump in.

WT posted 05-06-2011 09:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for WT  Send Email to WT     
I'm glad we got that "strait".

I kind of depends how far south Haro Strait runs. It looks like a realatively direct route from Anacortes to Vancover, one who "nick" (not cross) the northern part of the Strait Juan De Fucus.

Kind of like launching on the south side of a river but never touching the northern side of the river. Do you actually cross the river?

Warren

Jerry Townsend posted 05-06-2011 10:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jerry Townsend  Send Email to Jerry Townsend     
Jim - I'm glad that you were just reflecting "... the full bore silliness of these arguments ..." - as when I first read your retitling - I thought you have had too much to drink - or had slipped your mind. --- Jerry/Idaho
jimh posted 05-06-2011 11:11 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Jerry--It was only 8 p.m.--no way I could have too much to drink by then. Look for those 2 a.m. posts for those symptoms.
lizard posted 05-07-2011 12:32 AM ET (US)     Profile for lizard  Send Email to lizard     
Don't know how I missed such an insistent and tedious thread such as this. The title of the post sums it up. Unfortunately, camping and boating there most summers for the past 10 years, I need to concur, despite other documentation, that you DO NOT cross the strait of Juan De Fuca, or any of the other names mentioned in this thread, related to said strait.

Tom W Clark posted 05-07-2011 01:29 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
quote:
The Strait of Juan de Fuca is an arm of the sea, and it only has two shores.

Jim -- That is correct. There is a South shore and a North shore. Anacortes lies north of the North shore. Victoria is on the North shore. You do not cross the Straight traveling between them.

If you are confused, just let me know what part of this is not clear and I will try to rephrase it.

jimh posted 05-07-2011 08:38 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Tom--If Victoria and Anacortes were on the same shore, you could walk between them. Of course, you cannot. It is the same problem as one finds in the bad analogy about Wisconsin, Illinois, and Lake Michigan. You can walk from Wisconsin to Illinois because they are on the same shore of Lake Michigan.

Most people cannot walk from Anacortes to Victoria, except special people who can walk on water.

pglein posted 05-07-2011 08:56 AM ET (US)     Profile for pglein  Send Email to pglein     
Jim,

The fundamental flaw in your logic is the assumption that the Straight of Juan deFuca turns and continues up the east shore of Vancouver Island. It does not. This body of water is called Haro Straight.

It's all symantics at this point, but please respect the insight of people who live, work, and play in these waters on a regular basis.

jimh posted 05-07-2011 10:30 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
pglein--Thank you for the analysis of the root problem of this dispute. I agree with your analysis but not your conclusion.

I think it is clear that everyone agrees that my proposed route (which I described above) involves a crossing. Note that in the initial article, OldToby said "... I'm going to take a 16-foot boat across to Victoria...." He further said, "...this specific subject--the Victoria crossing..."

Tom Clark was first to reply and referred to the voyage as having the potential to be "...a very easy crossing..."

At that point I altered the TOPIC line to reflect a "crossing," and then there began a considerable sidebar debate--which has since taken over the entire thread--about the proper name for the body of water which is being crossed.

The source of the name of the body of water which I have used is NOAA. I took the name of the body of water from the NOAA chart. Specifically, I took it from the NOAA electronic chart--which, as far as I know (and here I may risk introducing another sidebar discussion) is acceptable as the legally required navigation chart for the portion of that water in the United States. I mention all this because I want to be clear that I did not pull the name out of a hat or from my own memory or from someone's self-published website definition. I got the name from NOAA.

I understand that there may be some local practice or custom or lore or habit or colloquial expression in which boaters do not call that particular area or body of water by the same name that NOAA does on their charts. But you really need to take this up with NOAA. If they have the wrong name on their chart, the boaters of that region ought to get in contact with them and suggest they amend their charts to reflect the local naming custom.

jimh posted 05-07-2011 10:32 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
By the way, there has also been a considerable amount of effort put forth to say that there is no crossing involved and that one is simply coasting along the shoreline, crossing nothing. Those efforts are self-contradictory. Clearly some body of water is being crossed, and the dispute is really all about the name of that body of water.
lhorn42 posted 05-07-2011 11:06 AM ET (US)     Profile for lhorn42  Send Email to lhorn42     
[Changed the topic to express criticsm of one of the participants. Please do not try to turn this discussion into a referrendum on each participant. We are discussing a boating topic. If you want to paticipate in the boating topic you are welcome, but please to not try to turn the discussion into one that focuses on the participants instead of the boating. --jimh]
towboater posted 05-07-2011 11:39 AM ET (US)     Profile for towboater  Send Email to towboater     
THanks for all the input. I might make the same trip someday. IMO, local knowledge takes precidence over charts. Neither can be ignored.

Toby, check out AIS for another perspective.


http://marinetraffic.com/ais/#

mkj


Tom W Clark posted 05-07-2011 11:50 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Jim -- Nobody has put forth any effort to say there will be no crossing on Toby's trip. But the crossing will not be of the Straight of Juan de Fuca.

You are correct that Anacortes and Victoria do not lie on the same shore. There is no dispute about that. You have to cross Rosario Straight and Haro Straight to get to Victoria from Anacortes.

You can continue to tilt at this windmill all you want, but you are not going to change the geography.

Toby came here looking for advice for his planned trip to the San Juan Islands and subsequent trip to Victoria. A number of participants here have offered advice for his trip.

You have introduced a completely peripheral discussion of the Straight of Juan de Fuca and steered the discussion completely away from Toby's trip, and in the process, changed the subject line four or five times now to reflect your agenda.

[Changed topic to the website itself. Please contact the moderator via email for discussions on the topic of the website itself. I strongly prefer to stay focused on boating-related topics.--jimh]

jimh posted 05-08-2011 12:32 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Tom--It has occurred to me that perhaps the confusion about the name of the body of water may be related to the nature of electronic charts. Electronic charts are manifested in a visual form by the software used to view them, and the location and position of elements on the chart are subject to some interpretation in the software. For example, features may be turned on and off, and some information may be shown or hidden as desired. In the case of a something like the name of a body of water, this name may be presented in a digital chart in a manner different than in the printed chart. I will follow up on this topic in SMALL BOAT ELECTRICAL.

ASIDE: Tom--I have elided some of your remarks which where not related to boating and will reply to them in email

OldToby posted 05-08-2011 01:36 PM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
This geo-nautical dissension over the location and definition of the Strait of Juan de Fuca has so upset my fine sensibilities and my desire just to see everyone get along, that I've decided to scrap the whole Anacortes-to-Victoria trip and go to Cawker City, Kansas, to see the world's second-largest largest ball of twine.
PeteB88 posted 05-08-2011 01:44 PM ET (US)     Profile for PeteB88  Send Email to PeteB88     
AIn't it Mother's Day?
Kencvit posted 05-08-2011 01:47 PM ET (US)     Profile for Kencvit  Send Email to Kencvit     
Toby, But think of all the "States" you will have to cross!

Tom and Jimh, Get your road atlas`s out.

Tom W Clark posted 05-08-2011 02:42 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
No, no, because Toby can walk to the state of Kansas, just as you can walk for Chicago to Milwaukee, he won't be "crossing" any of them ;-)
Jerry Townsend posted 05-08-2011 05:46 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jerry Townsend  Send Email to Jerry Townsend     
Toby - you don't have to go anywhere - stay right there on Pend Oreille - prettier, very nice, don't have to cross anything but a lake, if you desire - and you don't have to worry about a tide.

I must be slipping something - because normally, I won't go back to thread that even starts to off the deep end. --- Jerry/Idaho

K Albus posted 05-08-2011 06:50 PM ET (US)     Profile for K Albus  Send Email to K Albus     
I really hate to wade into this morass, but I think I know the source of our problem here. Jim has suggested a route for OldToby which includes crossing a portion of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Several other contributors, including some with a great deal of local knowledge, have suggested a route for OldToby which does not include crossing any portion of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. With regard to Jim's route, Jim is right. With regard to the preferred route, everybody else is right.
PeteB88 posted 05-08-2011 10:05 PM ET (US)     Profile for PeteB88  Send Email to PeteB88     
See, I knew somebody would get this figured out!
fluke posted 05-08-2011 10:19 PM ET (US)     Profile for fluke  Send Email to fluke     
Maybe a buddy boat, someone with local experience, could go along?
Mark
Tom W Clark posted 05-09-2011 01:12 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Kevin -- The distinction you make was made very early on in this thread.

It is understood that the route Jim proposed does not take you through the San Juan Islands, but that does not mean it crosses the Straight of Juan de Fuca either.

I do give Jim credit though; you are the first person in over 100 posts to agree with him on that point.

This is a long thread with two distinct parts:

1 - Advice for Toby and his trip to the San Juan Islands and subsequent crossing to Victoria.

2 - The academic argument of whether you cross the Straight of Juan de Fuca traveling from Anacortes to Victoria, leaving the San Juan Islands to the North.

The former has been addressed. The latter remains under debate. Let's review what we all agree on.

- NOAA charts are accurate. In spite of claims to the contrary, nobody here has said, or implied, that any of the relevant NOAA charts are inaccurate or mislabeled.

- A Straight has two shores, and to cross a Straight one travels from one shore to the other.

- Traveling from Anacortes to Victoria, leaving the San Juan Islands to the North exposes you to the open waters of the Straight of Juan de Fuca.

None of those three points is in question. We all agree on those facts. The sole point of contention is whether you cross the Straight of Juan de Fuca while traveling this route.

Peter and I have pointed out that while you may be traveling along a short portion of the periphery of the Straight of Juan de Fuca along this route, you are not crossing the Straight of Juan de Fuca. We both made the same analogy of traveling by boat from Milwaukee to Chicago, pointing out that one would not consider that a crossing of Lake Michigan.

Jim countered that because you can walk from Milwaukee to Chicago, they lie on the same shore and thus our analogy does not work, as you cannot walk from Anacortes to Victoria.

Unfortunately for Jim and his logic, you can walk from Milwaukee to Muskegon too, and I do not think anybody would try to argue that if you boated from Milwaukee to Muskegon you would not have crossed Lake Michigan. Whether you can walk between two points is irrelevant to this discussion. We are discussing boating, not walking.

The fact remains that the Straight of Juan de Fuca has two shores, a south shore and a north shore. Jim's route does not take you anywhere near the South shore, only along a short section of the North shore, as Victoria Harbor does open to the Straight of Juan de Fuca.

Anacortes (Skyline anyway) lies on Rosario Straight, not the Straight of Juan de Fuca. Traveling form Anacortes takes you down the Rosario Straight to the South end of Lopez Island where Rosario Straight meets the Straight of Juan de Fuca. This point is almost 20 miles for the South shore of the Straight of Juan de Fuca, and is as about as close as you will ever get to the South shore following Jim's route.

gnr posted 05-09-2011 01:31 PM ET (US)     Profile for gnr    
LOL

You crack me up Mr Clark.

Thank you for brightening my days.

LOL

jimh posted 05-09-2011 01:41 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Tom's most recent rebuttal:

"Unfortunately for Jim and his logic, you can walk from Milwaukee to Muskegon too, and I do not think anybody would try to argue that if you boated from Milwaukee to Muskegon you would not have crossed Lake Michigan."

Rather than a flaw in my logic, the apparent conflict in reasoning has to do more with the nature of a lake compared to a strait. The definition of a lake implies one could reach most places on its various shores by walking. The building of bridges has also aided remarkably in a walk from Milwaukee to Muskegon, but I will not try to take advantage of that in the defense of my reasoning.

WT posted 05-09-2011 02:39 PM ET (US)     Profile for WT  Send Email to WT     
For everyone's reference.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v665/warrent/Misc/StraitofJuandeFucaA. jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v665/warrent/Misc/StraitofJuandeFucaB. jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v665/warrent/Misc/StraitofJuandeFucaC. jpg

Warren

Tom W Clark posted 05-09-2011 02:46 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Thank you Warren.
Tom W Clark posted 05-09-2011 02:50 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Jim -- Please answer three non-rhetorical questions:

A. Do you cross Lake Michigan traveling by boat from Milwaukee to Chicago?

B. Do you cross Lake Michigan traveling by boat from Milwaukee to Muskegon?

C. Is it impossible to cross Lake Michigan because it is a lake, not a straight?

K Albus posted 05-09-2011 02:53 PM ET (US)     Profile for K Albus  Send Email to K Albus     
After looking at the chart again, I'm back on Tom's side. Jim's route certainly crosses a portion of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, but I don't think that I would say that it crosses the Strait.

Jim - If I put my boat in at Monroe, Michigan, crossed Lake Erie to the Canadian shore, proceeded up the Canadian side of the Detroit River, and landed in Windsor, would you say that I crossed the Detroit River?

WT posted 05-09-2011 03:04 PM ET (US)     Profile for WT  Send Email to WT     
OldToby:

Here's a link that you might find useful.


http://marine.geogarage.com/routes

The slider on the top right side of the screen (under USA) converts the NOAA charts to Google Earth. Or you can overlay both.

Have a great trip.

Warren

pglein posted 05-09-2011 03:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for pglein  Send Email to pglein     
"Crossing the straight" is a term that thousands of Puget Sound boaters use every year. With a few exceptions, it almost universally refers to a passage somewhere on the Olympic Peninsula (usually Port Townsend) to points north, (usually the San Juan Islands or Victoria Harbour). Entire chapters of cruising books have been devoted to the various intricacies of crossing the Straight of Juan deFuca. Under no circumstances, would a local refer to a trip from Anacortes to Victoria as "crossing the Straight (of Juan deFuca)."

I know this discussion has been beaten to death, but allow me to beat it just a little more. If you're tired of it, you are free to quit reading at any point.

One of the fundamental difference between a lake (say Lake Michigan), and a straight, is that a straight is, by definition, linear. That is, it has a direction in which it is situated, with entrances at eatch end. Otherwise it is just a sea, inlet, or bay. The Straight of Juan deFuca, has a (basically) east-west situation. To "cross" said straight, you must travel (roughly) north or south, starting at one of the land masses defining it's direction and ending at the other.

In making the trip from Anacortes to Victoria, you would most certainly cross Rosario and Haro Straights, and it could be said that you would "transit" (a portion of) the Straight of Juan deFuca (herinafter referred to as "JdF"). But you do not "cross" it. In fact, one could argue that, depending on which NOAA chart you look at, the JdF's east entrance is actually at Victor Foxtrot off Race Rocks, well west of Victora. However, smaller scale charts show it continuing all the way to Sierra Alpha, at the entrance to Admiralty Inlet. Either way, none show it continuing north towards Hein Bank.

Part of what you have to understand is the fundamental difference between crossing the straight and not crossing it, as it pertains to the conditions you will encounter. Ocean swells, as well as the prevailing northwest winds, travel unabbated down the straight and pound the shore of Whidbey Island, and anything they encounter along the way. A trip across the straight (as I am defining it) is fundamentally more dangerous than a trip along it's shores, for several reasons. First, this trip leaves you exposed with nowhere to hide if conditions deteriorate. Even at the eastern end, along the shore of Whidbey Island, there is nowhere to run for cover. Yet if one was travelling along the north or south shore, there are abundant bays, harbors, and islands in and behind which one could seek shelter. Secondly, we all know that travelling in a beam sea is more dangerous and uncomfortable that going into, or with, the dominant swell and wind. By crossing the straight, you are making an extended trip in a beam sea.

By travelling from Anacortes to Victoria, although you could certainly encounter hazardous conditions, you would never be exposing yourself to the full brunt of what JdF can dish up, even if you took the southern route, staying out of the San Juans and transting the eastern portion of JdF. You are actually in the lee of Vancouver Island for the entire trip. Whatever you would be experiencing on that trip, someone to the south, who was truly "crossing" the straight, would be experiencing much worse. Thus, it is not really fair to suggest that this trip is "crossing the Straight of Juan deFuca."

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a horse to bury.

K Albus posted 05-09-2011 04:16 PM ET (US)     Profile for K Albus  Send Email to K Albus     
Here's a description of the boundaries of the Strait of Juan de Fuca: http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/ f?p=gnispq:3:141748195663645::NO::P3_FID:1526614 .

By the way, the "official" name, according to the webpage linked above, is Strait of Juan de Fuca

WT posted 05-09-2011 05:11 PM ET (US)     Profile for WT  Send Email to WT     
If this is the boundary of the Striat of Juan De Fuca:

"Extends east from the Pacific Ocean between Vancouver Island, Canada, and the Olympic Peninsula, Washington, to Haro Strait, San Juan Channel, Rosario Strait, and Puget Sound; its Pacific Ocean boundary is formed by a line between Cape Flattery - Tatoosh Island, Washington, and Carmanah Point (Vancouver Island), British Columbia; its north boundary follows the shoreline of Vancouver Island to Gonzales Point, then follows a continuous line east to Seabird Point (Discovery Island), British Columbia; Cattle Point (San Juan Island), Washington; Iceberg Point (Lopez Island); Point Colville (Lopez Island); and then to Rosario Head (Fidalgo Island); the eastern boundary is a continuous line extending south from Rosario Head along Whidbey Island to Point Partridge and south to Point Wilson (Quimper Peninsula); the Washington mainland forms the southern boundary of the strait."

Then the blue line is the northern and eastern boundaries of the Strait of Juan de Fuca.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v665/warrent/Misc/StraitofJuandeFucaD. jpg

I must have too much tiome on my hands.

Warren

contender posted 05-09-2011 05:15 PM ET (US)     Profile for contender  Send Email to contender     
By the time anyone has read all of the threads on this I could have gone across twice... What is the big deal? just go...
jimh posted 05-09-2011 06:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Warren's legal description and his annotated chart conform precisely with my NOAA chart--not really a surprise.

My proposed course line goes from East to West, across the Strait of Juan de Fuca.


Question for Tom:

As you approach Victoria Harbour's entrance, what body of water are you in?

JMARTIN posted 05-09-2011 07:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for JMARTIN  Send Email to JMARTIN     
Warren can get a second job writing boundary descriptions for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

If you happen to be gay, not strait, can you even cross these bodies of water?

Should we expand the conversation and argue the correct navigational terms for rounding Point No Point?

John

jimh posted 05-09-2011 08:02 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I just can't escape from the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Sunday I picked up a new book, a narrative of the sea, and in the first chapter the author is sailing into the Strait of Juan de Fuca from the Pacific Ocean, but he calls it

The Strait of Wanna Puka

because of the rough seas from tidal currents and winds.

Tom W Clark posted 05-09-2011 08:02 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Jim -- As I have already pointed out, at least twice, Victoria Harbor opens to the Straight of Juan de Fuca. Again, there is no debate about that; we are in agreement on that point.

Now, would you please do me the favor of replying to my three simple questions?

jimh posted 05-09-2011 09:02 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Tom--Here goes on your three questions:

A. Do you cross Lake Michigan traveling by boat from Milwaukee to Chicago?
--No--


B. Do you cross Lake Michigan traveling by boat from Milwaukee to Muskegon?
--Yes--

C. Is it impossible to cross Lake Michigan because it is a lake, not a straight?
--No--

The problem with Lake Michigan is that it is a lake and its South shore is a nicely rounded circle. If you want to use Lake Michigan in an analogy to a strait, just cut off the South shore entirely. This would eliminate the shoreline from about Benton Harbor to the Eastern Chicago suburbs. Now we have turned Lake Michigan into a body of water that is like a strait. Now if you sail from Benton Harbor to Chicago you have crossed the strait. If you sail from Chicago to Milwaukee you have just coasted along the shoreline.

Tom W Clark posted 05-09-2011 09:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
I concur. Actually, I do not think there is any problem with Lake Michigan, but I am glad we are in agreement in our responses to my three questions.

Coasting the shoreline (the edge of a body of water) is just like traveling along the edge of the Straight of Juan de Fuca, which you do for some portion of your described route to Victoria.

But, of course, you have not crossed the Straight of Juan de Fuca because you did not start on one shore of the Straight of Juan de Fuca and wind up on the other.

OldToby posted 05-10-2011 10:12 AM ET (US)     Profile for OldToby  Send Email to OldToby     
**holds head in hands and weeps quietly, thin shoulders shudder as noiseless sobs wrack his frame**
PeteB88 posted 05-10-2011 10:54 AM ET (US)     Profile for PeteB88  Send Email to PeteB88     
Are we there yet?
frontier posted 05-10-2011 10:58 AM ET (US)     Profile for frontier  Send Email to frontier     
Let's talk boat related baseball.
What do ya think of those Mariners?
Bill B posted 05-10-2011 08:47 PM ET (US)     Profile for Bill B  Send Email to Bill B     
Wow, I have boated this area my entire life and have never read such a bunch of inaccurate information in one place.

Any trip on any boat regardless of size must be well planned. All the books say "seek local knowledge". If I read the "advice" offered here, I would cancel the trip idea, sell the boat and run!

Whoever said you wont "cross" the straights of Juan De Fuca is correct, but to enter Victoria harbor you will certainly be within their outer boundries. This is the area wher HAro Srtaights and The Straights of Juan De Fuca with all that Pacific Ocean influence converge. Someone also mentioned wind over current, this area is prone to that issue.

The best, safest, most predictable plan offering many great stop overs, is the "inside" route thru the US San Juans. Skyline is a good departure point no boat ramp only slings, but can have fog issues in August. A short hop across Rosario straight, thru thatcher pass, to Harney Channel, thru Pole pass (watch the tide, which should not be an issue with your boat), past Jones Island, very short hop across Presidents Channel, pass Speiden Island via Speiden Channel, Cross Haro Straight, pass Sidney Island and head direct to Sidney BC. The perfect spot to find moorage, protection and supplies at the Port of Sidney, with full access to town and great facilities, or Van Isle Marina (fuel dock there), a few bays over. A way better option than crusing into Victoria in my view and years of experience. Have a sausage roll at the Sidney Bakery for me.

Yes there is some open water, yes the weather changes, but there is a lot of protection along the way. Common sence is the key. After all you have a whaler! Do invest in some good charts and pre plot your course up front, get a tide and current table as well. A spare prop and mounting hardware may be worthwhile as well, there is a lot of crap in the water, also a lot of under water obsticles (watch the chart)Obvioiusly a good anchor, lots of rode (deep water here) and a depth sounder is a must.

Sidney is a great town. Need US passports to check into Customs, Port Sidney and Van Isle are Ports of Entry for Canadian Customs. From Sidney you can take a break acess the situation and boat to Victora, or leave the boat with no open water, or take a bus if the conditions are not so good. Buchart Gardens is in the Sidney area also accessable by boat or ground transportation. Also you can change directions and proceed the up several inside routes thru the Candian Gulf islands, Beautiful area. Otter Bay is close to Sidney, Sidney Spit marine park is great. They call it some of the best crusing areas in the world.

Sidney is the perfect central point to go wherever you want in the area.

Check back into US customs at Roach Harbor on San Juan Island. Deer Harbor on the return is a good last night lay over.

Good luck and have fun.

kglinz posted 05-10-2011 08:56 PM ET (US)     Profile for kglinz  Send Email to kglinz     
Just use a good chart.... http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y295/kglinz/family/Charts/ IMG_2233-448x600.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y295/kglinz/family/Charts/ IMG_2235-448x600.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y295/kglinz/family/Charts/ IMG_2236-448x600.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y295/kglinz/family/Charts/ IMG_2237-448x600.jpg
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y295/kglinz/family/Charts/IMG_2240-448x600.jpg[/url]
kglinz posted 05-10-2011 08:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for kglinz  Send Email to kglinz     
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y295/kglinz/family/Charts/ IMG_2240-448x600.jpg
fno posted 05-10-2011 10:44 PM ET (US)     Profile for fno  Send Email to fno     
I am sure glad the bandwidth for this site is minimal. Because this is definitely a waste of it..... not that I really care about bandwidth, but shouldn't you guys be working on your boats or launching them for a weekend here or there. Is it still Winter somewhere???/
olympicrainshadow posted 09-14-2011 12:37 AM ET (US)     Profile for olympicrainshadow  Send Email to olympicrainshadow     
this post also offers some good information on crossing the strait...

http://www.olympicrainshadow.com/blog/crossing-the-strait-of-juan-de-fuca

boatdryver posted 09-14-2011 10:14 AM ET (US)     Profile for boatdryver  Send Email to boatdryver     
Oh, no, not again!!! Not more advice on crossing Juan de Fuca!!

This thread had already driven OldToby away for good. We will never know if he made the trip in his Eastport.

JimL

Tom W Clark posted 09-14-2011 11:08 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Toby did not make the crossing of Haro Straight; the wind and tide conspired to make it too uncomfortable for them.

However, last Friday, I did make a crossing of the Straight of Juan de Fuca. My wife and I crossed from beautiful Aleck Bay on the south end of Lopez Island to Point Wilson near Port Townsend and hence to Seattle.

It was almost perfectly calm the whole crossing but for some residual wave motion rolling down the Straight.

Tollyfamily posted 09-14-2011 12:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tollyfamily  Send Email to Tollyfamily     
I just brought my boat back to Seattle after keeping it in Anacortes for the summer and did all the crossings mentioned here several times. When I was young and dumb we would listen to the weather and if there wasn’t a small craft warning we would cross the Straight, well ..many times we got hammered so bad you couldn’t even hang on to the wheel. Now that I am old and wise I listen to the forecast and if it’s less than 10 knots and 1 foot seas we go but not over that because there is a good chance it’s going to build before you get across.
The most valuable tool is the NOAA National Data Buoy Center web site, right in the middle of the straight is the Hein Bank weather buoy reporting actual conditions including wind and wave height.
My boat is a 40’ Tollycraft which was designed here for these conditions and can take about anything but why beat yourself and crew up? If the waves build to 2’ and 10-15 knots the ride is smooth but the boat will now be covered with salt water and most marinas up in the islands have limited water and don’t allow boat washing, at 3’ and 20 knots it starts to get a little rough but the wind is off your beam and it is a mess with the wipers going like mad. If visibility isn’t good you need radar to keep track of all the ships.
Don’t be held to a schedule and there are plenty of nice days. We were at Roche the third weekend in August and my boys fished Salmon (and got their limit every day) form our 11’ Whaler on the outside of Henry Island and it was flat calm the entire weekend. You could have taken a rowboat to Victoria.
We took a week to come back to Seattle and never got a drop of salt on the boat. My wife is a happy camper if it’s smooth!

Dan

boatdryver posted 09-14-2011 03:52 PM ET (US)     Profile for boatdryver  Send Email to boatdryver     
next to last message from OldToby:

"This geo-nautical dissension over the location and definition of the Strait of Juan de Fuca has so upset my fine sensibilities and my desire just to see everyone get along, that I've decided to scrap the whole Anacortes-to-Victoria trip and go to Cawker City, Kansas, to see the world's second-largest largest ball of twine."

Last message from him:

"**holds head in hands and weeps quietly, thin shoulders shudder as noiseless sobs wrack his frame**

I'm afraid we wore him out....

JimL

Tom W Clark posted 09-15-2011 09:47 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Toby just has a wry sense of humor.

I received an email for him in July. They made it as far as Roche (not Roach) Harbor and tried twice to cross Haro Straight but strong southeast winds meant the waves were just too big to make it to Victoria in their Eastport.

Strong southeast winds can mean very big nasty waves. Last week I spent one afternoon and evening motoring into the waves generated by strong southeast winds in the South end of the Straight of Georgia, and it was uncomfortable, even though we were in a 32,000 pound sailboat that is 50 feet long.

Dan -- You took a week to go from the San Juans to Seattle, I took five days to go from Desolation Sound to Seattle...at 6 knots.

Tollyfamily posted 09-15-2011 11:10 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tollyfamily  Send Email to Tollyfamily     
Yea Tom it was great, just the wife the dog and me, first time with no kids. Anacortes to Fraday harbor, Friday harbor to Deere, Deere to La Conner, la Conner to Langley, langley to Winslow etc. No rush as we hit the best waether of the entire summer. We did travel most mornings in zero visability fog which is pretty easy in my boat with an autopilot, radar and Nobeltec on my laptop. I bought an app for my iphone called Ship Finder that is basically AIS, I knew where the ferries were before they showed up on radar. I got to say that they don't honk there horn in the fog unless they hear someone else do it first or there is traffic in their way? Great summer!

Dan

jimh posted 09-15-2011 01:22 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
There is plenty of tempting bait in the water, but I am not biting.
Taylor posted 09-15-2011 01:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for Taylor  Send Email to Taylor     
I groaned when I saw this thread pop up to the top, there is useful new information here: both Dan (TollyFamily) and OlympicRainShadow's blog pointed to the Hein Bank buoy. I'm bookmarking that for future reference as well as the Neah Bay traffic separation buoy at the other end of the strait.

Tom - where you in a Nor'Wester? :)

Tom W Clark posted 09-15-2011 09:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Taylor -- I was on a Norwester motoring into a Sou'Easter for most of our run down and across the Straight of Georgia. However, while crossing the Straight of Juan de Fuca, Norwester had neither a Nor'Wester nor a Sou'Easter to contend with, it was calm, though after we passed Point Wilson, Norwester picked up enough of a Nor'Easter to fill the sails.
Chriscz posted 09-26-2011 06:56 PM ET (US)     Profile for Chriscz  Send Email to Chriscz     
I couldnt resist adding in here.[You should have. Thread closed. See TRIPS and RENDEZVOUS for a report of the trip to the San Juan Islands by Old Toby in his small boat.--jimh]

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.