|
ContinuousWave Whaler Moderated Discussion Areas ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area LEHR Propane Engines
|
Author | Topic: LEHR Propane Engines |
jimh |
posted 06-24-2013 01:43 PM ET (US)
Recently it was announced that LEHR propane engines would revolutionize boating. The LEHR company makes propane engines in several models, including small ones. One of the attributes claimed for LEHR engines by extraordinarily enthusiastic supporters (who had actually seen one being used on a sailboat dingy), suggested that freedom from carburetor problems was inherent in the propane engine. Apparently LEHR is not aware of this. An owner of a LEHR propane engine (used with a lawn trimmer) writes:
quote: More less-than-enthusiastic reviews found at http://www.amazon.com/LEHR-ST025DC-4-Stroke-Detachable-Curved-Shaft/ product-reviews/B001H1LS98 |
K Albus |
posted 06-24-2013 02:24 PM ET (US)
Are you seriously relying on reviews of lawn equipment (a string trimmer) to discredit the entire line of outboard motors? |
jimh |
posted 06-24-2013 02:34 PM ET (US)
The carburetors are the principal object of complaint. It was announced that propane engines would end all carburetor problems. Apparently that was premature. |
pcrussell50 |
posted 06-24-2013 03:43 PM ET (US)
I'm sure it's just growing pains by a new technology. As usual, over time, as more manufacturers get in on the game, the technology matures, and such things become more acceptable to the general public. And also as usual, it is the pie-eyed dreamers and their larger than expected, enthusiastic cash infusions, who keep the quirky "new thing" going on life support until it eventually becomes viable on it's own... Or fails... a fate that befalls many new things... Probably most, in fact. Always been that way. Always will be, I imagine. --Peter |
jimh |
posted 06-24-2013 03:47 PM ET (US)
Kevin--Let me ask you an analogous question: Are you seriously willing to accept the propane-powered outboard engine as a solution because one fellow saw a sailboat dingy go past with one? |
Jefecinco |
posted 06-24-2013 06:00 PM ET (US)
Propane and carburetors are not new. In 1955 I had a girlfriend with a 1955 Chevrolet Belair six cylinder two door hardtop powered by propane or gasoline. It was a pretty snazzy car for a young girl. The propane tank took up a pretty fair amount of the trunk space. In New Mexico, in those days, propane fired vehicles were popular with ranchers and farmers. Many had large propane tanks on the premises to power water heaters, refrigerators and stoves. Electrical power was not universally available. Propane was cheap and they had a lot of it on hand so it was smart to use it in the vehicles. The engines ran well but lacked torque and got through the propane. Happily the twist of a valve returned them to gasoline operation when the propane tank ran low. I don't recall any carburetor problems but perhaps my fifteen year old mind was occupied with other things. Butch |
K Albus |
posted 06-24-2013 07:59 PM ET (US)
Jim - A more analogous question would be whether I would purchase a propane powered outboard on the basis of good reviews of a propane powered string trimmer. The answer to that question is: "No." Should we assume from your analogy that the quality of BRP's snowmobiles, off-road vehicles, and motorcycles played a role in your purchase of an E-Tec outboard motor? |
EaglesPDX |
posted 06-24-2013 10:14 PM ET (US)
[k albus] Alright! The anti-LEHR jihad is now on in full force! [/quote] I think it's more "You kids get your propane toys off my lawn". Though TWO anti-LEHR threads within minutes shows someone has a bee in their jibonnet. It was interesting that a service rep answered the phone, spoke knowledgeably about the product, immediately ID'd what the operator did wrong, fixed the problem. Good to know. Combined with West Marine's (the LEHR distributor) solid reputation and return policies, it provides a level of security buying a new product. |
EaglesPDX |
posted 06-24-2013 10:59 PM ET (US)
Small samples on new products are always problematic but the LEHR Outboard Engines on West Marine's website with more than one review got 4.5 Stars our 5.0 Stars. [link=http://www.westmarine.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?productId=1098357&catalogId=10001&langId=-1&storeId=11151&storeNum=50596&subdeptNum=50616&classNum=61508#.UckFk-urtSA]West Marine LEHR Engines Page[/link] |
EaglesPDX |
posted 06-24-2013 11:00 PM ET (US)
Whoops...try this link. |
jimh |
posted 06-25-2013 07:56 AM ET (US)
If propane is to become the fuel for engines of the future, these problems with the fuel induction ("carburetors") will have to be worked out. The claim made for propane was that it eliminates problems with fuel sitting in the engine fuel system for long periods of non-use. Apparently propane does not inherently possess any special quality in this regard, as evidenced by the problems with the propane engines reported above. It seems there is nothing miraculous about propane and fuel induction. Induction of propane fuel into the cylinder of an internal combustion engine appears to be an engineering problem that has to be solved, perhaps yet to be solved reliably. I would like to see more information about propane fuel and how it is inducted into the cylinder of an internal combustion engine. In order for propane to remain a liquid it has to be kept under pressure. At normal atmospheric pressure it vaporizes into a gas. At first glance, it hardly seems like a normal carburetor would work, as the propane would be constantly evaporating to the atmosphere. The notion of "jihad" usually implies some religious belief. I can assure you, propane is not part of my religion. I do see that there are some fervent believers in the qualities of propane, but you can count me as a skeptic. Propane has been around for a long time, and it has not yet replaced gasoline as a fuel. If all the qualities of propane that have been ascribed to propane by the fervent believers are completely true, it would require a conspiracy to have kept propane from becoming the dominant fuel for internal combustion engines. In this instance, only one quality of propane is being examined: the claim that propane can be stored in the engine fuel system for long periods without any harm. When reasonable skepticism is expressed about claims made by fervent enthusiasts for a particular product or dogma, this is not normally called a jihad. Invoking the term jihad seems to me to be a manifestation of the religious fervor of the supporters of propane, not the skeptics. It seems like a form of ad hominem argument. Rather than explain further the miraculous qualities of propane, it is simpler to attack the critics. This sort of tactic in a discussion usually indicates one side of the argument has run out of good sound reasoning. So, if we can drop the religious hyperbole of "jihad", perhaps we can have an explanation of why the propane engines on the trimmers run so poorly yet propane is a better fuel than gasoline in terms of allowing fuel to remain in the fuel system of an engine for long periods of time without creating operating problems. |
andygere |
posted 06-25-2013 01:38 PM ET (US)
The LEHR propane outboards appear to be based on the Chinese-made Hidea Outboards, converted to burn propane. I had never heard of Hidea before looking into the LEHR outboards. I wonder how difficult it is to source basic repair and maintenance parts for either Hidea or LEHR outboard motors. http://www.hidea.ws/en/article.html?Id=8 |
pcrussell50 |
posted 06-25-2013 03:35 PM ET (US)
This just gets more and more interesting... I had never even heard of LEHR before Eagles pointed them out a few days ago. I just ASSumed they were an old German engine designer and builder of very fine, semi-hand-crafted motors, like the Germans are known for. If that's true, there's nothing about it in the "our story" that they themselves published on their web site. Their isn't even a wikipedia entry on them. As far as I know, old LEHR is a mid-level American merchant sea captain looking for a way to make something of himself. Or maybe not? There's just no info to say one way or the other. I just read LEHR's "story" on their own web site. It was a meatless, tome of glitz and polish with no content whatsoever. How long have they been in business? After reading their web site with a critical eye, ( I was too busy last week), I find myself less inclined, not more, to blow hard earned cash on one of their products. And the fact that even the people involved in the anti-LEHR jihad are having trouble finding anything, is telling me that there is not much track record at all as far as these things go. Me? I'll just wait a few years and see how things turn out. -Peter |
Dave Sutton |
posted 06-25-2013 04:13 PM ET (US)
A light-duty converted Chinese engine, without any local support *anyplace in the world*, marketed by a company with pockets about as deep as mine. You need to consider a thing like this as a dispose-an-engine if anything ever goes wrong. With that said, I did a propane conversion to my small Honda generator last year and it has worked perfectly. I use it at anchor for recharging my house batteries (why run a 12 KW diesel to recharge a battery?), and since I have propane as my house-fuel it made sense. These conversions are well documented and work well for their intended use. Google a little. I'm still considering going "no gasoline on the Trawler", Diesel and Propane are my main fuels for engine and big genset, and house fuel and small genset. If I could run the tender on "not gasoline" I would be willing to take the risk of buying a "dispose-an-engine" for the whopping $1900 it costs. There's a trawler-centric conversation about this here: http://www.trawlerforum.com/forums/s6/propane-fueled-outboards-5462.html With all that said, our friend PDX's nonsense about the iminent replacement of anything with propane has zero credibility. It's simply barking at the moon.
. |
DVollrath |
posted 06-25-2013 04:50 PM ET (US)
My understanding is that companies like Hidea and Parsun basically reverse engineer other products on the market, and manufacture them at a lower cost. Many companies design a product and have it manufactured offshore (e.g. the bulk of Apple products). It is kind of hard to imagine Hidea designing a propane powered outboard for a non-existent US market, and then Lehr just rebranding it. Just doesn't make sense when there are other well established markets that are so much more lucrative for companies like Hidea to go after. I'd bet it was the other way around, but of course I don't know. I guess I am puzzled by the way many are going after the technology. It seems intriguing to me, with many possible advantages. There have been good reviews of the Lehr outboard products (I have yet to find a bad one, but am certain others will be able to). The current Lehr incarnation of the propane outboard may have some shortcomings, but they or others may improve upon the concept if the market is there. That remains to be seen. Don't shoot the message just because you don't like the evangelistic manner of the messenger. I'm not advocating shooting the messenger either:)
|
Dave Sutton |
posted 06-25-2013 04:57 PM ET (US)
It's probably likely that Lehr simply has these made in China with their own specific modification to the basic "off the shelf" Chinese design, which itself may be a copy of something else (Nissan?) To think that Lehr has its own engineering department staffed by more than two men and a boy is really a stretch and its clear that they have no internal manufacturing capability. Nothing wrong with Chinese stuff, as long as you don't expect local service. On a simple product like this it's probably not a big deal.
. |
pcrussell50 |
posted 06-25-2013 07:13 PM ET (US)
quote: Agreed. And for "small ticket" items like leaf blowers and cheap standup scooters* like they used to sell at O'Reilly auto parts, you just toss them when you need a major part. We'll have to wait and see how LEHR handles big expensive outboards when/IF they ever produce one. Maybe by then one of the established/trusted manufacturers will be making them too? *I ended up getting my standup scooter from a more established, "made in California" manufacturer, with a Japanese engine, that has a parts/dealer/service network. It was more than twice as expensive, but I like the peace of mind. 10 years on, and still running great. Boating content: it folds up and and is easy to stow in a boat, and is a great way to get around the marina and local environs. -Peter |
WhalerAce |
posted 06-25-2013 08:31 PM ET (US)
Have you guys ever been to the San Antonio Riverwalk? All of the tour boats there have Mercury outboards converted to run on propane. And these guys run those engines ALL DAY. So I would think that the technology can and will be improved. I am just going to wait until about version 3.0 |
EaglesPDX |
posted 06-25-2013 10:38 PM ET (US)
quote: How cool is that. Apparently a number of kits out there to convert gasoline engines to propane. I wonder if the converted Mercury outboards were two or four cycle versions? That someone has done it to some Mercury outboards gives us evidence that for US outboards to run on propane is not a big engineering or manufacturing problem. |
andygere |
posted 06-26-2013 01:11 PM ET (US)
quote: They are 4-strokes. Nothing stopping you now... |
pcrussell50 |
posted 06-26-2013 02:11 PM ET (US)
San Antonio Riverwalk using propane. Big whoop. Another quasi-governmental fleet operator using propane in the same way as all the others, and probably for the same reasons. When I see the jackboots using propane to power their triple and quad, high-horsepower outboard pursuit boats, that will make a statement to me that maybe the idea is only a few years from readiness for day-to-day consumer use. -Peter |
Dave Sutton |
posted 06-26-2013 03:45 PM ET (US)
"Apparently a number of kits out there to convert gasoline engines to propane"
Try: "propane conversion mercury outboard" "propane conversion outboard engine" "propane conversion boat engine"
Dave . |
Jefecinco |
posted 06-26-2013 06:42 PM ET (US)
I forgot to mention in an earlier comment that propane automotive engine conversions could have some carburetor issues. In 1954 in South Texas (Harlingen) carburetor icing could interfere with running in more humid than usual conditions. Since the climate there was very humid, higher than normal humidity was very humid. The solution was to switch back to gasoline operation until conditions allowed a return to propane operation. The propane conversion kits were never intended to improve engine operation and installers always left the gasoline option in place. The sole purpose was to allow people with access to large propane supplies to save money. In my experience that was always farmers and ranchers. Butch |
pcrussell50 |
posted 06-26-2013 07:35 PM ET (US)
Sooo... the current state of the art in propane outboards looks like a shadowy startup, using pie-eyed dreamers with their endless patience, enthusiasm, pumping in cash on faith, like the duped flock of a cheesy television minister. Meanwhile their offices are 5 miles from the beach near the most expensive zip code in the country. Anyone smell anything Solyndra-esqe here? -Peter |
DVollrath |
posted 06-26-2013 07:46 PM ET (US)
Wow Peter, are you currently enrolled in a creative writing class by any chance? That is some beautiful word-smithing:) By the way, I was just at my local chandlery (Fisheries Supply), and saw all 3 Lehr motors on display. They have offered them since at least last fall. Next time I'm in I'll ask how sales have been and what reports they have gotten. Yes, I did look on the back side to make sure they weren't cardboard cutouts... Dennis |
Peter |
posted 06-27-2013 08:26 AM ET (US)
One big advantage to Lehr propane outboards over ordinary gasoline fueled outboards is that you can run them safely indoors. ;) |
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.