Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  18' Outrage vs Dauntless

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   18' Outrage vs Dauntless
rrodriguez38 posted 12-22-2013 03:18 AM ET (US)   Profile for rrodriguez38   Send Email to rrodriguez38  
Been waiting my whole life to own a Whaler. Getting closer now. I have fished out of a 17' Montauk and it was nice but somewhat cramped for 3 large adults and a young boy.

I have grown daughters and a wife that loves to fish so I am leaning towards an 18 footer. I'm thinking we will have between 2-4 adults fishing in this boat.

Most of us like to fish from a seated position. I do like the Dauntless' rear seating but like the openness of the Outrage.

Does one ride better than the other? Most of our fishing will be bay fishing in Galveston. Water depth usually ranges 3-6 feet.

The pulling vehicle is a Tundra with the larger V-8.

jimh posted 12-22-2013 02:39 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Four adults need an OUTRAGE 22 or maybe an OUTRAGE 25. The cost of these larger hulls has fallen in the past five years. They are very affordable. The only drawback to a larger hull will be a larger outboard. Unfortunately, outboard engines are still priced in very strict proportion to horsepower.

Four adults in a 17-footer? It does not sound like a fun day on the water.

mkelly posted 12-22-2013 09:09 PM ET (US)     Profile for mkelly  Send Email to mkelly     
I've owned a 19' Outrage for 13 years & while I love it, I have been seriously thinking about a dual console for more comfort & layout for multiple people. The Outrage is tough with more than two people, and you never get to sit. My ideal fishing boat would be if Boston Whaler of past would build a great dual console or reintroduce the 21 or 23 Walkaround, and increase the beam one foot
PeteB88 posted 12-23-2013 12:05 AM ET (US)     Profile for PeteB88  Send Email to PeteB88     
I think many of us have felt exactly like you when contemplating your first purchase of a Boston Whaler. I certainly remember all that and being excited and confused at the same time. What to buy, which boat is the right boat, reading tons of information, testimonials, reviews all of it. Then considering my unique experience in boats, growing up fishing w/ 14 ft and 9.5 Johnson with my dad and assorted fishin pals and taking major risks without blinking an eye in rough water at times. Then many years fishing Pacific NW streams including whitewater in wood drift boats and rafts. Sometimes dangerous as anything. Best years for sure and entirely uncomplicated.

jimH is correct, the bigger the boat the more comfort and room. But now we're talking budget (I have one for sure), practicality and lots of variables including tow vehicle, where you will keep it, storage, trailers, trailering/hauling, ground handling, use in open water only vs shallow water capable boat, inland lakes/rivers, open water, marina vs trailer boat vs lift and on and on. Moreover, will it be primarily a fishing boat or pleasure, party, cruiser? Or both?

What is perhaps more significant is: No one really answered your question about Outrage v. Dauntless. I can't help you with that. I got hung up on that for a couple years. I'm not an expert in an opinion and I've never been in a Dauntless. I know people that have 22s and love them but I don't know how they use them.

In any case, I struggled with Montauk, found several and [made a decision] partly because prior to buying my largest Whaler, an Outrage 17 1995, I never rode in a Montauk! I had an 11.5 and a 13. Still have them. When a very nice (condition and equipped) Outrage 17 went for sale, I bought it and probably at top dollar for the boat--very uncharacteristic of me. My rationale was I wanted a 17 Montauk for a variety of reasons including easy hauling and ground handling, the Outrage hull, same length is fantastic condition, with big console was very appealing, and tons of positive reviews on that particular boat, kind of a special, unique hull design as I was told and two previous Montauk owners who replaced their boats with Outrage 17s and raved about them - especially in rough water conditions. Then I got all into the lore of Bob Doherty who designed the boat and it was last year of the classics.

We are very pleased with the boat, live next to Lake Michigan and several inland lakes that connect to the big lake (sea) and it's been terrific. Have I wished it were a 22 or a 25 at times? You bet, on that lake that can get rotten in a real hurry. Have I had any concerns with the Outrage handling whatever, no, not really. Do I think it's versatile enough for what we do? Pretty much although I love to fish top waters for large mouth and fly rod w floating line so that means getting into shallow spots - it's sketchy there for sure - but I have a 13 for that purpose.

Capacity. I've had six aboard, adults and at the same time a couple of Clydesdales too - I'm 6' and about 225 so I displace some space for sure. Heck ya it's great for two people but I'd fish 4, done that many times running drift boats and rafts. I also notice dudes around here tend to bring a ton of gear with them, I go light, don't need a banquet, tons of junk but folk bring their stuff - I tend to sift through best I can before loading and then I gotta stow purses. - oh well. They get stuffed into dry bag.

Ride and Comfort - This is very significant: A longer, bigger, heavier boat will give you a smoother ride if chop and bumpy conditions are something you will have to deal with. This can be seriously important for passenger comfort. Some people get flat pissed. I have people who come aboard ready to stretch out and cruise. Most of our center console boats are meant to be rode standing up absorbing chop and bumps with your legs. Montauks and early Outrage models can pound.

I think the best advice that I wish had told me is to try and get some rides if you can (no easy way w/o being a jerk maybe - I don't know - hit the dealers) and see what you think. Sit in them, lay on bow cushion, sit in every seat, dig into the consoles and just keep looking hard. You really have to think about tow vehicle too - I used to pull my 13 with a Camry no problem, I'm going to put a hitch on my Matrix for same purpose and to pull a 4.6 M sailboat. I pull the Outrage w/ a 4 Runner. It's fine but big pickups are really built for towing.

Break it down - I think they are all great but not one is perfect. By observation most start with a 13 or 15, go to Montauk, then Outrage and after a lot of time many get Revenge models or post classic equivalent. Hope this helps.

DirtRoad posted 12-23-2013 04:30 PM ET (US)     Profile for DirtRoad  Send Email to DirtRoad     
The Whalers you are refering to are V style hulls which limit the access to fishing shallow waters in the bay.

Most persons looking for bay boats want a flat bottom for shallow water access.

I have a Revenge which is similar to the Outrage hull. I use the Revenge for offshore fishing. In the bay I use a flat bottom scooter.

Make sure you know your needs prior to buying.

sullyjhn posted 02-15-2014 02:36 PM ET (US)     Profile for sullyjhn  Send Email to sullyjhn     
Good information. Can you tube and ski with a Boston Whaler OUTRAGE 17?
saumon posted 02-15-2014 04:18 PM ET (US)     Profile for saumon  Send Email to saumon     
Agree with everything PeteB88 said about the early (1990-1995) Outrage 17, and much more. The added strorage, tall console and improved (very dry) ride of the deeper V-hull Outrage with the size, ease of use and economy of the Montauk but, still, there's no way you'd be able to fish three or four seated. Two is fine and at three it became cramped for fishing but for cruising/tubing there's no problem at all.
Jefecinco posted 02-15-2014 07:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jefecinco  Send Email to Jefecinco     
For comfort while inshore fishing there is little difference between an Outrage and a Dauntless. Offshore the Outrage has the advantage.

For shallow water and general inshore fishing I've found my 190 Montauk to be very suited. I've fished up to four adults aboard mine in relative comfort. Obviously larger boats provide greater fishing comfort for the same number of people.

If the largest fishing party you envision will be four adults the larger Montauk will do very well. The draft lends itself to somewhat shallower water than either the Outrage or the Dauntless if that is a concern.

If the 190 Montauk is something you want to look into I recommend you avoid those powered with a 115 or lower HP motor. My 190 has a 135 HP Verado and the performance is good to excellent. Also, if you wish to consistently fish parties of four consider getting seats for the aft quarters.

Butch

mkelly posted 02-16-2014 04:28 PM ET (US)     Profile for mkelly  Send Email to mkelly     
I have Outrage 19 and my buddy has the Dauntless 20, both 1995. The Dauntless is great but porpoises quite a bit; both are comparable on ride. I'd go with the dual console. You'll be happy and so will your fishing mates.
Jefecinco posted 02-16-2014 07:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jefecinco  Send Email to Jefecinco     
When you have a nice fish on it's often necessary to move around the boat in order to actually land the rascal. Usually a fishing companion will handle the landing net for you. A large fish on light tackle can be a pretty lively critter when it gets to the boat. Help in landing it is usually welcome. A center console boat is far better suited to fighting and landing a big fish if more than two angles are aboard.

There is a reason that most small salt water fishing boats are center consoles.

Butch

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.