posted 02-25-2004 11:03 AM ET (US)
Let me move a response that I had sent to Jim's reference article thread to here. After complimenting Jim on his usual great job, I said:One thing I am still curious about, though, and that is the propensity of riggers to want to mount the primer bulb so close to the END of the fuel line (that is, by the engine). It seems to me, intuitively, that the proper place to mount the primer bulb would be as close as possible to the outlet of the tank. This way, you are PUSHING fuel along the fuel line, not pulling it.
I had a case the other day where I could not prime the port engine on my Temptation. (The Temptation underneath the deck looks almost exactly like my Outrage with Whaler Drive did -- by that I mean that coming from the underdeck tank there are two large hoses that run to a transition plate. At this plate are bulkhead fittings that convert the fuel lines to the black 3/8" hoses that then run to the fuel-water separators and filters, and from there to each respective engine). I could pump and pump, but could never get gasoline to flow. I tried all of the usual tricks to make it work (yes, checking orientation of the bulbs, checking for air leaks, etc).
Finally turned out the easiest way to resolve the problem (which mainly showed up of the first start-up of the day) was to add a "primer" primer bulb just a few inches past the previously mentioned transition plate. This allows me to fill the separators and filters with gasoline (and not have to create a vacuum to do it) and get gasoline to the engine filter/carb/whatever with a whole lot less squeezing. I can then reach over the WhalerDrive and prime the last bulb as usual.
I would still like for someone to explain the rationale of pulling the fuel via vacuum versus pushing the fuel from the closest point to the tank.
I appreciate the indulgence.
WhalerAce