Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: Whaler Repairs/Mods
  Optimax Fuel Injection

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Optimax Fuel Injection
RevengeFamily posted 09-24-2012 07:35 AM ET (US)   Profile for RevengeFamily   Send Email to RevengeFamily  
I have Twin 1999 Mercury Optimax 225 engines...

Over Labor day weekend I headed out on what was suppose to be a weekend of fishing... But thanks again to one of my "Optibombs" the trip was cut short...

This time, bearings on the air compressor for my starboard motor went bad. So three hours into our trip we had to turn around and idle on back to the dock on the port side engine. Up until the compressor bearings died, both motors were running strong.

Instead of replacing the bearings, I purchased a new compressor. Do to other things going on in life, I finally got around to installing it this past Saturday. I read up in the Merc shop manual about replacing the compressor and thought it looked pretty much cut and dry.

However, after installing the compressor, the motor was difficult to start. When I finally did get her to run, I discovered she was only running on cylinders 2-4 and 6.

After checking for blown fuses, disconnected or loose wires, I checked for spark and found all three cylinders were firing. I then disconnected the control wires for the fuel injectors on cylinders 1-3 and 5. Disconnecting all three injectors at the same time made no difference in how it ran.

The fact that my port engine runs fine, I swapped the compressors to see if the trouble followed the compressor. It did not. Then I switched the ECU to see if it was failing to send signals to the cylinders, but again the trouble did not follow the part. I'm now assuming that I have trouble with the port side fuel rail.

Has anyone ever experience something similar? I can't imagine that I had three injectors all go bad at the same time. Remember that motor was running fine until the compressor bearings went bad.

Norm

Peter posted 09-24-2012 02:17 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
Clogged fuel or air rail caused by metal filings from compressor failure?
outragesteve posted 09-24-2012 02:46 PM ET (US)     Profile for outragesteve  Send Email to outragesteve     
A friend of mine had the same issue, and yes, the fuel rail on one side had contamination from the compressor failure. Took it all apart, and had the injectors cleaned/flowed @ Brucato. Runs perfectly fine now. Good luck!
martyn1075 posted 09-24-2012 11:03 PM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
Yes unfortunately what happens is that when that rod in the compressor moves for whatever reason it wears on the bearing and causes the compressor to overheat without warning. Likely what has happened is what Peter has mentioned is the small metal fragments from the explosion have shot into the rails and very likely the injectors hopefully not though.

By any chance do you know how many hours you got out of that compressor before it blew? Mercury offers a new design on this part in hopes to eliminate this problem. The other designs are really no different that the others with minimal change. Apparently this new one offers a bearing on each side rather than the one giving it needed support from possibly movement. They are not cheap quite cheeky of the company imo to ask the price they do considering they know this has been a problem part.

Martyn

martyn1075 posted 09-24-2012 11:13 PM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
Its not comfortable feeling knowing that this part just waiting in the wings to fail and the devastation at stake is is very large. Although it does happen to many of them some just don't blow up at all. The newer the engine the less they fail but not completely I have heard of Optimax's right up to 2010 that have prematurely blown with like 8 hours only. Fix it under warranty and get 1500 hours and counting without a problem on it.

I think its an assembly problem and perhaps instal at the factory. The part needs to be precise engineering. Its interesting how Mercury has put a stop to this part being built in Mexico after all these years and now is mandatory to being assembled in the US only!

Martyn

RevengeFamily posted 09-25-2012 07:10 AM ET (US)     Profile for RevengeFamily  Send Email to RevengeFamily     
Peter, Steve and Martyn...

Thanks for your assistance... I assumed I was going to have to disassemble the fuel rail...but hearing it from others confirms my suspicions and makes me feel more comfortable before diving into another morning of repair work...

Reading my shop manual, the 1997 engines had a filter screen on the high pressure side of the compressor to catch the filings before they got to the fuel rails. I thought that was a good idea, but of course Mercury thought they could save a dollar...

Martyn,
The compressors only had 480hrs on it... not exactly bullet proof as far as I'm concerned... I love the boat but dislike the engines... I'm investigating what it will cost to re power with Yamaha or Honda four strokes... Unfortunately for Brunswick, I have zero confidence in their engines.

Thanks again,
Norm

martyn1075 posted 09-25-2012 03:29 PM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
Norm I fully understand. It happens to be a major part and it should not die prematurely. I was interested on how many hours because I have been reading a fair amount about these compressors in the Optimax and on average they are lasting 500, and yours at 480 is right in that zone very interesting.

I have the the newer versions of your engine but it doesn't necessarily mean I'm going to get away scotch free. I have 344 hours. I am keeping a close eye with people who have installed the new design compressor to see if it actually makes the difference. If it does, I might actually replace my current compressors before the 500 range as more of a preventive maintenance procedure. It would cost about 2k for the parts alone but if it gets me another 1500 or more hours of blow up free time it might actually be a good investment. New engines are 20K or more each. If the compressor blows and tears apart my engine I might be faced with a $3k clean up bill or more on the aftermath of the bomb. Its the lesser of the two evils for me. I second your vision of the Honda or Yamaha. New discussions here on CW in regards to the Honda 250 is quite positive on reliability and gas savings.

Martyn

RevengeFamily posted 09-27-2012 07:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for RevengeFamily  Send Email to RevengeFamily     
Martyn,

I may have caused some confusion with my original post. The compressor did not explode. What failed was the bearing. What was strange about the failure was the outer race of the bearing became loose in what Mercury calls the "end cap". It almost appears as if the bearing seized and the torque from the drive belt spun the entire bearing assembly in the aluminum "end cap". After a few rotations it ate away at the aluminum allowing the bearing assembly, including the drive pulley to flop back and forth. Which was the cause of the noise I heard from under the cowling. I will be disassembling the old compressor and report on what I find. It sounds like the bearings will simply fall apart in my hands.

My new compressor set me back $700.00. Hopefully the new compressor will last long enough for me to save up for a replacement for my other engine...

martyn1075 posted 09-28-2012 01:37 PM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
Norm, yes that is exactly text book failure of the compressor it seems. The fact that you caught it in time is a bit of blessing even though I agree the thing should not be falling apart with only 480 hours. Its that bearing or really to be honest the pulley tensioner system seems to be a weak link. I thought there was a separate rod and bearing kit vs the whole compressor but maybe its sold together now.

I am really curious, how would you best describe the sound of the noise you heard in the engine? Was is a wheezing sound or high pitch noise or just clicking? Did it get louder when you were running higher rpm's or was it continuous even at idle. I have one engine in the twins that is making a slight noise more distinct than the other. I can't really confirm that its a wearing pre failure to the compressor but Im really conscious about it for the obvious reasons. I have only 344h hours on mine at the moment but they run great otherwise. I talked to a mechanic who told me to relax they are all different and no two engines sound the same and that it was harmless at this point.

Thanks,

Martyn

RevengeFamily posted 09-28-2012 05:31 PM ET (US)     Profile for RevengeFamily  Send Email to RevengeFamily     
After disassembling my 1999 Mercury Optimax air compressor, I discovered parts as large as 3/8ths of an inch deposited in the bottom of the crank section of the unit. These pieces were sections of the bearing cage from the inner bearing. Not sure why it broke apart, but once it did, the individual balls all moved together in the race. This allowed the crank to miss align and eat away at the aluminum surrounding the outer bearing.

The cylinder walls became scuffed and some aluminum was discharged into the airline for the fuel rails. Also, the roller bearings on the connecting rod (at the crank end) had it's outer race crack. This weekend I hope to get to the boat and disassemble the fuel rails, clean out any debris that may be clogging the injectors and get this engine running again.

Norm

L H G posted 09-28-2012 05:56 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
Instead of complaining about 13 year old Optibombs, from the infancy days of Government mandated Direct Fuel Injection, you should be happy the outsourced components from Japan or China (or is it American junk?) lasted even that long. That's a pretty good life for a compressor. I wish AC compressors on my cars lasted 13 years.

Where would you be if the boat came with OMC manufactured 1999 Evinrude Fichts, before bankruptcy? They are all in the scrap heap.

I doubt if you'll be able to get the Optibomb running again, and if you do, it will still be worth nothing, like throwing good money after bad. Go out and buy a pair of those 225 Hondas that the Coast Guard worships. The Japanese economy could use a little stimulus, and your Revenge will purr for the rest of your life.

martyn1075 posted 09-29-2012 12:45 AM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
Ok first of all lets be clear its not the compressor that is bad nor the idea of the compressor it doesn't wear out that quickly so Larry we can't compare it to a car AC in fact if we could and its was wearing out due to a similar part like Mercury's problem the company would be sued and there would be a recall to any owner with one of these badly manufactured parts. The problem is the rod and bearing that run through the wrongly accused compressor using a pulley tensioner system that is separate then the main belt system.

Larry the other problem is they die at anytime sometimes 8 hours only some go at 200 but most are in the 500 range from what I have gathered. Estimated time 5 years? I guess if you are lucky Mercury will cover it but once out of warranty that part is a time bomb and it shouldn't be. In fact sometimes the part is replaced and then dies again!

Now to Mercury's credit it looks like they have not given up on trying to fix it and the new design emphasizes a new structure that strengthens the rod and bearing so that it stays put eliminating hopefully for good the bearing that pre maturely wears out and kills the wrongly accused part that should in most cases yes at least give you 13 years dedicated use. In that case nobody should really complain but lets be honest Revenge Family and others are victims of a part that is wearing out prematurely due to reasons I don't want to repeat again. Also I might add that because of this issue anyone who owns one of these engines needs to be aware that when if it does explode the damage is terrifying and very expensive to fix.

martyn1075 posted 09-29-2012 12:54 AM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
Also to be fair not all die even at 500 hours or longer and the engine overall is good value imo otherwise. If this part is a permeate fix it will be a huge success for Optimax owners. Like I said putting out a thousand vs three thousand clean up bill and possibly a blown head all together because of it is far the better investment (long term) The other option is like Larry said, you can buy a Honda and not worry about it. It will set you back several thousands like the cost of a Civic. Buy two and you have two Civics sitting on the back of your Boston Whaler.

Martyn

RevengeFamily posted 09-29-2012 06:40 AM ET (US)     Profile for RevengeFamily  Send Email to RevengeFamily     
Larry, AKA "Mr Mercury"

Not sure what your point is, but I have had tractors with 600,000 + thousand miles on them and never had an AC compressor go bad. And my AC compressors are exposed to all sorts of highway dirt, salt and grime. Not to say that AC compressors don't eventually wear out, but come on, do the math and figure out how much longer they last...

Not sure where Mercury has these compressors made, but 480 hours on an air compressor? And these units are lubricated with two stroke oil and water cooled? Give me a break...

I'm not concerned about Evinrude Ficht's... Never owned one, but if I had, I'd be just as upset...

Before these Mercs, I owned Johnson's. And sorry to say Larry, I never had one self implode like these black Pieces Of S*#$!!!

Nothing like being on the water and WITHOUT WARNING have a piston and cylinder get wasted... I've been trying to keep these "Optibombs" from going to the dump for the past 6 years. I've had to resurrect each engine from the dead once. Apparently I rebuild these engines better than Merc makes them from the get go...

"Mr Mercury", you are correct about one thing, these engines are worth nothing. Having them bolted to the transom is actually detrimental to the value of my 1999 Boston Whaler 280 Conquest...

My 1990 Boston Whaler Revenge 22 W/T has 1999 twin F100 Yamaha's on her transom. Would you believe I have yet to do anything but change the oil and filter, gap the plugs and replace the zincs. Go figure...

I'd be willing to bet if I had Yamaha's or Honda's on my Conquest I would not be having this literary exchange with you...

Be well,
Norm

jimh posted 09-29-2012 11:11 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Another option for OptiMax owners might be to purchase a factory re-built OptiMax. The OptiMax had a bit of a dark period in its history, I believe around c.2005, when many power heads were failing during the warranty period. As a result, Mercury had to replace many power heads under warranty. The failed power heads they took back were so numerous that they began a factory rebuilding operation to refurbish them and re-sell them as a second-tier or B-stock or factory-refurbished product. They even had a special name for these engines--I can't think of it now. There was a rather big pipeline of these factory-refurbished or second-tier or B-stock engines available at one time, and, of course, they were being sold at a reduced priced compared to a newly made engine. The whole refurbished program had a name--darn it, I can't think of it. We have discussed that before.

The program was not widely known, and I think the dealers were not keen on it. I asked my local Mercury dealer about it, and he pooh-poohed it. I think he would have rather sold a new engine at full cost than a factory second-tier engine at a reduced cost. Of course, my local Mercury dealer advised all his customers not to buy any OptiMax engines, so he was not likely to recommend buying a factory-rebuilt one that has blown up under warranty for another customer.

Can anyone help me remember the name of that Mercury rebuild program?

RevengeFamily posted 09-29-2012 08:12 PM ET (US)     Profile for RevengeFamily  Send Email to RevengeFamily     
Jim,

MERCURY???

Only if I were marooned on a deserted island would I ever consider having a Mercury on my boat...

Other than that, NEVER AGAIN!!!

jimh posted 09-29-2012 10:36 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Here is more information about Mercury's factory re-manufacturing program. Mercury says they have re-manufactured almost 100,000 engines since 1996. I had no idea that they took back that many bad engines under warranty.
L H G posted 09-30-2012 11:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
We should all be so lucky that "Revenge Family" was marooned on an island with his 1999 Optibomb power. That would be poetic justice. Then we would all know that he would stay marooned, and he wouldn't have access to this site to air his well received broken record, anti-Mercury crusade about wear and tear on 13 YEAR OLD engines. These problems are way out of warranty, and not related to insurable damage. So what's the point? Of course there will be wear and tear. Who knows if they are even true, or how badly the engines have been treated and maintained, either by him or previous owners. Are we supposed to listen to this crusade, with no real evidence whatsoever?

One participant here is talking about 4200 trouble free hours on his Optimax 225. How could that be, or is more likely the norm?

martyn1075 posted 10-01-2012 02:10 AM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
Larry be good, I think this is more based on frustration its not like Revenge Family is hoping that something goes wrong and it ruins his trip just so he can bash Mercury on this website. Its more to do with, dam I now need to find out why this happened pay huge money out again. That and looking for advise on what to do.

4200 hours is just amazing for sure I would hope there are many more of them personally but you only here about the bad things usually why because people are mad disappointed and frustrated looking for advice its normal because we expect them to work all the time or at least most of the time. If they are breaking down while other engines are working at same hour intervals it adds to the frustration. Owners like Revenge Family have genuine concern with certain parts that are problems. There is a new fix for this Im just not sure its a bit early to really give it full praise but I would say if you have a good running Opti this part although expensive could very well be something that could eliminate a nick name given the Optibomb for good. Yes for good or at least cut the odds down. 13 years seems like a long time but I always base an engine on hours as long as the there is no corrosion inside these parts are based on usage. 480 is nothing its like a baby for a modern day engine. Can we expect them to last without compressors blowing up? I think so and I would expect that Mercury team would also agree they should.

The Optimax is rated for I think 2000 hours on the powerhead? These parts should be trouble free for longer than 500 range. If they don't on average then something is wrong. Also keep in mind the newer the Opti the more updated parts are factory installed years of learning the hard way have been adapted to eliminate problems that have plagued this motor. Im not letting Mercury off the hook with the early ones they should be better at 500 hours but it is the truth sadly and many have been caught in between which once again upsets the client in thinking they may have invested in a bad engine.

Martyn

jimh posted 10-01-2012 05:13 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Larry proposes a solution to the problem he sees in this thread: we must stop people who have bad experiences with certain engines from talking about those bad experiences. Or, perhaps we can limit people to talking about those experiences no more than once. Unfortunately we'd have to apply this equally, and we'd have to limit people who have had good experiences from talking about them only once. I don't see the merit in that approach. Here comes some fellow and he wants some first-hand advice about an engine. Under Larry's rules no one could participate if they'd ever mentioned their experience before. I just don't see it as a workable solution.

If every time a certain topic comes up there is a certain person who jumps in with his first-hand experience, then I suppose that long-time readers might begin to recognize a trend.

I think first-hand experience is valuable. I don't want to set up some rule that says you can only tell your story once. Your story might be worth telling over and over.

RevengeFamily posted 10-01-2012 09:19 PM ET (US)     Profile for RevengeFamily  Send Email to RevengeFamily     
Larry...

Do you own stock in Brunswick?

You must be delusional... You can't honestly think that I'd rather be at my computer asking for advice about repairing what YOU believe to be a fictitious problem?

Trust me when I tell you I'd rather be out on the water using my Whaler... Especially if the "Optibombs" would get me to and from a deserted island...

Norm

jimh posted 10-01-2012 10:04 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Norm--don't forget that Larry has never owned an OptiMax, never had an OptiMax on the transom of his boat, and never probably will. Larry just likes to stick up for the OptiMax. He likes to tell other people to own them; he doesn't own them himself.
L H G posted 10-01-2012 10:54 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
Let me see if I can answer.

1. I have never owned Brunswick stock

2. I don't have any money with Bain Capital

3. I have been smart enough to not buy 1999 DFI engines, either by Mercury or the old OMC.

4. I have told many privately, upon asking, that I would never own a DFI engine produced before 2004. That includes both Optimax and Ficht.

5. I have a pair of EFI Mercurys, 1997 year models bought new, that have been around 2500 hours on them, with no problems at all, other than non-powerhead related maintenance and wear and tear replacements. (I had a non-warranty power trim motor fail, and I didn't blanket this site with complaints about sub-standard Mercury parts) They are both quieter running and more powerful than those early Optimax engines, and get pretty good fuel economy.

http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v429/lgoltz/Outrage%2025/?action=view& current=MVI_0147.mp4 Why would I need to replace them?
But if I need to, I will.

In 1999, you could have bought that boat with Mercury 225 EFI's instead. If you had, they'd still be running. Somebody gave you bad advice to buy Optimax engines in their design and manufacturing infancy. That is never smart. Look what happened to OMC in 2000.

RevengeFamily posted 10-06-2012 08:24 AM ET (US)     Profile for RevengeFamily  Send Email to RevengeFamily     
Last weekend, after removing, cleaning and inspecting my fuel rails, fuel pressure regulator, air pressure regulator and the tracker valve on my 1999 Mercury 225 Optimax, I discovered nothing wrong with the system. When reassembled, the motor was still only running on cylinders 1-3 and 5 even though I had 90psi of fuel and 80psi of air pressure in the fuel rails.

After having my air compressor go bad back in September, I was certain that parts of the compressor had found their way into the fuel rails, so I concentrated my efforts there.

Not sure why, but I do my best analogical thinking early in the morning... Earlier this week at 03:40 I was going through my engines dilemma when something I had read in the shop manual was resurrected in my head. I remembered reading that when shifting, three of the fuel injectors are momentarily shut down to give the motor a bit of a "hiccup". This allows the gears in the lower unit to shift smoothly...

This momentary shut down of the three fuel injectors is controlled by a micro switch on the port side of the engine block. What are the odds that after my compressor died, the micro switch also got stuck in the electronically open position? I believe this would keep injectors 2-4-6 shut down.

So back to the boat today to inspect the switch... Will let you know what I find.

Norm

craiglucas26 posted 07-06-2014 03:54 PM ET (US)     Profile for craiglucas26  Send Email to craiglucas26     
[Two years later, apparently to Norm AKA RevengeFamily;] did you resolve the problem? I have the same problem with a Mercury Optimax.
RevengeFamily posted 07-07-2014 07:39 AM ET (US)     Profile for RevengeFamily  Send Email to RevengeFamily     
Yes I did resolve the problem(s). What I discovered was that I had three bad air injectors most likely from my compressor failure.

Unfortunately (but good for my wallet) I'm getting pretty good at diagnosing problems with these engines. Using the quick disconnects on the fuel and air injectors is a good way of identifying sick cylinders on the Optis.

I sent all six air injectors out to be cleaned and discovered that two were no longer serviceable. I knew Mercury charges an arm and a leg for them but went to the local dealer who said with a smile on his face that each air injector was only $385. I told him to go *#&# off and ended up purchasing used injectors on ebay for around $100 each. You see, there are so many of these POS's failing that guys are parting them out.

Keep in mind that this was a minor disaster for this motor and occurred in September of 2012.

Labor Day 2013 this engine seized on me again. This time I discovered the mighty "O" ring that Mercury uses for head gaskets on each cylinder split on cylinder 6. This allowed water to wash the cylinder wall and eventually seized the engine again.

So again I rebuilt it and am loving my Boston Whaler 280 Conquest but I'm still apprehensive to go more than 20 miles from the marina because I can never tell when the next Mercury Optimax disaster will occur.

Norm

martyn1075 posted 07-07-2014 07:30 PM ET (US)     Profile for martyn1075  Send Email to martyn1075     
Yes and also beware of the NEW (not so new but newer) model number for these parts. One can easily get fooled and buy the exact same part thinking they got the new and improved injector. Chances are they don't really exist at least they are harder to find. Most reputable dealers will only stock the new improved injectors but old ones can be in stock just collecting dust. Some dealers might try to sell ones of those wanting them out of the bin. They should be more expensive for the newer design. At the time I found them to be $100 difference. I will say they are good! I never lost one after I replaced them with the good ones as well never lost a compressor. They work together all parts must be tuned right, as well good gas and oil and the Optimax can really be a great engine.

Martyn

sosmerc posted 07-09-2014 01:49 AM ET (US)     Profile for sosmerc  Send Email to sosmerc     
"all parts must be tuned right, as well good gas and oil and the Optimax can really be a great engine."

I agree with Martyn, these engine can be very solid provided the owner pays close attention to diligent maintenance. Unfortunately, my experience is that most owners do not really have the time or desire to pay that much attention to service. The latest four-stroke engines are probably more user friendly and therefore may turn out to be superior in terms of satisfaction of the overall owner experience. As to pure power and performance, the DFI two-stroke engines can certainly hold their own in that department.

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.