Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: Whaler Repairs/Mods
  "Raising" the transom height on a larger Whaler

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   "Raising" the transom height on a larger Whaler
Buckda posted 11-06-2013 10:50 AM ET (US)   Profile for Buckda   Send Email to Buckda  
I have a 1983 25’ Outrage Cuddy. Boston Whaler set this boat to run with a single 25” shaft engine or twin 20” shaft engines because at the time, there were no 30” shaft engines on the market. Today, most twin-engine boats of this size are built to accommodate a 30” shaft single and twin 25” shaft engines. This makes purchasing counter-rotating engines difficult.

I would like to “raise” the transom on my boat to accommodate 25” shaft twin engines. I already have a pair on there and the extra shaft length is affecting the performance of the boat, and any future engines I might buy are likely to be 25” shaft engines. Additionally, new engines are likely going to be somewhat heavier than the current engines – so having a higher transom height will help the boat manage that weight by keeping water out of the splashwell.

The biggest question is how do I go about raising the height of this transom while retaining transom strength and rigidity needed for twin V6 outboards? Can it be done without replacing the whole transom, or will I have to laminate in a whole new transom? My current thinking is to remove the whole outer laminate and core and only part of the core near the top and re-laminate in a new core section near the top and use the new outer core section that would extend down to the keel for the rigidity/strength.

Thoughts?

george nagy posted 11-06-2013 12:22 PM ET (US)     Profile for george nagy  Send Email to george nagy     
Could you use jack plates instead?
george nagy posted 11-06-2013 12:25 PM ET (US)     Profile for george nagy  Send Email to george nagy     
Also if you wanted you could have a custom bracket made that would raise the engines 5" or so an use the original engine mounting holes in the transom. Maybe something like a 4" box that would offset from the rear of the transom and then lift the mounting height as well. It could be called a "jackbracket" -patent pending.
Buckda posted 11-06-2013 12:32 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Yes. CMC has a fixed 5 inch lift extension (2-piece) that would attach to the transom and can handle V6 outboards. I have a source for that product on file and had planned to go that route previously, however, I do think it amounts to a bandage rather than a fix.
leadsled posted 11-06-2013 01:43 PM ET (US)     Profile for leadsled  Send Email to leadsled     
I like the jackplate idea but maybee have a bracket that goes over the transom and hangs on to the transom like the clamps on a smaller outboard. In either case I would want to install a large sheet of alluminum plate to have the whole transom bear the stress and not just the 4 mounting bolts for each engine.
L H G posted 11-06-2013 04:28 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
Dave - The 30" transom has been a Commercial Products option for years, and I have seen many Guardians built that way. It was even an option when I bought mine back in 1989.

It was an alteration done in the glass shop after the complete hull was first manufactured as a standard hull.
Back then, additional cost was $1000., but I have no idea how they actually did the modification. You might consider contacting them for advice and how-to information. Maybe they will even do it for you?

If it were my boat, I would simply install an Armstrong bracket with the top surface at the new 25" height. This would be 5" higher than the transom notch, and with small side platforms, would span across it, keeping water out and effectively giving you the 5" higher transom. Then a nice teak slat platform could be built at the height of the bracket surface and covering the original splashwell.

You could walk right out on the platform & bracket if you wanted to, and overall boat performance would be nicely improved over transom mounted engines. If you took a huge wave into the boat, the water can still run out the back, although the pair of 3" transom drains would still be needed.

Or just do the Detwiler anodized jackplate solution. There is even a photo in the 1988 catalog of a 25 notched transom Outrage with jackplates. The boat looks nice.

Buckda posted 11-06-2013 06:14 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Here's what I doodled before I read LHG's post:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BxsbUJ20iWcvX2xBZzB1UU9pRTg/ edit?usp=sharing

I like the option of a bigger transom bracket...and have discussed that before as well. I just want it to look really good when it's done --and since I'm going to be redoing a lot of the gelcoat back there anyway, wanted to explore options.

Dave

contender posted 11-06-2013 09:44 PM ET (US)     Profile for contender  Send Email to contender     
Saw a 25 once not to long ago (either Palm Beach or Vero Beach area), the guy enclosed the entire transom and put a diveplatfoam/engine bracket across the new transom. Came out real nice and made the whaler look good...
jimh posted 11-07-2013 09:12 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Dave--If I were you, I would be very leery of adding a long engine platform to the boat, particularly one that lacked a buoyancy box to overcome the added weight, without building up the transom. For confirmation, just look at what Boston Whaler themselves did:

--they used an engine bracket with a buoyancy box--the Whaler Drive; they did not use long set back brackets without buoyancy boxes on their classic hulls;

--when Boston Whaler added the Whaler Drive they built up the transom height, and they used three long support rods from the Whaler Drive transom running upward to the new, higher transom, to carry the load.

Further, your 1983 hull is now 30-years old. The age of the hull would also make me consider carefully adding to it the load of a long engine setback bracket. Finally, there is the cost of such a bracket: they are expensive.

All of the above suggest to me that your initial thinking, raising the transom height by five inches through re-work, is probably the best option.

DeeVee posted 11-07-2013 09:17 AM ET (US)     Profile for DeeVee  Send Email to DeeVee     
Dave,

I saw an account of a person that did exactly what you are thinking about doing, for the same reason. I believe it was documented on Whaler Central. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find the information to direct you to it.

I think I understand your doodling, and as I remember, the procedure they used to raise the transom was similar.

I like the idea of raising the transom height better than using a bracket, though it is probably the more costly of the solutions. Heck, I would like to have a 30" transom on my 22. The further out of the water the better when backing down into the weather, while trying to keep your bait on the bottom.

Doug Vazquez

crow posted 11-08-2013 04:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for crow  Send Email to crow     
Here are some photos of the transom of my 1985 Outrage 25. The transom was raised by the previous owner to accommodate twin 25" shafts.
jimh posted 11-09-2013 09:21 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
The reworked transom looks very nice. Many thanks for the giving us a chance to see it.
Buckda posted 11-09-2013 09:45 AM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Crow - thanks for that link. I actually already have photos of your console in my files for reference when I refurbish mine...however, I plan to do mine in teak. I had forgotten that your transom was also raised on that boat. They did an excellent job.
jimh posted 11-09-2013 10:02 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
If the prior owner was using twin engines, what was the purpose of the center notch in the transom (where your single engine is now mounted)?

ASIDE to Dave: There is a nice 25-footer with a big single engine, eh?

DeeVee posted 11-10-2013 01:47 PM ET (US)     Profile for DeeVee  Send Email to DeeVee     
Dave,

I finally found the information I mentioned earlier this week concerning raising the transom on the 25 hull. See below:

http://www.whalercentral.com/userphotogallery_3.php?album_id=369

Doug Vazquez

DeeVee posted 11-10-2013 01:50 PM ET (US)     Profile for DeeVee  Send Email to DeeVee     
Dave,

I guess my link only gets you close to the info. After you get to that page, go to page 2 of 3. The album is noted as "Outrage 25 Restoration", at the top of the page.

Doug Vazquez

Plotman posted 11-12-2013 05:39 PM ET (US)     Profile for Plotman  Send Email to Plotman     
Dave-

Be careful of the CMC fixed 5" lift extension.

My 22 came to me with the 25" engines lifted by a pair and they did not provide enough lift.

I ended up changing to a pair of Lift plates from Bob's Machine shop, though if I had it to do all over again I would use 4" aluminum square tubing to fabricate my own lifts.

You could then fabricate a custom splashwell dam extension, or just use something similar to what the walleye fishermen use for back trolling.

David

Buckda posted 11-12-2013 07:40 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Doug - Thanks for that link. That's exactly they route I was thinking.

The only real roadblock is getting that cuddy shell off the hull and then safely flipping that big bertha over.

DeeVee posted 11-12-2013 11:17 PM ET (US)     Profile for DeeVee  Send Email to DeeVee     
Dave,

Do you think the boat needs flipped to do the transom modification? I think the boat in the project needed some work that required flipping it over, but didn't think the transom modification was the reason for flipping it.

Doug

Buckda posted 11-13-2013 09:50 AM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Doug -
You're right. I apologize for being confusing. I also need to remove the bottom paint and regelcoat the bottom of this boat...well, I don't need to, but I want to. Seeing that hull inverted in his photos made me start to think about that...

Dave

andygere posted 11-13-2013 01:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for andygere  Send Email to andygere     
Why take the cuddy off to invert the hull? It's pretty low profile, and I think you could provide adequate support along the gunwales and edge of the bow area. I would be worriend that the specialized gasket that seals the cuddy shell to the hull would be compromised if you were to pull it. I'd go with some desert tan antifouling paint and be done with it...
Buckda posted 11-13-2013 02:03 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
That cuddy gasket has been the biggest roadblock to moving forward on this project. I haven't figured out exactly what to do yet, but I need to regelcoat that area as well, and want the top shell to do so because I don't want any gelcoat "bridges" in that area, and I have a few under the cuddy modifications to make (I want to enlarge the anchor rode storage area and install two overboard drains similar to those found on the Revenge model - additionally, the headliner is shot in there, and I want to have the top off while I grind the adhesive backing off for the new headliner material). The gasket is badly oxidized and discolored and really is in need of replacement. I had planned to use a shim material and then a steam-bent teak 1/4 round trim piece to replace the 1/4 round edging on the gasket when it's finished.

dfmcintyre posted 11-13-2013 03:26 PM ET (US)     Profile for dfmcintyre  Send Email to dfmcintyre     
Dave -

When you enlarge the anchor rode area, also change out the rather small (from what I recall) factory installed line port to a much larger one. Helps.

andygere posted 11-13-2013 07:36 PM ET (US)     Profile for andygere  Send Email to andygere     
I think a teak 1/4 round molding would look great, but I'm not sure you could steam bend a single piece around the perimeter of the cuddy shell without snapping or twisting it. Maybe you could laminate thinner strips on a form, then cut the 1/4 round profile with a router afterwards. Either way, big job. My gasket/molding part is pretty oxidized too, but I was able to rehab it with a little compound and elbow grease, and I set a bead of desert tan caulk along either edge to keep it water tight. So far it's held, and still looks decent. The headliner project is probably the thing that will drive you to pull it though. Is there enough of the old one left for an upholstery shop to make a pattern? Having seen what you did with your 18, I have no doubt that this one will be a work of art too. Kudos to you for tearing of the Band-Aid and getting after it!
Jamesgt727 posted 11-15-2013 06:00 PM ET (US)     Profile for Jamesgt727  Send Email to Jamesgt727     
BRACKET! FIND A "WHALERDRIVE" NO BODY LOVES. Close the transom, and have a fabricator make a aluminum bracket to fit your needs, the extension of the bracket will benefit a 25.
Russ 13 posted 11-20-2013 12:35 AM ET (US)     Profile for Russ 13  Send Email to Russ 13     
Does the lack of a counter rotation engine really make that much difference??
..
What about the idea of having the gear-case changed on one
of the 20 inch shaft engines.
..
I have a hydraulic jack plate on my 22' cuddy.
IT is a great improvement & helps with running in skinny
water.
I am surprised how high the engine can be lifted without
the prop blowing out.
...
I would be cautious about the stresses added by a bracket
the added leverage/stress on the transom in rough weather would be large.
Buckda posted 11-20-2013 03:33 PM ET (US)     Profile for Buckda  Send Email to Buckda     
Re: counter rotation - yes, I believe above 115 hp or so, it is important. Even with Hydraulic steering, you get some "pull" from both props turning in the same direction at max speed with the 130's. When I repower, I will go for higher HP motors, so this is an important consideration - at least, to me it is.

Re: changing gear case: I don't think counter rotating is available for 20" shaft motors. Plus, since the existing motors have 25 inch shafts, the point is moot. I'm not going to blow $25K plus on new power and then another $5k to try to change out one of the gear cases...my money would be better spent to get a bracket for $2K installed and run 25" shaft engines with full warranties from the factory.

Twin hydraulic jack plates will cost about the same as a nice bracket with swim platform. Again, it's a give and take where and how to spend money.

I don't think the stresses added by a bracket would be any larger than those added by jackplates of similar setback. Certainly if I'm driving it hard through a headsea I can see additional stresses...but I tend to be of the school of thought that if a transom can handle a Whaler Drive for 30 years and still be fine, then it can handle the stress of adding one that it did not have to deal with the first 30 years of it's life. In fact, by that reasoning, it should be able to handle the added stresses better, since it hasn't had decades of structural fatigue and loading working on it.

Russ 13 posted 11-22-2013 06:41 AM ET (US)     Profile for Russ 13  Send Email to Russ 13     
Yes a 25' should have at least twin 150's.
I would think twin 200's would be a good match.
Always nice to be able to get up & go when needed.
...
I am surprised the larger 20 inch engines are not offered w/
counter rotation.
..
Armstrong makes a nice bracket.
walleyezer20 posted 11-26-2013 12:16 AM ET (US)     Profile for walleyezer20  Send Email to walleyezer20     
Go to hermco.com, there's a Whaler in their gallery you might like to see.

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.