posted 04-11-2001 08:33 PM ET (US)
The question is Racor vs "All The Others".
I'm talking about "Gasoline, Outboard only.First off, I should say I believe the "Racor" brand to probably be the best. It seems that the clear bowl water receptor and drain fitting in the bottom is a nice feature. But I never used them because of the 3 to 1 cost ratio, nor have I ever had engine trouble because of water getting through the conventional shaped units. From the one of the most competitive catalog supply houses I know, Shoreway Marine, in NJ, these are the prices:
Complete unit (filter and head)
Racor: $52.49
Mercury OEM: $32.00
Tempo: $26.59
(Other houses have Prime Line and Sierra at similar prices)( I suspect Sierra makes the Mercury OEM Unit)
So there is about a $20 - $25 initial cost penalty to go with Racor.
Racor also makes a conversion filter & bowl that screws on to the other manufacturer's bracket, costing about $32.50
Replacement filters only.
Racor : $17.50 They say replace once a year.
Mercury & others: $6.50 also to be replaced
once a year.
So one can buy 3 standard filters for the price of one Racor. Or you can change and throw out regular filters 3 times a year for the one Racor filter.
Performance: Racor says their product filters 100% of water & contaminants.
Tempo, Mercury and others say theirs' filters 98.8% of water and contaminants.
So it looks like we're talking about just 1.2% of the water and junk getting through. Since I have a V-6 200 EFI engine, with it's OWN water separating filter under the hood to protect the injectors, I can tell that the main Mercury style filter on the tank line is doing it's job. The engines have a warning signal when the engine mounted filter is filled with water, and after 500 hours, the mechanic said the filter was like new, dumped the contents of the filter into a clear plastic glass, found NO water, and did not need replacement. So the primary, non-Racor filters must be doing their job.
So the big question is, how do you feel about the value vs performance aspect of Racor vs "the Others". Just using Mercury's product as an example (the others are all similar), it seems to me that they wouldn't be selling and installing a product on their almost marine engine "monopoly" (85% of stern drives and 50% of outboards) if it didn't do the job correctly.
So I have used the standard shaped filter products for 15 years. I am wondering how others feel about this issue, and whether Racor is worth the high extra cost. Or is it just effective advertizing and promotion regarding the 1.2% additional filtration?