Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: Whaler Performance
  Classic 13: A 25-HP Four-stroke That Looks Great

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Classic 13: A 25-HP Four-stroke That Looks Great
Tohsgib posted 12-26-2007 12:32 PM ET (US)   Profile for Tohsgib   Send Email to Tohsgib  
Suzuki and Johnson both offer a 25-HP V2 four-stroke in 15-inch and 20-inch shaft. The beauty is it is only 168-lbs for the 20-inch electric-start remote-control model. Downside is no [power trim and tilt] is offered. CMC to the rescue. Ed's gets $2,700 for one. Anyone have this combo that can post some performance results? The 30-HP is a different design and has power trim and tilt but jumps to 212-lbs and [costs more].
Tohsgib posted 12-26-2007 12:35 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tohsgib  Send Email to Tohsgib     
Ed's is not showing the 30-HP anymore but the 40-HP is $44,000 [$4,400?] and weighs 243-lbs. Plus the 25 has a free six-year warranty.

Nissan/Tohatsu also has a 20-inch 30-HP with power trim and tilt that weighs 193-lbs.

L H G posted 12-26-2007 07:05 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
Nick - What's wrong with the Merc 30 EFI, at 172#? Power trim and 15" or 20" shaft. Made in the [Komagane, Nagano Prefecture, Japan] plant. Best 30 4-stroke you will find - no tiny carb jet passages to foul up.

http://www.mercurymarine.com/engines/outboards/fourstrokes/ enginesetthree_specs.php?ID=81 .

jimh posted 12-27-2007 12:00 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Does Honda make a four-stroke in this horsepower range? After winning the J. D. Power award for four-stroke motors every year that it has been given, I think they must have a little bit of a shot at being called "the best four-stroke."

However, those Tohatsu four-stroke with their battery-less fuel injection are a nice design. Tohatsu really has a nice motor--no battery needed and it still has electrical fuel injection. There is only one other motor that I can think of that uses electrical fuel injectors but does not need a battery to operate.

Tohsgib posted 12-27-2007 11:07 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tohsgib  Send Email to Tohsgib     
Larry if the Tohatsu weighs 193, how does the merc weigh 172? I guess that is w/o PTnT. My point was the Suzuki was VERY light at 168lbs.

Jim...I thought Honda tied Suzuki this year as well as 2005 for best 4 stroke.

L H G posted 12-27-2007 01:58 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
Even better, the 25 EFI wieghs only 157#. In these small 4-strokes, nobody else makes an EFI model except Mercury & Tohatsu. EFI is no brainer in small 4-strokes if you ask me. Don't the Suzuki and Honda have old technology carbs.
Binkie posted 12-27-2007 02:31 PM ET (US)     Profile for Binkie  Send Email to Binkie     
I was interested in the new(2007) 25hp Suzuki for my 13 footer. I need a 15" shaft. Unfortunately that motor does not come with t-n-t and is only available as a tiller model. The costs of parts to convert bring the price too high.

Rich

Peter posted 12-27-2007 05:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
Hey Larry isn't that 30 HP Mercury 4-stroke one of the several Mercury 4-strokes now made in mainland China and imported by Mercury into the the United States?
L H G posted 12-27-2007 05:35 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
Peter - No, you've got your facts wrong again.

Merc's 30HP and below, all 4-strokes, are made in a new plant [located in Komagane, Nagano Prefecture, Japan] with Tohatsu (who also markets product as Nissan). It's a brand new, ultra modern plant that can turn out a large number of these beautifully designed engines. Supposedly, they are a good product, and the only 25 and 30 EFI's on the market. I have noted that now the Tohatsu's and Nissan's coming out of here are all painted black also. These engines can be bought through catalog sales from West marine and Cabela's. Incidentally, what has happened to those 25 and 30 HP E-tecs, promised since 2004? Is this another HP market segment completely abandoned by Evinrude?

These engines, incidentally, are the reason Yamaha now has no 25 and 30 HP offering, as previous 25's came from Merc in the US, and the 30 *WAS* being made in the China plant. But China now only makes 40, 50 and 60HP models. Those engines, incidentally, are huge sellers in China also. (Note that Brunswick said sales of Merc outboards on the international market were up double digit numbers.)

Peter posted 12-27-2007 05:45 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
Thanks for clearing that up. I wasn't sure whether the new Mercury 30 FourStroke was being made in Japan or China these days. I guess its made in Japan just like the Suzukis.
jimh posted 12-27-2007 11:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Mercury has two big plants in Asia, one in Japan and one in China. I think it is accurate to say that ALL Mercury motors under 75-HP are built in either China or Japan.

I have never seen any sales data for outboard motors in China. However, I would tend to think that given certain nationalistic tendencies, outboard motors which were made in Japan might suffer a slight amount of bias in the Chinese market. On that basis, I think it is probably very likely that an American brand like Mercury, which is made in a factory in China, will find very strong acceptance in the Chinese market. Even without a single shred of actual data, I would be willing to believe those China-built Mercury motors are selling well over in China.

I have heard that American brand automobiles which are made in China are are selling well there.

One of the risks for manufacturers who move production to China is the possibility for their products to be stolen and manufactured by copy-cat manufacturers. The automotive suppliers have already seen this.

Up to this point I would characterize the North American market as being somewhat resistance to expensive manufactured items manufactured in China. A good example is an automobile. I don't think there is much volume of imported automobiles from China.

I guess we will soon learn if the North American market is receptive to moderately priced manufactured items from China. A $50 WALMART refrigerator for your kid's dorm room is one thing, and a $5,000 outboard mtor is another. Of course, Mercury is an American brand, and probably most buyers won't even be aware they're buying an engine built in China.

L H G posted 12-28-2007 02:21 AM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
Since buyers of Whaler's 2007, 2008 and future 130's and 150's will be stuck with these Chinese built Mercs, it will be interesting to see if sales have plummeted, or will plummet further.
jimh posted 12-28-2007 03:01 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Generally manufacturers know they might be exposed to some resistance when they move production of a product formerly made in the U.S. to overseas, and they tend to compensate by ramping up the quality. It would not surprise me at all if the Asian plant output was generally higher quality than the previous production here. One thing all manufacturers have learned today is there is very little--really no--tolerance for manufacturing defect in a new product. Any hint of that is a disaster.
Tohsgib posted 12-28-2007 11:26 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tohsgib  Send Email to Tohsgib     
The 30 Suzuki is EFI and comes with PTnT but hence why it weighs 212lbs. The 25 Suzuki has only 1 carb which does not bother me. It is when you have to rebuild 3 to 6 of them that gets my goat. my Yamaha 9.9 I had to clean that main jet EVERY time I used it. Had it down to a 5 minute science.
L H G posted 12-29-2007 05:52 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
Considering all of the 130 and 150 Whaler owners who must be reading here, powered exclusively with the 40 and 60 HP Mercury four-stroke motors made in China, and including the Yamaha versions of same powerhead, there are precious few indications of problems with these engines.

Considering the very few number of people here rigged with E-TEC 40 and 60-HP engines, we have seen several indications of considerable problems and moderate performance.

So these Chinese assembled Mercury engines must be pretty good, better than what's coming out of Wisconsin.

Maybe owners of these Mercury and Yamaha motors will report in?

jimh posted 12-29-2007 06:17 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Larry--I have never accepted your representation that Yamaha is buying motors from Mercury. I have never been able to find any source for this information other than your representations of it. So I think it is still highly speculative to state that Yamaha buys motors from Mercury which are made in China.

As for your conclusions about the comparative quality of the products assembled in China versus Wisconsin, I would like to know if you think that this same conclusion applies to the Mercury motors made in Wisconsin?

Or are you just speculating that any motor assembled by Mercury will be better than any motor assembled by Evinrude?

L H G posted 12-29-2007 06:42 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
Let me change my position. Yamaha's 40, 50 & 60 4-strokes have the EXACT same specs as the Mercs, which Mercury claims are 100% designed and built by Mercury. So it appears Yamaha has reverse engineered identical powerheads to the Smartcraft Mercs. (the different displacement Merc/Yamaha JV 50's from 1994 did not have Smartcraft, even thought Mercury made the short blocks) I always knew Yamaha was a copycat operation. I am surprised they didn't even bother to change the displacement by at least 1/100th of a liter to avoid a Merc lawsuit for infringement.

Another proof of their copycatting, Merc dropped the 3 cylinder 30 HP engine made on this platform, in favor of the newer, lighter, Merc/Tohatsu 30. True to form, Yamaha dropped their copycatted 30 HP engine at exactly the same time. Yamaha does not currently have a 30 HP 4-stroke, which makes me wonder even more why they would have followed Mercury's lead, dropping the big 30 and leaving a HP gap for them.

ALso Mercury dropped their American made 25HP 4-stroke when the Japan plant came on line, making the lightweight 25EFI.
Here again, copycat Yamaha dropped their identical displacement 25 4-stroke, following Mercury's lead. Now Yamaha has no 25 HP 4-stroke offering. Just don't understand why Yamaha would give up the 25-30 HP market, just because Mercury brought out new models. But then again, maybe Yamaha is copycatting Evinrude's lead, who also has no 25 or 30 HP E-tecs, and hasn't for the last 4 years.

Strange decisions sure get made in the outboard business.

jimh posted 12-29-2007 07:20 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Two good digital images, one of a Mercury power head and another "Yamaha" power head, would really help settle this point of contention.
fourdfish posted 12-29-2007 07:24 PM ET (US)     Profile for fourdfish  Send Email to fourdfish     
Larry I was reading your posts with interest until I got to the part about 40hp and 60 hp ETECs you state; "considerable problems and moderate performance" with the engines people have here! So I would guess you have hard numbers or FACTS to back up this statement of yours! What is the percentage of problems with these engines? Sure many people post when they have problems with their engine but others never say much when they don't! Look at the threads and see if any other brands are having problems! Again, you try to portray your opinion as fact! You just cannot say it is your opinion? It must be from your days as a salesman.
Tohsgib posted 12-30-2007 12:37 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tohsgib  Send Email to Tohsgib     
Why do you doubt Larry's claim of Yamaha "splashing" other engines? Their 55hp which put them on the map in the 70's was a direct copy of the OMC 2cyl Looper with a Merc lower unit. They have always copied the big boys...until recently. Who cares? I love Yamahas but I hate to pay the vig for a copycat engine with a clunky lower unit.
jimh posted 12-30-2007 01:31 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I don't doubt that Yamaha has copied engines. Their popular three-cylinder two-stroke classic motors are just about identical to the OMC models of that era.

What I question is the idea that Yamaha bought complete power heads from Mercury, shipped them to Japan, assembled them into Yamaha branded motors, and then shipped them back to North America for sale. And now that the power heads are being made in China, I have more questions. Japan and China are generally not really big trading partners, and there is the question of cultural biases to consider.

Again, all this could be resolved by a visual inspection of the two motors. Maybe the next winter boat show will provide an opportunity for me to do this. I will make it a goal to find some evidence, one way or another.

AZdave posted 12-30-2007 02:21 AM ET (US)     Profile for AZdave  Send Email to AZdave     
LHG, you did not respond to the question. Where are the 25 and 30 HP engines manufactured? Thanks. Dave
jimh posted 12-31-2007 11:57 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Dave--From what I know, the engine sold under the Mercury brand in the 25-HP and 30-HP models is probably being made in Japan at an outboard manufacturing plant in Komagane, Nagano Prefecture, on the island of Honshu.

Many North Americans probably remember Nagano as the site of the 1998 Winter Olympics. Komagane is a relatively small city--a hamlet by Japanese standards--with a population of around 35,000.

A nice picture of the plant is available on-line.

Almost all references to this manufacturing facility that I can find mention TOHATSU as the owner and operator of this plant. For example, Tohatsu says in their website:

"In January 2005, Tohatsu opened a new state-of-the-art manufacturing plant in the mountainous area of central Japan that boasts over 34,000 [square-meters] of space and has a production capacity of over 200,000 units per year. Tohatsu's new plant uses technologically advanced machinery that is fully automated to produce reliable outboards with award winning reputations."

You can see more images from the plant at:

http://www.tohatsu.co.jp/en/boat/profile.html

Tohatsu also mention this facility in their corporate profile:

http://tohatsu.co.jp/en/htm/comp/index.html

Here is more information about the Komagane plant, but, again, it seems to be all-Tohatsu in this coverage:

"TOHATSU: NEW STATE OF THE ART FACTORY IN 2005

"After the success Tohatsu are reaping world wide, Tohatsu invested heavily in a modern factory in Tokyo. Tohatsu believe in delivering only Reliability & Qaulity [sic] Salt Water Outboards. The new factory is 200km away from Tokyo in Komagane. It has 3 production assembly lines, 360 factory workers working in 2 shifts and total capacity for 200,000 units. The total factory build up area is 36,000 [square-meters] with futher area available for expansion. The new machines in the factory have increased the production schedules, always aiming to achieve better quality standards & best quality rewards: ISO 9001:2000 & ISO 14001 Certifications. To be in Tohastu's position in being of of Japan's leader in Outboard Manufacturing is no mean feat. In the Tohatsu Factory, all Outboards manufactured are tested individually to ensure that the end delivered product reach the optimum at the final destination."

Source: BoatsAndYachting No. 60, March/April 2005, page 70.

Brunswick mentions (what I assume to be) this same facility in their website, where they say it is a "joint venture with Tohatsu – TMC."

Cf.: http://www.brunswick.com/company/worldwide/primarymanufacturing.php

As far as the plant being a "joint venture" I cannot explain why Tohatsu never brings this up anywhere, but perhaps it is one of those idiomatic expressions in English that does not translate well.

As for the engines made there, they seem to be earning good reviews. Much praise has been given to Tohatsu for their industry-first design of a four-stroke motor with electronic fuel injection which does not need a battery to operate and can be pull-started. As has often been mentioned, the ability to make a modern engine with computer controls, electrical fuel injectors, and which can be operated without a battery is a difficult engineering task. It probably took quite a bit of research and development for this to be achieved, and Tohatsu is rightfully proud of their work.

jimh posted 12-31-2007 03:27 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Larry writes:
quote:
I have noted that now the Tohatsu's and Nissan's coming out of [Komagane] are all painted black

According to Tohatsu:
--
"New Paint Process

"Tohatsu has a new look for 2006. Our motors are now painted with the 'Aquamarine Blue' color and are all produced at our new plant in Komagane. Using state-of-the-art machinery, Tohatsu has upgraded the 5-layer painting process to now include an additional clear coat of acrylic resin that provides superior protection for the outboard."
--

A deep aquamarine blue is quite a standard color in the outboard industry these days. I think you could categorize E-TEC as being in that same hue range. Suzuki and Mercury are definitely black. Yamaha has some very dark gray engines, too.

I think the new color choice is more in tune with modern color schemes. In the past, pastel colors may have been more popular in Japan. If you recall Yamaha used to have a metallic powder blue color. Tohatsu's prior color was a lighter color, also a metallic medium blue, I believe.

The engines being made in Komagane have an elaborate five-layer coating:

--chemical conversion treatment
--zinc chromate primer undercoat
--acrylic high-solid paint
--acrylic finish paint
--acrylic resin clear overcoat

Tohsgib posted 01-02-2008 11:09 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tohsgib  Send Email to Tohsgib     
I wish engine companies would pick a color and stick to it like Mercury hasfor 40+ years. Johnson went white in 1977 and it was a big hit. In 1984 they went gray and only for a year then white again. In the early 90's they started offering charcoal along with white. Then in 1999 they went to silver for a couple years then back to white again....make up your mind. I also think metallic is not a smart decision being the UV abuse and engine sees. Tohatsu was usually a charcoalish color, nissan was blue for a while and then went a charcoalish color in early 90's I think. Suzuki started out bright blue, then went to white, then silver, then gold, then white, then silver/charcoal then black metallic in late 90's on 4s but 2s were a darker charcoal....again make up your mind.
L H G posted 01-02-2008 03:13 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
I recently saw a brand new 2008 Tohatsu 30 from the [Komagane] plant. It sure looked black to me, but maybe it was a very dark blue?
L H G posted 01-02-2008 09:10 PM ET (US)     Profile for L H G    
Perhaps Tohatsu has been experimenting with colors, and the one I saw was a 2007. For 2008, both Jim and I are wrong, as it looks silver-grey.

http://www.tohatsu-outboards.com/tohatsu-30-hp-4-stroke.htm .

Peter posted 01-02-2008 09:49 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
Try this site www.tohatsu.com/outboards/30_4st.html which is the Tohatsu web site. Looks like a dark blue to me.
jimh posted 01-02-2008 10:48 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
That must be the gray market engine.

:-)

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.