![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Author | Topic: Boat Weight From Certified Scale |
jimh |
![]() ![]() ![]() This weekend I incorporated a slight detour into our travel with the boat on the trailer. Using the CAT Scale website, I located a certified scale that was adjacent to an exit on the interstate we would pass. We pulled off to have our boat weighed. Here is the procedure: We drove onto the CAT Scale platform. The platform has three scales, which are easily deduced by their markings. I positioned the truck and trailer so that the steering axle of the truck was on the front platform, the drive axle of the truck was on the second platform, and the trailer axles were on the third platform. The spacing is really proportioned for a larger rig, but with careful positioning you can get most vehicles and boat trailers on the three scale platforms. I had to get out of the truck to go to the intercom panel, as it was several feet in front of our truck. It was also several feet above my head. Standing on tip-toes I could just reach the button to summon the operator. The operator responded: "Is this your first weigh?" I said, "Yes, I am weighing my truck and trailer, and then I will get a re-weigh after I drop the trailer." The operator replied in the affirmative, then told me she had my weights. At this point I was careful that I was not standing on any scale platform. Thus my weight was not recorded in this first pass. Chris was in the car, so she would have to stay for the second pass. Next, we pulled off the scale and dropped off the trailer. The parking lot had plenty of room, as it is sized to accommodate many large trucks. Then we pulled back onto the scale with just the truck. Again, I positioned the truck on the scale with the steer axle on the first platform and the drive axle on the second. I also parked in about the same position as the first measurement so as to reduce any influence on the weight from the axle position on the platform. I got out and went to the intercom. I called and asked for my re-weigh. And I again was careful to stay off the scale itself. The operator told me she had the weights, and I was to come to the office to get the tickets. Here are the weights: FIRST PASS SECOND PASS Calculations Trailer and Boat Combined 11,160 - 5,560 = 5,600-lbs This is very straight forward. One total has the trailer, the other does not. You just subtract them. This is how much weight we are towing with the truck. I'll come back to this later. Boat Weight 5,600 - 1,250 = 4,350-lbs How'd I know the trailer weight? From the manufacturer's certificate of origin, which stated 1,200-lbs, I added 50-lbs for the spare tire, the jack stand, and the tie downs I added. To my boat weight of 4,350-lbs I will later have to add the weight of any fuel I add, as well as my own weight and any crew weight. We added about 40-gallons of gasoline before we launched, which is about 250-lbs. We also added 370-lbs of captain and crew. We already had on board all of our other gear that we'd be using, so we don't need to allow for that weight. Thus, when the boat was underway later that day it probably weighed 4,350 + 250 + 370 = 4,970-lbs Tongue Weight 5,600 - 5,140 = 460-lbs This has to be the tongue weight; there is no other place for that load to bear. Now we compare the tongue weight with the total trailer weight to see if it is in the recommended range of 5- to 10-percent of the total weight: 460/5600 = 8.2-percent We also have to check the rating of the hitch. My hitch can handle 500-lbs of weight. It has a 40-lb margin. Axle Loading TRUCK GAWR-Rear =3,968-lbs TRAILER Note that I should add my weight back into the truck axle loading. I weigh 225-lbs, and you can figure as the driver I will be mainly on the front axle. Let's use a 75-25-split, or 169-lbs on the front axle and 56-lbs on the rear axle. That reduces the margins to 671-lbs (front) and 252-lbs (rear). Gross Vehicle Weight Rating TRUCK TRAILER Cost Comments I don't know where you can get more information for only $9.50. The entire process of weighing only took about ten minutes. Most of that was in unhitching the trailer. You can locate a CAT Certified Scale by using their website at http://www.catscale.com/ . The scale operator was very friendly and seemed happy to work with us, even though we weren't professional truck drivers. |
jimh |
![]() ![]() ![]() Here is another way to calculate the tongue weight: Tongue Weight = [STEER + DRIVE](Hitched) - [STEER + DRIVE](Unhitched) |
Plotman |
![]() ![]() ![]() What I found most interesting was that 460-lbs of tongue weight translated into 660-lbs on the rear axle [that is, the truck drive axle weight increased 660-lbs between the unhitched and hitched conditions]. It makes sense if you think about the levers and fulcrums involved; I had just never thought about them. David |
Casco Bay Outrage |
![]() ![]() ![]() Here is the link to the CAT scale website to find a location near you. |
avalaunch |
![]() ![]() ![]() Actually the tongue wt. is higher, note that it unloaded the front axle. You need to know the distances between the axles and hitch. |
jimh |
![]() ![]() ![]() I cannot see how the tongue weight can be other than explained above, but, again, if you have some technique which will derive a different value than the one I have shown, please present it here. However, you will need to offer more explanation than "[a]ctually the tongue wt. is higher...." |
Plotman |
![]() ![]() ![]() Ava- The front axle was unloaded by 200 lbs, the rear axle loaded by an extra 660 lbs, ergo there is a total of 460 lbs of tongue weight (660-200). You can't make pounds disappear. If the weight of the trailer isn't on the trailer wheels, it's on the tongue. |
Wasatch Whaler |
![]() ![]() ![]() jimh, This is an interesting topic. Thanks for starting the thread. With the discussion of tongue weights, and front and rear tow axle vehicle loading, I'm curious if any of the engineers out there can mathematically calculate the effect of tongue weight on the two axles. For example: jimh's 460 lb tongue weight translated into 660 lbs on the rear axle and minus 200 on the front. I have a long bed crew cab Diesel pickup onto which I occasionally load a heavy (roughly 4,000 lbs) slide-in truck camper. It's so long that I use a 42" hitch extension and attach the Outrage trailer there. (The truck's factory receiver hitch has been replaced with a heavier duty Tow Beast hitch.) If the tongue weight of the trailer were say 350 lbs how much would that increase (decrease) the weights on the truck's two axles? |
Chuck Tribolet |
![]() ![]() ![]() This is simple statics. It was in my high school physics book. The rear truck axle is a fulcrum for a lever. One side of FW = -TW*L/WB (note that this is a negative number) Now in this case, we know: FW = -200 lbs. flipping things around, we get: JimH: how about some measurements on your truck, and tell us And Mr. Dobosh (high school physics teacher): the units cancel
|
jimh |
![]() ![]() ![]() Measuring from the Front Axle: Rear Axle = 132-inches |
jimh |
![]() ![]() ![]() OK that gives WB = 132 L/WB = 60/132 = 0.45 |
Wasatch Whaler |
![]() ![]() ![]() Okay Gentlemen, I'm impressed. Chuck, I can't believe you remember this stuff from high school physics. I remember taking the class, and that Mr. Tiernan taught it, but that's about it. So, If I understand what you've posted, and using my information, this is what I come up with. Truck Wheelbase: 172.4 172.4/99.5=.578 .578x350(tongue weight)=202.3 So the front axle's weight is reduced by 202 lbs and the rear axles weight is increased by 350+202 = 552 lbs when towing the boat. Is that correct? |
jimh |
![]() ![]() ![]() Another consideration in assessing the overall towing set up is the tire rating. The rear tires on my truck are premium quality (Michelin radial tires) and have a maximum load of 2,183-lbs. With my axle load of 3,660-lbs, that give me a nice margin, 706-lbs. On the trailer the axles are the typical 3,500-lbs rating. With 2,780-lbs of load, there is another 720-lbs margin there. I will have to check the trailer tire ratings; the trailer is not on-site at the moment. |
SJUAE |
![]() ![]() ![]() JimH Lets play with the unknowns What's a certified weight? by whom and to what standard ?. All calibrated scales have an accuracy factor over it's operating range Trailer: I would presume/guess that the manufacturer may of weighed it once ( i.e. the first one he ever made) or worse one generic trailer and adjusted the weight to suit the various models he makes. I doubt very much that he weights a random sample or ever updates the weight should he have changed any parts or suppliers over the years. Although it would be reasonable to assume that he has ensured some additional margin or contingency to allow for such deviations including the accuracy of his original weighing. Therefore this weight could easily be +/- 5%, but I would assume on the plus side as it would be reasonable to assume he has been conservative for safety. JimH you have not listed the maximum permissible tongue weight of the trailer, not what's stamped on the coupling but what the trailer manufacture has designed to. This could be a limiting factor (i.e. less than your vehicles hitch capacity) Cat Scale: Cat scale does not state by whom or what standard they are calibrated to and what method they use to weigh. Assuming they have used a recognised body for certification we are left with what is there accuracy over the operating range. It would be fair to say that they should be more accurate at the higher end as usually this is the case or worse they have used an average calibration. Given that you're set up is much lighter than trucks and the maxima load Cat Scale can weigh, it is more likely to decrease the accuracy of your results. Additionally we can assume they are usually conservative else they would not be so confident on say "else we pay the fine" as they would only be caught out if their scales had not been recently re-tested/calibrated. Therefore this weight could easily be +/- 3% for lighter loads, but I would assume a plus 1.5% would be reasonable assumption. Truck: Unfortunately your truck is not a true ridged body so simple static's will not be that accurate. Without loading it with many variations we are unable to determine accurately how it distributes the load between the two axels. So there is likely to be a margin of inaccuracies there. JimH overall you have a reasonable weight that should be conservative for the total load you are pulling. However given that the first limiting factors are the trailers maximum designed nose weight and the car hitch, which ever is the least. I strongly recommend that you simply weigh the nose weight of the trailer at its normal towing height to limit/omit the inaccuracies/margins that are accumulated by deducing hitch weight by axel weighing subtraction methods. Regards |
Wasatch Whaler |
![]() ![]() ![]() jimh, you're absolutely right. This is an area overlooked by many. The stock tires on my truck were rated at 3,415 lbs each. I've since upgraded them to tires rated at 4,300 lbs each. Steve, Aren't you splitting hairs? While the vehicles frame may flex a bit which might effect the exact weights on the various parts, it's not really practical to figure out many different loading scenarios. I think a "certified scale" is about as good as one can reasonably do. While I certainly am not an engineer, every engineer I've ever met calculates things on the conservative side. I would think that all of the various GAWR, GWVR, and tire ratings also have a margin of error. That is, there would not be a catastrophic failure if the tires were overloaded by say 50 lbs. |
SJUAE |
![]() ![]() ![]() Wasatch Whaler I agree a lot of this is down to degrees of accuracy. You should weigh something on a certified scale that is ideally working around 80% of its capacity. The truck also has a suspension system that will also influence the results. I would never assume that any of us would go to the trouble of trying various loadings :). Simply we can cut out all of this and just get the trailer nose weight directly. The weigh bridge is only good for checking your overall mass you are pulling and axel loading vs tyre rating It should not be for deducing your nose/hitch weight is my point as too many unknowns/variables/allowances are in the summations, even if you consider them to all be equally wrong by the same percentage. It's true that there are safety margins in many things. However give an insurance investigator an inch or lbs over and he will wriggle his way out of a claim. As I previously noted Jim missed out the trailer capacity. Especially nose weight. This is not the capacity of the actual hitch cast/pressed head on the trailer but the design capacity of the frame and trailer as a whole, carrying it's maximum permissible load. Regards |
jimh |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Here is the weigh ticket. It contains various statements of accuracy and guarantee. Yes, I agree the weights involved here are far below the scale's capacity. And the load is not centered on the scale platform. On the other hand, I don't have a scale with any reasonable calibration that can weigh 460-lbs of tongue weight. The hitch manufacturers make some tongue weight scales, but I think they are 0-300-lbs range. So it is not simple to just weigh the tongue with a small scale. If I could find a decent tongue weight scale I would consider buying one. I think I could recover the cost by charging $5 to weight trailer tongues at Boston Whaler owner events. |
jimh |
![]() ![]() ![]() My trailer's hitch is a DICO Model 6. The specifications are: Model 6 Actuator with 2 5/16" Ball Coupler 7,500 pound capacity, Max. G.V.W.R., 600 pound tongue load, G.V.W.R. limited to ball rating. My deduced trailer weight is 5,600-lbs, thus the margin is 1,900-lbs on GVWR. The tongue load is 460, so margin on that is 140-lbs. I will have to check the hitch ball rating, however, it is the 2-5/16-inch diameter ball, the largest ball hitch, so I am certain it has a generous rating. I also bought it from a commercial towing shop, not at WALMART. |
Wasatch Whaler |
![]() ![]() ![]() [Recalls a] magazine article with photos about using a bathroom scale to determine a trailer's tongue weight. The process involved putting one end of a 2x6 on the scale and the other end on a brick or something. The trailer tongue was then placed on the 2x6. Then you read the scale and measure the distances between the scale and the trailer tongue and the brick and the trailer tongue. The math involved was pretty simple. |
Bella con23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Right on the money WW. I had success using a bathroom scale and a balance beam to measure my tongue weight. I took a 4"x4"x4'-8" wood beam and marked the center, and 4 inches from each end. Then I placed a 2"x8"x8" wood cutoff 4 feet along side of the bathroom scale and marked the center of it. Centering two 1 inch by 6 inch steel pipe nipples on both the scale and the platform, I laid the wood beam so all my centering makes lined up across the two and rested the trailer tongue on the center of the beam giving me a 2 to 1 ratio on the bathroom scale. How accurate is this method? I would guess it is as accurate as the measurements of the center lines and the bathroom scale itself. |
Chuck Tribolet |
![]() ![]() ![]() I made a false start at Mechanical Engineering in college, so that stuff got hammered in a couple of more times. WW: you got one BIG truck. And 172.4/99.5=.578 should read 99.5/172.4 = 0.577146172 I suspect the left side is a transcription error. But you
|
newt |
![]() ![]() ![]() Regarding the ball hitch, the 2 5/16" ball can be bought with different shank diameters which will effect the capacity. I have two of them. One is rated for 5-6,000 lb and the other is more like 10,000 lb. |
ConB |
![]() ![]() ![]() Well, after seeing this discussion start yesterday I thought I would take the time to go to the local fruit processing plant and have my boat and trailer weighed. 1987 Outrage 18 with 1987 Johnson 150 HP motor sitting on an aluminum and steel trailer. Trailer with boat weighed 3440# Axle of trailer with boat 3060# Tongue weight is 380# then. Trailer only 900# Boat, motor, fuel, and stuff 2540# I had about 25 gallons of fuel aboard. The whole package is about 500# more than my estimate. I also learned that a new acronym of FORD is found on ramp dead. Starter went south with trailer well submersed in the water. Con |
Wasatch Whaler |
![]() ![]() ![]() Joe and Chuck, Thank you both for the information and corrections. Thanks to CW I can now figure out the effect on the axle weights of adding a trailer with a bathroom scale and some simple math. Even I can do that! Chuck it is a big truck. Full of fuel with no tailgate, passenger, driver or load it weighs 7,720 lbs. For carrying and/or towing a heavy load it is awesome. Jay |
jimh |
![]() ![]() ![]() As Con has demonstrated, if you have access to a scale and can weigh the boat and trailer, then weigh the trailer only, you will have a simple path to deduction of the boat weight. Besides showing the CAT Scale method, I hope that this discussion also illustrates just how much weight is involved in hauling a moderate-size Boston Whaler boat on a trailer. I see many proposals put forth for towing boats with very modest vehicles. In my case, if I should replace my truck I would not move downward in capacity a single pound. If anything, I would prefer to move up to an 8,000-lbs rated truck. |
prj |
![]() ![]() ![]() One piece of information that I see here of great relevance is the relationship between published hull weight and loaded vessel weight. Consistently, across most boat sizes, this remains a 1:2 ratio. Examples: Many newcomers query about acceptable tow vehicles for loaded vessels, so this rule of thumb might be quite helpful. |
SJUAE |
![]() ![]() ![]() JimH I agree this is a very good thread in highlighting how simple it can be to add hundreds of lbs as the accumulated affect of adding gear to your boat easy to misjudge or over look. The Cat Scale is clear indication of what you're pulling behind your truck and gives an easy way to check axel loading, tyre rating and braked (hopefully) towing capacity. Twin bathroom scales and spreader beam is as simple and easy as you can get for checking trailer nose weight. I have seen compression struts a bit like fish scales in reverse, reminiscent of the old bull workers that you place in the hitch and chock to your tow height. Here's a UK version (sim to one have used) but in the US as you tow with much greater weights so you would need a bigger version http://www.towsure.com/product/406-Nose_Weight_Gauge I think a young UK female Eng has won an award for incorporating such a device into caravan hitches. Manufactures balls and hitches usually have a capacity far greater of your towing vehicle capacity or the trailer design. These should never be used as guidance over other limiting factors. JimH rule of 5-10% of towed load as a nose weight (providing it is does not exceed your vehicle or trailer capacity) is a good rule as this increase the stability of the tow and reduces pitching. Snaking (ie the tail wagging the dog) is usually caused by outside influences (wind, passing trucks etc) or high speed or excessive braking on declines, it is a distinct advantage to optimise nose weight for long distance tows to ensure maximum safety and limit wear on your vehicle. Another simple rule/guideline is 80% ratio between tow weight and kerb weight of vehicle for inexperienced towers and no more than 95%. Regards |
![]() ![]() |
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.