Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  Water in the transom

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   Water in the transom
Rick U posted 01-27-2003 09:19 PM ET (US)   Profile for Rick U   Send Email to Rick U  
Today I had my Whaler 27 hauled for a survey. I wanted to make sure the hull doesn’t have any major problems before investing in new outboards. Here is what we found: No blistering, and the through hull fittings all looked good. The surveyor tapped the hull listening for delamination or voids (non found). There are 2 sets of through hulls for bait pumps and/or wash downs. I am using 2 of them for bait pumps and the other 2 are capped off below deck. The ones that are capped off have 3 stainless screws forming a semi circle around the opening on the underside of the hull. The surveyor thought there must have been something like a clamshell mounted there at one time. Both sides have the same thing. We removed one of the screws and no water came out so his recommendation is to remove the screws and fiberglass over the holes. We talked about water in the core and agreed that even with the known hull weight it would be very hard to estimate all the added equipment. So now, it passed the tap test and one screw hold appeared to be dry but when sitting in the water, the bow sits a little low. I know by the boot stripe. I will bring her back to shipyard within 30 days for bottom paint. The yard manager suggested we drill drain holes in the hull and let them drain or even vacuum. So far this sounds reasonable. Here is what has me worried. There is 1 screw hole in the transom below the water line that dripped continuously while the boat was on the sling. What is in the transom for added support? Is it aluminum, wood, or solid fiberglass? If it’s wood, how will I find out if it’s rotted?
BugsyG posted 01-27-2003 09:34 PM ET (US)     Profile for BugsyG  Send Email to BugsyG     
My whaler (17) was loaded with water. Becuase the guy was too lazy to fix the crack in the bottom of it. So when I was sanding all the nasty paint off of it from before (long story), where the normin pin is, water was gushing out of it. But I got most of it out because when I did that, I released moisture and put it infront of the heater and literally baked that boat. I cranked it up to about 90 and baked most of the moisture out of it.

To get 100% of water out, you would have to crank it up to 200 degrees and let it sit for a good long time. Probably a week. But I have heard that when it goes in the water, the bottom soaks up water. (You may gain like 20lbs)in which is true.

TRANSOM: it is solid fiberglass EXCEPT for the front of the cowel. Thats wood. and where the eyes are in the back. Those little squares are wood. BUT you have wood "stingers" in it becasue thats where the counsil mounts to as well as the seat. Those may be rotten. I know probably mine are rotten. But regardless, the boat still is very very solid. Its ok. Thank you for your time.

JAZZ ;)

bwguardian posted 01-27-2003 11:23 PM ET (US)     Profile for bwguardian  Send Email to bwguardian     
What is the year and make (Outrage, Guardian, Offshore, etc.) of the vessel?
David Jenkins posted 01-27-2003 11:23 PM ET (US)     Profile for David Jenkins  Send Email to David Jenkins     
I never would have thought to put my boat in tent that was warmed to 200 degrees. Have you ever done that or are you offering advice about things with which you have no first-hand experience?

How do you know that Whaler transoms are solid fiberglass? Have you ever drilled into one?

I don't mean to sound harsh but you have the tone of an expert and I find your advice unbelievable. But maybe that just shows how much I still have to learn!

Rick U posted 01-27-2003 11:32 PM ET (US)     Profile for Rick U  Send Email to Rick U     
The Whaler 27 is a 1988. In a previous post I said it was an 86. I was wrong, it's an 88.
alkar posted 01-27-2003 11:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for alkar  Send Email to alkar     
Rick, I'm struggeling with some of the same concerns right now, and I don't have any confident answers, but you can learn a lot by reading the CSW (Chain Saw Whaler)thread - it contains a lot of valuable input from Tom Clark and others.

Here's where I am at this point: If there are no soft spots, the hull sounds crisp everywhere when it's tapped with a plastic hammer, and the boat sits high and even in the water, than the problem, if any, is probably relatively minor.

Bigshot recently provided this site, and it's a good start on an eductation in rot: http://www.rotdoctor.com/

Good luck. And let us know what you find as your project unfolds.

Alex

doobee posted 01-28-2003 12:43 AM ET (US)     Profile for doobee  Send Email to doobee     
the transom is reinforced with heavy plywood in the area where the engines mount.Put a straw in a glass of water, cover the end with your thumb, lift the straw out of the glass, and what happens? the water stays in the straw. That's the same thing going on with your hull. A wet hole will weep for weeks with no sign of letting up. If there is anything structurally wrong with your transom, it will appear in the form of stress cracks, or possibly as a large crack in the top of the transom where the deck mold meets the hull mold. (transom weld failure)

I agree with alkar. If you can patch the holes and the hull, and transom taps out solid. I wouldn't worry about anything that's already there. Whaler didn't install that cove stripe, so I wouldn't worry about how the hull sits compared to the stripe, unless you are noticing some sort of before and after affect. I would not recommend drilling holes in the hull unless you have an area with an obvious problem such as softness, gel cracks, or distortion.

What concerns me most is the missing clamshell. Whaler put the clamshell there to deflect water away from the drain tube. Without the clamshell water can force its way through the drain tube seal and into the hulls core. If you have water in the hull, that's the most likely spot.

A blown drain tube is probably the most common cause of hull failure in a whaler. It's also very easy to prevent, Whaler fans, check your tubes regularly, and if you don't need them, get rid of them.

whale on!

John O posted 01-28-2003 08:45 AM ET (US)     Profile for John O    
I had a hairline crack in the bottom of my splash well. (1988 Newport).It ran almost the entire width of the well dead center. I have used a Dremel to open it up and planned on filling w/ Marine Tex this Spring and spray get coat over it.Currently the boat is covered and the spash well has been covered and taped with a poly water proof cover. This was a hair line crack. The glass appears solid. Does this mean that the transom is comprimised?
Bigshot posted 01-28-2003 09:23 AM ET (US)     Profile for Bigshot  Send Email to Bigshot     
Hairlines are gelcoat only in 99% of all cases and most older hulls ahve a few. Don't worry about it.
bwguardian posted 01-28-2003 10:19 AM ET (US)     Profile for bwguardian  Send Email to bwguardian     
RickU,

Still not knowing the model of the 27, I will have to concur with doobe; The transom where the engines mount does have wood which is sandwiched by approximately 3/8" fiberglass on both sides. A common problem in the 27's is to develope cracks where the all fiberglass stringers meet the transom (will occur in a radius around the stringers). If you have a real problem you will be able to see deflection in the transom. Put a straight edge across near where the engines mount and see what this yields; probably nothing.

Tom W Clark posted 01-28-2003 10:57 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Rick,

As explained by others above, the transom is made with marine grade plywood in the transom in the center section where the outboards get bolted on. The outside sections of the transom are foam filled. There are no Whaler transoms that are solid fiberglass.

The dripping screw hole is a very common phenomena on Whalers that have sat in the water. I wouldn't worry about it too much. You might try removing what water you can by means of letting it drip or using suction. This won't dry a wet hull but it will remove localized accumulations of water and help insure the patch gets a good grip. Just be sure to seal up whatever needs sealing now so more water does not get in the hull.

As doobee says, there definitely should be clam shell ventilators around the exits of the drain tubes. I am surprised that you see only three screw holes around the drain tube that is missing its clam shell. There should be five screw holes, as Whaler used clam shells with five screws apparently drilling two extra holes in a standard Perko clam shell which comes with three holes.

bwguardian,

Rick already told you (twice) that he has Whaler 27. It's a 1988 model.

Bigshot posted 01-28-2003 11:10 AM ET (US)     Profile for Bigshot  Send Email to Bigshot     
Tom he just wants to know what model....outrage, full cabin, etc.
Rick U posted 01-28-2003 11:28 AM ET (US)     Profile for Rick U  Send Email to Rick U     
The model is called Whaler-27, it’s not the center consul and not the full cabin although I’d imagine the notched transom is the same on all.
Rick U posted 01-28-2003 11:28 AM ET (US)     Profile for Rick U  Send Email to Rick U     
Had I know that mounting things like transducers, temp sensors and the likes could possibly lead to transom damage I would have never done it. As part of this restoration I will replace the fish finder. Transom-mounted ducers seem to be sitting ducks for electrolysis when the boat lives in the water. Should I consider a through hull transducer or is the risk of leaking about the same? I love the idea of getting rid of the through hull tubes I am not using. For me, that would mean removing 3. This will also open up 3 vulnerable areas for drainage in the process. If Whaler screwed clamshells over these tubes to reduce water pressure, I consider that a band aid because the stainless shell and screws are not protected from electrolysis.
gcl posted 01-28-2003 11:31 AM ET (US)     Profile for gcl  Send Email to gcl     
One of the posts references a "drain tube". Let me display my ignorance: What is a drain tube, please?
Tom W Clark posted 01-28-2003 12:02 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
glc,

A drain tube is the hole through a hull that allows water drain out. The holes are typically lined with a 1" brass tube, though newer Whalers use plastic. Since the tubes are sealed to the hull only where they make contact with the skins, they can be a source of water intrusion as they degrade over time.

bwguardian & Nick,

That was a bit of a booby trap. Rick's boat model is Whaler 27 (no hyphen). This distinguishes it from a Whaler 27 Full Cabin, Whaler 27 Center Console Cuddy, Whaler 27 Walkaround, Offshore 27, 27' Guardian, 27' Vigilant or a 27' Challenger. There is no such thing as an Outrage 27 or a Revenge 27.

This is why you guys *need* the Whaler CD ROMs :)

Rick U posted 01-28-2003 12:10 PM ET (US)     Profile for Rick U  Send Email to Rick U     
Are you sure, my owners manuel has the hyphen?
Tom W Clark posted 01-28-2003 12:28 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Rick,

I have never seen Whaler 27 with a hyphen. Not in any catalog or flyer, not on any specification sheet or price list and not in any of the "Whaler News" news letters. But if it is hyphenated in your owner’s manual, then I guess that takes precedence.

Through the years, Whaler has been a bit inconsistent in the model identification and it gets confusing at times.

Regardless of what model of 27’ Whaler you have or whether or not the model name is hyphenated, the transom is built the same way, fiberglass over plywood in the area of the outboards.

Today's trivia quiz: What's the difference between a Revenge 25 Walk-Around and a Whaler 25 Walkaround?

bwguardian posted 01-28-2003 01:07 PM ET (US)     Profile for bwguardian  Send Email to bwguardian     
RickU,

In looking for the model of the vessel, I was hopeful in seeing if you could get easy access to sight where the stringers meet the transom. Tom W Clark, just trying to help, not argue; by the way what are these Whaler CD ROMs you are speaking to. New to this forum and by no means know everything, but have been around a while.

Taylor posted 01-28-2003 01:12 PM ET (US)     Profile for Taylor  Send Email to Taylor     
One thing that has not been touched on here is Rick's statement "...[W]hen sitting in the water, the bow sits a little low. I know by the boot stripe."

Now I don't know anything about 27's, and I'm going to fail miserably at Tom's quiz, but is there any guarantee that the boot strip matched the natural waterline of the boat at any point in time? Is it factory applied, or done by the dealer? What gear was mounted when the boot stripe was painted. Did whoever marked the location of the boot strip actually float the boat to find the correct location?

My Montauk has nicely applied bottom paint, I would guess it was done by the dealer, it follows the outline in the owners manual, but the boat sits at least an inch and a half low in the stern when compared to the line of the bottom paint. Does this mean that I have absorbed water in my boat at the back, or does this just mean that the waterline length was applied using some sort of theoretical waterline and does not take into account the 100HP (original) engine mounted on the boat?

I think the location of a boot stripe compared to the waterline is a poor indicator to the soundness of the hull.

Rick U posted 01-28-2003 01:12 PM ET (US)     Profile for Rick U  Send Email to Rick U     
Tom -
Do you agree with Doobie about getting rid of the unused drain tubes?
Tom W Clark posted 01-28-2003 01:22 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Rick,

Yes, I think doobee's idea of eliminating drain tubes is fine if you really do not need them. Which three would you remove? Will this create any water accumulation problems?

Taylor,

The boot stripe is not from the factory. I agree that it is a very poor indicator of a hull's dryness. The better gauge would be to see how she floats relative to other similar Whalers. But even this is going to be tough as there is so much variation in equipment and power.

bwguardian,

The CD ROMs are a digital collection of almost every Boston Whaler catalog, flyer, options and price list ever published. Read more about it here: http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/002283.html

Rick U posted 01-28-2003 01:25 PM ET (US)     Profile for Rick U  Send Email to Rick U     
"I think the location of a boot stripe compared to the waterline is a poor indicator to the soundness of the hull."
The Boat was floated till it got a scum line then hauled and painted. That was 15 yaers ago. Figure that line may have changes just a little with every bottom painting.
Taylor posted 01-28-2003 01:28 PM ET (US)     Profile for Taylor  Send Email to Taylor     
Regarding the possibility that the wood in the transom is rotted - Tom looked for that problem in Chain Saw Whaler, which was as sorry a whaler as you would ever want to see, and was completely saturated with water. I was there for the disection as an observer, and I can tell you that when he cut into the transom with the chain saw, the plywood appeared to be perfect. No delamination was apparent, and there was a nice fresh scent of new fir plywood.

I've stopped worrying about rot.

Taylor posted 01-28-2003 01:36 PM ET (US)     Profile for Taylor  Send Email to Taylor     
Rick - I did not realize you had had the boat that long. If the boot stripe (waterline?) was applied during your tenure, and you know how it was applied, then does seem reasonable to use it as a gauge. I was thinking a boat that came to me used.

There are other variables, though. Perhaps they don't matter as much on a 27, but fuel, fresh water or the anchor/chain all might be heavy enough to change trim.

gcl posted 01-28-2003 02:21 PM ET (US)     Profile for gcl  Send Email to gcl     
Does a 1971 Nauset have "drain tubes" ?
Rick U posted 01-28-2003 03:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for Rick U  Send Email to Rick U     
Yah, The bow does seem to sit a touch lower. If I do decided to drill a hole in the hull to test for water where should I drill it? Is there a stringer running along the keel?
bwguardian posted 01-28-2003 04:01 PM ET (US)     Profile for bwguardian  Send Email to bwguardian     
Rich U,

The two stringers will divide the width/beam of the hull in approximately 3 sections. You can get a better idea of thier location with below deck fish boxes etc. as the stringers will sit just outside of them. As for a stringer down the keel, not much to worry about unless you have a guardian in which case there still will not be a stringer but there will be material there in which will be tough drilling. As for a good place to drill, maybe someone else here on this forum has attempted this, I have not.

Capt_Tidy posted 01-28-2003 06:30 PM ET (US)     Profile for Capt_Tidy  Send Email to Capt_Tidy     
I am a big supporter of getting rid of all of these thru-hulls... leaving only two drains in the rear for deck water and the one in the anchor locker... and only because that one sits high out of the water. Glass over the rest. I would be temped to get rid of all the thru-holes and rely on a pump for deck water. Its on my list for this year.

As far a water in the hull, on my Outrage 25, I drill a couple of holes inside the boat near the thru-hulls in the fish wells, attached a couple of shopvacs via tape and left for the weekend. I did produce enough free to worry about. I don't believe water flows inside the hull unless you have channels... another debate.

I found a lot of water along the side of the front fish well... leaking in from the holes that held the cover. My front fish well pump was dead for a long time... the former owner was not as careful. After trying for a couple of weeks of negative pressure in this location and in the rear fish well... I collected about 2/3 gallons of water... not enough to continue.

But I would love to leave mine in Palm Springs for a couple of months and remove all the screws in the boat. Again not worth the gas to haul it out there.

A couple of drips is fine... I got a lot of water out of mine... it literally poured out of a couple of spots for a couple of minutes while drying on the rack in the yard. My rear fish well tube weeped for a week. Inside the foam looked good and dry immediately adjacent. To do anything I plan to cut out a large area around the tube and glass it over... adding in a new sounder.

Ultimately Tom Clark's thoughts proved very true on my whaler... it takes 10s of years of absolute neglect to cause a water problem big enough to worry about.. I suspect that the foam just doesn't soak it up that fast and reversing the process is eaqually as long. You need a driving force... ie: the weight of the boat sitting in water isn't that heavy. The weight of water against a rear sounder screw is a couple of pounds at best... not much drive here. The odd little drill hole or leak around a screw isn't the end of a Whaler.. else we would all have boats many times heavier than design and the name would have died a horrid death.

Let go of the image of your wash down the sponge... it's not the same as the foam in your boat.

Cheers
Ian

cheers
Ian

newdad66 posted 01-28-2003 06:45 PM ET (US)     Profile for newdad66  Send Email to newdad66     
If there were screws through the floor to hold the battery down and they were removed, would the colour of the inner part of the screw that penetrated the floor be a sign. Even if the hardware was stainless would the screws corrode or tarnish due to a prolonged presence of water in the foam?
Rick U posted 01-28-2003 08:09 PM ET (US)     Profile for Rick U  Send Email to Rick U     
Okay, I’m sold on glassing over the drain tubes. Two are below the rear storage hatches and one is forward of mid ship. This one is below the main bilge hatch where I can access my fresh water tank and my 2 stroke oil reserves. I would consider keeping them if this was a trailer boat but in the water I don’t see the need and the risks appear to be high.

I feel comfortable enough now to order the motors. You guys are such an incredible resource. Thank you !!!!

doobee posted 01-28-2003 09:12 PM ET (US)     Profile for doobee  Send Email to doobee     
good luck with the new motors.

I would stick with transom mount transducer as it is the best location, at the bottom of the keel between the motors. It is not likely to cause any problems if the screws are not too long (1/2" max) and they are properly bedded with a poly sulfide caulk such as Life Caulk or 4200.

You're right about the clam shells being a band aid, but hey, band aids have to be changed from time to time.

Barry posted 01-28-2003 10:01 PM ET (US)     Profile for Barry  Send Email to Barry     
Quiz answer: I believe the Revenge 25 WA had an 8' beam. It also an interesting raised "cap" on top of the gunwale that enclosed the walkway. The Whaler 25 Walkaround had a beam of 9'6". It was a slightly smaller version of the Whaler 27 Walkaround. The walkway was below the gunwale on that model.
Tom W Clark posted 01-28-2003 11:11 PM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
Barry,

You're good. The Whaler 25 Walkaround is an extremely rare model that was made for only a few years. Sometimes called the "Wide Body" it is very similar to a 27 but is not merely a shortened 27. Whaler spent a great deal of money and effort to build a unique mold for a model that sold at a very high price. The Whaler 25 was only ever built as this one model and only with Whaler Drive (though two different versions of Whaler Drive). It was also a very heavy boat as evidenced by the minimum recommended horsepower of 300!

I think Whaler make a conscious decision to [mis]spell the Whaler 25 as Walkaround precisely to help avoid the inevitable confusion with the Revenge 25 Walk-Around.

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.