|
ContinuousWave Whaler Moderated Discussion Areas ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area Would you buy another Verado?
|
Author | Topic: Would you buy another Verado? |
jarnau |
posted 09-07-2010 05:49 PM ET (US)
Most of you are on this site because you are Boston Whaler owners. I would like to be a Whaler owner, too, but I am struggling with the fact that I am stuck with Verados if I do so. Not that they are bad engines, but I just want the most reliable engine I can get. My question to you: Would you buy another Verado? Obviously, you bought your whalers so the mandatory Mercury didn't turn you off enough to go with a different boat. If you repower your whaler, would you repower with a Verado? |
Buckda |
posted 09-07-2010 06:02 PM ET (US)
Well, first of all, the vast majority of members on this site own CLASSIC whalers - back when you had a choice of engines. For those who bought new, or repowered their used Whalers, they chose their engines. The rest bought a used boat with whatever the previous owner had on her. For the past five years or so, Whaler has had a "mandatory tie-in" arrangement with Mercury motors. I think the VERADO is a fine motor, albeit a touch heavy for smaller boats. I do, however, find it telling that there are some members here who have very quickly repowered their boats with other engines. I supposed the novelty of doing such a thing gives their story some prominence whereas an owner who sticks with the original power is really a non-story, and doesn't feel compelled to tell us that either. That said, I don't think you should make a purchase decision soley on the motor on the boat. A new motor is likely to last as long as the next one given appropriate care and feeding. Just my $.02. Incidentally, I don't own any Mercury powered Whalers (anymore). When I did repower, I chose based on a technology that I liked and a dealership that I trusted. I also had some very specific reasons for the brand/technology decision I made. Where I buying a boat for "normal" use, I wouldn't hesitate to buy one that came with a Verado of suitable size and HP. |
Sal A |
posted 09-07-2010 08:02 PM ET (US)
I had a 175 Verado on my 205 Conquest. It had more ghosts than a Steven king novel. I will not buy another. |
Shrdlu |
posted 09-07-2010 08:36 PM ET (US)
I have a second generation (4 cyl) 200 HP Verado on a 2008 Dauntless 200. The motor has not suffered the reliability problems reported by others--failed fuel floats, pencil coils, power steering pumps. But it is extremely sensitive to low battery voltage. Anything below 12.2 and you are in trouble. |
dmeswi |
posted 09-07-2010 08:39 PM ET (US)
I have a 2006 Dauntless 220 with a 225 hp Verado. The engine has 700 hours on it and so far it has been flawless. Dennis |
SJUAE |
posted 09-07-2010 09:31 PM ET (US)
I don't think there are any bad or unreliable new modern engines The only reason I would not buy a Verado is on some boats with a low stern profile that big cowling on the large HP models just looks ugly IMO The other thing is what Jim pointed out recently is on 135hp and above DTS is compulsory. That's 3k more that could be well spent elsewhere. Regards |
bwhaler37 |
posted 09-07-2010 09:43 PM ET (US)
My last boat had Yamaha 150 four strokes, and when I sold with 300 hours, all I had done was oil changes and winterizing--it was absolutely bulletproof. |
contender |
posted 09-07-2010 10:09 PM ET (US)
I have owned 1 Mercury in my life, I sold the boat, never had any trouble with it, and the engine blew apart about one month after selling it. I have had friends that have had Mercury's and have had problems, They have sold their engine and purchased a Yamaha or an Evinrude. I have never had a friend or myself go from an Evinrude or Yamaha to a Mercury. |
jimh |
posted 09-07-2010 11:14 PM ET (US)
I haven't bought my first Mercury VERADO motor yet, so I can't really comment about buying a second one. I think the six-cylinder VERADO motors are quite well established. They run very smoothly and at idle are fantastically quiet. In order to own one, I would need to have a close relationship with a Mercury dealer who was completely qualified to service the motor, who was enthusiastic about the motor, and who was willing to personally stand behind the motor. That situation is just not obtainable here in Southeast Michigan, and that makes it highly unlikely that I would buy a VERADO. |
elaelap |
posted 09-08-2010 12:28 PM ET (US)
I can't think of any active member of this forum who has repowered his/her classic Boston Whaler with a Verado outboard. I gotta be wrong, and I look forward to a bunch of folks jumping in to correct me, but that's my best recollection. Tony |
Buckda |
posted 09-08-2010 12:53 PM ET (US)
Here you go Tony. Tom Birdsey repowered his 18' Outrage with a Verado 150 last year I think. |
Buckda |
posted 09-08-2010 12:54 PM ET (US)
Ok, it was a couple years ago: http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/006085.html |
elaelap |
posted 09-08-2010 05:25 PM ET (US)
Thanks for that link, Dave. I was overseas when that thread was posted and I missed it. Yikes, though...510 lbs dry for 150 horses. I really don't care for its looks back there either, and its numbers don't look any better or worse than any other 150. Not that I'd kick that absolutely bee-youtiful OR 18 outta bed, huge Verado or not ;-) Any other members who chose Verado when repowering a classic? Tony |
jollyrog305 |
posted 09-08-2010 07:06 PM ET (US)
If I could put a Verado 150 on the back of our Currituck, I would in a heartbeat…WOW, now there is a picture. Other than one bad fuel float (Mercury replaced the other automatically), both Verado's have been flawless. |
brisboats |
posted 09-08-2010 09:26 PM ET (US)
To me mounting a Verado on a classic Whaler is liken to Sophia Loren carrying around Lady Gaga piggyback. Brian |
wood duck |
posted 09-08-2010 10:33 PM ET (US)
I have owned three Verados on three Boston Whalers,a 135hp, 200hp, and the 250hp which is currently on a 235 Conquest. All three motors have been trouble free, run quietly, and meet the advertised performance expectations.I am also very satisfied with the Smartcraft system. My Whaler dealer has a certified tech completely qualified to service the motor and the dealer has demonstrated that he will stand behind the product that he sells. If I would need to repower in the future, I would not hesitate to buy a Verado |
jarnau |
posted 09-09-2010 12:48 AM ET (US)
thanks for the feedback |
wood duck |
posted 09-09-2010 09:52 PM ET (US)
Sal A, I was surprised by the negative comments regarding your Verado on the 205. Without looking back, I only recall the great reviews that you provided. In fact,when I purchased a 205 Conquest, I considered your positive feedback. I kept that boat for a couple of years before I traded up and the 200hp Verado that I had on the 205 was problem free for 300hrs. and performed very well. |
Sal A |
posted 09-09-2010 10:43 PM ET (US)
Wood duck. The 205 is a great boat. The engine was smooth and powerful. The Verado did have weird fault things going on. I didnt sell the boat for that reason. But if I ever get another boat, which doesnt appear likely, I just like simple stuff. Especially in marine environments. I am glad you had great luck with yours. Mine wasn't terrible. My Yamahas, though, were flawless and my current eTec is real nice. I have owned a Mercury 90 2 stroke, a Mercury 115 4 stroke, a Mercury 175 Verado, two Yamaha F150's, a Yamaha F250, a Yamaha 70 2 stroke, and now the eTec. The Mercury 90 two stroke and the Verado were the only engines that broke down on me underway. That's just something I don't like. |
elaelap |
posted 09-10-2010 09:50 AM ET (US)
Woke up early, kinda grumpy, lots of work waiting at the office, salmon season ended a couple of days ago...just sorta feeling those free-floating, autumn's-approaching blues and sure glad it's Friday. Opened up continuousWave and read this: "But if I ever get another boat, which doesn't appear likely, I just like simple stuff." Sal, I really gotta tell you -- I'm no fantasy fiction aficionado, but in your case I'll make an exception. Talk about a far-out prediction! This impossible-to-believe statement makes the Maya calendar 2012 end-of-the-world nonsense look like crisp Aristotelian logic. Thanks for cheering me up and making my day, old friend...and keep dreamin'. Tony |
erik selis |
posted 09-10-2010 02:52 PM ET (US)
@Sal...hahahaha |
Sal A |
posted 09-10-2010 07:03 PM ET (US)
:) Boats and guitars. I'll never buy another of either. |
Sal A |
posted 09-10-2010 07:04 PM ET (US)
:) Boats and guitars. I'll never buy another of either. |
tonyj1 |
posted 09-11-2010 08:18 AM ET (US)
I had a 135 on a 180 Dauntless and currently have a 225 on a 210 Ventura. I am extremely pleased with both engines and would not hesitate to buy any Verado powered boat. Tony |
Nushlie |
posted 09-11-2010 10:24 AM ET (US)
Gentlemen & Ladies, We have a 150 Verado, no issues. Nushlie |
boatdryver |
posted 09-11-2010 10:41 AM ET (US)
my 175 Verado has been great. 160 hrs. Yes, I'd buy another. JimL |
Dauntless 180 |
posted 09-11-2010 04:26 PM ET (US)
I had the 150, great engine but too many little issues. My Yamaha 150 had Zero issues. No, if given the choice I would get an E-Tec. |
tombro |
posted 09-12-2010 06:55 AM ET (US)
I don't know whether I'll get a retweet--but--other than the initial float swith/fuel system module replacement early on, our Gen 1 Verado 225 has run without a hitch. We are finishing up our 6th season with 613 engine hours. I was out 15 miles off Barnegat Inlet trolling the dickens out of the false albacore on Labor Day, so I do run around a bit with this engine on our 210 Ventura. So, yes, I would buy another Verado. |
pcrussell50 |
posted 09-12-2010 02:38 PM ET (US)
This is one of those questions where there is no right or wrong answer, and people's reasons are many and varied. I reckon the best that the original poster can hope for out of this thread is to read the various reasons put forth by CWW'ers and see which one(s) he relates to the best. So, for me? The answer is, no I would not buy a Verado. MY reasons are as follows: 1) Cost: since I have the skills to repair and maintain carbureted 2-strokes, AND carbureted 2-strokes are a whole order of magnitude cheaper than a new, top-shelf 4-stroke, it would be financially reckless to spend (literally) 10 times more for a Verado. This obviously changes dramatically if you do not posses the skills to maintain a carbureted 2-stroke. 2) Weight: They tend to be at-or-near, heaviest in class, for a given horsepower. This may not be too big of a deal to YOU, if your boat can handle the weight. But for me, I would find it irritating and inelegant, from an engineering standpoint. Somebody said in an earlier post that the 150hp Verado is 510 lbs. By comparison, a carbureted 2-stroke 150hp Evinrude is 375lbs. A 200hp digital electronic fuel injected Evinrude ETEC is still almost a hundred pound lighter, at 418... for 50 MORE horsepower. 3) Environmental impact: While nothing will burn as clean as a new modern 4-stroke, when you buy used, you are essentially recycling, as the environmental impact from the design and manufacture has already been ammortized, and this advantage grows, the older the motor you buy. Further, the older you buy, the greater the possibility that it was built domestically, with pay and working conditions that are up to developed-world standards. That said, I think someone in this thread said that Verados are domestic, so this rationale must be applied carefully, if labor standards are important to you. -Peter |
Tom W Clark |
posted 09-12-2010 03:17 PM ET (US)
The question as not "Would you buy a Verado?" but rather "Would you buy another Verado?" As I have never owned a Verado, I cannot answer the question.
quote: No, that is not true. The two stroke Evinrude E-TEC has lower emmisions than the Verado. |
Nushlie |
posted 09-12-2010 05:37 PM ET (US)
Gentlemen & Ladies I understand the Verado motors were largely designed by a former Porsche engineer. I'm surprised they are heavier than the other four strokes. Nushlie |
pcrussell50 |
posted 09-12-2010 07:05 PM ET (US)
Tom, the last question in the originating post was, "If you repower your whaler, would you repower with a Verado?". I went with THAT interpretation. If the ETEC has lower emissions than he Verado, color me surprised... and corrected. So much the better, too... as I quite like them, and may pay up for one to use on a fast, padded v-hull boat I'm looking at. -Peter |
pcrussell50 |
posted 09-12-2010 08:02 PM ET (US)
quote: No surprise to me. The 3.8L, 6-cylinder, 911 Turbo is some 300 lbs heavier than the 7L v8 Corvette z06. And I'm a Porsche'phile. -Peter |
brisboats |
posted 09-14-2010 08:58 AM ET (US)
Peter, I am a Porschephile too and still cognizant that Porsche motors make lousy marine engines. The 928's motor was marinized and used in boats for a time and did not provide reliable service. Dual overhead cams, aluminum block and heads high rpm powerbands make poor marine engines. I'll keep preaching simplicity of systems in the marine enviornment make for more reliable powerplants. Lightweight engines on light hulls make for a more balanced and responsive package. Much like a Porschephile using scales at all four corners to balance the car. Classic Porsches were light weight and needed less horspower to provide spirited performance just like the classic Whalers. To me putting a heavy modern motor on a classic hull is like asking a lineman to jockey a thoroughbred at the Preakness. Brian |
makoman310 |
posted 09-17-2010 10:15 PM ET (US)
yes i would by another verado love my 250 on my 1988 outrage wd i used to have a 225 oceanpro that i thought was good on fuel but with the new verado i am burning and 1/8 of the fuel i used to burn with the ocean pro and thats with a full tank of gas and bolth live wells fill up with water and bait i am avid striped bass angler. going to my inlet from my marina wot 35mph with the ocean pro i would burn 11 to 15 gals.with the verado same trip wot 45mph i burn 2.7 what a differance a normal day of bass fishing i would burn 38gal now 9gals well worth the money old prop was stainless 15x17 new prop 15x15 enertia motor has 330 hrs with no problems repowerd last year |
jimh |
posted 09-17-2010 10:25 PM ET (US)
If the Mercury VERADO got EIGHT TIMES better fuel economy than a conventional two-cycle motor it would be really big news. Amazing that Mercury never mentions this. |
makoman310 |
posted 09-17-2010 10:48 PM ET (US)
jim i reset the smart gage everytime i gas up when i get back i filled up the boat if the gage says 8.9 pump says 8.8 it is accurate |
jimh |
posted 09-17-2010 10:56 PM ET (US)
Gotcha--VERADO gets EIGHT TIME better fuel economy than conventional outboard. Great news for VERADO. They will immediately take over all outboard motor sales. No one comes even close to that. Amazing data. |
Tohsgib |
posted 09-17-2010 11:53 PM ET (US)
No! |
jimh |
posted 09-18-2010 09:32 AM ET (US)
Nick--The fellow says EIGHT TIMES better. Who is to dispute that? The potential for fuel savings is amazing. For example, if you run 100-gallons of fuel in a VERADO, you would have run 800-gallons of fuel in a conventional engine. The cost savings of 700-gallons of fuel with fuel selling around $4-gallon at average marina prices these days, would be $2,800. In other words, about five or six trips with a VERADO where you burn 100-gallons of fuel, and the engine has paid for itself! |
Tohsgib |
posted 09-18-2010 10:02 AM ET (US)
Wow! |
themclos |
posted 09-18-2010 10:13 AM ET (US)
While makoman310 says the Verado uses 1/8 of the gas of his old OceanPro, his 2 examples show the Verado using about a quarter of the gas that his old motor used. In the example of gas used over a normal day of fishing, he using about 1/4 of the gas the OceanPro burned. That is still great improvement in fuel economy. The OceanPro is known to be a good, solid motor, but is a gas hog especially at higher speeds. Dan |
Tohsgib |
posted 09-18-2010 10:40 AM ET (US)
According to the Verado website they burn roughly 10gph@4,000rpms. According to the Yamaha website a conventional 2 smoke 225 burns 12gph@4,000rpm. Even if an OMC was thirstier and burned 13gph@4000rpm that is still only a 23% decrease in consumption. The only time a Verado 250 burns 2.7gph is under 2000rpm and at hull speeds. If he thinks he is only burning 9gals a day compared to 38...he better check his tank before he runs out. It would be more like 29-30gals, not 9. Still it is a $32 savings which pays for bait. |
jimh |
posted 09-18-2010 10:45 AM ET (US)
It is possible to make some rather spectacular comparisons of fuel consumption between old and new motors, and if you carefully select the data you can get amazing results. For example, my old V6 carburetor motor used to give me about 1.6-MPG at 5.5-MPH, or a fuel flow rate of 3.4-GPH. My new motor can push the same boat to 5.5-MPH while burning fuel at a rate of 0.2-GPH. This is a fuel economy of 27.5 MPG. This means I could go around telling people that my new motor gets SEVENTEEN TIMES better fuel economy than my old motor. However, this sort of silly comparison is meaningless unless you spend all your time running around at that one throttle setting. My new motor does not really get SEVENTEEN TIMES better fuel economy than my old motor in the overall pattern of use of the motor. What I see is that the new motor gets about 1.6 to 1.7-TIMES better fuel economy overall, and I am very comfortable in telling people this. If I went around telling people my motor got SEVENTEEN TIMES better fuel economy, it would be completely true for that particular throttle setting, but it would be terribly misleading. I don't think it is of much value to mislead people about what benefit they will get from a particular brand. All these motors have to operate under the same laws of Physics, and the notion that one brand has created a miracle is generally not going to be accepted by educated people. When data is carefully selected in order to make the most favorable comparison possible, educated people who read it tend to raise their eyebrows. The net result is actually that the exaggerated claim tend to diminish the reputation of the product more than it does to enhance the reputation of the product. |
SJUAE |
posted 09-18-2010 02:48 PM ET (US)
As themclos pointed out if makoman310 had got a new calculator to go with his Verado. The example data shows nearer an extrodanary 4 times inprovement in fuel economy and 10mph more at wot with an extra 25HP There is only once conclusion his Oceanpro was used at planning speeds all day and the Varado at displacement, maybe he was running it in slowly :) |
seahorse |
posted 09-18-2010 04:27 PM ET (US)
In the real world, when someone replaces a traditional carbed 2-stroke with a same sized EFI 4-stroke or DFI 2-stroke, their overall fuel consumption will be about half of what it was. The newer technology is much more efficient at slow speeds and slightly more efficient at high speeds so at the end of the day, you will save about 50% on gas for identical trips and running conditions. |
fourdfish |
posted 09-18-2010 10:27 PM ET (US)
And 5 years later, I still love my 200hp ETEC. Still gets great mileage and runs great, just like the day I bought it! By the way, The Coast Guard and EPA found the ETEC to be the cleanest burning outboard a few years back! Check it out |
dropanchor |
posted 09-19-2010 05:30 PM ET (US)
I own a 2005 250HP Verado. Best engine I have ever owned; in my experience, nothing else comes close....I have also owned a 250HP Yamaha 4-stroke. The Verado is the ULTIMATE driving experience. Would definitely purchase another Verado. |
jimh |
posted 09-19-2010 07:02 PM ET (US)
There seems to be good support for the VERADO from its owners. I wonder when the VERADO will lead Mercury to its first win in the J.D. Power survey of customer satisfaction for four-cycle outboard motors. So far that category has been the exclusive domain of Yamaha. Even Honda can't crack that lock. |
Perry |
posted 09-19-2010 08:42 PM ET (US)
quote: What?? Honda has won 4 of the last 5 J.D. Power survey of customer satisfaction for four stroke outboard motors. 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2009. |
jimh |
posted 09-19-2010 09:02 PM ET (US)
OK--I'll take you word on that--my research apparently wasn't very good. Honda and Yamaha--both strong players. Can Verado break through? |
Perry |
posted 09-19-2010 09:35 PM ET (US)
I doubt it. |
L H G |
posted 09-20-2010 06:39 PM ET (US)
For those interested in Verados, here is some pricing information. Seems very reasonable considering the sophisticated 4-stroke engineering you are getting. For example a 150 Verado is only $1200 more than a relatively simple 2-stroke DFI 150 Optimax. |
jimh |
posted 09-20-2010 07:52 PM ET (US)
Larry--Your characterization of the Mercury OptiMax as "simple" is very misleading. It is far from it. I explain: The price of an OptiMax is not particularly low because Mercury has to pay for the right to use the technology. They did not invent OptiMax, just gave it a new name. The technology belongs to Orbital, and is called the Oribital Combustion Proceess. Mercury has to pay Orbital a fee for using their technology. The OptiMax is far from simple. Each cylinder has two specialized injectors, one for fuel, one for air. That twice as many injectors per cylinder than any other engine. The injectors are specialized devices, not generic off-the-shelf injectors used by the millions in other engines. So they are not cheap. The OptiMax needs a boost pump--just like the Verado--to raise the air pressure to the air injectors. So every OptiMax comes with its own separate air compressor built-in. It is like buying a little 3-HP outboard motor that is under the cowling of every OptiMax. The idea that VERADO and OptiMax sell within $1,200 of each other must confound Brunswick. They hoped that VERADO would command a big premium, and OptiMax would be the non-premium motor. A spread of only $1,200 tells me that the margins are cut thin. It is a good value for the consumer. VERADO gives a lot of motor, and thanks to extremely strong price competition, the price is not as high as it should be. A bargain, really. How long can the price be sustained this low? |
L H G |
posted 09-20-2010 08:08 PM ET (US)
I think Mercury is just facing up to the idea that have to compete with Suzuki's price dumped 4-stroke engines, also sold way below market, especially when you consider shipping costs from Japan. A Suzuki 150 4-stroke, a fairly sophisticated high tech engine, is selling around $9600, only a few pennies more than an Optimax. That is amazing. The Japanese must feel they have to sell complicated 4-stroke engines, clearly more expensive to manufacture, for what the Americans are selling 2-strokes for. I really don't know how they do it. http://edsmarinesuperstore.com/suzuki_yard_sale_prices.htm And we wonder why 15,000,000 are out of work? |
ConB |
posted 10-07-2010 03:03 PM ET (US)
Bush number one got some new Verados. I'm wondering how much he paid for them. http://www.tradeonlytoday.com/home/ 506635-former-president-bush-gets-a-mercury-powered-fountain |
Mumbo Jumbo |
posted 10-07-2010 06:52 PM ET (US)
No. I wouldn't buy the first one either. |
sosmerc |
posted 10-10-2010 12:28 AM ET (US)
Nether engine is "simple" (Optimax vs. Verado). It would be interesting to compare the specific number of components on each engine. My guess is that the Optimax has far fewer parts. I can say for a fact that the 3.0 litre Optimax service manual is one 2 inch thick book comprised of 8 sections. The Verado manual for the 6 cylinder model is 7 books together that comprise 9 sections. (altogether about an inch thicker) The logical conclusion is that the Verado is about 1 inch more complex :) Currently the Optimax powerheads can be rebuilt by mortal men with access to factory manual and proper tools. You can even purchase remanufactured powerheads from a variety of aftermarket suppliers. I am not aware of any aftermarket suppliers that deal with remanufactured Verado powerheads at this time. You can buy replacement powerheads from Mercury for Verado engines, but the price is very steep. In time I am sure that a market will develop for remanufactured 4 stroke powerheads of all brands and sizes.... |
Nushlie |
posted 10-10-2010 07:29 AM ET (US)
We have a 150 Verado on our Outrage 190, excellent power and very quiet. Time will tell with respect to reliability but after two seasons we have had no problems. |
Peter |
posted 10-10-2010 12:18 PM ET (US)
Regarding complexity of the Verado, a few years ago a municipal Whaler 27 Challenger with a pair of 250 Verados had been hauled apparently to do some repair work on one of the Verados. I don't know whether the boat hit something or something just failed. In any event one of the Verados had its leg removed revealing numerous things hanging down from the powerhead. I happen to have my camera phone with me and was curious about this because the appearance of the motor was odd in that with a conventional outboard motor mount, you wouldn't be able to remove the leg leaving only the powerhead hanging on the transom. so I snapped a couple of pictures: http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w231/Whaler-Fleet/CW%20Posts/ May27020.jpg http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w231/Whaler-Fleet/CW%20Posts/ May27021.jpg These pictures don't really show the exposed underbelly of the powerhead all that well but there was many things visible there that were unrecognizable and spoke of a very high degree of "complexity". Coming from many years of boating experience which has almost universally taught to me that the KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) philosphy is often best on a boat, this Verado with its "kimono" open was enough to confirm my thinking that one of those will never, ever be on my transom. |
jimh |
posted 10-10-2010 12:28 PM ET (US)
Peter--I believe that your photographs show components of the fuel system of the VERADO. These components are actually located close to or in some cases below the waterline. I though it was odd that the engine would be designed with components of the fuel system located below the powerhead and in such close proximity to the water. |
tmann45 |
posted 10-11-2010 04:45 PM ET (US)
I believe the canister on the right in the first picture is the fuel supply module as Jim related and the larger one on the left is the engine oil sump. The Verado is a dry sump engine. Tom |
Davm |
posted 10-16-2010 09:56 AM ET (US)
I have a 2005 205 Eastport with a 150 Optimax. If I had it to do over again, I would put on the 200 Optimax. I do like the Verados for quietness, but I have driven similar sized boats with them and didn't feel comfortable with the immediate available torque. Felt like I would need about 25% more motor to get the same uphill (upwave) torque response. |
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.