Forum: WHALER
  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: The Whaler GAM or General Area
  2014 Tohatsu 40 & 50 HP 4-Strokes

Post New Topic  Post Reply
search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   2014 Tohatsu 40 & 50 HP 4-Strokes
frontier posted 01-28-2014 05:54 PM ET (US)   Profile for frontier   Send Email to frontier  
Just saw the 2014 Tohatsu brochure with the new 40 and 50 HP 4-strokes.
Impressive. Lightweight (209#). Available in 15" and 20" shaft.
Looks like a good re-power choice for classic 13 and 15 Whalers.
Mr C posted 01-31-2014 12:27 AM ET (US)     Profile for Mr C  Send Email to Mr C     
http://www.tohatsu.com/tech_info/brochure_pdfs/2014_brochure/Tohatsu2014Brochure.pdf

http://www.tohatsu.com/tech_info/brochure_pdfs/2014_brochure/BFT2014Brochure.pdf

60 to 250 hp appear to be re-badged Honda's

40 and 50 hp outwardly appear much different then Honda.

Dave

Peter posted 01-31-2014 07:04 AM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
A 209 lb outboard is NOT a good repower choice for a classic 13 Whaler hull. It would be fine for a classic 15 Whaler hull.
frontier posted 01-31-2014 09:58 AM ET (US)     Profile for frontier  Send Email to frontier     
Remember the zillions of classic 40 HP Evinrudes and Johnsons that were put on 13 Whalers in the 1980's and 1990's? Famous brochure pictures.
They weigh 195# plus the VRO tank in the boat puts them over 200#.
Peter posted 01-31-2014 06:49 PM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
I've seen plenty of classic 13 hulls with the 185 lb OMC 2-cylinder looper on the transom and they all sit and ride stern heavy because the boat was never designed for such weight on the transom. At the time the classic 13 hull was designed, in the 1950s, the heaviest 35/40 HP outboard was about 140 lbs. That really is about the maximum weight that should be on the transom.

Further, the VRO tank used by the looper sat inside the boat, probably a foot or more in front of the transom. To be comparable to the 4-stroke weight, that VRO tank would have to be mounted in a way that the center of its mass would hang about a foot aft of the transom.

I think its a costly mistake to put a 210 lb outboard on a classic 13 transom.

OMCrobert posted 01-31-2014 08:36 PM ET (US)     Profile for OMCrobert  Send Email to OMCrobert     
Even though Whaler sold many, many 13 whalers with OMC 40hp 2 cylinders, they were all the 20inch transom on the later splashwell 13ft Whalers.

The classic 15inch transom 13 Whalers do not do well with that much weight at all or even close with the original 15inch transom cutout. I have even run one with a manual tilt 15inch 40hp Evinrude and it still sat way too low even just sitting at the dock.

Peter posted 02-01-2014 11:06 AM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
The 20 inch transom models don't do well with that weight either. The height of the transom has no impact on the poor weight distribution of a 185 lb outboard on the transom of a 350 lb boat that is only 13 feet long. A 210 lb outboard makes the poor weight distribution even worse.
Tom W Clark posted 02-01-2014 11:24 AM ET (US)     Profile for Tom W Clark  Send Email to Tom W Clark     
The 20" transoms do oblige you to buy a LONG shaft motor which just adds even more weight.

For a 20" transom 13 footer I would not want any motor much over 175 pounds.

For a 15" transom, just find a good ol' Johnson, Evinrude or Mercury 25 HP motor that weighs not much more that 100 pounds.

Look at page 17 of the 1988 Boston Whaler catalog. It shows a Super Sport 13 with an Evinrude 40 on it. The poor motor looks ridiculous being tucked in so close to the transom, because that is how those boats had to be run to get the stern up with all that weight.

Mad Hunt posted 02-02-2014 10:56 PM ET (US)     Profile for Mad Hunt  Send Email to Mad Hunt     
The OMC 521cc motor was THE motor for the 13' Whaler. Over 200lbs is just too much weight.
jimh posted 02-03-2014 08:56 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
quote:
60 to 250 hp appear to be re-badged Honda's

Tohatsu has partnered with Honda and is selling the Honda outboard engines under Tohatsu branding in North American (and perhaps elsewhere, I am not really sure). For one manufacturer to enter into a partnership with another manufacturer, to buy engines from their partner, to re-badge the engines with different paint schemes and identification decals, and to sell their competitor's engines under their own brand is a common practice in the outboard engine business, but there are a couple of things about the Tohatsu-Honda relationship that are unusual and worth remarking about.

The normal partnership arrangement in outboard manufacturing has been for a USA company to buy engines from a Japanese company, and then re-badge them for sale in North American under the USA branding. In the case of Tohatsu and Honda, we have two Japanese companies involved, one buying from the other. I don't know if the agreement with Honda allows Tohatsu to sell the re-badged engines anywhere else besides North America. But in North America you will find Japanese-made Honda engines being sold under the Tohatsu (Japanese) brand. This is a bit unusual.

Another very unusual aspect of the Tohatsu-Honda relationship is the existing and prior relationship between Tohatsu and Brunswick. Tohatsu has been manufacturing outboard engines and selling them to Brunswick for many years. Tohatsu replaced Yamaha as Brunswick's source of engines following a very chilly relationship between Brunwick and Yamaha that occurred after Brunswick initiated a complaint about underselling of outboard engines from Japan in the North American market with the USA International Trade Commission. The charges made by Brunswick were not sustained by the findings of the investigation, in part because the evidence showed that Brunswick was one of the largest importers of outboard engines made in Japan, and it would hardly be possible to punish Yamaha for importing engines and not Brunswick.

Now Brunswick buys most of their small four-stroke-power-cycles from Tohatsu, although they have constructed an intermediary company (TMC) they refer to as a joint venture with Tohatsu to be the corporate entity that makes the engines. But there is no confusion, Brunswick buys engines made by Tohatsu. When it came time for Tohatsu to buy some higher-horsepower outboard engines, Tohatsu did not extend their partnership with Brunswick to be the source of those engines, but instead partnered with Honda.

OMCrobert posted 02-03-2014 10:03 AM ET (US)     Profile for OMCrobert  Send Email to OMCrobert     
[The selling of re-badged Honda engines by Tohatsu] is not very surprising since Nissan outboards (Tohatsu) has been rebadging larger Honda outboard engines for several years.

All ideas about these agreements is just guesses and speculation without any evidence though.

jimh posted 02-04-2014 10:32 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
Yes, I agree. To make pie-in-the-sky assumptions is just silly. That is why there is nothing speculative about what I wrote (above). It is all well-known fact.
jimh posted 02-04-2014 11:47 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I don't know what relationship exists between Tohatsu and Nissan. I believe there are no outboards made by Nissan, and it is perhaps just a branding under which outboards made by Tohatsu are sold. I don't have any information about outboards made by Honda being sold by Nissan.
jimh posted 02-04-2014 11:58 AM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
According to an article in BOATING which appears on-line at

http://www.boatingmag.com/engines/outboards/ honda-to-private-label-large-outboards-tohatsu

the Tohatsu-branded Honda-made outboard engines will be sold in the USA and in 17 other countries.

That article expands the distribution of the Tohatsu-branded Honda-made engines. A prior report in TradeOnly mentioned only USA distribution. Compare at

http://www.tradeonlytoday.com/2013/08/ tohatsu-america-joins-with-honda-on-outboard-lineup/

The topic of the agreement between Tohatsu and Honda to sell Honda-made engines under the Tohatsu branding was covered in a thread that began about six months ago, when the announcement was first made. See

http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/022266.html

It is interesting to note that thread has been pruned of wild and unfounded speculation, and, while it does contains some opinions, those opinions are clearly expressed as such.

I have not found any evidence of sales of Honda-made engines under the Nissan brand as something that preceded the agreement of Honda and Tohatsu, but I have not really investigated it with much vigor. Perhaps someone can direct us to some evidence of that, if it is important for understanding the present situation with the newly announced Tohatsu 40-HP and 50-HP engines.

OMCrobert posted 02-04-2014 03:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for OMCrobert  Send Email to OMCrobert     
Nissan has been rebadging Honda's since Fall of 1998.

http://www.nissan-marine.co.jp/engin/225-200.html


The reason that I claim your post is speculation is because you do not have any insight as to the normal partnership agreement or joint venture information of any of these companies. Regardless of if it is with Honda/Tohatsu or Nissan/Tohatsu or Tohsatsu/Brunswick or Yamaha/Brunswick or BRP/Suzuki. It is all speculation without any proof. Companies do this all the time but it is all hearsay as these agreements are normally proprietary. Since we do not know any of this we can only guess. The same way we do not know if Tohatsu has actually been handling the marine affairs for Nissan and if Tohatsu always had a connection with Honda for engines.

One of the largest engine sellers not even mentioned in Europe/Western Asia is Selva which is a rebranded Yamaha in the larger horsepower ranges.

jimh posted 02-04-2014 03:43 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
OMCRObert--You are very late to the party in discussing the relationship between Brunswick and Tohatsu. You should read the definitive thread on that topic, which is really a culmination of ten years of bickering between the Mercury fantasy world and the real world. Please see:

http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020968.html

In that thread I give concise references and clear citations to all of the elements of my statements above. Perhaps you can enjoy an hour or two of reading with an open mind.

If you enjoy swimming against the current, you can jump into that stream and give us all the benefit of your unique knowledge. I look forward to being tremendously enlightened.

jimh posted 02-04-2014 03:48 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
OMCRobert writes:

quote:
Nissan has been rebadging Honda's since Fall of 1998.
http://www.nissan-marine.co.jp/engin/225-200.html

I am afraid I cannot read written Japanese in any of the popular glyphs, so I have no idea what is said on that page. I am already aware of that page, as it appears in the thread I just cited for you. But I find nothing in it that mentions 1998 or a partnership.

I don't understand what is so important about knowing that Nissan has been selling re-badged Honda engines, and, from what I can infer, only selling them in Japan. How does that affect the new Tohatsu 40 and 50-HP engines, being discussed here?

OMCrobert posted 02-04-2014 03:57 PM ET (US)     Profile for OMCrobert  Send Email to OMCrobert     
[Deleted a long essay on the sidebar topic; sorry, take this to email. I am not interested and neither are other readers.]

We should stick to facts and not speculation regardless of the company.

jimh posted 02-04-2014 04:02 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
There are only two remarkable points I brought up in my mention of the Honda and Tohatsu deal:

--it was Japan buying from Japan for re-badging and sale in USA, and

--it was Tohatsu NOT buying from their partner Mercury.

Neither of these are in any way speculation. They are clear and well-known facts. The persistence at which OMCRobert insists they are speculation leads me to believe that he must be upset by these circumstances. The more facts disagree with an existing belief system, they harder they are to accept as facts. This is unfortunately a characteristic of human nature, so I am able to forgive OMCRobert for his stubborn attempts to dismiss the facts; they must be in conflict with his beliefs.

I really do not know what goes on in the Japanese outboard market. If Nissan (Japan) buys from Honda (Japan) for sale in Nippon (Japan), it is not something I am following with much attention; I don't go shopping for outboard engines in Japan. Maybe they've been doing this in Dutch Guyana, too. That does not really make my comment about it happening in the USA and Canada as a speculative statement. I remarked about a Japanese manufacturing buying engines from another Japanese manufacturer for re-badging and sale in the USA and Canada. I remarked about it because it was remarkable.

Also, I did not bring up the topic of Honda and Tohatsu. That was introduced to the thread by someone else.

I would really prefer to hear more about Tohatsu 40 and 50-HP engines.

Whether or not OMCRobert holds views similar to mine about the way various manufacturers buy and sell from each other is really not of concern to me, and I doubt it holds much interest for other readers.

OMCrobert posted 02-04-2014 04:10 PM ET (US)     Profile for OMCrobert  Send Email to OMCrobert     
[Objected that I would not further distract this discussion by allowing him to continue to discuss his willingness to accept facts as facts or to dissmiss them as speculation. If you really want to begin a new discussion about the relationship of all outboard manufacturers to each other in your personal view of things, you are welcome to start a new thread. But, please, stop polluting this one with your distracting comments. Our topic is Tohatsu 40 and 50-HP engines, if you will kindly allow it to continue untarnished by your palaver.--jimh]
OMCrobert posted 02-04-2014 04:38 PM ET (US)     Profile for OMCrobert  Send Email to OMCrobert     
Those new 40/50hp Tohatsu's are real nice outboards. I find it very interesting that Tohatsu would invest in the tooling and design of completely new outboard when they already have a relatively newer designed 40/50hp TLDI 2 stroke in the line up.

In my opinion, I would say this signals the undeniable increase in demand for four stroke outboards over two stroke outboards.

jimh posted 02-04-2014 04:44 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
That is certainly interesting speculation. On the other hand, I speculate that Tohatsu found it impossible to compete with the competition in the 40-HP and 50-HP two-stroke-power-cycle market, and decided it was easier to make money competing with the four-stroke-power-cycle market. One can speculate about all kinds of things with such ease.
OMCrobert posted 02-04-2014 05:00 PM ET (US)     Profile for OMCrobert  Send Email to OMCrobert     
Since Evinrude is the only entrant into the two stroke 40/50hp market I would argue that market is not very big. I would back that up with the fact that Evinrude (who claims 2 stroke is superior) is using Tohatsu four strokes for their smaller engines. I would also point out that Yamaha has abandon the two stroke DFI market in the United States. I think that a logical person would see the undeniable shift in market demand to four stroke engines.
jimh posted 02-04-2014 05:07 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
The market for outboard engines is global. I have seen many 40-HP and 50-HP Yamaha classic two-stroke engines in use in Central America and the Caribbean. I speculate the market is very large, much larger than say the market for 250-HP engines.
OMCrobert posted 02-04-2014 05:22 PM ET (US)     Profile for OMCrobert  Send Email to OMCrobert     
If your speculation was correct then I surmise that these new four stroke would have been carb two strokes. The fact that they are four strokes supports my point that the demand in outboards has shifted to four strokes.
jimh posted 02-04-2014 07:36 PM ET (US)     Profile for jimh  Send Email to jimh     
I think you are speculating that your speculation is more accurate than my speculation. Again, that is just speculation. The marvelous thing about making purely speculative statements is that you can say anything you want and you never have to back it up. Let me try this, too. I speculate that my speculation is more accurate than yours. There, ball is in your court. Please go ahead.
leadsled posted 02-06-2014 09:25 AM ET (US)     Profile for leadsled  Send Email to leadsled     
I find it strange that Tohatsu would make three different 40 and 40 hp engines at the same time. If you google Tohatsu Austrailia you will see that they sell all their old style 2 stroke carbed engines from 3 hp up to 140 hp along side the newer small four stroke engines.
So now if they rebadge Honda 40 and 50 hp engines and also sell the 40 and 50 TLDI engines and still make 40 and 50 hp 2 stroke carbed engines from the 1990s that is a large product line.
I would love to buy the old 2 stroke carbed 50 hp short shaft manual start for my 13 Whaler because it only weighs about 155 lbs. Thats lighter then their 25 four stroke.
Peter posted 02-06-2014 09:59 AM ET (US)     Profile for Peter  Send Email to Peter     
Not so strange. In Brazil, for example, you have a choice of four Mercury 150 HP outboards -- 150 2-stroke EFI, 150 Optimax DFI, 150 4-stroke EFI and 150 Verado. At the 90 HP level you have a choice of 90 2-stroke carb'd, 90 Optimax DFI and 90 4-stroke EFI.
Monty684 posted 02-13-2014 11:23 PM ET (US)     Profile for Monty684  Send Email to Monty684     
I have a 50 TLDI on my 13 and it is not a bad choice at all. It porpoises a bit more I'm sure, but it is lightning fast all out. I hit 37 full trim and it chine walks pretty substantially. Needless to say I don't do it that often and unless I'm running on pure glass

Post New Topic  Post Reply
Hop to:


Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.