posted 09-03-2011 07:24 PM ET (US)            

It would be interesting to see if Boston Whaler offers it with twin 115 four strokes. You'd have to spend a lot of money on a 22 Outrage before being able to get twin four stroke motors on a new Boston Whaler boat.

Warren

posted 09-05-2011 05:56 PM ET (US)            

http://www.showmanagement.com/event/boat_listing/6197

posted 09-06-2011 03:10 PM ET (US)            

http://bostonwhaler.com.hr/article.asp?id=67

posted 09-06-2011 03:16 PM ET (US)            

I like it, but then again I have always been a fan of the simple nature of Montauk, regardless of era.

http://www.moteurboat.com/actualite/infos/boston-whaler-210-montauk.html

posted 09-06-2011 03:20 PM ET (US)            

Boston Whaler 210 Montauk

Long. : 6,5 m
Larg. : 2,59 m
Poids sans moteur : 1 134 kg
Homol. : en cours pour 8 pers.
Mot. cons. : 150 ch
Mot. maxi : 200 ch
Capacité en carb. : 272 l

posted 09-06-2011 03:30 PM ET (US)            

I agree. As much as I am looking to go bigger, I continue to be drawn to the simple elegance of the Montauk platform.

Easy to use, trailer and maintain. And a 72 gallon tank will take you a long way between fillups.

posted 09-06-2011 08:21 PM ET (US)            

The engine in the pictures is Mercury's soon to be released 150 HP Fourstroke.

It is not a Verado, it is a new motor.

See this thread:

http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/020833.html

posted 09-06-2011 10:33 PM ET (US)            

Length: 21' 4"
Beam: 8.5'
Fuel Capacity 72 gal
Weight: 2,500 lb

posted 09-06-2011 11:07 PM ET (US)            

I look forward to seeing a 210 MONTAUK in person and in the water. This is the real test of a boat's lines--how it looks in person in the water. If the overall size and style hold up as well as they present in the photo-image, this is going to be a beautiful boat.

posted 09-07-2011 06:51 AM ET (US)            

quote:

---

vintage "mooring post" for the bow cleat

---

Glad to see a new Whaler that I might get excited about if money were no object. The length of this Montauk fills out the high freeboard the others are stuck with.

posted 09-07-2011 09:23 AM ET (US)            

I wonder how well the VALURADO 150 will do pushing a 2500 lb boat, 8.5 foot beam around. I'm guessing that lightly loaded it will be a 42 to 44 MPH boat with about 5.0 MPG best cruise at 25 MPH.

posted 09-07-2011 10:14 AM ET (US)            

With the optimum propeller and engine height with a very light load the 210 may exceed 40 MPH on a good day.

Admittedly my engine could probably do a bit better if raised one hole.

posted 09-07-2011 10:23 AM ET (US)            

When I first heard about this new 21 I would have thought it would have twins on the stern like the old 18 but it does not. Would have been a good selling point.

I would also recommend the 200 instead of the 150 as the 115 Merc which came with mine was a dog till I changed it for the E-Tec 150. Now it moves like my old 17 with a 100hp.

Still a nice looking machine, anyone know how much it's going to cost??????

posted 09-08-2011 10:11 PM ET (US)            

Ed's Superstore told me the new 150 hp FOURSTROKE is going to sell for $10,100.

Just guessing,

Warren

posted 09-09-2011 09:37 AM ET (US)            

I moved from a 16 Dauntless to a 190 Montauk and have been delighted. It took a few launch and retrieve cycles before I became comfortable with the larger boat. I expect the 210 will be a little more intimidating at the ramp when boating solo for those moving from smaller boats.

At my age I doubt I'll own a boat larger than the 190.

posted 09-09-2011 11:27 AM ET (US)            

Unless additional seating is added the main gain will be in deck space for fishing. Maybe they will put a larger live well under the helm seats or forward of the console instead of back by the transom.

Or maybe the console is large enough for a porta potty. The porta potty on my 200 Dauntless has never been used in 3 years since we don't have a contortionist in the family.

It will be interesting to see a layout and the price differential between the 190 and 210 Montauk.

posted 09-29-2011 06:36 PM ET (US)            

Enjoy.

http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i316/srcbell/210Montauk/210Montauk_a. jpg

posted 09-30-2011 10:21 AM ET (US)            

Now my question is, what would the trade in value be on a botel kept, low hour, 2008 170 Montauk?

posted 09-30-2011 10:26 AM ET (US)            

I see a livewell in the stern that extends very far forward and a large -what is it?- "sunning" deck forward?

I don't see much "footroom" for a 21 foot hull. Less than I remember seeing in the 190 Montauk.

posted 10-01-2011 09:40 AM ET (US)            

[urlwww.bostonwhaler.com/page.aspx/pageid/33910/pmid/268465/stepNumber/2/Build-This-Boat.aspx[/url]

posted 10-01-2011 09:41 AM ET (US)            

www.bostonwhaler.com/page.aspx/pageid/33910/pmid/268465/stepNumber/2/ Build-This-Boat.aspx

Enjoy :)

posted 10-01-2011 09:46 AM ET (US)            

Using the build boat page link I previously sent: Click "choose model" in the itemized price list. Then scroll down to bottom page where the montauks are listed - select 210 Montauk. That should do it.

posted 10-01-2011 06:40 PM ET (US)            

Canvas

Console cover (black or blue) $344.00
Console cover with T-top (black or blue) $344.00
Reversible pilot seat cover (black or blue) $212.00
Electronics

5.7" Raymarine® Electronics / Navigation Package
- Preloaded with ready-to-navigate Navionics charts
- Raymarine A57D, 5.7" screen (GPS, chart plotter, fishfinder) $2,407.00
Engine

150 XL DTS Mercury® Verado FourStroke engine $0.00
Fishing

Fishing Package
- Console mounted rod holders (6)
- Cooler (94 qt) with cushion seat and console mounted backrest
- Tackle drawers (2) (mounted in reversible pilot seat) $745.00
Notable Options / Accessories

posted 10-01-2011 07:54 PM ET (US)            

"<< Choose Model" and that will give you an index page to choose from.

posted 10-02-2011 10:51 AM ET (US)            

When deciding on a replacement for my 16 Dauntless a 19 Outrage was on my list.

Ultimately I choose a 190 Montauk with a 135 Verado engine. If my fishing plans had included more offshore fishing the Outrage would have been my choice. But, for a number of reasons I believe the Montauk is better suited for inshore fishing. I have to add that the squared off bow that once looked awkward to me has become a feature I like a lot.

posted 10-02-2011 11:29 AM ET (US)            

I agree about Montauks in general; I had a classic smirked Montauk with a Honda 90 and came close to buying a 190 Montauk before settling on a 200 Dauntless for its seating capacity and lower bow for hopping off when beaching.

posted 10-03-2011 01:21 PM ET (US)            

Here's a link to the performance numbers, to save folks a click:

http://www.bostonwhaler.com/boat_graphics/eprowebsitemedia/2904/ EnginePerformance/270171_EnginePerf.pdf

posted 10-03-2011 09:17 PM ET (US)            

I thought for sure the 210 Montauk would hit 50mph+ with the 200 Verado. Maybe the drag from the T-top slows things down.

On another note, BW should offer this boat with twin 90 Merc FourStrokes engine.

re: livewell.

posted 10-04-2011 09:54 AM ET (US)            

If I was buying a 210 Montauk and my finances allowed I'd hang a 200 HP Verado on the back. When the day comes to sell the boat I believe a good bit of the extra cost can be recouped. Meanwhile the reserve power and DTS will add to the safety and fun of the boat.

posted 10-05-2011 10:14 AM ET (US)            

The Montauk may be a little faster in good conditions and more economical to operate. I suspect the Montauk would do better on a drift and it will be a more stable fishing platform. As stated, the Montauk will have more fishing space. I don't know if the Outrage has a head in the console but it is a useful feature, especially if the ladies are with you.

The Outrage would probably be a better offshore fishing boat.

We should be getting some reports on the 210 Montauk within a few months.

posted 10-19-2011 10:50 AM ET (US)            

It is 2 feet longer overall, and about a foot of that is lost to what appears to be a longer forward anchor well/"sundeck" area. The optional livewell is similarly positioned just forward of the outboard well.

I'd like to see more photographs of the deck plan. So far, I don't see a lot more foot room in the 210 Montauk compared to the 190 Montauk.

It's relatively inexpensive for a builder to add 2 feet the the hull mold, make a new deck mold, and create a new model boat that sells for a lot more.

So far, I don't see a big reason for a buyer to prefer the 210 over the 190 Montauk, which would perform better with 150 HP.