220 Outrage Replaces 210 Outrage - Moderated Discussion Areas

  ContinuousWave
  Whaler
  Moderated Discussion Areas
  ContinuousWave: Post-Classic Whalers
  220 Outrage Replaces 210 Outrage

search | FAQ | profile | register | author help

Author Topic:   220 Outrage Replaces 210 Outrage

Mambo Minnow posted 01-24-2010 10:39 AM ET (US)
[The Boston Whaler 220 Outrage boat was the] featured model on the cover of the latest TRAILER BOATS magazine. Detailed article in this edition. Guess the 210 Outrage of the last several years will be phased out. A nice design, with some pretty good deals likely on remaining inventory on dealer lots. Posted for those going to the Boat Shows this winter.
Jefecinco posted 01-24-2010 06:19 PM ET (US)
Has "Trailer Boats Magazine" resumed publication? If so, they owe me some issues.
Butch
Mambo Minnow posted 01-24-2010 10:22 PM ET (US)
I thought the same thing. Then, I read their notice of publication fine print and they only print 9 out of 12 months per year. Go figure!
Mambo Minnow posted 02-01-2010 05:55 PM ET (US)
I am surprised there is not more interest/discussion in the latest Outrage.
The boating market really is in the dumps!
SJUAE posted 02-02-2010 01:26 PM ET (US)
There was when we first heard about it 17 months back, your just a little late :)
I think this was one of the first posts on the subject
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/003714.html
And Jim recent post on twins on the 220 in the performance section
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/007068.html
Regards
Steve
onlyawhaler posted 02-02-2010 08:21 PM ET (US)
Utah is without a Whaler dealer anymore so videos help in looking at models. Check out this excellent video of the 2009 220 Outrage with twins. Looks like a great T-top and I like the layout a lot.
For me, this one with a 300-HP and room on the transom for a kicker without the need for a bracket would be the ticket. A classic it's not, but I think it is a great looking boat
Onlyawhaler
DeeVee posted 02-02-2010 09:06 PM ET (US)
onlyawhaler
I agree, not a classic, but definately a good looking boat.
Doug
jimh posted 02-03-2010 11:32 PM ET (US)
I enjoyed watching the video recording of the boat dealer's presentation. It was very well done. Thanks for posting that link.
prj posted 02-04-2010 11:20 AM ET (US)
A drink holder - hawsepipe combination! The ultimate blend of beer and function.
Wow.
diveorfish posted 02-04-2010 02:08 PM ET (US)
I’ll probably get teased unmercifully, but that hawse pipe drink holder is actually a nice thing to have. When you are sitting on the back seat there is no safe place to set a drink on my boat. I wish had them.
It’s weird how companies change designs. Then change back. The overall specifications of the 220 Outrage are nearly identical to my 2001 23 Outrage:
- The 23 outrage hull is only one inch longer
- The beam is the same.
- The draft is the same.
- The published weight is 3,000 for the 220 vs. 3,375 for the 23
- Swamp Capacity is 5,000 for the 220 and 5,500 for the 23
- Max HP at 300 is the same
There are some differences though:
- I think the 220 pickup a degree, or two in transom deadrise over the 23, but that’s a guess. If so, the new 220 probably rides better in a head sea.
- The 220 is more modern with DTS and four stroke motor(s). That DTS must be sweet. Not worrying about oil tanks would be nice as well.
- The 23 carries 50 more gallons of fuel
- The 23 has a much bigger center console (not good or bad)
- The 23 has a much larger anchor locker (good for me because I have a huge anchor)
- The 23 has a bow pulpit (I prefer one for anchoring)
Overall I prefer the layout of my 23, but that is mostly because I’m more familiar with it.
I’ll bet the 220 is a better balanced boat though. Aren’t the batteries in the console? My 23 is too stern heavy because everything is in the stern such as: twin engines, twin batteries, twin 3 gallon oil tanks, 8 gallon fresh water tank etc.
SJUAE posted 02-04-2010 04:28 PM ET (US)
diveorfish
Thanks for the comparison, I would like to see a similar one to the predecesor to my last generation 210 Outrage.
The 220 got back some of the features lost on my 2006 210 like the anchor locker (plus windlass option) and a porta potti, twin engine option which gives you the transom gate, but you loose the quater seats with the single splash well configuration.
I have aft drink holders :)
http://i707.photobucket.com/albums/ww76/SJUAE/Stern%20and%20misc/ IMAGE_009.jpg
Although I would like to replace these with the stainless steel ones.
I like the 220 helm layout and it's not disimilar to the new one I have been considering
http://i707.photobucket.com/albums/ww76/SJUAE/Lowrance%20HDS5/ finaldashlayout.jpg
The new aft seat is very nice, but the twin helm chairs options means there is a lack of grab rails around the aft, especially comparred to the old delux seating.
http://i707.photobucket.com/albums/ww76/SJUAE/Stern%20and%20misc/ IMAGE_014.jpg
http://i707.photobucket.com/albums/ww76/SJUAE/Stern%20and%20misc/ IMAGE_010.jpg
Regards
Steve

Hop to:

Contact Us | RETURN to ContinuousWave Top Page

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Freeware Version 2000
Purchase our Licensed Version- which adds many more features!
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 2000.

Author	Topic: 220 Outrage Replaces 210 Outrage
Mambo Minnow	posted 01-24-2010 10:39 AM ET (US) [The Boston Whaler 220 Outrage boat was the] featured model on the cover of the latest TRAILER BOATS magazine. Detailed article in this edition. Guess the 210 Outrage of the last several years will be phased out. A nice design, with some pretty good deals likely on remaining inventory on dealer lots. Posted for those going to the Boat Shows this winter.
Jefecinco	posted 01-24-2010 06:19 PM ET (US) Has "Trailer Boats Magazine" resumed publication? If so, they owe me some issues. Butch
Mambo Minnow	posted 01-24-2010 10:22 PM ET (US) I thought the same thing. Then, I read their notice of publication fine print and they only print 9 out of 12 months per year. Go figure!
Mambo Minnow	posted 02-01-2010 05:55 PM ET (US) I am surprised there is not more interest/discussion in the latest Outrage. The boating market really is in the dumps!
SJUAE	posted 02-02-2010 01:26 PM ET (US) There was when we first heard about it 17 months back, your just a little late :) I think this was one of the first posts on the subject http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/003714.html And Jim recent post on twins on the 220 in the performance section http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/007068.html Regards Steve
onlyawhaler	posted 02-02-2010 08:21 PM ET (US) Utah is without a Whaler dealer anymore so videos help in looking at models. Check out this excellent video of the 2009 220 Outrage with twins. Looks like a great T-top and I like the layout a lot. For me, this one with a 300-HP and room on the transom for a kicker without the need for a bracket would be the ticket. A classic it's not, but I think it is a great looking boat Onlyawhaler
DeeVee	posted 02-02-2010 09:06 PM ET (US) onlyawhaler I agree, not a classic, but definately a good looking boat. Doug
jimh	posted 02-03-2010 11:32 PM ET (US) I enjoyed watching the video recording of the boat dealer's presentation. It was very well done. Thanks for posting that link.
prj	posted 02-04-2010 11:20 AM ET (US) A drink holder - hawsepipe combination! The ultimate blend of beer and function. Wow.
diveorfish	posted 02-04-2010 02:08 PM ET (US) I’ll probably get teased unmercifully, but that hawse pipe drink holder is actually a nice thing to have. When you are sitting on the back seat there is no safe place to set a drink on my boat. I wish had them. It’s weird how companies change designs. Then change back. The overall specifications of the 220 Outrage are nearly identical to my 2001 23 Outrage: - The 23 outrage hull is only one inch longer - The beam is the same. - The draft is the same. - The published weight is 3,000 for the 220 vs. 3,375 for the 23 - Swamp Capacity is 5,000 for the 220 and 5,500 for the 23 - Max HP at 300 is the same There are some differences though: - I think the 220 pickup a degree, or two in transom deadrise over the 23, but that’s a guess. If so, the new 220 probably rides better in a head sea. - The 220 is more modern with DTS and four stroke motor(s). That DTS must be sweet. Not worrying about oil tanks would be nice as well. - The 23 carries 50 more gallons of fuel - The 23 has a much bigger center console (not good or bad) - The 23 has a much larger anchor locker (good for me because I have a huge anchor) - The 23 has a bow pulpit (I prefer one for anchoring) Overall I prefer the layout of my 23, but that is mostly because I’m more familiar with it. I’ll bet the 220 is a better balanced boat though. Aren’t the batteries in the console? My 23 is too stern heavy because everything is in the stern such as: twin engines, twin batteries, twin 3 gallon oil tanks, 8 gallon fresh water tank etc.
SJUAE	posted 02-04-2010 04:28 PM ET (US) diveorfish Thanks for the comparison, I would like to see a similar one to the predecesor to my last generation 210 Outrage. The 220 got back some of the features lost on my 2006 210 like the anchor locker (plus windlass option) and a porta potti, twin engine option which gives you the transom gate, but you loose the quater seats with the single splash well configuration. I have aft drink holders :) http://i707.photobucket.com/albums/ww76/SJUAE/Stern%20and%20misc/ IMAGE_009.jpg Although I would like to replace these with the stainless steel ones. I like the 220 helm layout and it's not disimilar to the new one I have been considering http://i707.photobucket.com/albums/ww76/SJUAE/Lowrance%20HDS5/ finaldashlayout.jpg The new aft seat is very nice, but the twin helm chairs options means there is a lack of grab rails around the aft, especially comparred to the old delux seating. http://i707.photobucket.com/albums/ww76/SJUAE/Stern%20and%20misc/ IMAGE_014.jpg http://i707.photobucket.com/albums/ww76/SJUAE/Stern%20and%20misc/ IMAGE_010.jpg Regards Steve